Improving the Estimation of Mealtime Insulin Dose in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
The Normal Insulin Demand for Dose Adjustment (NIDDA) study
- Jiansong Bao, MSC1,
- Heather R. Gilbertson, PHD, ADVAPD2,
- Robyn Gray, CDE3,
- Diane Munns, APD3,
- Gabrielle Howard, MD, FRACP3,
- Peter Petocz, PHD4,
- Stephen Colagiuri, MD, FRACP1 and
- Jennie C. Brand-Miller, PHD1⇓
- 1Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition & Exercise and the School of Molecular Biosciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- 2Department of Nutrition and Food Service, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- 3Sydney Insulin Pump Clinic, Sydney, Australia
- 4Department of Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Corresponding author: Jennie C. Brand-Miller, .
OBJECTIVE Although carbohydrate counting is routine practice in type 1 diabetes, hyperglycemic episodes are common. A food insulin index (FII) has been developed and validated for predicting the normal insulin demand generated by mixed meals in healthy adults. We sought to compare a novel algorithm on the basis of the FII for estimating mealtime insulin dose with carbohydrate counting in adults with type 1 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 28 patients using insulin pump therapy consumed two different breakfast meals of equal energy, glycemic index, fiber, and calculated insulin demand (both FII = 60) but approximately twofold difference in carbohydrate content, in random order on three consecutive mornings. On one occasion, a carbohydrate-counting algorithm was applied to meal A (75 g carbohydrate) for determining bolus insulin dose. On the other two occasions, carbohydrate counting (about half the insulin dose as meal A) and the FII algorithm (same dose as meal A) were applied to meal B (41 g carbohydrate). A real-time continuous glucose monitor was used to assess 3-h postprandial glycemia.
RESULTS Compared with carbohydrate counting, the FII algorithm significantly decreased glucose incremental area under the curve over 3 h (–52%, P = 0.013) and peak glucose excursion (–41%, P = 0.01) and improved the percentage of time within the normal blood glucose range (4–10 mmol/L) (31%, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of hypoglycemia.
CONCLUSIONS An insulin algorithm based on physiological insulin demand evoked by foods in healthy subjects may be a useful tool for estimating mealtime insulin dose in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Clinical trial reg. no. ACTRN12609001034224, anzctr.org.
This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/dc11-0567/-/DC1.
- Received March 23, 2011.
- Accepted May 23, 2011.
- © 2011 by the American Diabetes Association.
Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.