Factors Associated with Intensification of Oral Diabetes Medications in Primary Care Provider-Patient Dyads: A Cohort Study

  1. Shari Danielle Bolen, MD, MPH (sgolden4{at}jhmi.edu)1,
  2. Eric Bricker, MD, MPH6,
  3. T. Alafia Samuels, MD, MPH, PhD4,
  4. Hsin-Chieh Yeh, PhD1,2,3,
  5. Spyridon S. Marinopoulos, MD, MBA1,
  6. Maura McGuire, MD1,
  7. Marcela Abuid, MD5 and
  8. Frederick L. Brancati, MD, MHS1,2,3
  1. 1Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
  2. 2Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
  3. 3Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  4. 4Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Washington D.C
  5. 5Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts
  6. 6Department of Medicine, Baylor Regional Medical Center at Plano, Baylor Healthcare System, Plano, Texas

    Abstract

    Objective: Although suboptimal glycemic control is known to be common in diabetic adults, few studies have evaluated factors at the level of the physician-patient encounter. Our objective was to identify novel visit-based factors associated with intensification of oral diabetes medications in diabetic adults.

    Research Design and Methods: We conducted a non-concurrent prospective cohort study of 121 patients with type 2 diabetes and hyperglycemia [hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 8%] enrolled in an academically-affiliated managed care program. Over a 24-month interval (1999-2001), we identified 574 hyperglycemic visits. We measured treatment intensification and factors associated with intensification at each visit.

    Results: Provider-patient dyads intensified oral diabetes treatment in only 128 (22%) of 574 hyperglycemic visits. As expected, worse glycemia was an important predictor of intensification. Treatment was more likely to be intensified at visits that were ‘routine’ (Odds ratio [OR] 2.55; 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 1.49-4.38), in patients on two or more oral diabetes drugs (OR 2.82; 95%CI 1.74-4.56) or longer intervals between visits (OR per 30 days 1.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.10). In contrast, patients with less recent HbA1c measurements (> 30 days prior to the visit; OR 0.53; 95%CI 0.34-0.85), a higher number of prior visits (OR 0.94 per prior visit; 95%CI 0.88-1.00), and African Americans (OR 0.59; 95%CI 0.35-1.00) were less likely to have treatment intensified.

    Conclusions: Failure to intensify oral diabetes treatment is common in diabetes care. Quality improvement measures in type 2 diabetes should focus on overcoming inertia, improving continuity of care, and reducing racial disparities.

    Footnotes

      • Received July 11, 2008.
      • Accepted October 6, 2008.