Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Original Research

Osteoprotegerin Is an Independent Predictor of Vascular Events in Finnish Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

  1. Daniel Gordin, MD, DMSC1,2,
  2. Aino Soro-Paavonen, MD, DMSC1,2,
  3. Merlin C. Thomas, MBCHB, PHD3,
  4. Valma Harjutsalo, PHD1,2,4,
  5. Markku Saraheimo, MD, DMSC1,2,
  6. Mette Bjerre, PHD5,6,
  7. Carol Forsblom, DMSC1,2,
  8. Allan Flyvbjerg, MD, DMSC5,6,
  9. Per-Henrik Groop, MD, DMSC1,2,3⇑,
  10. on behalf of the FinnDiane Study Group
  1. 1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  2. 2Institute of Genetics, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland
  3. 3Diabetic Complications, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia
  4. 4Diabetes Prevention Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
  5. 5Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  6. 6Medical Research Laboratories, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  1. Corresponding author: Per-Henrik Groop, per-henrik.groop{at}helsinki.fi.
  1. D.G. and A.S.-P. contributed equally to this study.

Diabetes Care 2013 Jul; 36(7): 1827-1833. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2170
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Osteoprotegerin is an independent predictor of vascular events in Finnish adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013;36:1827–1833 - August 01, 2013

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is involved in the process of vascular calcification. We investigated whether OPG is associated with the development and progression of diabetes complications in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Serum OPG was measured in 1,939 adults with T1D participating in the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy (FinnDiane) Study. Patients with end-stage renal disease (dialysis or transplantation) at baseline were excluded from analysis. Data on cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality during follow-up were verified from hospital discharge registries (ICD codes) and the Finnish National Death Registry, respectively. The follow-up time was 10.4 ± 2.0 (mean ± SD) years.

RESULTS Only patients with macroalbuminuria and/or renal impairment had elevated OPG concentrations, when compared with participants without overt kidney disease. Patients with retinopathy or CV disease also had higher OPG concentrations, but this was attributable to their higher frequency of chronic kidney disease. OPG predicted an incident CV event (hazard ratio 1.21 [95% CI 1.01–1.45]; P = 0.035) and peripheral vascular disease/amputation events (1.46 [1.13–1.88]; P = 0.004) during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS We showed that serum OPG is an independent predictor of CV complications. OPG may be directly involved in extraosseous calcification, resulting in stiffening of the arteries and subsequent vascular insufficiency in patients with T1D.

Arterial calcification is strongly associated with the development and progression of vascular stiffening and arteriosclerosis leading to cardiovascular disease (CVD). This process is accelerated in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease (CKD) and especially in those with both (1). Many of the key regulators of bone mineralization also appear to be key mediators of osteogenic transformation of vascular smooth muscle cells and arterial calcification in diabetes (2,3). One of the most well known is osteoprotegerin (OPG) (4,5). OPG concentrations are positively correlated with coronary calcification (6), vascular stiffness (7), and the presence of unstable plaque (8) in nondiabetic individuals and an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality in patients with diabetes (9,10). In this study, we further explore the association between circulating concentrations of OPG and CV outcomes in a large well-characterized cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) exploring mortality, coronary, stroke, and amputation events.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Study participants

This study is part of the ongoing Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy (FinnDiane) Study, with the aim to identify genetic, clinical, and environmental risk factors for diabetic nephropathy in patients with T1D. The study was initiated in 1997, and follow-up data have been collected since 2004 either by re-examination of the patients or review of the medical files. Detailed description of the follow-up protocol has been described previously (11). T1D was defined as an onset of diabetes before the age of 40 years and permanent insulin treatment initiated within 1 year of diagnosis. For this study, outcomes were ascertained in patients in the FinnDiane prospective cohort recruited between 1997 and 2004, in whom serum OPG was estimated on baseline samples (N = 1,939). Furthermore, patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD; dialysis or transplantation) at baseline were excluded from analysis, as risk factors for adverse outcomes are clearly different in these patients. The ethical committees of all participating centers approved the study protocol. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki as revised in the year 2000.

