Advertisement

Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

  1. Dan Ziegler, MD, FRCPE (dan.ziegler{at}ddz.uni-duesseldorf.de)a,
  2. Tibor Hidvégi, MDb,
  3. Irina Gurieva, MDc,
  4. Sabine Bongardt, MSd,
  5. Rainer Freynhagen, MDe,
  6. David Sen, PhDf,
  7. Kenneth Sommerville, MDf and
  8. On behalf of the lacosamide SP743 Study Group
  1. a. Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center at the Heinrich Heine University, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research and Department of Metabolic Diseases, University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany
  2. b. Petz Aladár County Teaching Hospital, Department of Metabolism and Diabetes, Győr, Hungary
  3. c. Federal State Institution, Federal Bureau Medical Social Expertise, Moscow, Russia
  4. d. Schwarz Pharma, AG, UCB Group, Monheim, Germany
  5. e. Department of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine, Pain Therapy & Palliative Care, Pain Center Lake Starnberg, Benedictus Krankenhaus, Tutzing, Germany
  6. f. Schwarz Biosciences, Inc., UCB Group, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate efficacy and safety of lacosamide compared with placebo in painful diabetic polyneuropathy.

Research Design and Methods: Diabetic patients with at least moderate neuropathic pain were randomized to placebo or lacosamide 400 (in a slow or standard titration) or 600mg/day over 6-week titration and 12-week maintenance periods. Primary efficacy criterion was intra-individual change in average daily Numeric Pain Rating Scale score from baseline to the last 4 weeks.

Results: For the primary endpoint, pain reduction was numerically but not statistically greater with lacosamide compared with placebo (400mg/day,P=0.12;600mg/day,P=0.18). Both doses were significantly more effective compared with placebo over the titration (P=0.03,P=0.006), maintenance (P=0.01,P=0.005), and entire treatment periods (P=0.03,P=0.02). Safety profiles between titration schemes were similar.

Conclusions: Lacosamide reduced neuropathic pain and was well tolerated in diabetic patients, but the primary efficacy criterion was not met, possibly due to an increased placebo response over the last 4 weeks.

Footnotes

    • Received August 24, 2009.
    • Accepted January 3, 2010.

This Article

  1. Diabetes Care January 12, 2010
  1. Online-Only Appendix
  2. All Versions of this Article:
    1. dc09-1578v1
    2. 33/4/839 most recent
Advertisement