Advertisement

Interindividual Variability and Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Glycemic Index Values for Commercial White Bread

  1. Sonia Vega-López, PHD1,
  2. Lynne M. Ausman, DSC1,
  3. John L. Griffith, PHD2 and
  4. Alice H. Lichtenstein, DSC1
  1. 1Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory, Jean Mayer U.S. Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts
  2. 2Biostatistics Research Center, Tufts New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Alice H. Lichtenstein, DSC, Cardiovascular Nutrition Laboratory, J.M. USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, 711 Washington St., Boston, MA 02111. E-mail: alice.lichtenstein{at}tufts.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—We sought to assess the intra- and interindividual variability of glycemic index value determinations for white bread using glucose as the reference food.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 23 healthy adults (aged 20–70 years) completed up to three sets of two visits per set. Each pair of visits assessed the glycemic response to 50 g available carbohydrates from commercial white bread and glucose, administered in random order. Glycemic index values were calculated by dividing the 2-h incremental area under the serum glucose response curve after each commercial white bread challenge by the mean area under the curve (AUC) for glucose.

RESULTS—The mean ± SE ratio of the AUC after white bread intake by the AUC after glucose intake for the first set of determinations was 78 ± 15 (n = 23; coefficient of variation [CV] 94%). When using glycemic index values calculated with the subset of participants who completed three sets of tests (n = 14), glycemic index values for each of the three sets of determinations were 78 ± 10, 60 ± 5, and 75 ± 10, respectively. CVs were 50, 28, and 50%, respectively. The mean glycemic index value of these three sets was 71 ± 6, with a CV of 30%. When an ANOVA approach was applied to these data, the interindividual CV was 17.8%, and the intra-individual variation was 42.8%.

CONCLUSIONS—These data suggest that in response to a challenge of white bread relative to glucose, within-individual variability is a greater contributor to overall variability than among-individual variability. Further understanding of all the sources of variability would be helpful in better defining the utility of glycemic index values.

Footnotes

  • Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 23 March 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1598.

    Additional information for this article can be found in an online appendix at http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc06-1598.

    This article is based on work supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture under agreement no. 58-1950-4-401. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted March 13, 2007.
    • Received July 28, 2006.
| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Diabetes Care vol. 30 no. 6 1412-1417
  1. Online-Only Appendix
  2. All Versions of this Article:
    1. dc06-1598v1
    2. 30/6/1412 most recent
Advertisement