Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Bench to Clinic Symposia

Natriuretic Peptides, Heart, and Adipose Tissue: New Findings and Future Developments for Diabetes Research

  1. Gabriella Gruden,
  2. Andrea Landi and
  3. Graziella Bruno⇑
  1. Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  1. Corresponding author: Graziella Bruno, graziella.bruno{at}unito.it
Diabetes Care 2014 Nov; 37(11): 2899-2908. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0669
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Natriuretic peptides (NPs) play a key role in cardiovascular homeostasis, counteracting the deleterious effects of volume and pressure overload and activating antibrotic and antihypertrophic pathways in the heart. N-terminal B-type NP (NT-proBNP) also is a promising biomarker of global cardiovascular risk in the general population, and there is increasing interest on its potential use in diabetic patients for screening of silent cardiovascular abnormalities, cardiovascular risk stratification, and guided intervention. Recently, both atrial NP (ANP) and B-type NP (BNP) have emerged as key mediators in the control of metabolic processes including the heart in the network of organs that regulate energy usage and metabolism. Epidemiological studies have shown that ANP and BNP are reduced in people with obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes, and this deficiency may contribute to enhance their global cardiovascular risk. Moreover, ANP and BNP have receptors in the adipose tissue, enhance lipolysis and energy expenditure, and modulate adipokine release and food intake. Therefore, low ANP and BNP levels may be not only a consequence but also a cause of obesity, and recent prospective studies have shown that low levels of NT-proBNP and midregional proANP (MR-proANP) are a strong predictor of type 2 diabetes onset. Whether ANP and BNP supplementation may result in either cardiovascular or metabolic benefits in humans remains, however, to be established.

Introduction

Natriuretic peptides (NPs) have gained great interest as indicators of the state of cardiovascular health across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in diabetic subjects (1–4). Recently, NPs also have emerged as key mediators in the control of metabolic processes (5) and have been implicated in the development of diabetes (6,7), shifting current paradigms and opening novel avenues in diabetes research. This review will summarize new findings in the field and discuss their potential clinical relevance.

NPs and Their Receptors

NPs are a family of genetically distinct and structurally related peptides, including atrial NP (ANP), B-type NP (BNP), and C-type NP (CNP). They share a similar structural conformation, characterized by a peptide ring with a cysteine bridge, which is well preserved throughout evolution, being the portion of the chain that binds to the receptor. ANP and BNP are predominantly secreted by cardiomyocytes, whereas CNP is mainly produced by the central nervous system, the endothelium, the bone, and the reproductive system (8–11).

Human NP genes encode for long inactive peptides that are processed to active peptides and equimolar concentrations of inactive fragments, which have a longer plasma half-life and are thus more suitable biomarkers for clinical use (12). ProANP is processed into active ANP and inactive fragments (N-terminal BNP [NT-proBNP] and midregional proANP [MR-proANP]) predominantly by the enzyme corin (13). ProBNP, which is often posttranslationally O-glycosylated in the N-terminal region, is cleaved into active BNP and the inactive fragment NT-proBNP by corin and furin (9). ProBNP can be released into the bloodstream prior to processing (14), but has six- to eightfold lower activity than BNP. The CNP gene encodes for a 126 prepropeptide that contains the two active forms of CNP (CNP-22 and CNP-53) and the inactive NT-proCNP fragment (11).

The most important factor governing ANP secretion is mechanical stretching of the atria. ANP is stored in secretory granules and stretching induces both secretion of previously synthesized ANP and increased ANP gene transcription. Stress of the ventricular wall due to volume and/or pressure overload also is the main inducer of BNP transcription (10,15). Circulating BNP and NT-proBNP levels are quite low in the normal state but rise in pathophysiological conditions characterized by fluid retention, such as heart failure (HF) (16). In addition, hypoxia-response elements are present in the promoter region of the BNP gene and both myocardial ischemia and hypoxia are potent BNP inducers (17). This explains why high BNP levels are found in acute coronary syndrome or during exercise-induced ischemia despite the absence of ventricular dilatation. Finally, ANP and BNP secretion can be modulated by humoral factors, including endothelin-1, angiotensin II, sex steroids and thyroid hormones, glucocorticoids, and inflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α [TNF-α], interleukin [IL]-1, IL-6) (8–10,18). CNP expression is regulated by transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and other growth factors in a cell- and tissue-specific manner. In the endothelium, TGF-β, TNF-α, and IL-1 enhance CNP expression, whereas platelet-derived growth factor–BB is the major CNP inducer in vascular smooth muscle cells (11).

ANP and BNP plasma levels are higher in women than in men and increase with age (19). There is preliminary evidence that estrogens induce ANP and BNP production, whereas androgens suppress it; this may account for the sex differences in plasma concentrations (20). Plasma CNP levels are greater in men than in women, decline from adolescent to the fifth decade, and tend to increase thereafter, particularly in men (21). This is likely because both testosterone and growth hormone are potent CNP inducers (11).

