Advertisement

Flicker-Light induced Retinal Vasodilation in Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy

  1. Thanh T. Nguyen, MBBS1,
  2. Ryo Kawasaki, MD PhD1,
  3. Jie Jin Wang, PhD1,2,
  4. Andreas J. Kreis, MD1,
  5. Jonathan Shaw, MD3,
  6. Walthard Vilser, MS4 and
  7. Tien Y. Wong, MD PhD (twong{at}unimelb.edu.au)1,5
  1. 1. Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Australia
  2. 2. Centre for Vision Research, Westmead Millennium Institute, University of Sydney, Australia
  3. 3. Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Australia
  4. 4. IMEDOS, Jena, Germany
  5. 5. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore

    Abstract

    Objective: Flicker-light induced retinal vasodilation may reflect endothelial function in the retinal circulation. We investigated flicker-light induced vasodilation in persons with diabetes and diabetic retinopathy (DR).

    Research Design and Methods: Participants consisted of 224 persons with diabetes and 103 non-diabetic controls. Flicker-light induced retinal vasodilation (percentage increase over baseline diameter) was measured using the Dynamic Vessel Analyzer. DR was graded from retinal photographs.

    Results: Mean age was 56.5 (±11.8) years in those with diabetes, and 48.0 (±16.3) years in controls. Mean arteriolar and venular dilation after flicker-light stimulation were reduced in persons with diabetes than controls (1.43% [±2.10] vs. 3.46% [±2.36], p<0.001 for arteriolar, and 2.83% [±2.10] vs. 3.98% [±1.84], p<0.001 for venular dilation). After adjusting for age, gender, diabetes duration, fasting glucose, cholesterol and triglyceride levels, current smoking status, systolic blood pressure, use of anti-hypertensive and lipid-lowering medications, persons with reduced flicker-light induced vasodilation were more likely to have diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 19.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5-59.1, p<0.001, and OR 8.14, 95% CI 3.1-21.4, p<0.001, comparing lowest vs. highest tertile of arteriolar and venular dilation respectively). Diabetic persons with reduced flicker-light induced vasodilation were more likely to have DR (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.0, p=0.01 for arteriolar dilation; and OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.3-4.5, p=0.004, for venular dilation).

    Conclusions: Reduced retinal vasodilation after flicker-light stimulation is independently associated with diabetes status and, in persons with diabetes, with DR. Our findings may therefore support endothelial dysfunction as a pathophysiological mechanism underlying diabetes and its microvascular manifestations.

    Footnotes

      • Received January 14, 2009.
      • Accepted July 18, 2009.

    This Article

    1. Diabetes Care July 29, 2009
    1. All Versions of this Article:
      1. dc09-0075v1
      2. 32/11/2075 most recent
    Advertisement