Advertisement

Prospective Study of Hyperglycemia and Cancer Risk

Table 2—

RR of cancer according to fasting and postload glucose in quartiles in the Västerbotten Intervention Project, northern Sweden

1 (referent) 2 3 4 Ptrend*
Women
    All sites
Fasting glucose (n = 1,428)
    No cases 270 290 354 514
    Rate 458 430 473 587
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.94 (0.79–1.11) 1.03 (0.87–1.21) 1.26 (1.09–1.47) <0.001
Postload glucose (n = 1,328)
    No cases 261 267 345 455
    Rate 430 460 474 549
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.09 (0.92–1.29) 1.11 (0.95–1.31) 1.31 (1.12–1.52) <0.001
    Breast
Fasting (n = 510)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.92 (0.70–1.21) 1.03 (0.79–1.34) 1.06 (0.82–1.37) 0.454
Postload (n = 479)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.93 (0.70–1.24) 1.22 (0.95–1.59) 1.20 (0.93–1.55) 0.069
    Breast (aged <49 years)
Fasting (n = 92)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.65 (0.26–1.5) 1.88 (1.0–3.6) 2.13 (1.2–4.1) 0.002
Postload (n = 88)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.02 (0.50–2.1) 1.86 (1.1–3.5) 1.37 (0.73–2.6) 0.213
    Breast (aged ≥49 years)
Fasting (n = 418)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.91 (0.69–1.2) 0.94 (0.72–1.2) 0.90 (0.68–1.2) 0.492
Postload (n = 391)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.01 (0.75–1.4) 1.08 (0.81–1.4) 1.23 (0.93–1.6) 0.113
    Ovarian
Fasting (n = 90)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.39 (0.19–0.78) 0.76 (0.42–1.35) 0.89 (0.52–1.54) 0.824
Postload (n = 84)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.64 (0.32–1.23) 0.71 (0.38–1.30) 0.94 (0.53–1.65) 0.955
    Endometrium
Fasting (n = 117)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.32 (0.73–2.46) 1.16 (0.63–2.17) 1.86 (1.09–3.31) 0.019
Postload (n = 109)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.37 (0.75–2.57) 0.84 (0.44–1.61) 1.82 (1.07–3.23) 0.028
Men
    All sites
Fasting glucose (n = 1,241)
    No cases 257 265 289 430
    Rate 454 436 452 475
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.99 (0.83–1.17) 1.02 (0.86–1.21) 1.08 (0.92–1.27) 0.259
Postload glucose (n = 1,150)
    No cases 248 246 281 375
    Rate 477 437 446 458
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.93 (0.78–1.11) 0.97 (0.82–1.16) 0.98 (0.84–1.16) 0.992
    Prostate
Fasting (n = 458)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.02 (0.77–1.35) 0.97 (0.73–1.29) 0.96 (0.74–1.26) 0.713
    Postload (n = 425)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.83 (0.62–1.10) 0.71 (0.53–0.95) 0.79 (0.61–1.02) 0.074
Women and men combined
    Stomach
Fasting (n = 71)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.99 (0.42–2.21) 1.36 (0.70–2.73) 1.46 (0.75–2.94) 0.205
Postload (n = 63)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.53 (0.74–3.22) 1.35 (0.64–2.88) 1.23 (0.59–2.63) 0.717
    Colon
Fasting (n = 147)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.95 (0.55–1.62) 0.90 (0.56–1.46) 1.16 (0.74–1.85) 0.470
Postload (n = 138)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.13 (0.66–1.94) 1.17 (0.70–1.97) 1.23 (0.76–2.03) 0.422
    Rectum
Fasting (n = 87)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.18 (0.59–2.32) 0.99 (0.53–1.87) 1.13 (0.62–2.12) 0.782
Postload (n = 82)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.63 (0.30–1.27) 1.10 (0.61–2.01) 0.90 (0.49–1.66) 0.978
    Pancreas
Fasting (n = 62)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.19 (0.47–2.97) 1.11 (0.49–2.59) 2.49 (1.23–5.45) 0.006
Postload (n = 56)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.42 (0.16–0.97) 0.57 (0.26–1.23) 0.91 (0.47–1.78) 0.910
    Kidney
Fasting (n = 44)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.35 (0.46–3.97) 1.49 (0.60–4.02) 2.08 (0.88–5.50) 0.092
Postload (n = 41)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.40 (0.49–4.27) 1.97 (0.77–5.68) 1.76 (0.69–5.06) 0.247
    Urinary tract
Fasting (n = 97)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.05 (0.50–2.20) 1.38 (0.75–2.61) 1.69 (0.95–3.16) 0.049
Postload (n = 83)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.31 (0.72–2.40) 0.85 (0.43–1.65) 1.18 (0.65–2.17) 0.781
    Respiratory tract
Fasting (n = 114)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.08 (0.58–1.98) 0.83 (0.47–1.48) 1.40 (0.85–2.38) 0.178
Postload (n = 104)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.88 (0.48–1.59) 1.19 (0.68–2.06) 1.13 (0.67–1.94) 0.510
    Melanoma
Fasting (n = 92)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.41 (0.66–3.04) 2.14 (1.15–4.24) 2.16 (1.14–4.35) 0.013
Postload (n = 88)
    RR (95% CI) 1 1.16 (0.59–2.30) 1.50 (0.80–2.89) 1.65 (0.89–3.17) 0.086
    Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Fasting (n = 89)
    RR (95% CI) 1 0.84 (0.42–1.64) 0.99 (0.56–1.77) 0.89 (0.49–1.62) 0.786
Postload (n = 77)
    RR (95% CI) 1 3.06 (1.42–7.35) 3.05 (1.42–7.30) 2.53 (1.16–6.11) 0.081
  • *

    * Test for trend was performed using class medians as scores.

  • Directly standardized rate per 100,000 person-years.

  • Risk ratio estimated from Poisson model with likelihood ratio CIs. Risk was adjusted for age, calendar year, and smoking, by including these covariates into the statistical model.

This Article

  1. Diabetes Care March 2007 vol. 30 no. 3 561-567
Advertisement