Occupation-related differences in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome
- Miguel Angel Sánchez-Chaparro, M.D. (miguelangelsanchez{at}ibermutuamur.es)a,b,
- Eva Calvo-Bonacho, M.D.a,
- Arturo González-Quintela, M.D.c,
- Carlos Fernández-Labandera, M.D.a,
- Martha Cabrera, M.D.a,
- Juan Carlos Sáinz, M.D.a,
- Ana Fernández-Meseguer, M.D.a,
- José R. Banegas, M.D.d,
- Luis Miguel Ruilope, M.D.e,
- Pedro Valdivielso, M.D.b and
- Javier Román-García, M.D. on behalf of the ICARIA (Ibermutuamur CArdiovascular RIsk Assesment) Study Groupa
- aIbermutuamur (Mutua de Accidentes de Trabajo y Enfermedades Profesionales de la Seguridad Social 274), Spain
- bDepartment of Internal Medicine Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, University of Malaga, Spain
- cDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- dDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Heath, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain
- eHypertension Unit, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the Spanish working population, and determine how the prevalence varies according to occupation and gender.
Research design and methods: Cross-sectional study of 259,014 workers (mean age 36.4 years; range, 16-74 years; 72.9% males) who underwent a routine medical checkup. The ATPIII (2001) definition for metabolic syndrome was used.
Results: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 11.6% (95% CI 11.5-11.7) in males and 4.1% (95% CI 4.0-4.2) in females and increased with age. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome varied in the different categories of occupational activity depending on the gender considered. Among females, the age-adjusted prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher in blue-collar than in white-collar workers, but this difference was not evident among male workers.
Conclusions: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome varies in the different categories of occupational activity in the Spanish working population. This variation also depends on gender.
Footnotes
-
- Received February 29, 2008.
- Accepted June 13, 2008.
- Copyright © American Diabetes Association