NPs bind to high-affinity transmembrane NP receptors (NPR)-A, NPR-B, NPR-C that share a relatively common molecular configuration. NPR-C binds to all three peptides with similar affinity, whereas NPR-A and NPR-B differ in ligand specificity (NPR-A: ANP>BNP>>CNP; NPR-B: CNP>>ANP≥BNP); this, together with NPR tissue distribution, affects NP peripheral activity. Binding to both NPR-A and NPR-B causes a conformational change in the receptor molecule that, in turn, activates particulate guanylyl-cyclase and increases intracellular cGMP that represents a second messenger critical to NP activity. By contrast, binding to NPR-C results in NP internalization and enzymatic degradation, and NPR-C plays a key role in NP clearance (9,22) (Fig. 1). In addition to undergoing receptor-mediated degradation, NPs can be degraded by extracellular proteases, including neutral endopeptidase (NEP) and insulin-degrading enzyme (8,23). Moreover, cleavage of two N-terminal amino acids from BNP by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) yields BNP3–32, which retains the physiologic effects of BNP on the heart but has lower activity on both the kidney and the vessel wall (24). Other aminopeptidases can further digest the N-terminal region of BNP and BNP3–32, leading to formation of breakdown products (junk-BNP) of unclear biological significance (25) (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

ANP (red), BNP (blue), and CNP (green) NPs are secreted by the heart in response to various inducers and bind to high-affinity NPR-A, NPR-B, and NPR-C. NPR-C binds to all three peptides with similar affinity, whereas NPR-A and NPR-B differ in ligand specificity (NPR-A: ANP>BNP>>CNP; NPR-B: CNP>>ANP≥BNP). Binding to both NPR-A and NPR-B activates particulate guanylyl cyclase and increases intracellular cGMP leading to PKG activation. Binding to the clearance NPR-C leads to NP internalization and enzymatic degradation. GTP, guanosine-5-triphosphate.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Schematic representation of proBNP processing and cross-reactivity of assays measuring BNP and NT-proBNP. ProBNP can be posttranslationally O-glycosylated (O-glyc) within the Golgi apparatus. Both O-glycosylated and non-O-glycosylated proBNP are cleaved to BNP and NT-proBNP in equimolar fashion by the enzyme furin and then secreted into the circulation. In the bloodstream, BNP can be further degraded to BNP3–32 and other breakdown products (junk-BNP). ProBNP can be released prior to processing, particularly when O-glycosylated at position Thr71 interferes with cleavage by furin, and may undergo processing into the bloodstream. Assays measuring BNP also recognized proBNP, BNP3–32, and junk-BNP (black square). Assays measuring NT-proBNP cross-react with proBNP (green square) but have poor reactivity for O-glycosylated NT-proBNP and proBNP (dotted green square).

Biological Actions of NPs and Metabolism

Both ANP and BNP are important in maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis and counteracting the deleterious effects of volume and pressure overload. Indeed, they act on the kidney to promote diuresis and natriuresis, induce vasodilation, and protect the heart from high preload and afterload pressures, which can result in hypertrophy and fibrosis by activating antibrotic and antihypertrophic pathways (26–28). In addition, ANP and BNP reduce the sympathetic tone and suppress both renin and aldosterone secretion; therefore, they not only counterbalance but also lower the activity of systems with opposing renal and cardiovascular effects (29). Endothelial CNP, which is known to induce vasorelaxation by hyperpolarization of underlying vascular muscle cells, is a potential endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, participating in the paracrine action of other endothelial vasorelaxant mediators, such as nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin (11).

Our understanding of the physiology of the NP system has dramatically increased in the past decades, and today the key role of NPs in cardiovascular homeostasis is well established (see previous reviews [26–29]); however, emerging evidence suggests that the effects of NPs extend beyond the cardiovascular system. As detailed below, NPR are expressed in human adipose tissue, and NPs can stimulate lipolysis, promote browning of adipocytes, and also may modulate adipokine secretion and food intake (5,30–35). This previously unsuspected role of NPs in the regulation of metabolism is important as it raises the possibility that the heart belongs to the network of endocrine organs that regulate energy usage and metabolism. Furthermore, it may provide new targets for therapeutic intervention in the fight against obesity and insulin resistance.

The lipolytic effect of ANP was first shown almost 20 years ago in physiological studies in humans. Intravenous infusion of ANP acutely increases plasma concentrations of both glycerol and free fatty acids (FFA) (36). Furthermore, ANP infusion in human subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue induces lipolysis and increases local blood flow, resulting in enhanced lipid mobilization (37). Elegant studies performed in humans suggest that FFA mobilized in response to ANP may undergo mitochondrial oxidation in the liver, the skeletal muscle, and the adipose tissue itself (37–39). In vitro studies on adipocytes have partially clarified the underlying mechanism of NP lipolytic activity. Activation of the NPR-A receptor induces a rise in cGMP levels, followed by activation of protein kinase G (PKG). PKG, in turn, phosphorylates perilipin, and this induces a physical alteration of the lipid droplet surface that facilitates activation of both adipose triglyceride lipase and hormone-sensitive lipase, thus triggering lipolysis (35). The clearance receptor NPR-C reduces NPR-A–mediated lipolysis by lowering local NP bioavailability. Indeed, rodents, which express NPR-C at high levels on adipocytes, have a blunted lipolytic response to NPs, and NPR-C deletion rescues their responsiveness (32).

