Long-Term Effects on Medical Costs of Improving Depression Outcomes in Patients with Depression and Diabetes

  1. Wayne J. Katon, MD (wkaton{at}u.washington.edu)1,
  2. Joan E. Russo, MD1,
  3. Michael Von Korff, ScD2,
  4. Elizabeth H.B. Lin, MD, MPH2,
  5. Evette Ludman, PhD2 and
  6. Paul S. Ciechanowski, MD, MPH1
  1. 1Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
  2. 2Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA

    Abstract

    Objective: To examine the 5-year effects on total health care costs of the Pathways depression intervention program for patients with diabetes and comorbid depression compared to usual primary care.

    Research Design and Methods: The Pathways trial was conducted in 9 primary care practices of a large HMO and enrolled 329 patients with diabetes and comorbid major depression. The current study analyzed the differences in long-term medical costs between intervention and usual care patients. Participants were randomly assigned to a nurse depression intervention (N = 164) or to usual primary care (N = 165). The intervention included education about depression, behavioral activation and a choice of either starting with support of antidepressant medication treatment by the primary care doctor or problem solving therapy in primary care (PST-PC). Interventions were provided for up to 12 months and the main outcome measures are health costs over a 5-year period.

    Results: Patients in the intervention arm of the study had improved depression outcomes and trends for reduced 5 year mean total medical costs -$3907 (95% CI -$15,454 less to $7640 more) compared to usual care patients. A sensitivity analysis found that these cost differences were largely explained by the patients with depression and the most severe medical comorbidity.

    Conclusion: The Pathways depression collaborative care program improved depression outcomes compared to usual care with no evidence of greater long-term costs, and with trends for reduced costs among the more severely medically ill patients with diabetes.

    Footnotes

      • Received January 4, 2008.
      • Accepted February 28, 2008.