Cohort characteristics

At baseline, all patients also underwent a thorough clinical investigation in connection with a regular patient visit to their attending physician. Data on medication and diabetes complications were registered with the use of a standardized questionnaire, which was completed by the physician based upon medical files. Blood pressure was measured twice in the sitting position after a 10-min rest, and the average of these two measurements was used in the analysis. Height, weight, and waist-to-hip ratio were recorded, and blood was drawn for the measurements of HbA1c, lipids, and creatinine. HbA1c and creatinine were determined by standardized assays at each center and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (12,13). Serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were analyzed centrally by automated enzymatic methods (Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Urinary albumin was determined in one sample using an immunoturbidimetric method (Hitachi 911 analyzer; Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). In addition, serum OPG was measured by a sandwich time-resolved immunofluorometric assay using commercially available antibodies (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), as previously described (14).

Ascertainment of outcomes

Renal status was defined based on the urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) in three overnight or 24-h urine collections. Normal AER was defined as <20 µg/min or <30 mg/24 h, microalbuminuria as 20 μg/min ≤ AER <200 µg/min or 30 mg/24 h ≤ AER <300 mg/24 h, and macroalbuminuria as AER ≥200 µg/min or ≥300 mg/24 h. ESRD was defined as patients undergoing dialysis or having received a kidney transplant. Identification of the CVD until the end of 2010 was obtained by linking the FinnDiane data with the Hospital Discharge Register (HDR) and the Finnish Cause of Death Registry. The HDR lists all discharged hospital patients, each patient’s unique personal identifier (assigned to every resident of Finland), dates of admission and discharge, and up to four diagnoses with the ICD and procedure codes that are based on the Nordic Classification of Surgical Procedures. Completeness and accuracy of the HDR concerning vascular disease has been shown to be very high (15). CVD was defined as a history of myocardial infarction, a coronary artery procedure (bypass surgery or angioplasty), stroke, or a peripheral artery procedure (bypass surgery or angioplasty), which was verified on the basis of ICD discharge codes specifying CV events. Limb amputations were further ascertained on the basis of ICD discharge codes specifying amputation, regardless of the presence or absence of documented peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Deaths from any cause through to 17 March 2010 were identified via a search of the Finnish National Death Registry and center databases. All deaths were confirmed with death certificate data. In each case, vitality status was verified from the Finnish National Death Registry and cause of death classified on the basis of death certificates. The causes of death in this cohort were CV death (49%), cancer-related death (8%), infection-related death (9%), and other causes (34%).

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Differences in the mean among groups were compared using two-way ANOVA. Pairwise multiple comparisons were made with the Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis to detect significant differences between groups. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. To evaluate the independent predictors of all-cause mortality, CV, coronary, stroke, and amputation events, we used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Model selection from candidate variables was accomplished by minimization of the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria (16). Overall, Cox model fit was assessed by: 1) approximation of cumulative Cox-Snell residuals to (-log) Kaplan-Meier estimates, residual plots, and specific testing of the proportional hazards assumption (17) and 2) Harrell’s C statistic (18) and added-variable goodness-of-fit tests (19). Cox model performance was adjudged by the explained variation using 5,000 bootstrap repetitions of the whole data set, adjusting for covariates (20). The potential for multiple colinearity was tested using the variance inflation factor and condition number, in which a variance inflation factor <10 and condition number <30 are desirable (21).

