Insulin Sensitivity as an Independent Predictor of Fat Mass Gain in Hispanic Adolescents

  1. Tanja C. Adam, PHD,
  2. Claudia Toledo-Corral, MS,
  3. Christianne J. Lane, PHD,
  4. Marc J. Weigensberg, MD,
  5. Donna Spruijt-Metz, PHD,
  6. Jaimie N. Davies, PHD and
  7. Michael I. Goran, PHD
  1. From the Departments of Preventive Medicine, Physiology, Biophysics, and Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
  1. Corresponding author: Michael I. Goran, goran{at}usc.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between changes in insulin sensitivity and subsequent changes in fat mass in obese Hispanic children over 3 consecutive years.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a longitudinal research design, insulin sensitivity (Si) of 96 research participants was determined at baseline and 1 year later. Body adiposity was assessed at four assessments.

RESULTS The change in Si during the first year of the study was a significant predictor of further fat mass development (P < 0.05). Considering different directions of Si change, Si was a strong predictor for further fat mass development only in the group that decreased their Si (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS The results show that the direction of change in insulin sensitivity at an early age is an important independent predictor for further fat mass development and emphasize the importance of insulin sensitivity as a primary target for long-term obesity prevention, as well as the significance of early age intervention.

Hispanic youth are disproportionately affected by the pediatric obesity epidemic and the associated comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes (1). Although the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes in children remains unclear, it likely involves characteristics similar to those of adults (2), including the negative effect of increased adiposity on insulin sensitivity and subsequent β-cell failure (3,4). While insulin resistance traditionally has been examined as a consequence of increased adiposity, there is evidence that insulin resistance at an early age in turn may increase adiposity in adolescents and early adulthood (5). The purpose of this study is to further clarify whether changes in insulin resistance early in life are related to fat mass development later in life in Hispanic adolescents.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The analysis included data from 96 (29 female and 67 male; Tanner stages 1 and 2) overweight (BMI 26.7 ± 4.6 kg/m2; BMI percentile 96.9 ± 4.1) children who are part of the University of Southern California Study of Latino Adolescents at Risk (USC SOLAR) diabetes project, a longitudinal study that examines the development of type 2 diabetes in at-risk Hispanic youth. The subsample was chosen from a larger cohort (n = 222) based on Tanner stage and the completeness of their measures from four consecutive annual visits. Insulin sensitivity, acute insulin response, and disposition index were assessed annually with a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIVGTT). The FSIVGTT was performed in the morning after an overnight fast as previously described (6). Body composition was determined annually with a whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan using a Hologic QDR 4500W. Intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue were determined by magnetic resonance imaging using a GE 1.5 Signa LX-Ecospeed with a GE 1.5 Tesla magnet and a single slice at the level of the umbilicus.

Included in the study were healthy children of Hispanic ethnicity and a BMI that was at or above the 85th percentile for age and sex (7).

A detailed description of the methods and the study protocol for the USC SOLAR study have been previously published (8).

Data analysis

Change in Si for all 96 participants and for the two groups with the different direction of Si change was determined by subtracting Si at the first follow-up from baseline Si. Subsequent changes in fat mass were analyzed as a function of change in Si over the remaining 2 years using repeated-measures ANCOVA. Whether changes in fat mass determined further Si development was tested in the same way. All analyses were adjusted for baseline fat mass, fat-free mass at all visits, baseline Si, change in Si, age, Tanner stage, and sex.

RESULTS

Si decreased significantly over the period of 3 years from 2.4 ± 1.4 ([×10−4 min−1/(μU/ml)]3 at baseline to 1.5 ± 0.79 [(×10−4 min−1/(μU/ml)]3 at the fourth consecutive annual assessment (P < 0.05), while fat mass increased from 21.8 ± 8.7 to 28.9 ± 10 kg (P < 0.05). For the whole group, the change in Si during the first study year was a significant predictor of further fat mass development (P < 0.05), independent of fat-free mass, change in Si, age, Tanner stage, and sex. In return, the change in fat mass between baseline and the first follow-up was not related to a change in Si over the following 2 years.

When comparing a subgroup that significantly increased their Si during the initial study year (n = 17) with a group that decreased in Si (n = 79) during that time, the change in Si was a strong predictor for further fat mass development only in the group that decreased their Si (P < 0.05), not in the group that increased in Si during the first year. Fat mass increased from 21.3 ± 7.5 to 26.2 ± 10.9 kg in the group that increased in Si and from 21.9 ± 8.9 to 29.4 ± 9.9 kg in the group that decreased in Si during the initial study year. Baseline Si, age, fat mass, lean body mass, and specific fat compartments (intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue) were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The main finding of the analysis is that the first-year change in Si was an independent predictor of subsequent gain in fat mass over the next 2 years, specifically in those who decreased in Si. The result was independent of fat-free mass, sex, age, and Tanner stage and is in accordance with a recently published study reporting preteen insulin resistance as a predictor for weight gain (5).

While a decrease in insulin sensitivity traditionally has been looked at as a consequence of increased body adiposity, the present study shows that insulin resistance in turn might also be a cause of increased body adiposity. Hispanic youths are more likely to be insulin resistant than their Caucasian peers, independent of body adiposity (2), predisposing them to an even higher disease risk. We can only speculate on the possible mechanisms behind that relationship, but among other possibilities it very well might involve the effects of insulin resistance on the brain. Insulin receptors have been located in areas that are important for the motivational regulation of food intake (9). Recently, evidence emerged that insulin resistance in the brain might co-occur with insulin resistance in the periphery (10). Sufficient insulin supply, transport, and reception in the brain are thus essential for the maintenance of energy balance. Considering this evidence, the present study might be supportive of the idea that the natural defense against excessive weight gain through adiposity signaling can be undermined by acquired resistance to adiposity-regulating hormones (11,12). The results of the present study show that the change in insulin sensitivity at an early age is an important independent predictor for further weight gain and emphasize the importance of insulin sensitivity as a primary target for long-term obesity prevention in addition to it being a secondary target to weight loss.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 DK 59211), the American Diabetes Association (7-05-MN-22), and in part by the General Clinical Research Center, National Center for Research Resources (grant MO1 RR 00043).

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

We thank Courtney Byrd-Williams and Emily Ventura for their help with the manuscript preparation and their contribution to the discussion of the results.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Received May 6, 2009.
    • Accepted July 27, 2009.
  • Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

References

| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Diabetes Care vol. 32 no. 11 2114-2115
  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. dc09-0833v1
    2. 32/11/2114 most recent