Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk

Consequences of Change in Waist Circumference on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Over 9 Years

Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR)

  1. Beverley Balkau, PHD12,
  2. Pascaline Picard, MSC12,
  3. Sylviane Vol, MSC3,
  4. Leopold Fezeu, MD, MSC12,
  5. Eveline Eschwège, MD12 and
  6. for the DESIR Study Group *
  1. 1Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 780-IFR69, Epidemiological and Biostatistical Research, Villejuif, France
  2. 2Université Paris Sud, Kremlin Bicêtre, France
  3. 3Institut Inter-Régional pour la Santé, La Riche, France
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Beverley Balkau, INSERM U780-IFR69, 16 Ave. Paul Vaillant-Couturier, 94807, Villejuif, France. E-mail: balkau{at}vjf.inserm.fr
Diabetes Care 2007 Jul; 30(7): 1901-1903. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2542
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR)

  • DESIR, Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome

Obesity and abdominal adiposity have been shown in prospective studies to be risk factors for cardiovascular disease and particularly for diabetes (1–8). In cross-sectional studies, both are related with risk factors for these diseases (9–12), but there are few publications on the effects of changes in abdominal adiposity (13). We characterized men and women who gained and lost abdominal adiposity over 9 years and describe the incidence and the improvement in cardiometabolic risk factors according to changes in waist circumference.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—

From the Data from an Epidemiological Study on the Insulin Resistance Syndrome (DESIR) cohort (9,14,15), 1,868 men and 1,939 women aged 30–64 years at baseline were followed over 9 years. The 73% of the baseline cohort that we studied were older, less frequently abdominally obese, hypertriglyceridemic, hyperinsulinemic, smokers, and fewer had metabolic syndrome. Cardiometabolic abnormalities and the metabolic syndrome were defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) criteria (16), except high blood pressure, which included antihypertensive treatment (Table 1); hyperinsulinemia was defined by upper quartiles of fasting insulin ≥57.3 pmol/l for men and ≥52.8 pmol/l. The incidence and improvement of cardiometabolic risk factors were studied by age-adjusted logistic regression, according to waist change: ≤ −3.0 cm, −2.9 to +2.9 cm, 3.0–6.9 cm, and ≥7.0 cm. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS—

The median increase in waist circumference was 3 cm in men and 4 cm in women; 25 and 34% of men and women, respectively, increased their waist by ≥7 cm, 14% decreased their waist by ≥3 cm, and 29% remained stable (±2.9 cm).

Men whose waist decreased were older and had a larger waist circumference and BMI at baseline. Age was not significantly related to waist change in women; however, women who became slimmer had a larger baseline waist but similar BMI. Men who decreased alcohol intake reduced their waist circumference. Stopping smoking was associated with an increase in waist circumference, but smoking at baseline was associated with a gain in waist circumference in only men. Baseline physical activity did not influence waist change, but an increase was associated with a decreasing waist circumference.

The incidence of abdominal obesity was 10% in men and 15% in women (Table 1). Of all risk factors, high blood pressure had the highest incidence (48 and 30%, respectively), and the incidences of the metabolic syndrome were 8% for men and 7% for women. The metabolic syndrome and all cardiometabolic factors showed significant trends that became worse with an increasing waist (with one exception, LDL cholesterol in women). The odds ratios (95% CI) for an incident metabolic syndrome were 7.9 (4.4–13.9) in men and 4.7 (2.7–8.0) in women who increased their waist by ≥7 cm, compared with a stable waist circumference. Results were not changed after adjusting for baseline waist circumference or BMI. Adjusting for 9-year BMI change, only the metabolic syndrome (P < 0.0001) in both sexes and fasting insulin in women (P = 0.02) remained statistically significant. Further adjustment for change in smoking habits or physical activity did not alter these associations.

Of those abdominally obese at baseline, 19% of men and 10% of women improved at 9 years (Table 1). High blood pressure was the abnormality that improved the least. Of those with the metabolic syndrome at baseline, 47% of men and 38% of women no longer had it at 9 years. A decreasing waist circumference was beneficially associated with the syndrome, triglycerides, and insulin in both men and women and blood pressure in women. Further adjustment for baseline waist circumference or BMI did not alter these results, but after adjustment for change in BMI, relations remained significant only in women for the syndrome, triglycerides, and blood pressure. These improvements were not due to starting or continuing drug treatment (data not shown).

