Advertisement

The Role of Iron in Diabetes and Its Complications

Reponse to Swaminathan et al.

  1. Giovanni Targher, MD1,
  2. Massimo Franchini, MD2,
  3. Martina Montagnana, MD3 and
  4. Giuseppe Lippi, MD3
  1. 1Section of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
  2. 2Service of Immunohematology and Transfusion, Civil Hospital, Verona, Italy
  3. 3Section of Clinical Chemistry, Department of Biomedical and Morphological Sciences, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, Italy
  1. Address correspondence to Dr. Giovanni Targher, Section of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical and Surgical Sciences, University of Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Piazzale Stefani, 1, 37126 Verona, Italy. E-mail: giovanni.targher{at}univr.it

Markers of fatty liver such as γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) are independently associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (1). Some recent studies have shown that hyperferritinemia may also predict new-onset type 2 diabetes (2).

We assessed the cross-sectional relationships between ferritin, GGT, and glucose intolerance status in a large cohort of adults. We performed a retrospective analysis on the database of our clinical chemistry laboratory to retrieve results of serum ferritin, GGT, lipids, glucose (fasting plasma glucose [FPG]), and C-reactive protein (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hs-CRP]) tests, which were performed on the whole cohort of outpatient adults (aged ≥35 years) consecutively referred by general practitioners for routine blood testing over the past 2 years. Fasting GGT, FPG, and lipids were measured by standard enzymatic procedures (Roche Diagnostics), ferritin by a chemiluminescence assay (DiaSorin-Liaison), and hs-CRP by a nephelometric assay (Dade-Behring).

We used separate multivariable logistic regression analyses to examine the interaction relationships with impaired fasting glycemia (impaired fasting glucose [IFG] as defined by an FPG value ≥5.6 mmol/l) or diabetes (FPG value ≥7.1 mmol/l) as the dependent variables predicted from ferritin quartiles (<42, 42–80, 80–156, and ≥156 μg/l) within the quartiles of GGT (<16, 16–25, 26–35, and ≥36 units/l). Adjusting variables were sex, age, lipids, and hs-CRP.

Cumulative results of FPG and ferritin were retrieved for 2,637 individuals. After excluding subjects with C-reactive protein >10 mg/l (because inflammation may increase ferritin) and those with very low ferritin, which might be due to anemia (<15 μg/l), and very high ferritin, which might be due to hemochromatosis (>400 μg/l in men and >300 μg/l in women), the final study population consisted of 2,449 subjects (63% female) with a mean ± SD (range) age of 61.8 ± 15 years (35–107). Overall, 161 (6.6%) subjects had a FPG value ≥7.1 mmol/l, and 559 (22.8%) subjects had IFG. Mean GGT and ferritin concentrations were 33 ± 46 units/l and 108 ± 84 μg/l, respectively.

Although the prevalence rates of ferritin quartiles increased steadily across IFG/diabetes categories (ranging from 17 to 27% for IFG and from 4 to 8% for diabetes; P < 0.0001), these prevalences remarkably varied by GGT quartiles. As GGT increased, the prevalence rates of ferritin quartiles across IFG/diabetes categories strengthened (P < 0.001 for interaction). For example, within the lowest GGT quartile, ferritin quartiles were not associated with IFG (ranging from 12.7 to 14.5%) or diabetes (from 1.2 to 1.5%), in contrast to the highest GGT quartile, wherein the prevalence rates ranged from 19.2 to 28.3% for IFG and from 9.4 to 13.5% for diabetes (P < 0.01). These results remained significant even after adjustment for sex, age, lipids, and hs-CRP.

Our findings, although only correlative in nature, indicate that ferritin is associated with a greater frequency of IFG or diabetes only among those with high-normal GGT (≥36 units/l), not in those with low-normal GGT, and suggest that ferritin itself might not be a sufficient risk factor for developing IFG/diabetes. The association between increased GGT and glucose intolerance might be explained by some underlying, biological, mechanisms such as enhanced oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and fatty liver (3).

Footnotes

References

| Table of Contents

Navigate This Article

Advertisement