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics of the study subjects

The FinnDiane cohort in whom serum OPG was estimated comprised 1,939 adult patients with T1D without ESRD. The cohort characteristics at baseline have been previously described in detail (11) and are summarized in Table 1. Briefly, approximately half of the participants were males (51%). The mean age of the participants was 39 years, with a median duration of diabetes of 20 years. Forty-seven percent of patients had hypertension (defined by the use of antihypertensive agents and/or a blood pressure >140/90 mmHg). At baseline, 17% had a urinary AER in the microalbuminuric range, 13% had a urinary AER in the macroalbuminuric range, and 65% had a urinary AER in the normoalbuminuric range. A further 5% of study participants were unclassified because of an inadequate number of urine collections, and 12% of patients had an estimated GFR (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, most of whom also had macroalbuminuria.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1

Demographic and biochemical characteristics of the study subjects

Serum OPG concentrations and their determinants

Serum OPG concentrations did not differ between patients with T1D and normoalbuminuria or microalbuminuria (Table 1). However, patients with macroalbuminuria had higher OPG concentrations than those with microalbuminuria or normal AER. Patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) also had higher OPG concentrations that those without renal impairment (1.9 ± 0.1 vs. 1.4 ± 0.1 μg/mL; P < 0.05). In addition, after adjusting for renal function, OPG remained independently correlated with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, a marker of systemic inflammation (P < 0.01), and HbA1c, a marker of chronic glycemic control (P < 0.05; data not shown). Notably age, sex, body mass, blood pressure, and lipid concentrations were not associated with OPG after adjusting for renal function. Patients with established CVD had higher OPG concentrations than those without macrovascular disease (2.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.7 ± 0.1 mg/L; P < 0.001). However, the observed difference in serum OPG in patients with T1D with or without CVD was attributable to an excess of patients with CKD and eliminated after adjusting for renal function. Furthermore, patients with retinopathy requiring laser treatment had higher OPG concentrations than those without severe retinal disease (1.9 ± 0.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.1 mg/L; P < 0.001).

OPG and all-cause mortality in patients with T1D

A total of 166 patients (9%, 0.8 per hundred person-years) died during follow-up (mean of 10.2 years). Serum OPG concentrations at baseline were higher in patients who died due to an all-cause mortality (2.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.1 mg/L; P = 0.006). However, after adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with all-cause mortality, OPG was no longer associated with all-cause mortality on multivariate Cox regression analysis (P not significant; Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2

Cox regression analysis for the predictive value of serum OPG for all-cause mortality, after adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with the studied event

OPG and incident CVD in patients with T1D

During the follow-up period (mean of 10.5 years), 190 patients experienced their first CV event ever (of 1,844 patients without prior CVD; 1.0 per hundred patient-years). Again, serum OPG concentrations at baseline were higher in patients who had an incident CVD event (2.2 ± 0.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.1 mg/L; P < 0.001). After adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with CVD, OPG remained significantly associated with incident CVD on multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.03; Table 3, Fig. 1A).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3

Cox regression analysis for the predictive value of serum OPG for incident CVD, after adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with the studied event

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

The relationship of serum OPG concentrations (above and below the mean) with new-onset CVD (A) and amputation/leg revascularization (B), stratified according to the stage of albuminuria, and adjusted for other risk factors. µ−, patients with microalbuminuria and OPG concentrations below median; µ+, patients with microalbuminuria and OPG concentrations above median; M−, patients with macroalbuminuria and OPG concentrations below median; M+, patients with macroalbuminuria and OPG concentrations above median; N−, patients with normal AER and OPG concentrations below median; N+, patients with normal AER and OPG concentrations above median.

OPG and incident coronary heart disease in patients with T1D

During the follow-up period (mean of 10.5 years), 152 patients experienced their first coronary event (of 1,868 patients without prior coronary heart disease [CHD]; 0.8 per hundred patient-years). Furthermore, serum OPG concentrations at baseline were increased in patients who had an incident CVD event (2.2 ± 0.1 vs. 1.3 ± 0.1 mg/L; P = 0.002). After adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with CHD, the association of OPG with incident CHD was of borderline significance on multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.07; Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4

Cox regression analysis for the predictive value of serum OPG for incident CHD, after adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with the studied event

OPG and incident stroke in patients with T1D

During a mean of 10.3 years of follow-up, 71 patients experienced their first stroke event (of 1,903 patients without a prior stroke; 0.3 per hundred patient-years). Again, serum OPG concentrations at baseline were higher in patients who had an incident stroke (2.2 ± 0.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.1 mg/L; P = 0.02). After adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with stroke, OPG was not associated with stroke on multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.7; Table 5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 5

