Efficacy and Safety of Rimonabant for Improvement of Multiple Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Overweight/Obese Patients
Pooled 1-year data from the Rimonabant in Obesity (RIO) program
- Luc Van Gaal, MD1,
- Xavier Pi-Sunyer, MD2,
- Jean-Pierre Després, PHD3,
- Christine McCarthy, MD4 and
- André Scheen, MD5
- 1Department of Diabetology, Metabolism, and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- 2St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, New York
- 3Quebec Heart Institute, Laval Hospital Research Center, Laval University, Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada
- 4sanofi-aventis, Chilly-Mazarin, France
- 5Division of Diabetes, Nutrition, and Metabolic Disorders, CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Luc Van Gaal, University Hospital Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine (Department of Diabetology, Metabolism, and Clinical Nutrition), Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem-Antwerp, Belgium. E-mail: luc.van.gaal{at}uza.be
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—To better define the efficacy and safety of rimonabant, the first selective cannabinoid type 1 (CB1) receptor antagonist, in a large population of overweight and obese patients using pooled efficacy data from three Phase III nondiabetes Rimonabant in Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders (RIO) studies, selected efficacy data from the RIO-Diabetes study, and pooled safety data for all four RIO studies.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The RIO studies enrolled patients who were either overweight (BMI >27 kg/m2) with at least one comorbidity (i.e., hypertension, dyslipidemia, or, for RIO-Diabetes, type 2 diabetes) or obese. All patients received daily treatment with rimonabant (5 or 20 mg) or placebo for 1 year plus a hypocaloric diet (600 kcal/day deficit) and advice on increased physical activity. RIO-Europe (n = 1,508), RIO-North America (n = 3,045), and RIO-Lipids (n = 1,036) excluded patients with type 2 diabetes; untreated dyslipidemia was an entry requirement for RIO-Lipids. RIO-Diabetes (n = 1,047) required the presence of type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy.
RESULTS—The pooled intention-to-treat population comprised 5,580 patients without diabetes (3,165 completed treatment) and 1,047 patients with diabetes (692 completed treatment). Most efficacy measures improved during the 4-week placebo run-in period, except that HDL cholesterol decreased as expected in the early phase of a hypocaloric diet. After 1 year of randomized treatment, changes from baseline with 20 mg rimonabant in the nondiabetic population were as follows: body weight −6.5 kg, waist circumference −6.4 cm, HDL cholesterol +16.4%, triglycerides −6.9%, fasting insulin −0.6 μU/ml, and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) −0.2 (all P < 0.001 vs. placebo). In the diabetic population, 20 mg rimonabant reduced A1C levels by 0.6% (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). Regression analysis of change in HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, adiponectin (in RIO-Lipids), and A1C (in RIO-Diabetes) versus body weight at 1 year by ANCOVA suggested that 45–57% of the effect of rimonabant could not be explained by the observed weight loss. At 1 year, adverse events more frequently reported with rimonabant were gastrointestinal, neurological, and psychiatric in nature. Serious adverse events were infrequent and almost equivalent to placebo. Overall discontinuation rates were similar across treatment groups, except discontinuation from adverse events, which occurred more frequently with 20 mg rimonabant versus placebo (most commonly, depressive disorders [1.9 vs. 0.8%], nausea [1.4 vs. 0.1%], mood alterations with depressive symptoms [1.0 vs. 0.6%], and anxiety [1.0 vs. 0.3%]). A thorough review of psychiatric and neurological adverse events was performed.
CONCLUSIONS—In overweight/obese patients, 20 mg/day rimonabant produced weight loss and significant improvements in multiple cardiometabolic risk factors such as waist circumference, A1C, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. Rimonabant was generally well tolerated, with more frequently reported adverse events being gastrointestinal, neurological, and psychiatric in nature.
- BP, blood pressure
- HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance
- ITT, intention-to-treat
- RIO, Rimonabant in Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders
Footnotes
-
L.V.G. has received research funding from Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (Belgium); is on the speaker bureau for Abbott Pharma, AstraZeneca, and sanofi-aventis; and is a member on advisory boards for Abbott Pharma, Amylin/Eli Lilly, Johnson-Johnson, Roche, and sanofi-aventis. X.P.-S. has served on an advisory board for and received grant support from sanofi-aventis. J.P.D. has acted as a speaker for Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Solvay Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer Canada, and sanofi-aventis; has received research funding from GlaxoSmithKline, sanofi-aventis, the Canadian Diabetes Association, and the Canadian Institutes of Health; and has acted on an advisory board for MSD, sanofi-aventis, and Novartis. A.J.S. is a member of the Belgian Drug Reimbursement Commission; is a consultant for sanofi-aventis, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck-Santé; and has received research funding from Novo-Nordisk.
This article is based on a presentation at the 1st World Congress of Controversies in Diabetes, Obesity and Hypertension (CODHy). The Congress and the publication of this article were made possible by unrestricted educational grants from MSD, Roche, sanofi-aventis, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, LifeScan, World Wide, Eli Lilly, Keryx, Abbott, Novartis, Pfizer, Generx Biotechnology, Schering, and Johnson & Johnson.
- DIABETES CARE