CONCLUSIONS—

A changing waist circumference affected cardiometabolic risk factors, and this was most clearly seen for the metabolic syndrome, which accumulates the effects of individual abnormalities. After accounting for changes in BMI, reducing waist by ≥3 cm only had a significant beneficial effect on the metabolic syndrome in women, and increasing waist by ≥7 cm had a detriment effect in both sexes.

Overall, those who reduced their waist were older and more abdominally obese, and fewer men smoked at baseline. Such men and women might be receptive toward targeted intervention. Further, an increase in physical activity had beneficial effects in our study. The only other report that we have found on the effects of waist circumference change on cardiometabolic risk factors is a 10-year study of Chinese adults (13). Both waist and BMI change, together, were related to change in systolic blood pressure and hypertension. In our European population, a comparable result was found only in women.

Though not all individuals were able to be followed-up, there were no differences in baseline waist circumference or changes in waist circumference over 3 and 6 years with those studied.

Increasing abdominal adiposity was associated with individual cardiometabolic risk factors and their aggregation in the metabolic syndrome in both men and women. Unfortunately, a decreasing waistline did not always have a large effect on risk factors, as aging is also inherent when following populations. The metabolic syndrome was still associated with changing waist circumference after taking account of changing BMI, indicating the importance of this simple clinical measure.

APPENDIX

Members of the DESIR Study Group

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U780: B. Balkau, P. Ducimetière, and E. Eschwège; INSERM U367: F. Alhenc-Gelas; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers: Y. Gallois and A. Girault; Hôpital Bichat: F. Fumeron and M. Marre; Centres d'Examens de Santé: Alençon-Angers-Blois-Caen-Chartres-Châteauroux-Cholet-Le Mans-Orléans-Tours; Institut de Recherche en Médecine Générale: J. Cogneau; Médecins Généralistes des Départements; Institut inter-Régionale pour la Santé: C. Born, E. Cacès, M. Cailleau, J.G. Moreau, F. Rakotozafy, J. Tichet, and S. Vol.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1—

Age-adjusted odds ratios of the incidence of cardiometabolic parameters according to change in waist circumferences

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by cooperative contracts between Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Caisse Nationale d'Assurances Maladies des Travailleurs Salariés, Lilly, Novartis Pharma, and Sanofi-Aventis, by INSERM (Réseaux en Santé Publique, Interactions entre les Determinants de la Santé), by the Association Diabète Risque Vasculaire, the Fédération Française de Cardiologie, La Fondation de France, l'Association de Langue Française pour l'Etude du Diabète et des Maladies Métaboliques, l'Office National Interprofessionnel des Vins, Ardix Medical, Bayer Diagnostics, Becton Dickinson, Cardionics, Merck Santé, Novo Nordisk, Pierre Fabre, Roche, and Topcon.

P. P. was supported by grant from Sanofi-Aventis (France).

We thank I. Villadary for her suggestions.

Footnotes

  • Published ahead of print at http://care.diabetesjournals.org on 27 April 2007. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2542.

  • *

    ↵* A complete list of the members of the DESIR Study Group can be found in the appendix.

  • A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Système International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances.

    The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Accepted April 2, 2007.
    • Received December 15, 2006.
  • DIABETES CARE