Cox regression analysis for the predictive value of serum OPG for incident stroke, after adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with the studied event

OPG and incident PVD in patients with T1D

During a mean of 10.2 years of follow-up, 80 patients had a leg revascularization procedure or an amputation (any cause) as their first CV event (of 1,922 patients without prior CVD; 0.4% per hundred patient-years). Serum OPG concentrations at baseline were higher in patients who had an incident leg revascularization procedure or amputation (2.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.6 ± 0.1 mg/L; P < 0.001). After adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with PVD events, OPG was independently associated with leg revascularization procedure or an amputation on multivariate Cox regression analysis (P = 0.004; Table 6, Fig. 1B).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 6

Cox regression analysis for the predictive value of serum OPG for incident amputation or peripheral revascularization, after adjusting for factors associated with serum OPG concentrations, as well as other factors independently associated with the studied event

CONCLUSIONS

OPG has been widely implicated in the process of vascular calcification and progressive CVD. OPG concentrations are positively correlated with coronary calcification (6), vascular stiffness (7), and the presence of unstable plaque (8) as well as all-cause and CV mortality in elderly women (22), as well as men with coronary artery disease (23). Previous studies have suggested that OPG concentrations are also associated with CV mortality in patients with diabetes (9,10,24). The current study extends these findings to show that OPG predicted not only incident CVD and PVD events but was also associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with T1D.

Although it has been suggested in small studies that children with T1D have increased OPG concentrations compared with nondiabetic individuals (25), in our large adult cohort, OPG concentrations were not directly elevated by T1D. Elevation of the OPG concentration was only observed in those with overt nephropathy or established macrovascular disease. The mechanisms by which OPG concentrations are increased in these settings are unclear (26). The retention of peptides like OPG and cystatin C associated with renal impairment provides part of the answer. In our study, OPG levels were certainly higher in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). However, after adjusting for renal function and albuminuria, OPG levels remained a significant predictor of adverse outcomes. Indeed, some of the risk attributable to renal disease may be medicated through accelerated vascular calcification. This may be one reason why eGFR was eliminated as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in this cohort. The independent association of OPG with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, a marker of systemic inflammation (P < 0.01), may also have contributed to elevated OPG levels in patients with overt complications, as inflammation is also elevated in patients with complications and inflammation may also drive the expression of OPG.

OPG is a soluble member of the inflammatory tumor necrosis factor receptor super family. It acts as a receptor for the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) and interferes in its binding to cell-surface RANK (27). OPG has been shown to block the differentiation of osteoclasts, the bone-resorbing cell type. OPG also has an important regulatory role in endocrine function and the immune system (4). In addition, the OPG–RANKL–RANK axis has recently been linked to atherosclerosis (5). OPG is present in blood vessels (4,28) and especially in the smooth muscle cells of the vascular media (29,30), which are thought to be the major source of OPG in the arterial wall. OPG-deficient mice develop early arterial calcification (31,32). Consequently, the elevation of circulating OPG concentrations in proatherogenic settings has been thought to represent a compensatory phenomenon to limit further vascular damage. However, by inhibiting the regulatory pathways signaled through the RANK receptor, and particularly those of the atheroprotective ligand tumor necrosis factor-α–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (33), elevated OPG concentrations may also have direct actions on vascular function, as well as the development and progression of vascular disease. Indeed, it has been previously shown that human full-length OPG induces the proliferation of rodent vascular smooth muscle cells and augments atherogenesis in diabetic apolipoprotein E knockout mice (34). In addition, it has been demonstrated that OPG is able to initiate transforming growth factor-β–dependent changes in vascular smooth muscle cells, stimulating proliferation, inflammation, and fibrogenesis. Such data suggest that the increases in adverse vascular outcomes associated with elevated OPG concentration in our patients with T1D may be causally linked.

