Dietary Patterns and Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)
- Jennifer A. Nettleton, PHD1,
- Lyn M. Steffen, PHD, MPH, RD2,
- Hanyu Ni, PHD, MPH3,
- Kiang Liu, PHD4 and
- David R. Jacobs, Jr., PHD25
- 1Division of Epidemiology and Disease Control, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, Houston, Texas
- 2Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- 3National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
- 4Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois
- 5Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Corresponding author: Jennifer Nettleton, jennifer.a.nettleton{at}uth.tmc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—We characterized dietary patterns and their relation to incident type 2 diabetes in 5,011 participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—White, black, Hispanic, and Chinese adults, aged 45–84 years and free of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, completed food frequency questionnaires at baseline (2000–2002). Incident type 2 diabetes was defined at three follow-up exams (2002–2003, 2004–2005, and 2005–2007) as fasting glucose >126 mg/dl, self-reported type 2 diabetes, or use of diabetes medication. Two types of dietary patterns were studied: four empirically derived (principal components analysis) and one author-defined (low-risk food pattern) as the weighted sum of whole grains, vegetables, nuts/seeds, low-fat dairy, coffee (positively weighted), red meat, processed meat, high-fat dairy, and soda (negatively weighted).
RESULTS—The empirically derived dietary pattern characterized by high intake of tomatoes, beans, refined grains, high-fat dairy, and red meat was associated with an 18% greater risk (hazard ratio per 1-score SD 1.18 [95% CI 1.06–1.32]; Ptrend = 0.004), whereas the empirically derived dietary pattern characterized by high intake of whole grains, fruit, nuts/seeds, green leafy vegetables, and low-fat dairy was associated with a 15% lower diabetes risk (0.85 [0.76–0.95]; Ptrend = 0.005). The low-risk food pattern was also inversely associated with diabetes risk (0.87 [0.81–0.99]; Ptrend = 0.04). Individual component food groups were not independently associated with diabetes risk. Associations were not modified by sex or race/ethnicity.
CONCLUSIONS—Multiple food groups collectively influence type 2 diabetes risk beyond that of the individual food groups themselves.
Footnotes
-
Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 10 June 2008.
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
-
- Accepted May 23, 2008.
- Received April 21, 2008.
- DIABETES CARE











