Advertisement

HbA1c for screening and diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice

  1. Zhong X Lu, (PhD) (zhong.lu{at}mps.com.au)1,2,
  2. Karen Z Walker, (PhD)3,4,
  3. Kerin O'Dea, (PhD)6,
  4. Ken A Sikaris, (FRCPA)1 and
  5. Jonathan E Shaw, (MD)5
  1. 1Melbourne Pathology Services, Melbourne, Australia
  2. 2Department of Medicine, Monash Medical Centre and
  3. 3Department of Nutrition and Diabetes, Monash University, Melbourne
  4. 4Preventative Health Unit and
  5. 5Clinical Diabetes and Epidemiology Unit, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne
  6. 6Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

Abstract

Objective- To evaluate HbA1c for screening and diagnosis of undiagnosed Type 2 diabetes defined by oral glucose tolerance testing in clinical and general populations.

Research design and methods- HbA1c cut-offs (≤5.5% to ‘rule-out’; ≥7.0% to ‘rule-in’ diabetes) were derived from a clinical group (MP: n= 2,494; undiagnosed diabetes 34.6%) and then evaluated in a population-based sample (AusDiab: n=6,015, undiagnosed diabetes 4.6%).

Results- For diabetes in MP and AusDiab, HbA1c at 5.5% gave sensitivities of 98.7% and 83.5%, while HbA1c at 7.0% gave specificities of 98.2% and 100%, respectively. Many (61.9 – 69.3%) with impaired HbA1c (IA1c: 5.6 – 6.9%) in both populations had abnormal glucose status.

Conclusions- HbA1c ≤5.5% and ≥7.0% predicts absence or presence of Type 2 diabetes while at HbA1c 6.5–6.9%, diabetes is highly probable in clinical and population settings. A high proportion of people with IA1c have abnormal glucose status requiring follow-up.

Footnotes

    • Received September 21, 2009.
    • Accepted January 6, 2010.

This Article

  1. Diabetes Care January 12, 2010
  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. dc09-1763v1
    2. 33/4/817 most recent
Advertisement