The Effect of Glucose Variability on the Risk of Microvascular Complications in Type 1 Diabetes

Response to Kilpatrick et al.

  1. Louis Monnier, MD1,
  2. Claude Colette, PHD2,
  3. Lawrence Leiter, MD3,
  4. Antonio Ceriello, MD4,
  5. Markolf Hanefeld, MD5,
  6. David Owens, MD6,
  7. Naoko Tajima, MD7,
  8. Jaakko Tuomiletho, MD8,
  9. Jaime Davidson, MD9 and
  10. On Behalf of the PGR Group
  1. 1Department of Metabolic Diseases, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
  2. 2Laboratory of Human Nutrition and Atherogenesis, University Institute of Clinical Research, Montpellier, France
  3. 3Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  4. 4Clinical Sciences Research Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K.
  5. 5Centre for Clinical Studies, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
  6. 6Academic Centre, Diabetes Research Unit, Llandough Hospital, Cardiff, U.K.
  7. 7JIKEI University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  8. 8National Public Health Institute, Helsinki Finland
  9. 9University of Texas, Dallas, Texas
  1. Address correspondence to Louis Monnier, MD, Lapeyronie Hospital, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France. E-mail: l-monnier{at}chu-montpellier.fr

In an analysis of the datasets collected in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, Kilpatrick et al. (1) reported that mean blood glucose was predictive of microvascular complications in patients with type 1 diabetes, while glucose variability did not appear to be a factor in their development. We question their methodology and thereby also the conclusions. They calculated the variability of within-day blood glucose as the SD around the mean of a seven-point glycemic profile measured at each patient’s quarterly visit. With such a methodology, they have probably not selected major glucose fluctuations, but rather a composite of both major and minor fluctuations, …

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents