Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Original Articles

The Effect of Recurrent Practice at Home on the Acceptability of Capillary Blood Glucose Readings: Accuracy of self blood glucose testing

  1. Udaya M Kabadi, MD,
  2. Kathleen M O'Connell, PHD,
  3. Jennal Johnson, MS, RNP and
  4. Mary Kabadi, RN, BSN
  1. Medical Service, Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center Phoenix, Arizona; and Medisense, Inc. Waltham, Massachusetts
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Udaya M. Kabadi, MD, Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center, 650 East Indian School Road, Phoenix, AZ 85012
Diabetes Care 1994 Oct; 17(10): 1110-1114. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.17.10.1110
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To judge how reliably patients perform capillary blood glucose testing over time with recurrent practice at home and to assess if a clinic glucose meter is an acceptable alternative to the clinical laboratory for monitoring patient performance.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We compared capillary blood glucose readings obtained by patients with their own equipment and the venous blood glucose determinations by the clinical laboratory at three biweekly visits during the initial phase in 40 subjects attending the diabetes clinic at the Veterans' Affairs Medical Center in Phoenix, Arizona. We also compared patient-generated readings using their own equipment and the readings obtained by the clinic glucose meter and strips at five weekly visits during the second phase in 11 subjects who continued further participation. Error grid analysis was used for both comparisons. Capillary blood glucose readings obtained with clinic glucose meter and strips on one hand were correlated with venous blood glucose levels determined by the clinical laboratory.

RESULTS During the initial phase, 30 subjects consistently obtained clinically acceptable comparisons (zone A on the error grid, i.e., within 20% of the laboratory value) or improved over time, 9 subjects showed deterioration, and 1 subject failed to obtain zone A results on any of the visits. Three subjects who had consistently obtained zone A results during the initial phase maintained their performance, whereas eight subjects who had failed to achieve zone A values by the end of the initial phase gradually improved and ultimately achieved zone A values by the end of the study. A highly significant correlation was noted between clinic meter readings and laboratory values (r = 0.93, P < 0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS Clinically acceptable user proficiency in capillary blood glucose testing can be maintained in most subjects, with recurrent intensive education during follow-up clinic visits. Therefore, we recommend that these comparisons be performed and patient's technique be observed at each visit to monitor their performance. The clinic glucose meter is a suitable alternative to a clinical laboratory for user proficiency checks.

  • Received August 10, 1993.
  • Revision received March 10, 1994.
  • Accepted March 10, 1994.
  • Copyright © 1994 by the American Diabetes Association

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this Issue

October 1994, 17(10)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effect of Recurrent Practice at Home on the Acceptability of Capillary Blood Glucose Readings: Accuracy of self blood glucose testing
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Effect of Recurrent Practice at Home on the Acceptability of Capillary Blood Glucose Readings: Accuracy of self blood glucose testing
Udaya M Kabadi, Kathleen M O'Connell, Jennal Johnson, Mary Kabadi
Diabetes Care Oct 1994, 17 (10) 1110-1114; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.17.10.1110

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

The Effect of Recurrent Practice at Home on the Acceptability of Capillary Blood Glucose Readings: Accuracy of self blood glucose testing
Udaya M Kabadi, Kathleen M O'Connell, Jennal Johnson, Mary Kabadi
Diabetes Care Oct 1994, 17 (10) 1110-1114; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.17.10.1110
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Genetics of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Type 2 Diabetes
  • Modified Therapy for Gestational Diabetes Using High-Risk and Low-Risk Fetal Abdominal Circumference Growth to Select Strict Versus Relaxed Maternal Glycemic Targets
  • Increasing Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Show more Original Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.