Prognostic Impact of Metabolic Syndrome by Different Definitions in a Population with High Prevalence of Obesity and Diabetes: The Strong Heart Study.

  1. Giovanni de Simone, M.D. (simogi{at}unina.it)a,b,
  2. Richard B. Devereux, M.D.a,
  3. Marcello Chinali, M.D.b,
  4. Lyle G. Best, M.D.c,
  5. Elisa T. Lee, PhD.d,
  6. James M. Galloway, M.D., M.P.H.e,
  7. Helaine E. Resnick, PhD.f and
  8. for the Strong Heart Study Investigators
  1. aWeill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, N.Y
  2. bFederico II University, Naples, Italy
  3. cMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Timber Lake, SD
  4. dCenter for American Indian Health Research, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
  5. eIndian Health Service, University of Arizona
  6. fMedstar Research Institute, Washington, D.C

    Abstract

    Objective: This study analyzed which definition of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) is more predictive of cardiovascular events in both diabetic and non-diabetic members of a population based sample.

    Research Design and Method: Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of the Strong Heart Study cohort has been evaluated. The analysis included 3,945 participants (2,384 women) with complete data (1,700 with diabetes; 1,468 with arterial hypertension) for evaluation of MetS. Those with prevalent cardiovascular disease were excluded (n=287, 127 women). Prevalence of MetS was assessed based on WHO, ATPIII, and IDF definitions. Main outcome was 10-year incidence of combined fatal and non fatal cardiovascular events (CVe), including stroke, coronary heart disease and congestive heart failure.

    Results: Fatal and non-fatal CVe occurred in 1,120 participants. After adjusting for age, sex and diabetes, MetS by all definitions was significantly associated with higher incidence of CVe, (all p<0.0001). In nondiabetic individuals, incident CVe rates were about 30-40% higher in those with MetS, without significant difference among definitions (0.03<p<0.001), and remained significant in WHO and ATPIII definitions even after further adjustment for obesity, hypertension, and low HDL-cholesterol. In the diabetic group, MetS risk for CVe was greatest using the WHO definition (p<0.002 vs other models).

    Conclusions: In persons without diabetes, MetS is associated with incident cardiovascular disease, especially with WHO and ATPIII definitions. MetS also predicts higher CV event rates in diabetic participants, a prediction that is greatest using the WHO definition.

    Footnotes

      • Received October 18, 2006.
      • Accepted March 30, 2007.