Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Editorials

Chronobiology Impacts Response to Antihypertensive Drug Regimen in Type 2 Diabetes

  1. Eli A. Friedman, MD and
  2. Mary Ann Banerji, MD
  1. From the Divisions of Nephrology and Endocrinology and Diabetes, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York
  1. Corresponding author: Eli A. Friedman, elifriedmn{at}aol.com.
Diabetes Care 2011 Jun; 34(6): 1438-1439. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0576
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Chronobiology is the term applied to the study of how body rhythms are governed by our environment, starting with the solar system, which cycles night and day and changes one season into another (1). Bodily responses encompassed by chronobiology determine both everyday behavior and expression of illness (2). Key rhythms modulating health and disease states may be circadian (lasting about 24 h and defining sleep-awake patterns) or infradian (lasting longer than 24 h, as in monthly menstruation). Adjusting timing of medical treatment to its differing effects depending on the patient's circadian state as currently applied in nocturnal asthma (3) and arthritis (4) is called chronotherapy. Hermida et al. (5) report a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point trial of how varying the time of day during which antihypertensive drugs are taken may affect cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.

That chronotherapy might assist in management of hypertension was appreciated by Bartter et al. (6) in a retrospective 24-h study of a single patient with systolic and diastolic hypertension treated with hydrochlorthiazide in 1976. Availability of continuous 24-h blood pressure monitoring devices prompted a French study in 1985 suggesting that each hypertensive patient be evaluated over a full day with subsequent antihypertensive drug treatment scheduled to fit daily periods of highest pressure (7). Noting that “many cardiovascular disorders occur with greatest frequency between 06:00 and 12:00 AM,” Cooke and Lynch (8), in 1994, proposed that a chronotherapeutic approach to therapy might proffer advantage in thromboembolism, hypertension, angina, and acute myocardial infarction by facilitating improved patient outcomes. Predicting that chronotherapy for ischemic heart disease would be forthcoming, the University of Texas established a chronobiology department in 1996 (9). As newer classes of antihypertensive drugs have been introduced, focused attention on blood pressure during sleep increased with growing hope that cardiovascular complications might be reduced in frequency and intensity (10).

The study by Hermida et al. of 448 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes who had ambulatory blood pressure measured initially for 48 h and then annually over a mean of 5.4 years found that administering antihypertensive medications at bedtime produced a significantly lower cardiovascular risk (adjusted by sex and age) than that in a randomly selected cohort given their antihypertensive drugs upon awakening. Taking antihypertensive drugs at bedtime significantly decreased the adjusted risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (0.25; P = 0.003). Bedtime treatment significantly reduced both sleep-time blood pressure mean with a 12% cardiovascular risk reduction per 5 mmHg decrease in asleep systolic pressure during follow-up.

It is well known that shift workers have increased diabetes and obesity, worse glucose control, and higher rates of cardiovascular disease and mortality (11). Changing the clocks back in spring is associated with increased myocardial infarctions. Supporting these observations are short-term experimental studies showing that misalignment of behavioral and circadian cycles results in adverse cardiometabolic end points including higher arterial blood pressure, glucose, insulin, ghrelin, cortisol, and catecholamines (12). Genetic studies point to molecular mechanisms based in highly conserved controllers of periodicity or Zeitgaber (13,14). These molecular clocks are located in the central nervous system and in peripheral tissue, communicating with each other and responding to a great number of inputs presumably designed to maintain homeostasis of the entire organism relative to changing environments.

An article by Hermida et al. (15) demonstrating that treatment synchronized to the biology of hypertension is highly effective in diabetes and nondiabetes gives support to the concept that treatment synchronized to the biology of metabolism might also be effective especially as glycemia is particularly difficult to management. There is some use of chronotherapy in current glycemia treatment; however, it is not a major focus. For example, bedtime insulin is used to lower the tendency of the blood glucose to rise in the morning. The conventional explanation is that insulin counters the tendency to increase hepatic glucose production by the normal nocturnal surge in growth hormone and cortisol. However, newer data suggest a greater complexity—liver cells themselves have molecular clocks that govern hepatic glucose production and fat storage suggesting regulation of hepatic steatosis (16). Meal-associated insulin treatment targets the expected postprandial rise in blood glucose. Indeed, molecular genetic studies identify a clock gene for β-cell mitochondrial function that in part governs insulin secretion. The new technology of 24-h continuous glucose monitoring promises insights into how we might better define normalcy and tailor glycemic treatment. Another example is the use of statin therapy at bedtime to lower LDL cholesterol because lipid metabolism is nocturnal. The study by Hermida et al. (5) prompts us to reexamine the basis for management of glycemia through the lens of chronobiology.

A key strength of the report by Hermida et al. (5) is that it confirms the well known J curve for adverse outcomes in systolic blood pressure as measured in a clinic but shows no such effect for systolic blood pressure while asleep, for which the lowest blood pressure is associated with the lowest hazard ratio. The recently published Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial failed to show a difference in major cardiovascular outcomes between intensive and nonintensive systolic blood pressure targets of <120 and <140 mmHg, respectively (17). Had the investigators considered the pragmatic reality of drug effect possibly being altered by chronobiology, their results might have differed, as the timing of dosing of blood pressure medications was not standardized. Other possible variables that may have altered the effect of antihypertensive treatment during the study include differences in lifestyle and behavior practices including meditations, exercise, diet, stress reduction, and sleep hygiene policies.

