Advertisement

Randomized Trial of a Literacy-Sensitive, Culturally Tailored Diabetes Self-Management Intervention for Low-Income Latinos

Latinos en Control

  1. George Reed, PHD1
  1. 1Department of Medicine, Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
  2. 2Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
  3. 3Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
  4. 4Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
  5. 5Department of Psychology, Brightwood Health Center/Tufts University, Springfield, Massachusetts
  6. 6Family Health Services of Worcester, Worcester, Massachusetts
  7. 7Department of Psychiatry, Baystate Medical Center/Tufts University, Springfield, Massachusetts
  1. Corresponding author: Milagros C. Rosal, milagros.rosal{at}umassmed.edu.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To test whether a theory-based, literacy, and culturally tailored self-management intervention, Latinos en Control, improves glycemic control among low-income Latinos with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 252 patients recruited from community health centers were randomized to the Latinos en Control intervention or to usual care. The primarily group-based intervention consisted of 12 weekly and 8 monthly sessions and targeted knowledge, attitudes, and self-management behaviors. The primary outcome was HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included diet, physical activity, blood glucose self-monitoring, diabetes knowledge and self-efficacy, and other physiological factors (e.g., lipids, blood pressure, and weight). Measures were collected at baseline and at 4- and 12-month follow-up. Change in outcomes over time between the groups and the association between HbA1c and possible mediators were estimated using mixed-effects models and an intention-to-treat approach.

RESULTS A significant difference in HbA1c change between the groups was observed at 4 months (intervention −0.88 [−1.15 to −0.60] versus control −0.35 [−0.62 to 0.07], P < 0.01), although this difference decreased and lost statistical significance at 12 months (intervention −0.46 [−0.77 to −0.13] versus control −0.20 [−0.53 to 0.13], P = 0.293). The intervention resulted in significant change differences in diabetes knowledge at 12 months (P = 0.001), self-efficacy (P = 0.001), blood glucose self-monitoring (P = 0.02), and diet, including dietary quality (P = 0.01), kilocalories consumed (P < 0.001), percentage of fat (P = 0.003), and percentage of saturated fat (P = 0.04). These changes were in turn significantly associated with HbA1c change at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS Literacy-sensitive, culturally tailored interventions can improve diabetes control among low-income Latinos; however, strategies to sustain improvements are needed.

  • Received October 19, 2010.
  • Accepted January 11, 2011.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Diabetes Care vol. 34 no. 4 838-844
  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. dc10-1981v1
    2. 34/4/838 most recent
Advertisement