Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcast
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcast
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Original Articles

Evaluation of Fasting Plasma Glucose as Screening Test for NIDDM in Older Adults: Rancho Bernardo Study

  1. Barbara A Blunt, MPH,
  2. Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, MD and
  3. Deborah L Wingard, PhD
  1. Department of Community and Family Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, MD, Department of Community and Family Medicine, 0607, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Cilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0607.
Diabetes Care 1991 Nov; 14(11): 989-993. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.14.11.989
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To examine the efficiency of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) as a screening test for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). RESEARCH AND METHODS DESIGN: A population-based evaluation was made of FPG as screening test for NIDDM in an upper middle-class white community of Rancho Bernardo, California. NIDDM was defined by 2-h postchallenge plasma glucose (PCPG) level ≥ 11.1 mM, the cutoff point recommended by the World Health Organization. Participants comprised a population-based sample of 1851 men and women 50–79 yr of age that represented 80% of surviving participants surveyed between 1972 and 1974 for the Lipid Research Clinic Prevalence Study. Those with insulin-dependent diabetes were excluded.

Results Analyses were stratified by age after logistic regression indicated that FPG and age (but not gender) were significantly related to probability of disease. As FPG cutoff points increased, sensitivity and percentage of the population to be recalled for confirmation decreased, whereas specificity and positive predictive value increased. Negative predictive value was consistently in the 90% range. Specificity did not change with age. In contrast, at virtually every FPG cutoff point, sensitivity decreased with increasing age. For example, at FPG ≥ 6.7 mM, sensitivity was 65.6% for those 50–64 yr of age and 40.0% for those 65–79 yr of age. At FPG ≥ 7.2 mM, these sensitivities were 46.9 and 28.5%, respectively. Positive predictive value increased with increasing age, reflecting the increasing prevalence of NIDDM with age.

Conclusions Poorer sensitivity with increasing age reflects the fact that the numerator of the sensitivity equation is not affected by age (mean FPG did not vary significantly between age-groups), whereas the denominator increases with age (mean PCPG increased from 6.6 mM for subjects 50–64 yr of age to 8.2 mM for subjects 65–79 yr of age). Nevertheless, because the clinical significance of increasing PCPG with age in older adults is unknown, age-specific screening criteria probably are not warranted.

  • Received December 19, 1990.
  • Revision received June 22, 1991.
  • Accepted June 22, 1991.
  • Copyright © 1991 by the American Diabetes Association
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this Issue

November 1991, 14(11)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Fasting Plasma Glucose as Screening Test for NIDDM in Older Adults: Rancho Bernardo Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Fasting Plasma Glucose as Screening Test for NIDDM in Older Adults: Rancho Bernardo Study
Barbara A Blunt, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Deborah L Wingard
Diabetes Care Nov 1991, 14 (11) 989-993; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.14.11.989

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Evaluation of Fasting Plasma Glucose as Screening Test for NIDDM in Older Adults: Rancho Bernardo Study
Barbara A Blunt, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Deborah L Wingard
Diabetes Care Nov 1991, 14 (11) 989-993; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.14.11.989
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Breastfeeding After Gestational Diabetes Pregnancy
  • Gestational Diabetes After Delivery
  • The Predisposition to Obesity and Diabetes in Offspring of Diabetic Mothers
Show more Original Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.