At the least, Hermida et al. proffer a strong argument for establishing each newly managed hypertensive diabetic patient's circadian pattern of time-related blood pressure elevation as a potential correctable variable when designing an individualized antihypertensive regimen. In a larger perspective, we should be alert to ignoring inherent cycles of nature that contribute to establishing blood pressure responses as well as, according to some investigators, the basis of our growing obesity pandemic. Awareness and response to ticking biological clocks must be kept in mind when constructing pertinent therapies, as evidence now supports the thesis that knowledge of chronobiology is a concern when building a chronotherapy for hypertension (18).

Acknowledgments

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

  • © 2011 by the American Diabetes Association.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chung S,
    2. Son GH,
    3. Kim K
    . Adrenal peripheral oscillator in generating the circadian glucocorticoid rhythm. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2011;1220:71–81
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Smolensky MH,
    2. Di Milia L,
    3. Ohayon MM,
    4. Philip P
    . Sleep disorders, medical conditions, and road accident risk. Accid Anal Prev 2011;43:533–548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Patel MM,
    2. Amin AF
    . Design and optimization of colon-targeted system of theophylline for chronotherapy of nocturnal asthma. J Pharm Sci 2011;100:1760–1772
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lotlikar V,
    2. Kedar U,
    3. Shidhaye S,
    4. Kadam V
    . pH-responsive dual pulse multiparticulate dosage form for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2010;36:1295–1302
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Hermida RC,
    2. Ayala DE,
    3. Mojón A,
    4. Fernádez JR
    . Influence of time of day of blood pressure–lowering treatment on cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1270–1276
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Bartter FC,
    2. Delea CS,
    3. Baker W,
    4. Halberg F,
    5. Lee JK
    . Chronobiology in the diagnosis and treatment of mesor-hypertension. Chronobiologia 1976;3:199–213
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Mallion JM,
    2. Debru JL,
    3. de Gaudemaris R,
    4. Dimitriou R,
    5. Perdrix A,
    6. Cau G
    . Ambulatory measurement of arterial pressure. Diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic value. Presse Med 1985;14:151–155 [Article in French]
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cooke HM,
    2. Lynch A
    . Biorhythms and chronotherapy in cardiovascular disease. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994;51:2569–2580
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. ↵
    1. Smolensky MH
    . Chronobiology and chronotherapeutics. Applications to cardiovascular medicine. Am J Hypertens 1996;9:11S–21S
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Morgan TO
    . The importance of sleep blood pressure. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2010;8:803–809
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Karlsson B,
    2. Knutsson A,
    3. Lindahl B
    . Is there an association between shift work and having a metabolic syndrome? Results from a population based study of 27,485 people. Occup Environ Med 2001;58:747–752
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Scheer FA,
    2. Hilton MF,
    3. Mantzoros CS,
    4. Shea SA
    . Adverse metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of circadian misalignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:4453–4458
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Maury E,
    2. Ramsey KM,
    3. Bass J
    . Circadian rhythms and metabolic syndrome: from experimental genetics to human disease. Circ Res 2010;106:447–462
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Silva CM,
    2. Sato S,
    3. Margolis RN
    . No time to lose: workshop on circadian rhythms and metabolic disease. Genes Dev 2010;24:1456–1464
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Hermida RC,
    2. Ayala DE,
    3. Mojón A,
    4. Fernández JR
    . Influence of circadian time of hypertension treatment on cardiovascular risk: results of the MAPEC study. Chronobiol Int 2010;27:1629–1651
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Feng D,
    2. Liu T,
    3. Sun Z,
    4. et al
    . A circadian rhythm orchestrated by histone deacetylase 3 controls hepatic lipid metabolism. Science 2011;331:1315–1319
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Cushman WC,
    2. Evans GW,
    3. Byington RP,
    4. et al.
    ; ACCORD Study Group. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1575–1585
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Marcheva B,
    2. Ramsey KM,
    3. Affinati A,
    4. Bass J
    . Clock genes and metabolic disease. J Appl Physiol 2009;107:1638–1646
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 34 (6)

In this Issue

June 2011, 34(6)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chronobiology Impacts Response to Antihypertensive Drug Regimen in Type 2 Diabetes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Chronobiology Impacts Response to Antihypertensive Drug Regimen in Type 2 Diabetes
Eli A. Friedman, Mary Ann Banerji
Diabetes Care Jun 2011, 34 (6) 1438-1439; DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0576

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Chronobiology Impacts Response to Antihypertensive Drug Regimen in Type 2 Diabetes
Eli A. Friedman, Mary Ann Banerji
Diabetes Care Jun 2011, 34 (6) 1438-1439; DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0576
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Strategies to Reduce the Cost of Renal Complications in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
  • Aiming at New Targets to Achieve Normoglycemia During Pregnancy
  • Metformin Therapy During Pregnancy
Show more Editorials

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.