Incidence of IDDM In Mauritian Children and Adolescents From 1986 to 1990

Jaakko Tuomilehto; Jaydev Dabee; Marjatta Karvonen; Gary K Dowse; Hassam Gareeboo; Esa Virtala; Marja Tiihonen; K George M M Alberti; Paul Z Zimmet

doi:10.2337/diacare.16.12.1588

Original Articles

Incidence of IDDM In Mauritian Children and Adolescents From 1986 to 1990

Jaakko Tuomilehto, MD, PHD,
Jaydev Dabee,
Marjatta Karvonen, MSC,
Gary K Dowse, MBBS, MSC,
Hassam Gareeboo, MBBS, FRCP,
Esa Virtala, BSC,
Marja Tiihonen, BSC,
K George M M Alberti, MD, PHD and
Paul Z Zimmet, MD, PHD

Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute Helsinki, Finland the Ministry of Health Port Louis, Mauritius Center for the Epidemiology of Diabetes Mellitus, Lions-Internal Diabetes Institute, Melbourne Australia Human Metabolism Research Center and Department of Medicine, University of Newcastleupon- Tyne United Kingdom

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jaakko Tuomilehto, MD, Elimaenkatu 25, FIN-00510 Helsinki, Finland.

Diabetes Care 1993 Dec; 16(12): 1588-1591. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.16.12.1588

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To document the incidence of IDDM in Mauritian children and adolescents 0–19 yr of age from 1986 to 1990.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We used a population-based register that used pediatricians, physicians, nutritionists, and general practitioners as a primary source of restrospective case ascertainment. The denominator data were obtained from the Statistics Office of the Ministry of Health (Port Louis, Mauritius).

RESULTS In 1990, 37 newly diagnosed IDDM cases (22 females and 15 males) were identified between 1986 and 1990 among the population ≤19 yr of age. The average incidence density per year was 1.9/100,000 people and was slightly higher among girls (2.2/100,000) than among boys (1.5/100,000). The average agestandardized incidence density was 2.1/100,000 people (95% confidence interval 1.5–3.0) among children ≤14 yr of age, 2.5/100,000 people (95% confidence interval 1.5–3.9) among girls, and 1.8/100,000 people (95% confidence interval 1.0–3.0) among boys. The incidence was similarly low in Mauritians of Asian Indian, Chinese, and Creole (predominantly African) origin.

CONCLUSIONS The incidence of IDDM in Mauritian children and adolescents is among the lowest yet reported. This sharply contrasts with the very high risk of NIDDM found among the adult population in this rapidly modernizing country.