Prevalence and Predictors of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Spanish Women With Diabetes

  1. Rodrigo Jiménez-Garcia, PHD,
  2. Valentin Hernandez-Barrera, MPH,
  3. Pilar Carrasco-Garrido, PHD and
  4. Angel Gil, PHD
  1. From the Preventive Medicine Unit, Rey Juan Carlos University, Alcorcón, Spain.
  1. Corresponding author: Rodrigo Jiménez-García, rodrigo.jimenez{at}urjc.es.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the use of mammography and Papanicolaou (Pap) smear among women with diabetes and to identify predictors of adherence to these tests.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We analyzed data of a nationally representative sample of Spanish women. Diabetes status was self-reported. Screenings were assessed asking whether they had a mammography (≥40 years) and a Pap smear (18–69 years) within the previous 2 and 3 years, respectively.

RESULTS Women with diabetes were less likely to receive mammography (57.9%) or have a Pap smear (61.5%) than women without diabetes (mammography 61.9%, P < 0.05; Pap smear 65.6%, P < 0.05). After adjusting for age, educational level, income, comorbidity, tobacco use, obesity, and physician visits, the corresponding odds ratios remained significant (0.84, 95% CI 0.72–0.97) and (0.82, 95% CI 0.66–0.98). Higher educational level was a positive predictor for both tests among diabetic women.

CONCLUSIONS Spanish women with diabetes underuse breast and cervical cancer screening tests.

Women with diabetes have an increased incidence of breast cancer, and women diagnosed with this cancer who have preexisting diabetes are at increased risk of breast cancer mortality compared with those without diabetes (1,2).

The relationship between diabetes and risk of cervical cancer remains to be evaluated, but cervical cancer mortality is higher in obese women, being these conditions are strongly associated with diabetes (3,4).

Spanish preventive practice guides recommend mammography for women aged 50–69 years every 1–2 years and beginning at 40 years if any condition that increases risk exists (5). For cervical carcinoma, recommendations include screening with Papanicolaou (Pap) smear for 2 years starting 3 years after women become sexually active, and if both yield normal results, repeat every 3 years (6). In Spain, population-based programs for breast and cervical cancer prevention are established by the Public Health System and provide free mammography and Pap smears to target populations (5,6). However, adherence to the cancer screening guidelines is not known among Spanish women with diabetes.

Studies conducted in the U.S. and Canada have shown that women with diabetes undergo mammography and Pap smear less frequently than women without diabetes (710). We aimed to examine and compare the prevalence of receiving breast and cervical cancer screenings among women with and without diabetes and to identify predictors of adherence to these recommendations among women with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study was undertaken using individualized data of women included in the year 2006 National Health Survey (NHS). Details of NHS methodology are described elsewhere (11).

Women were classified as having diabetes if they answered affirmatively to the question: “Has your doctor told you that you suffer from diabetes?”

Receipt of screening for breast cancer was assessed by asking women ages 40 years and older whether they had received a mammography in the previous 2 years and receipt of screening for cervical cancer by asking respondents aged 18–69 years whether they had received a Pap smear within the previous 3 years. The independent variables included in our analyses are shown in Table 1. The variable comorbidity was created and included women with one or more of the following conditions: hypertension, heart attack, chronic heart disease, asthma, or chronic bronchitis. The prevalence estimates for receiving cancer screenings by diabetes status were age-standardized to the 2006 Spanish population.

Table 1

Age-standardized prevalences of Spanish women with and without diabetes who had received screenings for breast and cervical cancers by selected characteristics and predictors of adherence among diabetic women

We have generated four multivariate logistic regression models. First, selecting only women eligible for breast cancer screening (n = 12,429), we used mammography as the dependent variable and diabetes status (women without diabetes used as the referent) as the main independent variable, adjusting the model by the rest of covariates. Second, we did the same for Pap smear. Third, to determine which variables were independent predictors of adherence to mammography among women with diabetes, we selected women with diabetes eligible for this test (n = 1,222), and using mammography as the dependent variable, we identified which of the covariates analyzed were significantly and independently associated to mammography uptake. Lastly, we repeated this for Pap smear.

RESULTS

Women with diabetes were significantly older than women without diabetes (mean ages 67.4 vs. 50.3 years). The prevalence of comorbidity (75.2 vs. 38.5%; P < 0.05), obesity (56.1 vs. 25.3%; P < 0.05), and “physician visit in the last 4 weeks” (65.7 vs. 44.9%; P < 0.05) was higher among diabetic women, and smoking was less frequent (6.9 vs. 23.2%; P < 0.05).

Shown in Table 1 are the age-standardized prevalences of screening practices broken down by covariates. Women with diabetes were less likely to receive mammography (57.9%) or have a Pap smear (61.5%) than women without diabetes (mammography 61.9%, P < 0.05; Pap smear 65.6%, P < 0.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, the corresponding odds ratio remained significant (0.84 [95% CI 0.72–0.97] and 0.82 [0.66–0.98]). Shown in Table 1 are the predictors for receiving the screening tests analyzed among diabetic women.

Having a mammography within the last 2 years was associated with age-groups 50–59 and 60–69 years, higher educational level, comorbidity, “visiting any physician in the last 4 weeks,” and BMI <30 kg/m2. For Pap smear, the positive predictors were higher educational level, higher income, and ex-smoker.

CONCLUSIONS

The main finding of this work is that after adjusting by sociodemographic and health-related variables, women with diabetes had significantly lower use rates of breast- and cervical cancer–screening tests than women without diabetes. Previous studies have shown a reduction in mammography and Pap smear among women with diabetes (7,8,10). Several explications have been proposed to explain why diabetic women are particularly vulnerable to receiving inadequate preventive care, including increasing time constraints on physicians, more complex diabetes management leaving less time for preventive management, and a perception of diminished survival by patients and/or their physicians possibly making long-term disease prevention seem less important (810,12).

Our results also agree with other studies finding that lower economical and educational levels are associated with a lower compliance with screening recommendations, suggesting that sociocultural barriers to adequate health education may also contribute to lower screening in this population (5,810,13). Finally, as described previously, clustering of unhealthy behavioral risk factors and nonadherence to cancer screening appear among Spanish women with diabetes (9,13,14).

Our study has several limitations. First, self-reported measures of diabetes status and the receipt of cancer screenings were used and are thus subject to recall bias. Second, the NHS does not collect information about characteristics of the diabetes (type, insulin use, duration) that may influence the adherence to the cancer screening guidelines. Lastly, the initial NHS response rate was 65%, so a possible nonresponse bias should therefore be considered (12).

More research is needed to address theses issues by examining patients, providers, and organizational factors that can influence access to and quality of care of women with diabetes in Spain. Meanwhile, interventions to increase screening uptake rates such as letters to patients, mailed educational materials, electronic reminder systems, and specific guidelines for disease management must be considered and implemented (710,15).

Acknowledgments

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Received March 11, 2009.
    • Accepted May 7, 2009.
  • Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

References

| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Diabetes Care vol. 32 no. 8 1470-1472
  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. dc09-0479v1
    2. 32/8/1470 most recent