Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Emerging Treatments and Technologies

Long-Term Beneficial Effect of Islet Transplantation on Diabetic Macro-/Microangiopathy in Type 1 Diabetic Kidney-Transplanted Patients

  1. Paolo Fiorina, MD1,
  2. Franco Folli, MD1,
  3. Federico Bertuzzi, MD1,
  4. Paola Maffi, MD1,
  5. Giovanna Finzi, MB2,
  6. Massimo Venturini, MD3,
  7. Carlo Socci, MD4,
  8. Alberto Davalli, MD1,
  9. Elena Orsenigo, MD4,
  10. Lucilla Monti, MD1,
  11. Luca Falqui, MD1,
  12. Silvia Uccella, MD2,
  13. Stefano La Rosa, MD2,
  14. Luciana Usellini, MB2,
  15. Giuliana Properzi, MD5,
  16. Valerio Di Carlo, MD46,
  17. Alessandro Del Maschio, MD36,
  18. Carlo Capella, MD2 and
  19. Antonio Secchi, MD16
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine I, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  2. 2Department of Pathology, Insubria University, Varese, Italy
  3. 3Department of Radiology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  4. 4Department of General Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
  5. 5Department of Medicine, L’Aquila University, L’Aquila, Italy
  6. 6Vita e Salute-San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
    Diabetes Care 2003 Apr; 26(4): 1129-1136. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.4.1129
    PreviousNext
    • Article
    • Figures & Tables
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Loading

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE—Our aim was to evaluate the long-term effects of transplanted islets on diabetic macro-/microangiopathy in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients.

    RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—A total of 34 type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients underwent islet transplantation and were divided into two groups: successful islet-kidney transplantation (SI-K; 21 patients, fasting C-peptide serum concentration >0.5 ng/ml for >1 year) and unsuccessful islet-kidney transplantation (UI-K; 13 patients, fasting C-peptide serum concentration <0.5 ng/ml). Patients cumulative survival, cardiovascular death rate, and atherosclerosis progression were compared in the two groups. Skin biopsies, endothelial dependent dilation (EDD), nitric oxide (NO) levels, and atherothrombotic risk factors [von Willebrand factor (vWF) and d-dimer fragment (DDF)] were studied cross-sectionally.

    RESULTS—The SI-K group showed a significant better patient survival rate (SI-K 100, 100, and 90% vs. UI-K 84, 74, and 51% at 1, 4, and 7 years, respectively, P = 0.04), lower cardiovascular death rate (SI-K 1/21 vs. UI-K 4/13, χ2 = 3.9, P = 0.04), and lower intima-media thickness progression than the UI-K group (SI-K group: Δ1–3 years −13 ± 30 μm vs. UI-K group: Δ1–3 years 245 ± 20 μm, P = 0.03) with decreased signs of endothelial injuring at skin biopsy. Furthermore, the SI-K group showed a higher EDD than the UI-K group (EDD: SI-K 7.8 ± 4.5% vs. UI-K 0.5 ± 2.7%, P = 0.02), higher basal NO (SI-K 42.9 ± 6.5 vs. UI-K 20.2 ± 6.8 μmol/l, P = 0.02), and lower levels of vWF (SI-K 138.6 ± 15.3 vs. UI-K 180.6 ± 7.0%, P = 0.02) and DDF (SI-K 0.61 ± 0.22 vs. UI-K 3.07 ± 0.68 μg/ml, P < 0.01). C-peptide-to-creatinine ratio correlated positively with EDD and NO and negatively with vWF and DDF.

    CONCLUSIONS—Successful islet transplantation improves survival, cardiovascular, and endothelial function in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients.

    • DBP, diastolic blood pressure
    • DDF, d-dimer fragment
    • ecNOs, endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase
    • EDD, endothelial dependent dilation
    • IMT, intima-media thickness
    • SBP, systolic blood pressure
    • SI-K, successful islet-kidney transplantation
    • UI-K, unsuccessful islet-kidney transplantation
    • vWF, von Willebrand factor

    Islet transplantation, particularly after kidney transplantation, is an alternative to pancreas transplantation to restore endogenous insulin secretion (1–7). Islet transplantation is a safe procedure leading to an improvement of glycometabolic control and of protein and lipid metabolism (1,3,6–8). The benefits of the improvement of glycometabolic control alone on macroangiopathy are unknown (9,10).

    Patients with type 1 diabetes are at high risk for several cardiovascular disorders, such as coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral arterial disease, cardiomyopathy, and congestive heart failure (11). These risks are particularly high in patients with uremia and type 1 diabetes, even after kidney transplantation (12). A worsening of carotid lesion has been observed in patients undergoing kidney-alone transplantation (13). High levels of von Willebrand factors (vWF) and d-dimer fragments (DDFs), and impaired endothelial-dependent dilation (EDD) are commonly involved in development of atherosclerosis (14). In particular, endothelium modulates platelet adhesion, macrophage migration, lipid transport, and mitogenesis (14). Impairment of dilationability is an important predictor of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events (13,14). Both diabetes and uremia are conditions with increased proneness toward impaired EDD and hemostasis abnormalities that could accelerate atherosclerosis (13,15–18).

