Advertisement

Insulin Resistance, Metabolic Syndrome and Subclinical Atherosclerosis: The Multi-Ethnic study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

  1. Alain G Bertoni, MD, MPH (abertoni{at}wfubmc.edu)1,
  2. Nathan D Wong, PhD2,
  3. Steven Shea, MD3,
  4. Shuangge Ma4,
  5. Kiang Liu, PhD5,
  6. Preethi Srikanthan, MBBS6,
  7. David R. Jacobs, Jr., PhD7,
  8. Colin Wu, PhD8,
  9. Mohammed F Saad, MD, MRCP9 and
  10. Moyses Szklo, MD10
  1. 1 Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest University
  2. 2 Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine
  3. 3 Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University
  4. 4 Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health
  5. 5 Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University
  6. 6 Division of Epidemiology and Preventative medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
  7. 7 Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota
  8. 8 National Heart Lung and Blood Institute
  9. 9 State University of New York at Stonybrook, and
  10. 10 Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

    Abstract

    Objective: To investigate the association of insulin resistance and the clinically defined metabolic syndrome (MetS) with subclinical atherosclerosis and examine whether these relationships vary by race/ethnicity or gender.

    Research Design and Methods: Subclinical atherosclerosis was assessed by coronary artery calcium and carotid intima-medial wall thickness in 5810 participants without diabetes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, a cohort of adults aged 45–84 without prior CVD. Fasting insulin and glucose was utilized to estimate insulin resistance by the HOMA-IR index, and the revised National Cholesterol Education Program definition of MetS was utilized. Multivariable linear or relative risk regression was used to analyze the association between HOMA-IR and subclinical atherosclerosis and assess its independence from MetS components.

    Results: HOMA-IR was associated with increased IMT after adjustment for demographics (age, site, education), smoking, education, and LDL-cholesterol in each ethnic group except Hispanics, and in both men and women. After further adjusting for non-glucose MetS components, HOMA-IR was not associated with increased IMT. Persons in the highest quintile of HOMA-IR had an elevated prevalence of CAC in each ethnic group and both genders, after adjustment for demographics, smoking and LDL, but not after further adjustment for non-glucose MetS components. Among those with detectable CAC, there was no significant relationship between HOMA-IR and the amount of CAC.

    Conclusions: Although HOMA-IR was associated with increased subclinical atherosclerosis, the association was not independent of the risk factors that comprise MetS. Determination of HOMA-IR is unlikely contribute to improved determination of risk of subclinical cardiovascular disease.

    Footnotes

      • Received June 1, 2007.
      • Accepted August 9, 2007.

    This Article

    1. Diabetes Care August 17, 2007
    1. All Versions of this Article:
      1. dc07-1042v1
      2. 30/11/2951 most recent
    Advertisement