Vascular calcification is strongly associated with PVD in patients with diabetes, including the risk for amputation. Vascular calcification score on plain radiographs of the feet is a predictor of peripheral arterial disease in patients with CKD. However, our study is the first to show an independent link between OPG and peripheral vascular events (amputation or revascularization). Although amputation may have multiple etiologies, we chose to use this more pragmatic outcome as it is often difficult to determine the relative contribution of infection, neuropathy, or vascular insufficiency as the cause of a foot ulcer or subsequent need for amputation.

While OPG was higher in those participants with severe retinal disease in our much larger patient cohort, after adjusting for the confounding effects of renal impairment, this difference was eliminated. Similarly, no association between OPG and diabetic retinopathy was reported in a cohort of 200 patients with T1D (35). By contrast, OPG has previously been associated with maculopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (24). The reasons for this difference between T1D and T2D is unclear, although it may be due to confounding effects of renal impairment in older patients with T2D.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that serum OPG is independently associated with CV complications and mortality in adults with T1D. There are also sufficient experimental data to support a causal link. Blocking the actions of OPG consequently may therefore offer one potential intervention to slow the development and progression of vascular disease in diabetes. Indeed, complete blockade of OPG in mice causes early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification (32). This suggests that a better target for the prevention of vascular disease may be to augment its ligands, TRAIL and RANKL. For example, studies using TRAIL in apolipoprotein E knockout mice with T1D have shown promising reductions in atherogenesis (33), possibly by overcoming the inhibitory effects of its decoy-receptor OPG.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from Folkhälsan Research Foundation, Academy of Finland (134379), Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Funds (EVO), the Wilhelm and Else Stockmann Foundation, the Waldemar von Frenckell Foundation, the Liv och Hälsa Foundation, the Finnish Medical Society (Finska Läkaresällskapet), the Diabetes Research Foundation, the Paulo Foundation, the Paavo Nurmi Foundation, The Finnish Medical Foundation, and the Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation. P.-H.G. received lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Genzyme, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Novo Nordisk and is an advisory board member of Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Cebix. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

D.G., A.S.-P., and M.C.T. were responsible for the conception, design, and collection of the study and data; data analysis and interpretation; and writing and editing of the manuscript. V.H., M.S., M.B., C.F., and A.F. were responsible for the conception, design, and collection of the study and data and the writing and editing of the manuscript. P.-H.G. was responsible for the conception, design, and collection of the study and data, writing and editing of the manuscript, and final approval of the manuscript. P.-H.G. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

The authors thank Anna Sandelin, Jaana Tuomikangas, Tuula Soppela, Maikki Parkkonen, and Anna-Reetta Salonen from the Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, and Institute of Genetics, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland, for excellent technical assistance.

  • Received October 23, 2012.
  • Accepted December 17, 2012.
  • © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association.