    Pancreas transplantation could slow the progression of atherosclerosis and could improve endothelial function in uremic type 1 diabetic patients (13).

    Recent studies have shown that exogenous C-peptide can improve neural and vascular function in diabetic rats and can restore nitric oxide (NO) synthase expression, which is impaired in diabetic patients (19–23). Islet transplantation is an appealing alternative to pancreas transplantation, given that with classic immunosuppression a persistent C-peptide secretion could be obtained for a long period of time. Our aim was to evaluate whether islet transplantation could affect survival, cardiovascular death rate, and endothelial function in kidney-transplanted type 1 diabetic patients.

    RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

    Patients

    A total of 34 type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients underwent islet transplantation and were followed for an average of 53.4 ± 7.09 months until 1 January 2001 or until they were lost to follow-up due to exitus or other causes. The general characteristics of the patients before transplantation are summarized in Table 1. All the patients were C-peptide negative (<0.5 ng/ml) before transplantation (Table 1). C-peptide levels reported at each time of follow-up were assessed during hospitalization. Exclusion criteria for transplantation were as follows: 1) previous strokes, 2) major amputations, 3) severe dilated cardiomyopathy, and 4) coronary artery disease. Before transplantation none of the patients had a pathological ejection fraction or heart failure. Furthermore, all of the patients who entered the islet transplantation program at our institute were carefully evaluated for known cardiovascular risk factors. No differences were evident with regards to electrocardiogram, perfusional myocardial scintigraphy, echocardiography, and carotid and lower limb arterial status, as evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography.

    Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of C-peptide secretion: the successful islet-kidney-transplanted (SI-K) group (fasting C-peptide serum concentration >0.5 ng/ml for >1 year, 21 patients, mean follow-up 46 ± 9 months) and the unsuccessful islet-kidney-transplanted group (UI-K) (fasting C-peptide serum concentration <0.5 ng/ml, 13 patients, mean follow-up 63 ± 13 months).

    All of the patients were evaluated for cumulative survival, cardiovascular death rate, C-peptide secretion, insulin requirement, and metabolic control. Subgroups of patients underwent the following investigations aimed at studying the vascular function: 1) 24 patients (16 SI-K, 8 UI-K) were studied for EDD, NO levels, atherothrombotic risk factors such as vWF and DDF levels cross-sectionally; 2) 19 patients (13 SI-K, 6 UI-K) were studied for intima-media thickness (IMT) progression; and 3) 12 patients (6 SI-K, 6 UI-K) underwent skin biopsy for pathological examination, cross-sectionally. Patients were pooled together to perform correlations between C-peptide-to-creatinine ratio/HbA1c and parameters under investigations. An informed consent was obtained for every study.

    Islet isolation and transplantation

    Patients underwent kidney transplantation according to ABO match. Eight patients received simultaneous Langherans islet transplantation, while the others received islet transplantation after kidney transplantation. Islets were isolated from pancreas obtained from multiorgan donors, according to a modification of the automated method and purified by centrifugation on a discontinuous gradient previously described (4,24). Islets were then cultured in a humidified atmosphere (5% CO2) in M199 medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate, and 2 mmol/l glutamine (Seromed Biochrom, Berlin, Germany). Preparations were considered adequate for transplantation according to the following criteria: 1) sterility (aerobic, anaerobic, fungal, and mycoplasm assessment); 2) number of equivalent islets >6,000/kg body wt; 3) purity >20% (morphometric determination of islet/total mass); and 4) islet viability. Transplantation was performed between 12 and 48 h after isolation. Percutaneous transhepatic injection (under local anesthesia) was performed according to the protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board. All patients were already under immunosuppression therapy with steroids and cyclosporine for a previous kidney transplant. After induction with ATG (125 mg/day for 10 days) (Thymoglobulin; Merieux, Lyon, France) immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine (7.5 mg · kg−1 · day−1); mycophenolate mofetil (2 g/day); and metilprednisone (10 mg/day). Steroids were withdrawn within 3–6 months after islet transplantation.

    Patient survival and cardiovascular events

    Patients actuarial survivals were calculated. Cardiovascular death rate was assessed according to ICD-9.

    IMT

    Patients underwent ultrasonographic analysis of IMT of the carotid artery (11) 3.1 ± 0.5 years after islet transplantation. The examinations were repeated 3 years later and the variation of the IMT was calculated. Ultrasonographic analysis of the carotid artery was done with a high-resolution ultrasound scanner (Acuson 128 Xp/10) equipped with a linear array 3.5- to 5-MHz transducer. Optimal axial resolution is ∼0.20 mm. The analysis limited to the “far wall” of a restricted area of common carotid artery was at least 1 cm below the bifurcation; the start of the carotid bifurcation was evaluated as the point of loss of parallel configuration of the far and near wall. IMT was defined as the distance from the leading edge of the lumen-intima interface and the leading edge of the media-adventitia interface of the far wall. The mean of the right and the left longitudinal common carotid artery IMT measurements was used in the analysis. Intraobserver variability varied between a mean ± SD difference of 0.02 ± 0.02 mm in selected and trained group (13), which is quite similar to our reproducibility.

