Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Original Research

Abdominal Adiposity Is Associated With Elevated C-Reactive Protein Independent of BMI in Healthy Nonobese People

  1. Emanuela Lapice, MD,
  2. Simona Maione, BS,
  3. Lidia Patti, PHD,
  4. Paola Cipriano, BS,
  5. Angela A. Rivellese, MD,
  6. Gabriele Riccardi, MD and
  7. Olga Vaccaro, MD
  1. From the Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
  1. Corresponding author: Olga Vaccaro, ovaccaro{at}unina.it.
Diabetes Care 2009 Sep; 32(9): 1734-1736. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0176
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE There is debate over the most appropriate adiposity markers of obesity-associated health risks. We evaluated the relationship between fat distribution and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), independent of total adiposity.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We studied 350 people with abdominal adiposity (waist-to-hip ratio [WHR] ≥0.9 in male and ≥0.85 in female subjects) and 199 control subjects (WHR <0.9 in male and <0.85 in female subjects) matched for BMI and age. We measured hs-CRP and major cardiovascular risk factors.

RESULTS Participants with abdominal adiposity had BMI similar to that in control subjects (24.8 ± 2.5 vs. 24.7 ± 2.2 kg/m2, respectively), but significantly higher waist circumference (96.4 ± 6.0 vs. 83.3 ± 6.7 cm; P < 0.01) and WHR (1.07 ± 0.08 vs. 0.85 ± 0.05; P < 0.001). Compared with the control subjects, participants with abdominal adiposity had an adverse cardiovascular risk factor profile, significantly higher hs-CRP (1.96 ± 2.60 vs. 1.53 ± 1.74 mg/dl; P < 0.01), and a twofold prevalence of elevated CRP values (>3 mg/dl).

CONCLUSIONS In nonobese people, moderate abdominal adiposity is associated with markers of subclinical inflammation independent of BMI.

There is debate over the most appropriate adiposity markers of obesity-associated health risks. Large studies have shown that measures of abdominal adiposity, such as waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), are more closely associated with the risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and death than BMI, which is a measure of general adiposity (1,2). The excess cardiometabolic risk associated with abdominal adiposity is only partly explained by established risk factors; additional less extensively explored mechanisms may include systemic low-grade inflammation (3). Indeed, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is a powerful marker of cardiovascular risk despite normal cholesterol levels, thus expanding the indication for use of statins beyond hyperlipidemia, because these drugs lower both cholesterol and CRP levels (4). To assess the impact of abdominal adiposity on low-grade inflammation independent of BMI, we compared hs-CRP in people with or without abdominal adiposity but with the same BMI.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The analysis is based on a case-control design. Among 1,252 subjects undergoing health screenings (5), we selected 350 consecutive people with abdominal adiposity (WHR ≥0.9 in male and ≥0.85 in female subjects) and 199 control subjects (WHR <0.9 in male and <0.85 in female subjects) (6) matched for BMI (± 1 kg/m2) and age (± 5 years) within sex strata. Exclusion criteria were diabetes, BMI >35 or <20 kg/m2, use of statins or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acute or chronic infections (assessed by history, use of drugs, and clinical examination), and previous cardiovascular disease. We measured anthropometry, supine blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose levels, uric acid, triglycerides, total and HDL cholesterol levels (standard methods), insulin (radioimmunoassay), fibrinogen (immunonephelometry), and hs-CRP (Tina-Quant; Roche). Insulin resistance was also calculated using homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Detailed study procedures have previously been published (5). The local ethics committee approved the study, and participants gave informed consent. Data were analyzed by unpaired Student's t test, χ2, Pearson correlation, and multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Participants with abdominal adiposity had age and BMI similar to that in control subjects (24.8 ± 2.5 vs. 24.7 ± 2.2 kg/m2), but significantly higher waist circumference and WHR (Table 1). CRP was significantly higher in participants with abdominal adiposity than in control subjects; accordingly, in the group with abdominal adiposity, the proportion of people with elevated CRP (>3 mg/dl) was twice that in the control subjects (Table 1). Nine case subjects (1.9%) and one control subject (0.5%) had CRP >10 mg/dl, and removing these people from analysis quantitatively attenuated the differences between case and control subjects (mean ± SD CRP 1.66 ± 1.50 vs. 1.43 ± 1.26 mg/dl, P = 0.07, and 19.5 vs. 9.6%, P = 0.04, with CRP >3 mg/dl). The male sex was more prevalent among case subjects; however, CRP was similar for male and female subjects (1.78 ± 2.16 vs. 1.87 ± 2.11 mg/dl; P < 0.65). Furthermore, a two-way analysis of variance did not show a significant sex effect or the interaction between sex and abdominal adiposity on CRP. People with abdominal adiposity showed an adverse cardiometabolic risk profile compared with that in control subjects (Table 1) (i.e., significantly higher triglycerides, blood pressure, HOMA-IR, lower HDL cholesterol levels, and twice the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (Adult Treatment Panel III [ATPIII]). Smoking status and plasma fibrinogen were comparable in the two groups. hs-CRP was significantly correlated with BMI in both case (r = 0.23; P < 0.01) and control subjects (r = 0.17; P < 0.02); however, multivariate analyses confirmed a significant association of abdominal adiposity with either CRP (continuous variable) or elevated CRP (>3 mg/dl) independent of BMI, age, sex, and measured cardiovascular risk factors.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

