Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Original Research

Review of Adverse Events Associated With False Glucose Readings Measured by GDH-PQQ–Based Glucose Test Strips in the Presence of Interfering Sugars

  1. Juan P. Frias, MD,
  2. Christine G. Lim, MD, MPH,
  3. John M. Ellison, MS and
  4. Carol M. Montandon, BS
  1. From the Departments of Clinical, Medical, and Regulatory Affairs, LifeScan, Milpitas, California.
  1. Corresponding author: John Ellison, jellison{at}its.jnj.com.
Diabetes Care 2010 Apr; 33(4): 728-729. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1822
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the implications of falsely elevated glucose readings measured with glucose dehydrogenase pyrroloquinolinequinone (GDH-PQQ) test strips.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted a review of the Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database and medical literature for adverse events (AEs) associated with falsely elevated glucose readings with GDH-PQQ test strips in the presence of interfering sugars.

RESULTS Eighty-two reports were identified: 16 (20%) were associated with death, 46 (56%) with severe hypoglycemia, and 12 (15%) with nonsevere hypoglycemia. In eight reports (10%), the AE was not described. Forty-two events (51%) occurred in the U.S. Although most events occurred in hospitalized patients, at least 14 (17%) occurred in outpatients. Agents most commonly associated with AEs were icodextrin-containing peritoneal dialysate and maltose-containing intravenous immune globulin.

CONCLUSIONS GDH-PQQ test strips pose a safety risk to insulin-using patients treated with agents containing or metabolized to interfering sugars.

Enzymes play a critical role in measuring blood glucose. Following blood application, glucose tests strips utilize enzymes to selectively catalyze the oxidation of glucose. In many systems, the product of the enzyme reaction is detected electrochemically, using a meter to convert the measured current into a glucose value.

Currently available glucose test strip enzymes include glucose oxidase (GOx), dehydrogenase (GDH) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (GDH-NAD), GDH flavin adenine dinucleotide (GDH-FAD), and GDH pyrroloquinolinequinone (GDH-PQQ). GDH-PQQ (referring to native GDH-PQQ not mutants of GDH-PQQ) is not glucose specific. As such, in addition to reacting with glucose, it reacts with other sugars (maltose, galactose, and xylose). Systems that utilize GDH-PQQ test strips may therefore report falsely elevated glucose readings in blood samples from patients treated with agents containing or metabolized to these sugars.

Over the past 10 years, reports have appeared of GDH-PQQ–related falsely elevated glucose readings resulting in insulin overdose and adverse events (AEs), including severe hypoglycemia and death. This brief report provides a comprehensive assessment of AEs associated with falsely elevated glucose readings measured with GDH-PQQ test strips in the presence of interfering sugars.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A query of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was conducted in August, 2009. This database contains voluntary reports since June 1993, user facility reports since 1991, distributor reports since 1993, and manufacturer reports since August 1996 (available at http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/maude.html). The search was limited to codes for glucose-monitoring products and was further limited by searching for the following key words: maltose, galactose, xylose, icodextrin, extraneal, peritoneal dialysis, immunoglobulin, intravenous immune globulin (IVIG), globulin, Octagam, Intragam, Gamimune N, WinRho SDF, HepaGam B, abatacept, Orencia, Adept Solution, maltodextrin, galactosemia, tositumomab, and Bexxar. Each report was assessed by the authors to identify AEs associated with GDH-PQQ test strips and an interfering agent or disorder.

Combinations of the same key words were used to search Ovid and PubMed databases for AEs. Each retrieved article was assessed by the authors, and the article's references were searched for additional reports. Reports were categorized by type of AE and agent or condition associated with the event. AEs appearing in both MAUDE and literature databases were counted once.

RESULTS

The MAUDE database and literature search yielded 61 and 21 unique cases of GDH-PQQ–related AEs, respectively (see supplementary references in the online appendix [available at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dc09-1822/DC1]). Table 1 summarizes the AEs by severity and associated agent or condition. Of 82 AEs, 16 (20%) were associated with death and 46 (56%) with severe hypoglycemia (4 resulting in permanent injury). Most events (78%) were associated with the use of icodextrin-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution and 13% with a maltose-containing IVIG. In two reports, the false glucose reading was associated with galactosemia.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

AEs summarized by severity and associated agent or condition

Fifty-nine (72%) events occurred in an inpatient setting, 14 (17%) in an outpatient setting, and in 9 (11%) cases the setting was not documented. Half of the events (51%) occurred in the U.S. Other countries reporting AEs included Australia, Belgium, China, England, Holland, Israel, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and South Africa.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite repeated warnings by regulatory agencies and manufactures, AEs associated with GDH-PQQ test strips have continued to occur. A recent FDA Public Health Notification reported 13 deaths associated with GDH-PQQ test strip interference from nonglucose sugars. Six of 13 deaths occurred after 2007 (1).

The most commonly implicated agent in our review was icodextrin-containing PD solution, which is used in treating end-stage renal disease, a condition with a heightened risk of hypoglycemia (2). Importantly, 12% of cases were associated with maltose-containing IVIG, which is used in several disorders including primary immune deficiency and idiopathic thrombocytopenia, and is reportedly used off label ∼50% of the time. Over 150 off-label uses were recently described (3,4). Other maltose-containing agents that may interfere with GDH-PQQ test strips include abatacept (for rheumatoid arthritis), Adept Solution (for reduction of postsurgical adhesions), and tositumomab (for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma). Given the wide spectrum of disorders that may be treated with icodextrin or maltose-containing agents, health care providers across a range of specialties need to be familiar with this issue.