    Skin biopsy

    Patients underwent skin-punch biopsy on the internal surface of the arm 4.5 ± 1.2 years after transplantation (25). Microvessel lesions were evaluated on routinely stained paraffin-embedded sections. Two different rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed against the vWF (Dako, Copenhagen, Denmark and Biomeda, Hayward, CA), and a polyclonal antibody directed against endothelial constitutive NO synthase (ecNOs) (Santa Cruz Biothecnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were used. The immunoreactivity was independently scored by two different pathologists (S.L. and S.U.) on at least 10 capillaries. Anti-vWF and anti-vimentin antibodies (Dako) were used for immunoelectron microscopy experiments (26). A score of endothelial cell injury was calculated at ultra-structural examination, each feature (rough endoplasmic reticulum, cisternae dilation, microvilli ramification, vimentin-like filament, chromatine condensation, and irregular nuclear contour) was evaluated based on a scale from 0 (normal) to 3 (highly pathological).

    Endothelial function, NO production, and atherothrombotic risk factors

    Patients underwent EDD, NO, and atherothrombotic risk factor assessment 4.2 ± 0.9 years after transplantation. EDD, circulating levels of vWF, DDF, and NO levels were determined as previously described (13,27,28). Patients were then pooled together and the parameters of endothelial function were correlated with C-peptide and HbA1c. EDD was assessed by evaluation of flow increase after hyperemia. Endothelial-independent dilation was studied by vasodilation mediated by nitrates. Anteroposterior diameter was evaluated as parameters of endothelial function. Diameter of the artery was preferentially evaluated in B-mode. An occluding forearm cuff placed 5 cm below the antecubital fossa was inflated to 50 mmHg above systolic pressure for 5 min and then released to induce reactive local hyperemia. Recordings were made 5, 60, and 120 s after onset of reactive hyperemia and 3 min after sublingual administration of nitroglycerine spray (400 mg). In each case, the arm without shunt was used for the test. Our reproducibility for EDD performed in control groups ranged from 2.5 to 3.0% (13).

    Laboratory assessment

    Fasting levels of cyclosporine, creatinine, HbA1c, serum C-peptide, total cholesterol, and triglycerides were assayed yearly (13). Due to a potential confounding effect of C-peptide renal clearance, C-peptide is reported as C-peptide-to-creatinine ratio. vWF was determined by an immunoelectrophoresis method based on the use of polyclonal goat IgG anti-human vWF (American Diagnostic, Greenwich, CT) (13). Serum C-peptide levels (intra-assay CV 3.0%; interassay CV 3.0%) were assayed by radioimmunoassy using commercial kits (Medical System, Genova, Italy). NO levels were assayed by measurement of the end products of their metabolism [i.e., nitrite and nitrate levels (NO2-/NO3-)], using enzymatic catalysis coupled with Griess reaction. Specifically, NO3- was reduced to NO2- by 0.1 unit nitrate reductase, 5 × 10−6 mol/l flavinadenine dinucleotide, and 250 × 10−6 mol/l nicotinamide adenine dinucleotidephosphate (reduced form). Samples were incubated at 37°C for 3 h, 8.8 units lactate dehydrogenase and 10−2 mol/l pyruvate were added to each well, and the sample was incubated for 90 min at 37°C. Finally, Griess reactives were added to each well, and the sample was read at 540 nm. The other parameters were assessed with common laboratory kit assay.

    Statistical analyses

    All the data were expressed as mean ± SEM. The cumulative survival was evaluated with a Wilcoxon test. A multivariate analysis (Cox analysis) was used to determine the effect of sex on survival. Differences between parameters were evaluated using Student’s t test when parameters were normally distributed, Mann-Whitney U test when parameters were not normally distributed, and a χ2 test for categorical variables. Correlations were assessed with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

    RESULTS

    General characteristics

    Before transplantation, the two groups were similar for the most important characteristics (Table 1). No differences for creatinine levels, fasting serum insulin, lipid profile, arterial blood pressure, cyclosporine levels, kidney rejection rate, and smoking habits (data not shown) were observed during the follow-up. A statistical difference was evident for systolic blood pressure (SBP) at baseline (SI-K 135.6 ± 8.8 vs. UI-K 148.2 ± 6.2 mmHg, P = 0.04). However, this difference was no longer observed at 2 (SI-K 140.2 ± 5.4 vs. UI-K 149.0 ± 6.3 mmHg, NS) and 4 years (SI-K 143.3 ± 8.8 vs. UI-K 150.0 ± 6.2 mmHg, NS). Sex distribution appeared significantly different in the two groups (Table 1). As shown, the UI-K group has a longer follow-up than the SI-K group, although not statistically significant. The accrual rate in the two groups during the whole follow-up was similar except in 1991 (SI-K 0 vs. UI-K 3, P = 0.048) and in 2000 (SI-K 7 vs. UI-K 0, P = 0.02). At the moment of cross-sectional studies, no differences were evident for creatinine (SI-K 1.3 ± 0.1 vs. UI-K 1.5 ± 0.2 mg/dl), SBP (SI-K 143.3 ± 8.8 vs. UI-K 148.8 ± 5.6 mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (SI-K 83.3 ± 3.6 vs. UI-K 84.4 ± 2.4 mmHg), and lipid profile (data not shown). Immunosuppression and medical treatment during the follow-up were similar in the two groups.

