Depression Screening Disparities Among Veterans With Diabetes Compared With the General Veteran Population

  1. Laura E. Jones, PHD1 and
  2. Caroline Carney Doebbeling, MD, MSC23
  1. 1Roudebush VAMC Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence on Implementing Evidence-Based Practice, Indianapolis, Indiana
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
  3. 3Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Caroline Carney Doebbeling, MD, MSc, Indiana University School of Medicine, 449 RT, 535 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, IN 46202. E-mail: ccarneyd{at}iupui.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—We sought to describe the proportion of veterans with diabetes screened for depression compared with the general population of veterans.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Electronic medical records (fiscal years 2001–2004) from a Midwestern Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facility and VHA External Peer Review Program (EPRP) data were used for the study. Facility-level data included inpatient and outpatient encounters, which included depression screen results. EPRP data were facility-level summary data, which detailed the proportion of general population veterans nationwide and patients at the Midwestern facility who were screened for depression. Logistic regression tested for associations between depression screen receipt and screening positive and demographic/clinical characteristics among patients with diabetes.

RESULTS—Depression screening among those with diabetes improved from 62% in fiscal year 2001 to 83% in 2004. Screening was 9–23% lower and 11–22% lower in patients with diabetes compared with the general population of veterans nationwide and patients at the Midwestern facility, respectively. Seventeen percent of subjects with diabetes screened positive, which is two times higher than in the general population. Women (odds ratio 0.45 [95% CI 0.35–0.60]) and subjects with unknown A1C (0.40 [0.34–0.46]) were less likely to be screened for depression. A ≥50% service-connected disability rating was inversely associated with screening (0.84 [0.72–0.99]) but positively associated with screening positive for depression (1.56 [1.33–1.82]).

CONCLUSIONS—Screening for depression among veterans with diabetes improved 21% but is considerably lower than the proportion of general population veterans screened nationally and at the facility of interest. Targeted interventions to improve screening in patients with diabetes are required based on evidence that screening translates into increased provider recognition and treatment of depression.

Footnotes

  • Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 11 June 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0350.

    The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted June 1, 2007.
    • Received February 19, 2007.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Published online before print June 11, 2007, doi: 10.2337/dc07-0350 Diabetes Care September 2007 vol. 30 no. 9 2216-2221
  1. » Abstract
  2. Full Text
  3. Full Text (PDF)
  4. All Versions of this Article:
    1. dc07-0350v1
    2. 30/9/2216 most recent

Current Issue

  1. November 2009, 32 (11)
  1. Current Issue
  1. Alert me to new issues of Diabetes Care