Vitamin D Levels in Subjects With and Without Type 1 Diabetes Residing in a Solar Rich Environment
- Lindsey Bierschenk, MS1,
- John Alexander, PHD1,
- Clive Wasserfall, MS1,
- Michael Haller, MD2,
- Desmond Schatz, MD2 and
- Mark Atkinson, PHD1
- 1Department of Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida;
- 2Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
- Corresponding author: Mark Atkinson, atkinson{at}ufl.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies, largely in northern Europe, have suggested an association between type 1 diabetes and reduced serum 25-hydroxy(OH) vitamin D levels, a concept we tested in individuals residing in a solar-rich region (Florida).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Serum samples from 415 individuals residing in Florida were cross-sectionally analyzed: 153 control subjects, 46 new-onset type 1 diabetic patients, 110 established type 1 diabetic patients (samples ≥5 months from diagnosis), and 106 first-degree relatives of the diabetic patients.
RESULTS In this study, 25-OH vitamin D levels (median, range, interquartile range [IQR]) were similar among control subjects (20.1, below detection [bd]–163.5, 13.0–37.4 ng/ml), new-onset type 1 diabetic patients (21.2, bd–48.6, 12.2–30.2 ng/ml), established type 1 diabetic patients (23.2, bd–263.8, 13.8–33.9 ng/ml), and first-degree relatives (22.2, bd–59.9, 12.7–33.1 ng/ml) (P = 0.87). Mean 25-OH vitamin D levels were less than the optimal World Health Organization level of 30 ng/ml in all study groups.
CONCLUSIONS Reduced serum 25-OH vitamin D levels were not specifically associated with type 1 diabetes. The uniform suboptimal 225-OH vitamin D levels, despite residence in a zone with abundant sunshine, support additional dietary vitamin D fortification practices.
Footnotes
-
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
-
- Received June 15, 2009.
- Accepted July 30, 2009.
- © 2009 by the American Diabetes Association.