    Patient survival and cardiovascular death rate

    The SI-K group showed a statistically significant (P = 0.04) higher patient survival than the UI-K group at 10 years (Fig. 1A). A statistical difference was evident in sex distribution between the SI-K and the UI-K group (Table 1). However, analyzing our data in a multivariate analysis (Cox analysis), inserting sex as a cofactor, does not appear to have a significant impact on survival (P = 0.89, relative risk 1.12 [95% CI 0.21–5.8]). Cardiovascular death rate (according to ICD-9) was higher in the UI-K group than in the SI-K group (SI-K 1/21 vs. UI-K 4/13, χ2 = 3.9, P = 0.04).

    Glycometabolic control

    C-peptide secretion was higher in the SI-K group than in the UI-K group (Fig. 1B), insulin requirement was lower in the SI-K group than in the UI-K group (Fig 1C), and no statistical difference in HbA1c levels was observed in the two groups (Fig. 1D).

    IMT

    A stabilization of IMT was observed in the SI-K group (Δ1–3 years −13 ± 30 μm), while IMT increased in the UI-K group (Δ1–3 years 245 ± 20 μm) (P = 0.03).

    Skin biopsy

    Histopatology and immunohistochemistry.

    Morphologic evaluation of routinely stained sections from skin biopsy specimens did not show any specific skin disease apart from lesions of diabetic microangiopathy. In particular, periodic acid Schiff stains demonstrated an increase of basal membrane thickness of dermal capillaries in both SI-K and UI-K groups, with no significant differences between them. vWF and ecNOs immunohistochemical expression in endothelial cells was higher in the SI-K than in the UI-K group (Fig. 2).

    Electron microscopy.

    The basal membrane thickness was slightly lower in the SI-K group than in the UI-K group (SI-K 1,488 ± 276 vs. UI-K 1,628 ± 790 nm, NS). The endothelial cells of cutaneous capillaries of the SI-K group showed lower cell injury compared with capillaries of the UI-K group. The endothelial cells of the UI-K group showed microvillar blebbing, dilated endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. 3A and B), condensation of vimentin filaments (Fig. 3C and D), and irregular nuclear contour with chromatin condensation more prominent than those of the SI-K group (Fig. 3E and F). A global score of microvascular/endothelium injury was significantly better in the SI-K group than in the UI-K group (Table 2).

    Endothelial function, NO production, and atherothrombotic risk factors

    The SI-K group showed a higher EDD than the UI-K group (EDD [SI-K] 7.8 ± 4.5% vs. [UI-K] 0.5 ± 2.7%, P = 0.02), higher basal NO level (SI-K 42.9 ± 6.5 vs. UI-K 20.2 ± 6.8 μmol/l, P = 0.02), and lower levels of vWF (SI-K 138.6 ± 15.3 vs. UI-K 180.6 ± 7.0%, P = 0.02) and DDF (SI-K 0.61 ± 0.22 vs. UI-K 3.07 ± 0.68 μg/ml, P < 0.01). EDD and NO serum levels positively correlated with C-peptide-to-creatinine ratio (r = 0.43, P = 0.04 and r = 0.50, P = 0.01, respectively) while vWF and DDF serum levels negatively correlated with C-peptide-to-creatinine ratio (r = −0.51, P = 0.01 and r = 0.74, P < 0.01, respectively). None of these parameters correlated with HbA1c.

    The SI-K group was subdivided according to higher or lower levels of C-peptide (divided on the basis of 50 percentiles) (higher 1.30 ± 0.16 vs. lower 3.27 ± 0.62 ng/ml, P < 0.01). Patients with higher levels of C-peptide showed normal EDD (higher 12.8 ± 4.0 vs. lower 4.1 ± 4.3%, NS), higher NO levels (higher 42.5 ± 7.3 vs. lower 29.4 ± 7.9 μmol/l, NS), and reduced vWF (higher 111.6 ± 16.8 vs. lower 164.8 ± 22.9%, NS) and DDF (higher 0.46 ± 0.13 vs. lower 1.15 ± 0.80 μg/ml, NS) levels, when compared with patients with lower C-peptide levels.

    CONCLUSIONS

    Survival in uremic type 1 diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis is extremely poor (12,29). Kidney-pancreas transplantation doubles life expectancy in these patients (12,29). In this report we describe, for the first time, the long-term beneficial effects of islet transplantation on survival and micro- and macrovascular complications in 34 type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients at a single institution.