CRP values and cardiovascular risk factor profile in participants with or without visceral adiposity

CONCLUSIONS

The study shows that in healthy nonobese people, abdominal adiposity is associated with hs-CRP, independent of age and BMI, which is a measure of total adiposity. hs-CRP values and the proportion of people with elevated hs-CRP [i.e., >3 mg/dl, a value associated with increased cardiovascular risk (7)] are significantly higher in those with abdominal adiposity than in control subjects, notwithstanding a superimposable BMI. A significant correlation between BMI and hs-CRP levels is observed in both groups, thus confirming expected findings and conferring internal consistency with our results. The excess cardiometabolic risk associated with abdominal adiposity is only partially explained by established risk factors; systemic low-grade inflammation may represent an additional less extensively explored mechanism (3,4). Indeed, hs-CRP predicts cardiovascular events in people with nonelevated LDL cholesterol levels (4,7). Because statins lower both cholesterol and CRP, measuring this biomarker helps to identify people who may benefit from statin treatment beyond its lipid-lowering effect.

Given the strong association we show between WHR and hs-CRP—independent of BMI—and considering the difficulty of routinely measuring hs-CRP in the general population, WHR (although a crude measure of abdominal adiposity) might be proposed in nonobese people as a surrogate marker for subclinical inflammation or, alternatively, as a simple means to select individuals in whom hs-CRP should be measured to further characterize their cardiovascular risk. CRP is the most widely measured marker of systemic inflammation; its interindividual variance is largely due to genetic factors (50%). However, adiposity is the other major determinant of hepatic CRP synthesis via production of proinflammatory cytokines (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-1, and tumor necrosis factor-α). There is evidence that IL-6, a key determinant of CRP production in hepatocytes, is secreted in an endocrine manner in proportion to the expansion of fat mass, particularly in the abdominal region (8,9). The relation of CRP with fat mass and fat distribution has been extensively explored with partially conflicting results (10–13). Most, but not all, studies focus on obese or morbidly obese people in whom a differential impact of total or abdominal adiposity may be difficult to evaluate. This is one of the very few population-based studies of nonobese people. Furthermore, unlike previous studies, we used a case-control design, which is particularly efficient in controlling for the confounding effect of BMI, allowing us to compare people with different fat distribution but the same BMI. The cross-sectional nature of the study, however, does not allow to determine whether abdominal adiposity is causally associated with CPR elevation or whether the association is mediated through other obesity-associated conditions such as insulin resistance or subclinical atherosclerosis.

In conclusion, the study shows that in healthy nonobese people, hs-CRP is associated with abdominal adiposity—evaluated as WHR—independent of BMI, thus supporting current recommendations that in people with BMI 25.0–34.9 kg/m2, waist circumference or WHR should be measured to identify people at high cardiovascular and metabolic risk. The relative contribution of general adiposity may, however, be more relevant in severe obesity.

Acknowledgments

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

    • Received February 2, 2009.
    • Accepted June 10, 2009.
  • Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

