Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

Glycemic Index, Dietary Fiber, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in a Cohort of Older Australians

  1. Alan W. Barclay, BSC1,
  2. Victoria M. Flood, PHD23,
  3. Elena Rochtchina, MAPPSTAT2,
  4. Paul Mitchell, MD, PHD2 and
  5. Jennie C. Brand-Miller, PHD1
  1. 1Human Nutrition Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  3. 3NSW Centre for Public Health Nutrition, Human Nutrition Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Paul Mitchell, University of Sydney, Ophthalmology, Eye Clinic, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia 2145. E-mail: paul_mitchell{at}wmi.usyd.edu.au
Diabetes Care 2007 Nov; 30(11): 2811-2813. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-0784
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • FFQ, food frequency questionnaire
  • GI, glycemic index

The role of glycemic index (GI) in the prevention of diabetes remains controversial. Some, but not all, prospective cohort studies have yielded positive relationships (1–8). A significant limitation of studies to date has been the fact that the food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) used were not validated for their ability to accurately assess GI. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship of GI and fiber with incidence of type 2 diabetes in older Australians whose dietary intake was estimated by a fully validated FFQ.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—

In 1991, 4,433 residents aged 49+ years were identified, of which 3,654 (82%) participated in detailed examinations during 1992–1994 (9,10). Of these, 2,335 (75% of survivors) returned for 5-year and 1,952 (76%) for 10-year examinations (2002–2004). Individuals were largely of Caucasian origin and broadly representative of the older Australian population (11).

Diagnostic criteria were either self-reported diabetes and current use of diabetes medications or fasting glucose concentration ≥126 mg/dl (12). Diabetes incidence was defined in participants without diabetes at baseline who were diagnosed with diabetes before or at the 5- or 10-year follow-up. In total, 2,564 individuals were followed from baseline. After excluding 163 participants with existing diabetes and 52 with missing data, 2,349 were considered at risk of incident diabetes. An additional 226 participants did not have fasting blood tests at either the 5- or 10-year follow-up due to failure to fast or refusal on the day, leaving 2,123 with data for the assessment of 10-year incident diabetes.

Participants were sent a questionnaire that included items on diet and physical activity. The 145-item semiquantitative FFQ was modified from an earlier FFQ (13). FFQs with over 12 items missing or with implausible values (<500 calories/day or >4,000 calories/day) were excluded (14). Data were entered into a database (15) using Australian food composition tables (16) and published GI values (glucose = 100) (17). The average GI for each participant was calculated by summing the weighted GI of individual foods, with weighting proportional to the contribution to total carbohydrate intake. A validation study determined a correlation coefficient of 0.82 and correct classification of 85% of people within one quintile for dietary fiber and a coefficient of 0.57 and correct classification of 74% within one quintile for GI (18). Physical activity (as metabolic equivalents) was based on self-reported time spent walking and performing moderate and/or vigorous activities, using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (19).

Using SAS, version 9.1 (20), multivariate-adjusted discrete logistic models were constructed to assess factors associated with diabetes using three time points at which presence/absence of the outcome event was recorded (21). When incident cases were identified, lifestyle data from the preceding survey were used. Participants with incomplete data were excluded. Variables tested for association with diabetes included age, sex, family history, smoking, blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, BMI, METs, GI, and total dietary fiber and its fractions. GI and fiber (and its fractions) were measured as continuous variables in 10-unit and 5-g increments, respectively. Further analyses were conducted by age stratification (<70 and ≥70 years). P < 0.05 was used for statistical significance. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs are shown.

RESULTS—

During 10 years of follow-up, 138 incident cases of type 2 diabetes were identified among 1,833 participants. The incidence in this sample was 0.9% per year, compared with 0.8% per year among individuals aged 25+ years in the broader Australian population (22). Total carbohydrate, starch, sugar, and total fiber intake were not associated with diabetes risk in the age- and sex-adjusted model or the multivariate-adjusted model (Table 1).