    Survival in patients with functioning islets is similar to kidney-pancreas-transplanted patients, and is better than in patients with nonfunctioning transplanted islets (12,29). Because of sex mismatch, the results of our analysis on patients’ survival in the UI-K and SI-K groups have been reanalyzed in a multivariate analysis. Sex does not appear to be a confounding factor for survival.

    IMT is an important index for eventual cardiovascular disease. For each 100 μm of IMT, the risk of acute myocardial infarction increased by 11% (13). The worsening of IMT in the UI-K group is higher than the value observed in the general population (30 μm/3 years), but is similar to the population with ischemic heart disease (90–200 μm/3 years) (30). Islet function could play a role in preventing atherosclerosis and impairment of microvascular reactivity characteristics of diabetes and related conditions (31). Although no pretransplant analysis has been performed for the variable that we have studied in these patients, it is unlikely that the data observed could be attributed to differences at baseline. The two groups were studied in detail and were similar for major known cardiovascular risk factors and status.

    Endothelial function positively correlates with C-peptide-to-creatinine ratio but does not correlate with HbA1c levels. Endothelial function reflects the ability of the endothelium to produce NO, which is impaired in uremia and in long-term hyperglycemia (22,32–34). As reported in the rat model, restoration of C-peptide secretion may protect endothelial function via ecNOs activation (19). vWF and DDF are well-established markers of endothelial dysfunction and incipient atherosclerosis (13). The higher levels of these two soluble markers in the patients with lower C-peptide levels suggest proneness toward accelerated atherosclerosis.

    Histology and immunohistochemistry of skin biopsies did not show major morphological differences, although a reduced expression of vWF and ecNOs was evident in the vessels of the UI-K group. The alterations most frequently reported in electron microscopy include thickening of the capillary basement membrane (35), cell swelling, dilated endoplasmic reticulum in endothelial cells, and separations of interendothelial junctions (35,36). Basal membranes were thicker in the UI-K group than the SI-K group, perhaps because of the continuous process of endothelial cell death and regeneration (35,37,38). Furthermore, accumulation of bundles of vimentin filaments could be considered a sign of degeneration or a consequence of hemodynamic modifications (39). Our frequent observation of nuclear irregular shapes, most frequent in the UI-K group, can be explained either as an aspect of endothelial damage (40) or as a consequence of rearrangement in the vimentin filaments. In fact, in many cells, intermediate filaments are closely associated with the nucleus, suggesting a function in nuclear anchoring or signaling (41). The presence of nuclear chromatine condensation indicating apoptosis in endothelial cells in the UI-K group is consistent with previous studies showing a role of hyperglycemia in the induction of apoptosis in islet and endothelial cells (26,41).

    The beneficial effects of functioning islets could be the consequence of an improved metabolic control and of the restoration of islet endocrine function in the SI-K group. Interestingly, during the follow-up, the SI-K reached values of HbA1c similar to those found by Diabetes Control and Complications Trial to prevent diabetic microvascular complications (9). The subanalysis in the SI-K group suggests that there are some beneficial effects of restoring islet endocrine function, after splitting the patients into two groups according to higher or lower C-peptide levels. However, at this time it is difficult to distinguish between effects mediated by 1) improvement of glycometabolic control, 2) restoration of islet endocrine function, and 3) some undetectable differences that might have been present between the two groups, making the SI-K group healthier than the UI-K group.

    Pancreas transplantation and, to a lesser extent, islet transplantation reduce insulin resistance in type 1 diabetic patients (42,43), which is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (44). Islet graft restoration of endogenous C-peptide secretion may also play a beneficial effect through the modulation of ecNOs. It is also possible that C-peptide replacement may prevent the development or retard the progression of chronic complications in type 1 diabetes by a variety of mechanisms, including augmented blood flow in skeletal muscle and skin, diminished glomerular hyperfiltration, and improved nerve function (45).

    In conclusion, this study shows that successful islet transplantation improves the overall survival, cardiovascular outcomes, and endothelial function in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients. We hypothesize that islet transplantation could exert its beneficial effects, by not only improving blood glucose control, but also by partial restoration of endocrine islet function.

    Figure 1—
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1—

    Patients cumulative survival (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.04) (A), and mean HbA1c (B), C-peptide levels (C), and exogenous insulin requirement (D) in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients with successful islet transplantation (SI-K) or failed islet transplantation (UI-K). (*P < 0.01, °P < 0.05).

    Figure 2—
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2—

    Immunohistochemical analysis of skin biopsies performed in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients with successful islet transplantation (SI-K, no. 34) or failed islet transplantation (UI-K, no. 3) (original magnification 200×). A: Periodic acid Schiff in an SI-K patient. B: Periodic acid Schiff in a UI-K patient. C: vWF vascular expression in an SI-K patient. D: vWF vascular expression in a UI-K patient. E: ecNOs vascular expression in an SI-K patient. F: ecNOs vascular expression in a UI-K patient.

