Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Letters: Comments and Responses

Meta-Analysis of Low-Glycemic Index Diets in the Management of Diabetes

Response to Brand-Miller et al. and Mann

  1. Marion J. Franz, MS, RD, CDE
  1. From Nutrition Concepts by Franz, Minneapolis, Minnesota
  1. Address correspondence to Marion J. Franz, MS, RD, CDE, Nutrition Concepts by Franz, Inc., 6635 Limerick Dr., Minneapolis, MN 55439. E-mail: marionfranz{at}aol.com
Diabetes Care 2003 Dec; 26(12): 3364-3365. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.12.3364-a
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Response to Brand-Miller et al. and Mann

Mann (1) and Brand-Miller et al. (2) state in this issue of Diabetes Care that study subjects have been on previous nutrition therapies before the implementation of low–versus high–glycemic index diets. Although this may be the case, in reviewing the studies included in the meta-analysis, only two studies state this clearly. The first is the study by Fontvieille et al. (3), in which the low–compared with high–glycemic index diet did not improve HbA1c levels over 5 weeks but did result in a decrease in fructosamine (P < 0.05). The second is the study by Heilbronn et al. (4), wherein subjects participated in 12 weeks of energy restriction. After 4 weeks on a weight loss diet similar in composition to the average Australian diet, the subjects were randomized to a low–versus high–glycemic index diet for 8 weeks. At week 12 there was no statistically significant difference in improving glycemic control or weight loss between the low–and high–glycemic index groups. However, if subjects in the reported trials had been on previous food/meal planning approaches, it supports the position of the American Diabetes Association, which holds that there is not evidence “to recommend use of low–glycemic index diets as a primary strategy in food/meal planning,” (5) but as is suggested in the editorial, “glycemic responses of foods can best be used for fine-tuning glycemic control” (6).

There are three questions that need answering in order to assist clinicians in deciding on an intervention approach. First, have two different approaches been compared and which approach has the better outcome? This is the question that Brand-Miller et al. addressed in their meta-analysis (7). They determined that low–glycemic index diets compared with high–glycemic index diets resulted in a small but significant improvement in glycemia (7.4% reduction in glycated proteins). Although Brand-Miller et al. (2) state in their letter that the change in HbA1c is >0.6%, they also state in their conclusion that “after an average duration of 10 weeks, subjects who were following low–glycemic index diets had HbA1c levels ∼0.4% lower than those ingesting a high–glycemic index diet.” But regardless if it is 0.4 or 0.6%, it is still less than other nutrition intervention outcomes cited in the editorial, which report decreases in HbA1c of ∼1–2% and, therefore, are better choices for primary nutrition therapy interventions (8,9).

The second question is of equal importance. What is the expected outcome from the intervention? Table 1 lists the studies included in the meta-analysis with a duration of 6 weeks or longer, their baseline HbA1c values, and the study-end HbA1c value. The low–glycemic index intervention resulted in decreases from baseline to study end in HbA1c ranging from 0.0 to 0.7%, with an average per subject decrease of 0.35%. Readers can decide the clinical significance of this change for themselves.

The final question is also of importance to clinicians. Can people with diabetes implement the intervention outside of a research center? Although not addressed in these studies, one clue does emerge from the reported research. In the longest study (10), which was 1 year, at the end of the year both groups reported diets with similar glycemic index values, suggesting that it may be difficult in the real world to change the overall glycemic index of an individual’s food intake over the long term.

The bottom line is that dietitians and other health care providers will make the decision on which food/meal-planning approach their patients with diabetes will understand, be able to implement, and benefit from. Some individuals will benefit from simple guidelines as to what to eat and when, others will benefit from carbohydrate counting or exchange lists, moderate weight loss, and yes, some may even benefit from the use of low–glycemic index foods. However, the research suggests that the use of low–glycemic index diets is not as effective as other nutrition interventions. And ultimately, people with diabetes will decide what foods they eat and, by using their glucose monitoring results, determine if their choices have led to their target goals.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Changes in HbA1c from baseline to study end from low- and high-glycemic index diets

Footnotes

  • DIABETES CARE

References

  1. ↵
    Mann J: Meta-analysis of low-glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes (Letter). Diabetes Care 26:3364, 2003
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Brand-Miller JC, Petocz P, Colagiuri S: Meta-analysis of low–glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes (Letter). Diabetes Care 26:3363, 2003
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Fontvieille AM, Rizkalla SW, Penfornis A, Acosta M, Bornet FRJ, Slama G: The use of low glycaemic index foods improves metabolic control of diabetic patients over five weeks. Diabet Med 9:444–450, 1992
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Heilbronn LK, Noakes M, Clifton PM: The effect of high- and low-glycemic index energy restricted diets on plasma lipid and glucose profiles in type 2 diabetic subjects with varying glycemic control. J Am Coll Nutr 21:120–127, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    American Diabetes Association: Evidence-based nutrition principles and recommendations for the treatment and prevention of diabetes and related complications (Position Statement). Diabetes Care 26 (Suppl. 1):S51–S61, 2003
  6. ↵
    Franz MJ: The glycemic index: not the most effective nutrition therapy intervention (Editorial). Diabetes Care 26:2466–2468, 2003
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Brand-Miller J, Hayne S, Petocz P, Colagiuri S: Low–glycemic index diets in the management of diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 26:2261–2267, 2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Pastors JG, Warshaw H, Daly A, Franz M, Kulkarni K: The evidence for the effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy in diabetes management. Diabetes Care 25:bp608–613, 2002
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Pastors JG, Franz MJ, Warshaw H, Daly A, Arnold L: How effective is medical nutrition therapy in diabetes care? J Am Diet Assoc 103:827–831, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Gilbertson HR, Brand-Miller JC, Thorburn AW, Evans E, Chondros P, Werther GA: The effect of flexible low glycemic index dietary advice versus measured carbohydrate exchange diets on glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 24:1137–1143, 2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Giacco R, Parillo M, Rivellese AA, Lasorella G, Giacco A, D’Episcopo L, Riccardi G: Long-term dietary treatment with increased amounts of fiber-rich low–glycemic index natural foods improves blood glucose control and reduces the number of hypoglycemic events in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 23:1461–1466, 2000
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. ↵
    Brand J, Colagiuri S, Crossman S, Allen A, Roberts D, Truswell A: Low–glycemic index foods improve long-term glycemic control in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 14:95–102, 1991
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. Collier G, Giudici S, Salmusky J, Wolever T, Helman G, Wesson V: Low glycaemic index starchy food improve glucose control and lower serum cholesterol in diabetic children. Diab Nutr Metab 1:11–18, 1988
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 26 (12)

In this Issue

December 2003, 26(12)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Meta-Analysis of Low-Glycemic Index Diets in the Management of Diabetes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Meta-Analysis of Low-Glycemic Index Diets in the Management of Diabetes
Marion J. Franz
Diabetes Care Dec 2003, 26 (12) 3364-3365; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.12.3364-a

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Meta-Analysis of Low-Glycemic Index Diets in the Management of Diabetes
Marion J. Franz
Diabetes Care Dec 2003, 26 (12) 3364-3365; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.12.3364-a
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary Aldosteronism in Diabetic Subjects With Resistant Hypertension
  • Primary Aldosteronism in Diabetic Subjects With Resistant Hypertension
  • Increased Adiposity at Diagnosis in Younger Children With Type 1 Diabetes Does Not Persist
Show more Letters: Comments and Responses

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.