Advertisement

URINE PROTEOME ANALYSIS MAY ALLOW NON-INVASIVE DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY

  1. Massimo Papale, PhD1,
  2. Salvatore Di Paolo, MD2,
  3. Riccardo Magistroni, MD3,
  4. Olga Lamacchia, MD4,
  5. Angela De Mattia, MD5,
  6. Maria Teresa Rocchetti, PhD1,
  7. Luciana Furci, MD3,
  8. Sonia Pasquali, MD7,
  9. Salvatore De Cosmo, MD8,
  10. Mauro Cignarelli, MD4 and
  11. Loreto Gesualdo, MD (l.gesualdo{at}unifg.it)9
  1. 1. Core facility of Proteomics and Mass Spectrometry, Dept. of BioAgroMed, Faculty of Medicine, University of Foggia
  2. 2. Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Hospital “Dimiccoli” , ASL BAT, Barletta, Italy
  3. 3. Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Dept. of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena. Italy
  4. 4. Division of Endocrinology, Dept. of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia
  5. 5. Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Foggia
  6. 6. Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Foggia
  7. 7. Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Sant'Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
  8. 8. Unit of Endocrinology, Scientific Institute “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza” San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
  9. 9. Division of Nephrology, Dept. of Biomedical Sciences and Bioagromed, Faculty of Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy

Abstract

Objective: Chronic renal insufficiency and/or proteinuria in type 2 diabetes may stem from chronic renal diseases (CKD) other than classic diabetic nephropathy (DN) in over one third of cases. We interrogated urine proteomic profiles generated by SELDI-TOF/MS with the aim to isolate a set of biomarkers able to reliably identify biopsy-proven DN and to establish a stringent correlation with the different patterns of renal injury.

Research design and methods: Ten μg urine proteins from 190 subjects [20 healthy subjects (HS), 20 normoalbuminuric (NAD) and 18 microalbuminuric (MICRO) diabetic patients, and 132 patients with biopsy-proven nephropathy (65 DN, 10 diabetics with non-diabetic CKD (nd-CKD) and 57 non-diabetic patients with CKD)] were run by CM10 ProteinChip array and analysed by supervised learning methods (CART analysis).

Results: The classification model correctly identified 75% NAD, 87.5% MICRO and 87.5% DN when applied to a blinded testing set. Most importantly, it was able to reliably differentiate DN from nd-CKD in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Among the best predictors of the classification model, we identified and validated 2 proteins, ubiquitin and ß2-microglobulin.

Conclusions: Our data suggest the presence of a specific urine proteomic signature able to reliably identify type 2 diabetic patients with diabetic glomerulosclerosis.

Footnotes

    Advertisement