Advertisement

Quantifying the Excess Risk of Type 2 Diabetes by Body Habitus Measurements Among Australian Aborigines Living in Remote Areas

  1. Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, MBBS, MPH1,
  2. Wendy E. Hoy, FRACP1,
  3. Zhiqiang Wang, PHD1 and
  4. Jonathan Shaw, MD2
  1. 1Centre for Chronic Disease, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2International Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Royal Brisbane Hospital, P.O. Box 213, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia. E-mail: sri{at}somc.uq.edu.au

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To quantify the risk for type 2 diabetes by body habitus measurements among remote-living Australian Aborigines relative to that measured in the general Australian population (as characterized by the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle [AusDiab] study).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Anthropometric measurements and diabetes status were assessed by standard procedures among Aborigines (n = 1,456) and Australians aged ≥25 years (n = 11,247). Age-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for diabetes among Aborigines relative to AusDiab participants were calculated by commonly used categories of body size measurements.

RESULTS—The OR (95% CI) values for diabetes among normal, overweight, and obese (by waist) Aboriginal women relative to AusDiab women were 2.6 (0.6–11.5), 13.1 (6.7–25.7), and 6.1 (4.6–8.0), respectively, and for Aboriginal men relative to AusDiab men, they were 7.6 (4.6–12.5), 7.6 (4.3–13.4), and 5.2 (3.4–8.0), respectively. Rates of diabetes were also excessive in Aborigines for each standard category of BMI.

CONCLUSIONS—Higher rates of diabetes, even at normal and lower body habitus measurements, among Aborigines suggest that strategies for prevention should expand beyond exclusive focus on diet and weight management.

Footnotes

  • Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 4 December 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1156.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted November 17, 2007.
    • Received June 18, 2007.
| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Diabetes Care March 2008 vol. 31 no. 3 585-586
  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. dc07-1156v1
    2. 31/3/585 most recent
Advertisement