Vegetable fiber had a significant inverse association with risk of type 2 diabetes in the age- and sex-adjusted and multivariate-adjusted models. After stratifying by age, a significant negative association between vegetable fiber and risk of incident diabetes was found in the age- and sex-adjusted model, but not after multivariate adjustment, in individuals aged <70 years at baseline. No associations were found for those aged ≥70 years at baseline (26% of the cohort).

For all ages combined, there were positive trends of association between GI and risk of diabetes, but none reached statistical significance. In the age-stratified and multivariate analyses, a significant positive association between GI and incident diabetes was found for individuals aged <70 years at baseline, but no association was found for those aged ≥70 years.

CONCLUSIONS—

In a representative sample of older Australians, only vegetable fiber was independently associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes over a 10-year period. In a secondary analysis of people under 70 years of age, a high-GI carbohydrate diet was also linked to increased risk of diabetes. Our study is the first to use a FFQ validated specifically to assess GI.

Our study has limitations, including a relatively small sample size and relatively few incident diabetes cases. While the FFQ was not originally designed to assess GI, our analyses suggest that the tool reliably ranks individuals for fiber and GI. A similar FFQ was used in six earlier studies, but they have not been directly validated for their ability to measure GI (1,2,4,5,7,8).

Plausible mechanisms link certain types of carbohydrate to increased risk of diabetes (23). “Fast-acting” carbohydrates from high-GI foods increase blood glucose spikes and insulin demand. Insufficient β-cell capacity can result in impaired glucose tolerance and eventually type 2 diabetes (24). Diets high in cereal fiber and legumes may also improve insulin economy by “second meal” effects on postprandial glycemia (25). In the present study, peas, baked beans, and other legumes were classified as vegetables. It is therefore difficult to separate any protective effect of vegetable fiber per se from potential benefits related to reduced glycemia (i.e., low GI).

Our study supports the hypothesis that the type or quality of carbohydrate plays an important role in the etiology of type 2 diabetes. These findings, and those of similar studies, suggest that a dietary pattern characterized by high fiber and low-GI carbohydrates is sustainable over time and may represent an effective strategy to prevent type 2 diabetes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

HRs (95% CIs) for carbohydrate fractions, GI, and incidence of type 2 diabetes in a cohort of older Australians

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 21 August 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0784.

    J.B.M. is the director of a not-for-profit GI-based food endorsement program in Australia and manages the University of Sydney GI testing service, and A.B. is a consultant for Glycemic Index Ltd., a not-for-profit GI-based food endorsement program in Australia.

    A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted August 9, 2007.
    • Received April 23, 2007.
  • DIABETES CARE

