Advertisement

Increased Incidence of Gestational Diabetes in Women Receiving Prophylactic 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate for Prevention of Recurrent Preterm Delivery

  1. Andrei Rebarber, MD1,
  2. Niki B. Istwan, RN2,
  3. Karen Russo-Stieglitz, MD3,
  4. Jane Cleary-Goldman, MD1,
  5. Debbie J. Rhea, MPH2,
  6. Gary J. Stanziano, MD2 and
  7. Daniel H. Saltzman, MD1
  1. 1Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, New York, New York
  2. 2Matria Healthcare, Department of Clinical Research, Marietta, Georgia
  3. 3Valley Health System, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Ridgewood, New Jersey
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Andrei Rebarber, MD, 70 E. 90th St., New York, NY 10029. E-mail: arebarber{at}mfmnyc.com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—Progesterone has a known diabetogenic effect. We sought to determine whether the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is altered in women receiving weekly 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17P) prophylaxis for the prevention of recurrent preterm birth.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Singleton gestations in women having a history of preterm delivery were identified from a database containing prospectively collected information from women receiving outpatient nursing services related to a high-risk pregnancy. Included were patients enrolled for outpatient management at <27 weeks' gestation with documented pregnancy outcome and delivery at >28 weeks. Patients with preexisting diabetes were excluded. The incidence of GDM was compared between patients who received prophylactic intramuscular 17P (250-mg weekly injection initiated between 16.0 and 20.9 weeks' gestation) and those who did not.

RESULTS—Maternal BMI and age were similar. The incidence of GDM was 12.9% in the 17P group (n = 557) compared with 4.9% in control subjects (n = 1,524, P < 0.001; odds ratio 2.9 [95% CI 2.1–4.1]).

CONCLUSIONS—The use of 17P for the prevention of recurrent preterm delivery is associated with an increased risk of developing GDM. Early GDM screening is appropriate for women receiving 17P prophylaxis.

Footnotes

  • Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 11 June 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0564.

    A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted May 28, 2007.
    • Received March 21, 2007.
| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Diabetes Care September 2007 vol. 30 no. 9 2277-2280
  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. dc07-0564v1
    2. 30/9/2277 most recent
Advertisement