  • © 2009 by the American Diabetes Association.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Pischon T,
    2. Boeing H,
    3. Hoffmann K,
    4. Bergmann M,
    5. Schulze MB,
    6. Overvad K,
    7. van der Schouw YT,
    8. Spencer E,
    9. Moons KG,
    10. Tjønneland A,
    11. Halkjaer J,
    12. Jensen MK,
    13. Stegger J,
    14. Clavel-Chapelon F,
    15. Boutron-Ruault MC,
    16. Chajes V,
    17. Linseisen J,
    18. Kaaks R,
    19. Trichopoulou A,
    20. Trichopoulos D,
    21. Bamia C,
    22. Sieri S,
    23. Palli D,
    24. Tumino R,
    25. Vineis P,
    26. Panico S,
    27. Peeters PH,
    28. May AM,
    29. Bueno-de-Mesquita HB,
    30. van Duijnhoven FJ,
    31. Hallmans G,
    32. Weinehall L,
    33. Manjer J,
    34. Hedblad B,
    35. Lund E,
    36. Agudo A,
    37. Arriola L,
    38. Barricarte A,
    39. Navarro C,
    40. Martinez C,
    41. Quirós JR,
    42. Key T,
    43. Bingham S,
    44. Khaw KT,
    45. Boffetta P,
    46. Jenab M,
    47. Ferrari P,
    48. Riboli E
    . General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2105– 2120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Freiberg MS,
    2. Pencina MJ,
    3. D'Agostino RB,
    4. Lanier K,
    5. Wilson PW,
    6. Vasan RS
    . BMI vs. waist circumference for identifying vascular risk. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 463– 469
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Pai JK,
    2. Pischon T,
    3. Ma J,
    4. Manson JE,
    5. Hankinson SE,
    6. Joshipura K,
    7. Curhan GC,
    8. Rifai N,
    9. Cannuscio CC,
    10. Stampfer MJ,
    11. Rimm EB
    . Inflammatory markers and the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2599– 2610
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Ridker PM,
    2. Danielson E,
    3. Fonseca FA,
    4. Genest J,
    5. Gotto AM, Jr,
    6. Kastelein JJ,
    7. Koenig W,
    8. Libby P,
    9. Lorenzatti AJ,
    10. MacFadyen JG,
    11. Nordestgaard BG,
    12. Shepherd J,
    13. Willerson JT,
    14. Glynn RJ
    ; JUPITER Study Group. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2195– 2207
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Imperatore G,
    2. Riccardi G,
    3. Iovine C,
    4. Rivellese AA,
    5. Vaccaro O
    . Plasma fibrinogen: a new factor of the metabolic syndrome: a population-based study. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 649– 654
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    World Health Organization, International Association for the Study of Obesity, International Obesity Task Force. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment. Health Communications Australia Pty Limited, 2000
  7. ↵
    1. Casas JP,
    2. Shah T,
    3. Hingorani AD,
    4. Danesh J,
    5. Pepys MB
    . C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease: a critical review. J Intern Med 2008; 264: 295– 314
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Fried SK,
    2. Bunkin DA,
    3. Greenberg AS
    . Omental and subcutaneous adipose tissues of obese subjects release interleukin-6: depot difference and regulation by glucocorticoid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83: 847– 850
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Castell JV,
    2. Gómez-Lechón MJ,
    3. David M,
    4. Andus T,
    5. Geiger T,
    6. Trullenque R,
    7. Fabra R,
    8. Heinrich PC
    . Interleukin-6 is the major regulator of acute phase protein synthesis in adult human hepatocytes. FEBS Lett 1989; 242: 237– 239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Pannacciulli N,
    2. Cantatore FP,
    3. Minenna A,
    4. Bellacicco M,
    5. Giorgino R,
    6. De Pergola G
    . C-reactive protein is independently associated with total body fat, central fat, and insulin resistance in adult women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1416– 1420
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Festa A,
    2. D'Agostino R, Jr,
    3. Williams K,
    4. Karter AJ,
    5. Mayer-Davis EJ,
    6. Tracy RP,
    7. Haffner SM
    . The relation of body fat mass and distribution to markers of chronic inflammation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1407– 1415
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Rexrode KM,
    2. Pradhan A,
    3. Manson JE,
    4. Buring JE,
    5. Ridker PM
    . Relationship of total and abdominal adiposity with CRP and IL-6 in women. Ann Epidemiol 2003; 13: 674– 682
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Pou KM,
    2. Massaro JM,
    3. Hoffmann U,
    4. Vasan RS,
    5. Maurovich-Horvat P,
    6. Larson MG,
    7. Keaney JF, Jr,
    8. Meigs JB,
    9. Lipinska I,
    10. Kathiresan S,
    11. Murabito JM,
    12. O'Donnell CJ,
    13. Benjamin EJ,
    14. Fox CS
    . Visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes are cross-sectionally related to markers of inflammation and oxidative stress: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2007; 116: 1234– 1241
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 32 (9)

In this Issue

September 2009, 32(9)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Abdominal Adiposity Is Associated With Elevated C-Reactive Protein Independent of BMI in Healthy Nonobese People
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Abdominal Adiposity Is Associated With Elevated C-Reactive Protein Independent of BMI in Healthy Nonobese People
Emanuela Lapice, Simona Maione, Lidia Patti, Paola Cipriano, Angela A. Rivellese, Gabriele Riccardi, Olga Vaccaro
Diabetes Care Sep 2009, 32 (9) 1734-1736; DOI: 10.2337/dc09-0176

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Abdominal Adiposity Is Associated With Elevated C-Reactive Protein Independent of BMI in Healthy Nonobese People
Emanuela Lapice, Simona Maione, Lidia Patti, Paola Cipriano, Angela A. Rivellese, Gabriele Riccardi, Olga Vaccaro
Diabetes Care Sep 2009, 32 (9) 1734-1736; DOI: 10.2337/dc09-0176
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Original Research

  • n-3 Fatty Acid Biomarkers and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: An Individual Participant-Level Pooling Project of 20 Prospective Cohort Studies
  • Cardiovascular and Renal Disease Burden in Type 1 Compared With Type 2 Diabetes: A Two-Country Nationwide Observational Study
  • Glycemic Outcome Associated With Insulin Pump and Glucose Sensor Use in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. Data From the International Pediatric Registry SWEET
Show more Original Research

Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk

  • Impact of Obesity on Measures of Cardiovascular and Kidney Health in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes as Compared With Youth With Type 2 Diabetes
  • Serum Galectin-3 and Subsequent Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Subjects With Childhood-Onset Type 1 Diabetes: A Cohort Study
  • OGTT Glucose Response Curves, Insulin Sensitivity, and β-Cell Function in RISE: Comparison Between Youth and Adults at Randomization and in Response to Interventions to Preserve β-Cell Function
Show more Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.