References

  1. ↵
    Salmeron J, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Spiegelman D, Jenkins DJ, Stampfer MJ, Wing AL, Willett WC: Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of NIDDM in men. Diabetes Care 20: 545–550, 1997
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Salmeron J, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Wing AL, Willett WC: Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 277: 472–477, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. Hodge AM, English DR, O'Dea K, Giles GG: Glycemic index and dietary fiber and the risk of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27: 2701–2706, 2004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Schulze MB, Liu S, Rimm EB, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB: Glycemic index, glycemic load, and dietary fiber intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes in younger and middle-aged women. Am J Clin Nutr 80: 348–356, 2004
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Zhang C, Liu S, Solomon CG, Hu FB: Dietary fiber intake, dietary glycemic load, and the risk for gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 29: 2223–2230, 2006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. Patel AV, McCullough ML, Pavluck AL, Jacobs EJ, Thun MJ, Calle EE: Glycemic load, glycemic index, and carbohydrate intake in relation to pancreatic cancer risk in a large US cohort. Cancer Causes Control 18: 287–294, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Meyer KA, Kushi LH, Jacobs DR Jr, Slavin J, Sellers TA, Folsom AR: Carbohydrates, dietary fiber, and incident type 2 diabetes in older women. Am J Clin Nutr 71: 921–930, 2000
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Stevens J, Ahn K, Juhaeri, Houston D, Steffan L, Couper D: Dietary fiber intake and glycemic index and incidence of diabetes in African-American and white adults: the ARIC study. Diabetes Care 25: 1715–1721, 2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Attebo K, Mitchell P, Smith W: Visual acuity and the causes of visual loss in Australia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 103: 357–364, 1996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Smith W, Mitchell P, Reay EM, Webb K, Harvey PW: Validity and reproducibility of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire in older people. Aust NZJ Public Health 22: 456–463, 1998
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Webb KL, Schofield WN, Lazarus R, Smith W, Mitchell P, Leeder SR: Prevalence and socio-demographic predictors of dietary goal attainment in an older population. Aust NZJ Public Health 23: 578–584, 1999
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    World Health Organization: Definition, diagnosis, and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus [article online], 1999. Geneva, World Health Org. Available from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1999/WHO_NCD_NCS_99.2.pdf. Accessed 13 September 2007
  13. ↵
    Willett WC, Sampson L, Browne ML, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE: The use of a self-administered questionnaire to assess diet four years in the past. Am J Epidemiol 127: 188–199, 1988
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Willett W: Nutritional Epidemiology. New York, Oxford University Press, 1998
  15. ↵
    DBASE IV [Computer program], 1991. Scotts Valley, CA, Borland International Inc.
  16. ↵
    Department of Community Services and Health: NUTTAB 90 Nutrient Data Table for Use in Australia. Canberra, Australia, Australian Government Publishing Service, 1990
  17. ↵
    Foster-Powell K, Holt SH, Brand-Miller JC: International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002. Am J Clin Nutr 76: 5–56, 2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Barclay AW, Flood VM, Brand-Miller JC, Mitchell P: Validity of carbohydrate, glycemic index and glycemic load data obtained using a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire. Public Health Nutrition. In press
  19. ↵
    Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P: International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 35: 1381–1395, 2003
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    SAS Institute Inc.: SAS/STAT Users Guide. Version 9.1, 9th ed. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc., 2006
  21. ↵
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1989
  22. ↵
    Cameron AJ, Welborn TA, Zimmet PZ, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Salmon J, Dalton M, Jolley D, Shaw JE: Overweight and obesity in Australia: the 1999–2000 Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Med J Aust 178: 427–432, 2003
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Ludwig DS: The glycemic index: physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 287: 2414–2423, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Pawlak DB, Kushner JA, Ludwig DS: Effects of dietary glycaemic index on adiposity, glucose homoeostasis, and plasma lipids in animals. Lancet 364: 778–785, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Weickert MO, Mohlig M, Koebnick C, Holst JJ, Namsolleck P, Ristow M, Osterhoff M, Rochlitz H, Rudovich N, Spranger J, Pfeiffer AF: Impact of cereal fibre on glucose-regulating factors. Diabetologia 48: 2343–2353, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 30 (11)

In this Issue

November 2007, 30(11)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glycemic Index, Dietary Fiber, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in a Cohort of Older Australians
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Glycemic Index, Dietary Fiber, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in a Cohort of Older Australians
Alan W. Barclay, Victoria M. Flood, Elena Rochtchina, Paul Mitchell, Jennie C. Brand-Miller
Diabetes Care Nov 2007, 30 (11) 2811-2813; DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0784

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Glycemic Index, Dietary Fiber, and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in a Cohort of Older Australians
Alan W. Barclay, Victoria M. Flood, Elena Rochtchina, Paul Mitchell, Jennie C. Brand-Miller
Diabetes Care Nov 2007, 30 (11) 2811-2813; DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0784
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—
    • RESULTS—
    • CONCLUSIONS—
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cost-effectiveness of Community-Based Depression Interventions for Rural and Urban Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Projections From Program ACTIVE (Adults Coming Together to Increase Vital Exercise) II
  • Association of Implementation of a Comprehensive Preconception-to-Pregnancy Management Plan With Pregnancy Outcomes Among Chinese Pregnant Women With Type 1 Diabetes: The CARNATION Study
  • Association of Early-Phase In-Hospital Glycemic Fluctuation With Mortality in Adult Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019
Show more Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.