References

  1. ↵
    Larsson B, Svardsudd K, Welin L, Wilhelmsen L, Bjorntorp P, Tibblin G: Abdominal adipose tissue distribution, obesity, and risk of cardiovascular disease and death: 13 year follow up of participants in the study of men born in 1913. BMJ 288:1401–1404, 1984
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. Rexrode KM, Carey VJ, Hennekens CH, Walters EE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Manson JE: Abdominal adiposity and coronary heart disease in women. JAMA 280:1843–1848, 1998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. Rexrode KM, Buring JE, Manson JE: Abdominal and total adiposity and risk of coronary heart disease in men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 25:1047–1056, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Bautista L, Franzosi MG, Commerford P, Lang CC, Rumboldt Z, Onen CL, Lisheng L, Tanomsup S, Wangai P Jr, Razak F, Sharma AM, Anand SS, INTERHEART Study Investigators: Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case-control study. Lancet 366:1640–1649, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. Ohlson LO, Larsson B, Svardsudd K, Welin L, Eriksson H, Wilhelmsen L, Bjorntorp P, Tibblin G: The influence of body fat distribution on the incidence of diabetes mellitus: 13.5 years of follow-up of the participants in the study of men born in 1913. Diabetes 34:1055–1058, 1985
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. Kissebah AH, Peiris AN: Biology of regional body fat distribution: relationship to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabete Metab Rev 5:83–109, 1989
    OpenUrl
  7. Carey VJ, Walters EE, Colditz GA, Solomon CG, Willett WC, Rosner BA, Speizer FE, Manson JE: Body fat distribution and risk of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women: the Nurses’ Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 145:614–619, 1997
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Wei M, Gaskill SP, Haffner SM, Stern MP: Waist circumference as the best predictor of noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) compared with body mass index, waist/hip ratio and other anthropometric measurements in Mexican Americans: a 7-year prospective study. Obes Res 5:16–23, 1997
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Bertrais S, Balkau B, Vol S, Forhan A, Calvet C, Marre M, Eschwege E: Relationships between abdominal body fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors: an explanation for women's healthier cardiovascular risk profile: the DESIR Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 23:1085–1094, 1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. Despres JP, Moorjani S, Lupien PJ, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Bouchard C: Regional distribution of body fat, plasma lipoproteins, and cardiovascular disease. Arteriosclerosis 10:497–511, 1990
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. Stolk RP, Suriyawongpaisal P, Aekplakorn W, Woodward M, Neal B; InterASIA Collaborative Group: Fat distribution is strongly associated with plasma glucose levels and diabetes in Thai adults: the InterASIA study. Diabetologia 48:657–660, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Canoy D, Luben R, Welch A, Bingham S, Wareham N, Day N, Khaw KT: Fat distribution, body mass index and blood pressure in 22,090 men and women in the Norfolk cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk) study. J Hypertens 22:2067–2074, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Chuang SY, Chou P, Hsu PF, Cheng HM, Tsai ST, Lin IF, Chen CH: Presence and progression of abdominal obesity are predictors of future high blood pressure and hypertension. Am J Hypertens 19:788–795, 2006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Balkau B, Vernay M, Mhamdi L, Novak M, Arondel D, Vol S, Tichet J, Eschwege E; D.E.S.I.R. Study Group: The incidence and persistence of the NCEP (National Cholesterol Education Program) metabolic syndrome. The French D.E.S.I.R. study. Diabetes Metab 29:526–532, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Hillier TA, Fagot-Campagna A, Eschwege E, Vol S, Cailleau M, Balkau B, the DESIR Study group: Weight change and changes in the metabolic syndrome as the French population moves towardoverweight: the DESIR cohort. Int J Epidemiol 35:190–196, 2006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults: Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 285:2486–2497, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 30 (7)

In this Issue

July 2007, 30(7)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Consequences of Change in Waist Circumference on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Over 9 Years
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Consequences of Change in Waist Circumference on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Over 9 Years
Beverley Balkau, Pascaline Picard, Sylviane Vol, Leopold Fezeu, Eveline Eschwège
Diabetes Care Jul 2007, 30 (7) 1901-1903; DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2542

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Consequences of Change in Waist Circumference on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Over 9 Years
Beverley Balkau, Pascaline Picard, Sylviane Vol, Leopold Fezeu, Eveline Eschwège
Diabetes Care Jul 2007, 30 (7) 1901-1903; DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2542
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—
    • RESULTS—
    • CONCLUSIONS—
    • APPENDIX
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Serum Galectin-3 and Subsequent Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Subjects With Childhood-Onset Type 1 Diabetes: A Cohort Study
  • OGTT Glucose Response Curves, Insulin Sensitivity, and β-Cell Function in RISE: Comparison Between Youth and Adults at Randomization and in Response to Interventions to Preserve β-Cell Function
  • Carbamylated HDL and Mortality Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
Show more Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.