Alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyltransferase and incident diabetes: The British Women's Heart and Health Study and meta-analysis

  1. Abigail Fraser, PhD (Abigail.fraser{at}bristol.ac.uk)1,
  2. Ross Harris, MSc1,
  3. Naveed Sattar, PhD2,
  4. Shah Ebrahim, DM3,
  5. George Davey Smith, DSC1 and
  6. Debbie A Lawlor, PhD1
  1. 1. MRC Centre for Causal Analysis in Translational Epidemiology, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Oakfield House, 15-23 Oakfield Grove, Bristol, UK
  2. 2. BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  3. 3. Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK

    Abstract

    Objective: To estimate and compare associations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT) with incident diabetes.

    Research Design and Methods: ALT and GGT were studied as determinants of diabetes in the British Women's Heart and Health Study, a cohort of 4,286 women 60-79 years old (median followed up 7.3 years). A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 prospective, population-based studies of ultrasonography (USS) diagnosed NAFLD, ALT and GGT as determinants of diabetes were conducted and associations of ALT and GGT with diabetes were compared.

    Results: USS diagnosed NAFLD was associated with more than a doubling in the risk of incident diabetes (3 studies). ALT and GGT both predicted diabetes. The fully adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for diabetes per increase in one unit of logged ALT was 1.83 (95%CI: 1.57, 2.14, I2=8%) and for GGT the HR=1.92 (95%CI: 1.66, 2.21, I2=55%). In order to directly compare ALT and GGT as determinants of diabetes, the fully adjusted risk of diabetes in the top versus bottom fourth of the ALT and GGT distributions was estimated using data from studies that included results for both markers. For ALT the HR=2.02 (95%CI: 1.59, 2.58, I2=27%) and for GGT HR=2.94 (95%CI: 1.98, 3.88, I2=20%), suggesting that GGT may be a better predictor (p=0.05).

    Conclusion: Findings are consistent with the role of liver fat in diabetes pathogenesis. GGT may be a better diabetes predictor than ALT, but additional studies with directly determined liver fat content, ALT and GGT are needed to confirm this finding.

    Footnotes

      • Received November 15, 2008.
      • Accepted January 6, 2009.