    Figure 3—
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3—

    Electron microscopy analysis in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients with successful islet transplantation (SI-K) or failed islet transplantation (UI-K). A: Microvilli ramification and cisternae dilation in a SI-K patient (no. 13) (final magnification 13,000×). B: Microvilli ramification and cisternae dilation in a UI-K patient, (no. 21) (final magnification 13,000×). C: Vimentin-like filament in an SI-K patient (no. 13) (final magnification 13,000×); inset: anti-vimentin immunogold labeling (final magnification 22,000×). D: Vimentin-like filament in a UI-K patient (no. 21) (final magnification 13,000×); inset: anti-vimentin immunogold labeling (final magnification 22,000×). E: Nuclear aspect and chromatine pattern in an SI-K patient (no. 24) (final magnification 6,300×). F: Nuclear aspect and chromatine pattern in a UI-K patient (no. 21) (final magnification 6,300×).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    Table 1—

    Pretransplant characteristics in type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients with successful islet transplantation (SI-K) or unsuccessful islet transplantation (UI-K)

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    Table 2—

    Scoring of electron microscopy characteristics (indicating endothelial cell sufference), obtained from skin biopsies of type 1 diabetic kidney-transplanted patients with SI-K or UI-K

    Acknowledgments

    This work was partially supported by Ministero della Sanità (Ricerca Finalizzata 1999, RF 99.52) e Ministero della Ricerca Scientifica (Cofinanziamento 2000). F.F. is supported by Ricerca Finalizzata (RF2001).

    We are grateful to Dr. Tara Zoll for English editing, Dr. Armando D’Angelo e Patrizia Della Valle for vWF and DDF measurements, and Dr. Piermarco Piatti for suggestions.

    Footnotes

    • Address correspondence and reprint requests to Antonio Secchi, MD, Vita e Salute-San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milano, Italy. E-mail: antonio.secchi{at}hsr.it.

      Received for publication 24 October 2002 and accepted for publication 7 January 2003.