The majority of AEs in this review (71%) occurred in an inpatient setting. Based on similar findings, the FDA recently issued recommendations to “avoid using GDH-PQQ glucose test trips in healthcare facilities” (1). However, 18% of AEs in our review occurred in an outpatient setting (including 10 cases of severe hypoglycemia and one death). This is not unexpected since PD is primarily administered at home and IVIG infusions may be administered in a provider's office. This is therefore an issue that should be considered for patients in the outpatient setting as well as for hospitalized patients.

Because voluntary reports in MAUDE vary in detail and, unlike the published literature, may not always provide enough information for the reviewer to establish direct causality, we chose to report all AEs as device associated. It is important to note that the AEs summarized in this report likely represent a small fraction of the AEs that have actually occurred, as it is well accepted that significant underreporting of AEs occurs in databases that rely on spontaneous reporting, including the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System and MAUDE (5–7).

A list of GDH-PQQ test strips has recently been published (1). The risk posed by these products must be balanced against the risk of available alternatives. Test strips using enzymes with higher glucose specificity are widely available. These include GOx, GDH-NAD, and GDH-FAD. These enzymes do not yield falsely elevated glucose readings in the presence of maltose and galactose (GDH-FAD does react with xylose). Although GOx-based test strips can be affected by varying oxygen levels and may exhibit chemical interferences common to most electrochemical systems, these limitations are not due to nonspecificity of the enzyme. We have found no reports of serious injury or death due to interferences with GOx, GDH-NAD, or GDH-FAD enzymes.

Findings in this report indicate that GDH-PQQ test strips pose an important safety risk to insulin-treated patients with diabetes undergoing therapies with agents containing or metabolized to interfering sugars. Health care professionals and patients must be aware of this risk and of known interfering agents and disorders.

Acknowledgments

All authors are employed by LifeScan, a Johnson & Johnson Company. LifeScan manufactures and sells blood glucose–monitoring systems. All of LifeScan's currently marketed test strips use GOx. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Parts of this study were presented as a poster at the 45th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), Vienna, Austria, 30 September 2009.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • See accompanying editorial, p. 948.

    • Received September 29, 2009.
    • Accepted November 9, 2009.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

  • © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association.

References

  1. ↵
    Food and Drug Administration: FDA public health notification: potentially fatal errors with GDH-P glucose monitoring technology [article online], 2009. Available from http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/PublicHealthNotifications/ucm176992.htm. Accessed 13 August 2009
  2. ↵
    1. Moen M,
    2. Zhan M,
    3. Hsu V,
    4. Walker L,
    5. Einhorn L,
    6. Seliger S,
    7. Fink J
    . Frequency of hypoglycemia and its significance in chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009;4:1121–1127
  3. ↵
    1. Leong H,
    2. Stachnik J,
    3. Bonk ME,
    4. Matuszewski KA
    . Unlabeled uses of intravenous immune globulin. Am J Health-Sys Pharm 2008;65:1815–1824
  4. ↵
    1. Darabi K,
    2. Abdelllll-Wahab O,
    3. Dzik W
    . Current usage of intravenous immune globulin and the rationale behind it: Massachusetts General Hospital data and a review of the literature. Transfusion 2006;46:741–753
  5. ↵
    1. Goldman SA
    . Limitations and strengths of spontaneous report data. Clin Thera 1998;20(Suppl. C):40–44
  6. ↵
    1. Trontell AE
    . How the US Food and Drug Administration defines and detects adverse drug events. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2001;62:641–649
  7. ↵
    1. Fuller J,
    2. Ashar,
    3. Carey-Corrado J
    . Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: An analysis of 1399 reports to the FDA. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:302–307
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 33 (4)

In this Issue

April 2010, 33(4)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Review of Adverse Events Associated With False Glucose Readings Measured by GDH-PQQ–Based Glucose Test Strips in the Presence of Interfering Sugars
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Review of Adverse Events Associated With False Glucose Readings Measured by GDH-PQQ–Based Glucose Test Strips in the Presence of Interfering Sugars
Juan P. Frias, Christine G. Lim, John M. Ellison, Carol M. Montandon
Diabetes Care Apr 2010, 33 (4) 728-729; DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1822

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Review of Adverse Events Associated With False Glucose Readings Measured by GDH-PQQ–Based Glucose Test Strips in the Presence of Interfering Sugars
Juan P. Frias, Christine G. Lim, John M. Ellison, Carol M. Montandon
Diabetes Care Apr 2010, 33 (4) 728-729; DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1822
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Original Research

  • n-3 Fatty Acid Biomarkers and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: An Individual Participant-Level Pooling Project of 20 Prospective Cohort Studies
  • Cardiovascular and Renal Disease Burden in Type 1 Compared With Type 2 Diabetes: A Two-Country Nationwide Observational Study
  • Glycemic Outcome Associated With Insulin Pump and Glucose Sensor Use in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. Data From the International Pediatric Registry SWEET
Show more Original Research

Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

  • Association of Oily and Nonoily Fish Consumption and Fish Oil Supplements With Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Large Population-Based Prospective Study
  • Changes in Plant-Based Diet Indices and Subsequent Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women and Men: Three U.S. Prospective Cohorts
  • Not Only Diabetes but Also Prediabetes Leads to Functional Decline and Disability in Older Adults
Show more Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.