Advertisement

Impact of Self-Reported Patient Characteristics Upon Assessment of Glycemic Control in the Veterans Health Administration

  1. Miriam Maney, MA, CPHQ1,
  2. Chin-Lin Tseng, DRPH12,
  3. Monika M. Safford, MD3,
  4. Donald R. Miller, SCD4 and
  5. Leonard M. Pogach, MD, MBA12
  1. 1Department of Veterans Affairs, New Jersey Healthcare System–Center for Healthcare Knowledge Management, East Orange, New Jersey
  2. 2University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
  3. 3Deep South Center on Effectiveness at the Birmingham VA Medical Center and the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
  4. 4School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, and the Bedford VA Medical Center for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research, Bedford, Massachusetts
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Leonard M. Pogach, MD, MBA, VA HSR&D Center for Healthcare Knowledge Management Research, VA New Jersey Healthcare System, 385 Tremont Ave., East Orange, NJ. E-mail: len.pogach{at}verison.net

Abstract

OBJECTIVE— The purpose of this article was to evaluate the impact of self-reported patient factors on quality assessment of Veterans Health Administration medical centers in achieving glycemic control.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS— We linked survey data and administrative records for veterans who self-reported diabetes on a 1999 national weighted survey. Linear regression models were used to adjust A1C levels in fiscal year 2000 for socioeconomic status (education level, employment, and concerns of having enough food), social support (marital status and living alone), health behaviors (smoking, alcohol use, and exercise level), physical and mental health status, BMI, and diabetes duration. Medical centers were ranked by deciles, with and without adjustment for patient characteristics, on proportions of patients achieving A1C <7 or <8%.

RESULTS— There was substantial medical center level variation in patient characteristics of the 56,740 individuals from 105 centers, e.g., grade school education (mean 15.3% [range 2.3–32.7%]), being retired (38.3% [19.9−59.7%]) or married (65.2% [43.7–77.8%]), food insufficiency (13.9% [7.2–24.6%]), and no reported exercise (43.2% [31.1–53.6%]). The final model had an R2 of 7.8%. The Spearman rank coefficient comparing the thresholds adjusted only for age and sex to the full model was 0.71 for <7% and 0.64 for <8% (P < 0.0001). After risk adjustment, 4 of the 11 best-performing centers changed at least two deciles for the <7% threshold, and 2 of 11 changed two deciles for the <8% threshold.

CONCLUSIONS— Adjustment for patient self-reported socioeconomic status and health impacts medical center rankings for glycemic control, suggesting the need for risk adjustment to assure valid inferences about quality.

Footnotes

  • A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted October 24, 2006.
    • Received April 7, 2006.
| Table of Contents
Advertisement