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Floege J,
    2. Ketteler M
    . Vascular calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19(Suppl. 5):V59–V66pmid:15284362
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Tyson KL,
    2. Reynolds JL,
    3. McNair R,
    4. Zhang Q,
    5. Weissberg PL,
    6. Shanahan CM
    . Osteo/chondrocytic transcription factors and their target genes exhibit distinct patterns of expression in human arterial calcification. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:489–494pmid:12615658
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Vaccarezza M,
    2. Bortul R,
    3. Fadda R,
    4. Zweyer M
    . Increased OPG expression and impaired OPG/TRAIL ratio in the aorta of diabetic rats. Med Chem 2007;3:387–391pmid:17627577
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Simonet WS,
    2. Lacey DL,
    3. Dunstan CR,
    4. et al
    . Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density. Cell 1997;89:309–319pmid:9108485
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Flyvbjerg A
    . Diabetic angiopathy, the complement system and the tumor necrosis factor superfamily. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2010;6:94–101
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Anand DV,
    2. Lahiri A,
    3. Lim E,
    4. Hopkins D,
    5. Corder R
    . The relationship between plasma osteoprotegerin levels and coronary artery calcification in uncomplicated type 2 diabetic subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1850–1857pmid:16682312
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Tousoulis D,
    2. Siasos G,
    3. Maniatis K,
    4. et al
    . Serum osteoprotegerin and osteopontin levels are associated with arterial stiffness and the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 26 May 2012 [Epub ahead of print]pmid:22640692
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Vik A,
    2. Mathiesen EB,
    3. Johnsen SH,
    4. et al
    . Serum osteoprotegerin, sRANKL and carotid plaque formation and growth in a general population—the Tromsø study. J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:898–905pmid:20128863
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Jorsal A,
    2. Tarnow L,
    3. Flyvbjerg A,
    4. Parving HH,
    5. Rossing P,
    6. Rasmussen LM
    . Plasma osteoprotegerin levels predict cardiovascular and all-cause mortality and deterioration of kidney function in type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy. Diabetologia 2008;51:2100–2107pmid:18719882
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Reinhard H,
    2. Lajer M,
    3. Gall MA,
    4. et al
    . Osteoprotegerin and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2561–2566pmid:20929997
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Groop PH,
    2. Thomas MC,
    3. Moran JL,
    4. et al.,
    5. FinnDiane Study Group
    . The presence and severity of chronic kidney disease predicts all-cause mortality in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2009;58:1651–1658pmid:19401416
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. National Kidney Foundation
    . K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39(Suppl. 1):S1–S266pmid:11904577
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Levey AS,
    2. Stevens LA,
    3. Schmid CH,
    4. et al.,
    5. CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration)
    . A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:604–612pmid:19414839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Røysland R,
    2. Masson S,
    3. Omland T,
    4. et al.,
    5. GISSI-HF Investigators
    . Prognostic value of osteoprotegerin in chronic heart failure: The GISSI-HF trial. Am Heart J 2010;160:286–293pmid:20691834
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Sund R
    . Quality of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: a systematic review. Scand J Public Health 2012;40:505–515pmid:22899561
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Kuha J
    . AIC and BIC. Comparisons of assumptions and performance. Sociol Methods Res 2004;33:188–229
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. ↵
    1. Grambsch PM,
    2. Therneau TM
    . Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based upon weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994;81:515–526
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Harrell FE Jr,
    2. Lee KL,
    3. Mark DB
    . Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996;15:361–387pmid:8668867
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    May S, Hosmer DW. Hosmer and Lemeshow type goodness-of-fit statistics for the Cox proprotional hazards model. In Handbook of Statistics, Volume 23: Advances in Survival Analysis. Balakrishnan N, Rao CR, Eds. Amsterdam, North Holland, 2004, p. 383–394
  20. ↵
    1. Royston P
    . Explained variation for survival models. Stata J 2006;6:83–96
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Belsley DA
    . Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression. New York, Wiley-Interscience, 1991
  22. ↵
    1. Browner WS,
    2. Lui LY,
    3. Cummings SR
    . Associations of serum osteoprotegerin levels with diabetes, stroke, bone density, fractures, and mortality in elderly women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:631–637pmid:11158021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Schoppet M,
    2. Sattler AM,
    3. Schaefer JR,
    4. Herzum M,
    5. Maisch B,
    6. Hofbauer LC
    . Increased osteoprotegerin serum levels in men with coronary artery disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:1024–1028pmid:12629080
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Knudsen ST,
    2. Foss CH,
    3. Poulsen PL,
    4. Andersen NH,
    5. Mogensen CE,
    6. Rasmussen LM
    . Increased plasma concentrations of osteoprotegerin in type 2 diabetic patients with microvascular complications. Eur J Endocrinol 2003;149:39–42pmid:12824864
    OpenUrlAbstract
  25. ↵
    1. Galluzzi F,
    2. Stagi S,
    3. Salti R,
    4. et al
    . Osteoprotegerin serum levels in children with type 1 diabetes: a potential modulating role in bone status. Eur J Endocrinol 2005;153:879–885pmid:16322394
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Hofbauer LC,
    2. Schoppet M
    . Osteoprotegerin: a link between osteoporosis and arterial calcification? Lancet 2001;358:257–259pmid:11498208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Boyle WJ,
    2. Simonet WS,
    3. Lacey DL
    . Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature 2003;423:337–342pmid:12748652
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Schoppet M,
    2. Preissner KT,
    3. Hofbauer LC
    . RANK ligand and osteoprotegerin: paracrine regulators of bone metabolism and vascular function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002;22:549–553pmid:11950689
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Olesen P,
    2. Ledet T,
    3. Rasmussen LM
    . Arterial osteoprotegerin: increased amounts in diabetes and modifiable synthesis from vascular smooth muscle cells by insulin and TNF-alpha. Diabetologia 2005;48:561–568pmid:15700136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hofbauer LC,
    2. Shui C,
    3. Riggs BL,
    4. et al
    . Effects of immunosuppressants on receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin production by human osteoblastic and coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001;280:334–339pmid:11162519
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Bucay N,
    2. Sarosi I,
    3. Dunstan CR,
    4. et al
    . osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification. Genes Dev 1998;12:1260–1268pmid:9573043
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Min H,
    2. Morony S,
    3. Sarosi I,
    4. et al
    . Osteoprotegerin reverses osteoporosis by inhibiting endosteal osteoclasts and prevents vascular calcification by blocking a process resembling osteoclastogenesis. J Exp Med 2000;192:463–474pmid:10952716
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Secchiero P,
    2. Candido R,
    3. Corallini F,
    4. et al
    . Systemic tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand delivery shows antiatherosclerotic activity in apolipoprotein E-null diabetic mice. Circulation 2006;114:1522–1530pmid:17000905
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Candido R,
    2. Toffoli B,
    3. Corallini F,
    4. et al
    . Human full-length osteoprotegerin induces the proliferation of rodent vascular smooth muscle cells both in vitro and in vivo. J Vasc Res 2010;47:252–261pmid:19907187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Rasmussen LM,
    2. Tarnow L,
    3. Hansen TK,
    4. Parving HH,
    5. Flyvbjerg A
    . Plasma osteoprotegerin levels are associated with glycaemic status, systolic blood pressure, kidney function and cardiovascular morbidity in type 1 diabetic patients. Eur J Endocrinol 2006;154:75–81pmid:16381994
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 36 (7)

In this Issue

July 2013, 36(7)
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Osteoprotegerin Is an Independent Predictor of Vascular Events in Finnish Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Osteoprotegerin Is an Independent Predictor of Vascular Events in Finnish Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Daniel Gordin, Aino Soro-Paavonen, Merlin C. Thomas, Valma Harjutsalo, Markku Saraheimo, Mette Bjerre, Carol Forsblom, Allan Flyvbjerg, Per-Henrik Groop, on behalf of the FinnDiane Study Group
Diabetes Care Jul 2013, 36 (7) 1827-1833; DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2170

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Osteoprotegerin Is an Independent Predictor of Vascular Events in Finnish Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Daniel Gordin, Aino Soro-Paavonen, Merlin C. Thomas, Valma Harjutsalo, Markku Saraheimo, Mette Bjerre, Carol Forsblom, Allan Flyvbjerg, Per-Henrik Groop, on behalf of the FinnDiane Study Group
Diabetes Care Jul 2013, 36 (7) 1827-1833; DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2170
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Original Research

  • Insulin Resistance Is Associated With Enhanced Brain Glucose Uptake During Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemia: A Large-Scale PET Cohort
  • Not Only Diabetes but Also Prediabetes Leads to Functional Decline and Disability in Older Adults
  • Changes in Plant-Based Diet Indices and Subsequent Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Women and Men: Three U.S. Prospective Cohorts
Show more Original Research

Diabetes Care Symposium

  • Is Coronary Artery Disease Inevitable in Type 2 Diabetes? From a Glucocentric to a Holistic View on Patient Management
  • From Hong Kong Diabetes Register to JADE Program to RAMP-DM for Data-Driven Actions
  • The TCF7L2 Locus: A Genetic Window Into the Pathogenesis of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Show more Diabetes Care Symposium

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.