      A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    • DIABETES CARE

    References

    1. ↵
      Secchi A, Socci C, Maffi P, Taglietti MV, Falqui L, Bertuzzi F, De Nittis P, Piemonti L, Scopsi L, Di Carlo V, Pozza G: Islet transplantation in IDDM patients. Diabetologia 40:225–231, 1997
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    2. Warnock GL, Kneteman NM, Ryan EA, Rabinovitch A, Rajotte RV: Long-term follow-up after transplantation of insulin-producing pancreatic islet into patients with type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 35:89–95, 1992
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      Luzi L, Perseghin G, Brendel MD, Terruzzi I, Battezzati A, Eckhard M, Brandhorst D, Brandhorst H, Friemann S, Socci C, Di Carlo V, Piceni Sereni L, Benedini S, Secchi A, Pozza G, Bretzel RG: Metabolic effects of restoring partial β-cell function after islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes 50:277–282, 2001
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      Ricordi C, Lacy PE, Scharp DW: Automated islet isolation from human pancreas. Diabetes 38 (Suppl. 1):140–142, 1989
    5. Robertson RP: Successful islet transplantation for patients with diabetes-fact or fantasy? N Engl J Med 343:289–290, 2000
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      Shapiro AM, Lakey JR, Ryan EA, Korbutt GS, Toth E, Warnock GL, Kneteman NM, Rajotte RV: Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen. N Engl J Med 343:230–238, 2000
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    7. ↵
      Robertson RP, Lanz KJ, Sutherland DER, Kendall DM: Prevention of diabetes for up to 13 years by autoislet transplantation after pancreatectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Diabetes 50:47–50, 2001
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      Giorgino F, Logoluso F, Davalli AM, Napoli R, Laviola L, Hirshman MF, Horton ES, Weir GC, Smith RJ: Islet transplantation restores normal levels of insulin receptor and substrate tyrosine phosphorylation and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity in skeletal muscle and myocardium of streptozocin-induced diabetic rats. Diabetes 48:801–812, 1999
      OpenUrlAbstract
    9. ↵
      Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group: The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent mellitus. N Engl J Med 329:977–986, 1993
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, Hadden D, Turner RC, Holman RR: Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 321:405–412, 2000
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      American Diabetes Association; The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; The Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International; The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; The American Heart Association: Diabetes mellitus: a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (Joint Editorial Statement). Circulation 100:1132–1133, 1999
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      Tyden G, Bolinder J, Solders G, Brattstrom C, Tibell A, Groth CG: Improved survival in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and end-stage diabetic nephropathy 10 years after combined pancreas and kidney transplantation. Transplantation 5:645–648, 1999
    13. ↵
      Fiorina P, La Rocca E, Venturini M, Minicucci F, Fermo I, Paroni R, D’Angelo A, Sblendido M, Di Carlo V, Cristallo M, Del Maschio A, Pozza G, Secchi A: Effects of kidney-pancreas transplantation on atherosclerotic risk factors and endothelial function in patients with uremia and type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 50:496–501, 2001
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    14. ↵
      Ross R: Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 340:115–126, 1999
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      Morris ST, Jardine AG: The vascular endothelium in chronic renal failure. J Nephrol 13:96–105, 2000
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    16. Clarkson P, Celermajer DS, Donald AE, Sampson M, Sorensen KE, Adams M, Yue DK, Betteridge DJ, Deanfield JE: Impaired vascular reactivity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is related to disease duration and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:573–579, 1996
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    17. Vicari AM, Taglietti MV, Pellegatta F, Spotti D, Melandri M, Galli L, Ronchi P, Folli F: Deranged platelet calcium homeostasis in diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure: a possible link to increased cardiovascular mortality? Diabetes Care 19:1062–1066, 1996
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      Di Minno G, Martinez J, McKean ML, De La Rosa J, Burke JF, Murphy S: Platelet dysfunction in uremia: multifaceted defect partially corrected by dialysis. Am J Med 79:552–559, 1985
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      Ido Y, Vindigni A, Chang K, Stramm L, Chance R, Heath WF, DiMarchi RD, Di Cera E, Williamson JR: Prevention of vascular and neural dysfunction in diabetic rats by C-peptide. Science 277:563–566, 1997
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    20. Rigler R, Pramanik A, Jonasson P, Kratz G, Jansson OT, Nygren P, Stahl S, Ekberg K, Johansson B, Uhlen S, Uhlen M, Jornvall H, Wahren J: Specific binding of proinsulin C-peptide to human cell membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:13318–13323, 1999
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. Kjeldsen K, Braendgaard H, Sidenius P, JS Larsen, Norgaard A: Diabetes decreases Na+-K+ pump concentration in skeletal muscles, heart ventricular muscle, and peripheral nerves of rat. Diabetes 36:842–848, 1987
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    22. ↵
      Wever R, Boer P, Hijmering M, Stroes E, Verhaar M, Kastelein J, Versluis K, Lagerwerf F, van Rijn H, Koomans H, Rabelink T: Nitric oxide is reduced in patients with chronic renal failure. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19:1168–1172, 1999
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    23. ↵
      Raccah D, Gallice P, Pouget J, Vague P: Low Na+-K+-ATPase activity in the red cell membrane, a potential marker of the predisposition to diabetic neuropathy. Diab Met 18:236–241, 1992
      OpenUrl
    24. ↵
      Bretzel RG, Hering BJ, Federlin KF: Islet cell transplantation in diabetes mellitus: from bench to bedside. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 103 (Suppl. 2):143–159, 1995
    25. ↵
      Properzi G, Terenghi G, Gu XH, Poccia G, Pasqua R, Francavilla S, Polak JM: Early increase precedes a depletion of endothelin-1 but not of von Willebrand factor in cutaneous microvessels of diabetic patients: a quantitative immunohistochemical study. J Pathol 175:243–252, 1995
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    26. ↵
      Federici M, Hribal M, Perego L, Ranalli M, Caradonna Z, Perego C, Usellini L, Nano R, Bonini P, Bertuzzi F, Marlier LN, Davalli AM, Carandente O, Pontiroli AE, Melino G, Marchetti P, Lauro R, Sesti G, Folli F: High glucose causes apoptosis in cultured human pancreatic islets of Langerhans: a potential role for regulation of specific Bcl family genes towards an apoptotic cell death program. Diabetes 50:1290–1301, 2001
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      Silveira AM, Yamamoto T, Adamson L, Hessel B, Blombäck B: Application of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to von Willebrand factor (vWF) and its derivatives. Thromb Res 143:91–102, 1986
      OpenUrl
    28. ↵
      Piatti PM, Monti LD, Zavaroni I, Valsecchi G, Van Phan C, Costa S, Conti M, Sandoli EP, Solerte B, Pozza G, Pontiroli AE, Reaven G: Alterations in nitric oxide/cyclic-GMP pathway in nondiabetic siblings of patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2416–2420, 2000
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      La Rocca E, Fiorina P, di Carlo V, Astorri E, Rossetti C, Lucignani G, Fazio F, Giudici D, Cristallo M, Bianchi G, Pozza G, Secchi A: Cardiovascular outcomes after kidney-pancreas and kidney-alone transplantation. Kidney Int 60:1964–1971, 2001
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    30. ↵
      Lehmann ED, Riley WA, Clarkson P, Gosling RG: Non-invasive assessment of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Lancet 350 (Suppl. 1):SI14–9, 1997
    31. ↵
      Caballero AE, Arora S, Saouaf R, Lim SC, Smakowski P, Park JY, King GL, LoGerfo FW, Horton ES, Veves A: Microvascular and macrovascular reactivity is reduced in subjects at risk for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 48:1856–1862, 1999
      OpenUrlAbstract
    32. ↵
      Sorensen KE, Kristensen IB, Celermaier DS: Atherosclerosis in the human brachial artery. J Am Coll Card 29:318–322, 1997
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    33. Kanani P, Sinkey CA, Browning RL, Allaman M, Knapp HR, Haynes WG: Role of oxidant stress in endothelial dysfunction produced by experimental hyperomocysteinemia in humans. Circulation 100:1161–1168, 1999
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    34. ↵
      Enderle MD, Benda N, Schmuelling RM, Haering HU, Pfohl M: Preserved endothelial function in IDDM patients, but not in NIDDM patients, compared with healthy subjects. Diabetes Care 21:271–277, 1998
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. ↵
      Williamson JR, Kilo C: Capillary basement membranes in diabetes. Diabetes 32 Suppl. 2:96–100, 1983
    36. ↵
      Sima AA, Nathaniel V, Prashar A, Bril V, Greene DA: Endoneurial microvessels in human diabetic neuropathy: endothelial cell dysjunction and lack of treatment effect by aldose reductase inhibitor. Diabetes 40:1090–1099, 1991
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    37. ↵
      Mompeo B, Ortega F: Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of microvessels in diabetic veins. Ultrastruct Pathol 23:25–31, 1999
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    38. ↵
      Arshi K, Bendayan M, Ghitescu LD: Alterations of the rat mesentery vasculature in experimental diabetes. Lab Invest 80:1171–1184, 2000
      OpenUrlPubMed
    39. ↵
      Helmke BP, Goldman RD, Davies PF: Rapid displacement of vimentin intermediate filaments in living endothelial cells exposed to flow. Circ Res 86:745–752, 2000
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    40. ↵
      Ribau JC, Hatton MW, Richardson M: Changes in the aortic endothelium and plasma von Willebrand factor levels during the onset and progression of insulin-dependent diabetes in BB rats. Atherosclerosis 139:291–2999, 1998
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    41. ↵
      Wu QD, Wang JH, Fennessy F, Redmond HP, Bouchier-Hayes D: Taurine prevents high-glucose-induced human vascular endothelial cell apoptosis. Am J Physiol 277:C129–C138, 1999
      OpenUrl
    42. ↵
      Luzi L, Secchi A, Facchini F, Battezzati A, Staudacher C, Spotti D, Castoldi R, Ferrari G, Di Carlo V, Pozza G: Reduction of insulin resistance by combined kidney-pancreas transplantation in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia 33:549–556, 1990
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    43. ↵
      Katz H, Homan M, Velosa J, Robertson P, Rizza R: Effects of pancreas transplantation on postprandial glucose metabolism. N Engl J Med 325:1278–1283, 1991
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    44. ↵
      Haffner SM: Epidemiology of insulin resistance and its relation to coronary artery disease (Review). Am J Cardiol 84:11J–14J, 1999
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    45. ↵
      Wahren J, Ekberg K, Johansson J, Henriksson M, Pramanik A, Johansson BL, Rigler R, Jornvall H: Role of C-peptide in human physiology. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278:E759–E768, 2000
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    PreviousNext
    Back to top
    Diabetes Care: 26 (4)

