Advertisement

Longitudinal Study of New and Prevalent Use of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose

  1. Andrew J. Karter, PHD1,
  2. Melissa M. Parker, MS1,
  3. Howard H. Moffet, MPH1,
  4. Michele M. Spence, PHD2,
  5. James Chan, PHARMD, PHD2,
  6. Susan L. Ettner, PHD3 and
  7. Joe V. Selby, MD1
  1. 1Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California
  2. 2Pharmacy Outcomes Research Group, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California
  3. 3Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Andrew J. Karter, PhD, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612. E-mail: andy.j.karter{at}kp.org

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—We sought to assess longitudinal association between self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and glycemic control in diabetic patients from an integrated health plan (Kaiser Permanente Northern California).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Longitudinal analyses of glycemic control among 1) 16,091 patients initiating SMBG (new-user cohort) and 2) 15,347 ongoing users of SMBG (prevalent-user cohort). SMBG frequency was based on pharmacy use (number of blood glucose test strips dispensed), and glycemic control was based on HbA1c (A1C). In the new-user cohort, ANCOVA models (pre- and posttest design) were used to assess the effect of initiating SMBG. In the prevalent-user cohort, repeated-measure, mixed-effects models with random-intercept and time-dependent covariates were used to assess changes in SMBG and A1C. All models were stratified by therapy (no medications, oral agents only, or insulin) and adjusted for baseline A1C, sociodemographics, insulin injection frequency, comorbidity index, medication adherence, smoking status, health care use, and provider specialty.

RESULTS—Greater SMBG practice frequency among new users was associated with a graded decrease in A1C (relative to nonusers) regardless of diabetes therapy (P < 0.0001). Changes in SMBG frequency among prevalent users were associated with an inverse graded change in A1C only among pharmacologically treated patients (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS—These observational findings are consistent with short-term benefits of initiating SMBG practice for all patients but continuing benefits only for pharmacologically treated patients. Differences in effectiveness between new versus prevalent users of SMBG have implications for guideline development and interpretation of observational outcomes data.

Footnotes

  • A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “ advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted April 28, 2006.
    • Received October 27, 2005.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement