Table 1—

Correlations of HOMA against other methods

Insulin sensitivity methodCorrelation with HOMA-%SCommentsHOMA modelRef.P
Euglycemic clampRs = 0.88NGT (n = 12), diabetes (n = 11)Equation10.0001
Euglycemic clampRs = 0.82NGT (n = 62), diabetes (n = 53)Equation210.0001
Euglycemic clampr = 0.73Diabetes (n = 80)Equation220.0001
Euglycemic clampr = 0.73Diabetes (n = 55)Equation300.0001
Euglycemic clampr = 0.58NGT (n = 104)Equation310.0005
Euglycemic clampr = 0.78Diabetes (n = 30)Computer180.0001
Minimal modelr = 0.7NGT (n = 87)Equation230.001
Minimal modelr = 0.88NGT (n = 7), IGT (n = 5), diabetes (n = 1)Computer32
β-Cell function methodCorrelation with HOMA-%βCommentsHOMA modelRef.P
Hyperglycemic clampRS = 0.69NGT (n = 10), diabetes (n = 11)Equation10.001
Hyperglycemic clampr = 0.62NGT (n = 104)Equation310.0005
Hyperglycemic clampRS = 0.9NGT (n = 36), diabetes (n = 21)Computer330.001
Hyperglycemic clampr = 0.87Diabetes (n = 30)Computer180.0001
AIR (IVGTT)r = 0.73NGT (n = 7), IGT (n = 8), diabetes (n = 9)Computer25
CIGMAr = 0.88NGT (n = 7), IGT (n = 8), diabetes (n = 9)Computer25
CIGMARS = 0.87NGT (n = 11), diabetes (n = 12)Equation10.0001
  • AIR, acute insulin response.