    In this Issue

    April 2003, 26(4)
    • Table of Contents
    • About the Cover
    • Index by Author
    Sign up to receive current issue alerts
    View Selected Citations (0)
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Long-Term Beneficial Effect of Islet Transplantation on Diabetic Macro-/Microangiopathy in Type 1 Diabetic Kidney-Transplanted Patients
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Long-Term Beneficial Effect of Islet Transplantation on Diabetic Macro-/Microangiopathy in Type 1 Diabetic Kidney-Transplanted Patients
    Paolo Fiorina, Franco Folli, Federico Bertuzzi, Paola Maffi, Giovanna Finzi, Massimo Venturini, Carlo Socci, Alberto Davalli, Elena Orsenigo, Lucilla Monti, Luca Falqui, Silvia Uccella, Stefano La Rosa, Luciana Usellini, Giuliana Properzi, Valerio Di Carlo, Alessandro Del Maschio, Carlo Capella, Antonio Secchi
    Diabetes Care Apr 2003, 26 (4) 1129-1136; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1129

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Add to Selected Citations
    Share

    Long-Term Beneficial Effect of Islet Transplantation on Diabetic Macro-/Microangiopathy in Type 1 Diabetic Kidney-Transplanted Patients
    Paolo Fiorina, Franco Folli, Federico Bertuzzi, Paola Maffi, Giovanna Finzi, Massimo Venturini, Carlo Socci, Alberto Davalli, Elena Orsenigo, Lucilla Monti, Luca Falqui, Silvia Uccella, Stefano La Rosa, Luciana Usellini, Giuliana Properzi, Valerio Di Carlo, Alessandro Del Maschio, Carlo Capella, Antonio Secchi
    Diabetes Care Apr 2003, 26 (4) 1129-1136; DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1129
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Abstract
      • RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
      • RESULTS
      • CONCLUSIONS
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Tables
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • Autologous Umbilical Cord Blood Transfusion in Young Children With Type 1 Diabetes Fails to Preserve C-Peptide
    • Effects of MK-0941, a Novel Glucokinase Activator, on Glycemic Control in Insulin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
    • Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program
    Show more Emerging Treatments and Technologies

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Current Issue
    • Standards of Care Guidelines
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Submit
    • Subscribe
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds

    More Information

    • About the Journal
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Advertising
    • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
    • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
    • Contact Us

    Other ADA Resources

    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
    • Professional Books
    • Diabetes Forecast

     

    • DiabetesJournals.org
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • ADA's DiabetesPro
    • ADA Member Directory
    • Diabetes.org

    © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.