Six months of diazoxide treatment at bedtime in newly diagnosed subjects with type 1 diabetes does not influence parameters of β-cell function and autoimmunity, but improves glycemic control.
- Maria Anita Radtke, M.D. (maria.radtke{at}ntnu.no)1,2,
- Ingrid Nermoen, M.D.3,
- Magnus Kollind, PhD4,
- Svein Skeie, PhD5,
- Jan Inge Sørheim, M.D.6,
- Johan Svartberg, PhD7,8,
- Ingrid Hals, M.Sc1,
- Torolf Moen, PhD9,
- Gry Høst Dørflinger, M.D.1 and
- Valdemar Grill, PhD1,2
- 1 Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
- 2 Department of Endocrinology, St.Olavs Hospital/University Hospital of Trondheim
- 3 Department of Endocrinology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog
- 4 Endocrinology unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Levanger Hospital
- 5 Section of Endocrinology, Division of Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital
- 6 Section of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen
- 7 Section of Endocrinology, Division of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway; Tromsø
- 8 Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø
- 9 Department of Laboratory Medicine,Children's and Women's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim
Abstract
Objective: Continuous β-cell rest with diazoxide preserves residual endogenous insulin production in type 1 diabetes. However, side-effects have hampered therapeutic usefulness. In a double blind study we tested whether lower, intermittent dosing of diazoxide had beneficial effects on insulin production, metabolic control and autoimmunity markers in the absence of side-effects.
Research Design and Methods: Forty-one newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients were randomized to 6 months treatment with placebo or diazoxide, 100 mg at bedtime. HbA1c, C-peptide (fasting and glucagon-stimulated) and FoxP3+ regulatory T-cells (Tregs) were measured. Patients were followed for 6 months after intervention.
Results: Of six drop-outs, three were due to perceived side effects: one subject in the diazoxide group experienced rash, another dizziness, and one in the placebo group sleep disturbance. Adverse effects in others were absent.
Diazoxide treatment reduced HbA1c from 8.6% at baseline to 6.0% at 6 and 6.5% at 12 months. Corresponding HbA1c in the placebo arm were 8.3%, 7.3% and 7.5% (p < 0.05 for stronger reduction in the diazoxide group). Fasting and stimulated C-peptide decreased during 12 months similarly in both arms (mean −0.30 and −0.18 nmol/l in the diazoxide, −0.08 and −0.09 nmol/l in the placebo arm). The proportion of Tregs was similar in both arms, and remained stable during intervention, but was significantly lower compared to non-diabetic subjects.
Conclusion: Six months of low-dose diazoxide was without the side-effects, did not measurably affect insulin production, but was associated with improved metabolic control.
Footnotes
-
- Received August 3, 2009.
- Accepted December 10, 2009.
- Copyright © American Diabetes Association