A recent breakthrough in our understanding of role of NP on fat tissue metabolism has been the demonstration that in adipocytes NPR-A activation induces transcription of genes enhancing energy expenditure and heat production (adipocyte browning) (32). The most important gene encodes the mitochondrial transporter uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) that enables the separation of lipid oxidation from ATP production, allowing the conversion of nutritional energy to heat. NPR-A activation elicits this response by increasing p38α signaling and phosphorylation of ATF2, directly increasing PPARγ coactivator-1α [PGC-1α]) and UCP1 transcription. PGC-1α and UCP-1 promote mitochondrial biogenesis and both coupled and uncoupled respiration, and this results in enhanced energy expenditure thereby limiting white fat mass expansion. In line with these findings, NPR-A knockout mice have an increased fat mass, whereas BNP infusion results in enhanced energy expenditure in mice (32).

NPs also have a direct effect on the skeletal muscle, the major site of fuel oxidation and energy expenditure. Transgenic mice overexpressing BNP and fed with a high-fat diet display higher expression of mitochondrial oxidative genes in skeletal muscle (40). Furthermore, cultured human skeletal muscle myotubes respond to both ANP and BNP with a significant increase in mitochondrial fat oxidative capacity through transcriptional activation of PGC-1α and subsequent induction of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) genes and mitochondrial respiration (39). ANP also induces energy uncoupling, possibly via overexpression of UCP-3 and adenine nucleotide translocase 1, which accounts for 50% of basal (noninduced) proton leak (41). Notably, an upregulation of NPR-A, PGC-1α, and OXPHOS genes is observed in the skeletal muscle of obese subjects in response to an aerobic exercise training program, suggesting that some of the metabolic adaptations of skeletal muscle in response to chronic exercise may be mediated by ANP and BNP (39).

Data on the interplay between the NP system and cytokines released by the fat tissue are still limited. However, in vitro in human adipocytes, ANP inhibits leptin release and both ANP and BNP enhance adiponectin secretion via NPR-A (33). In addition, in adipose tissue explants, ANP reduces IL-6, TNF-α, MCP-1, and leptin secretion (35). Finally, ANP infusion enhances adiponectin plasma levels in humans (42). Collectively, these findings suggest that NPR-A activation may modulate adipokine secretion and has a beneficial effect on low-grade inflammation of the adipose tissue and thus insulin resistance.

Recent studies suggest that NPs are involved in food intake control. A study performed in healthy fasting volunteers has shown that BNP infusion decreases hunger and increases satiety, possibly by lowering circulating ghrelin levels (34). Ghrelin also has direct cardiovascular effects (43), and this supports the existence of a bidirectional heart–gut cross talk. In addition, the high expression of NPR-B, the main CNP receptor, in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus suggests a role of CNP in the control of food intake. Consistently, a recent experimental study has shown that central administration of CNP reduces food intake and body weight, partially through activation of the hypothalamic melanocortin pathway, which also is engaged by leptin and serotonin (44). Recently, Kim et al. (45) have described an entirely new mechanism in the control of ANP release from the heart by the gut-released hormone GLP-1, revealing a new gut–heart connection. Activation of GLP-1 receptors in the atrial myocardium induces ANP secretion, resulting in vasodilation, natriuresis, and reduced blood pressure. Therefore, an increase in nutrients after a meal triggers a gut-mediated response, leading not only to effective regulation of insulin and glucagon release through a direct GLP-1 effect but also to indirect metabolic and hemodynamic changes mediated by ANP. ANP-induced vasodilation may be advantageous in this setting as it may promote an increased blood supply to the gut and adipose tissue, thus resulting in better absorption and distribution of nutrients (45,46).

The key role of insulin in metabolism has prompted studies on the potential interplay between NPs and β-cells. In vitro ANP induces insulin secretion in an NPR-A–dependent manner by increasing Ca2+ influx through blockade of ATP-sensitive K+ channels. Furthermore, ANP increases the insulin content of isolated islets, and NPR-A knockout mice have lower insulin levels in freshly isolated islets, reduced β-cell mass, and higher fasting blood glucose levels (47). In keeping with these data, ANP infusion enhances insulin secretion in humans in the fasted state and in response to a meal test (37,48).

Only a few studies have assessed the effect of NP infusion on glucose homeostasis. In fasting healthy men, an acute high-dose ANP infusion induces a modest increase in blood glucose that is likely due to enhanced FFA mobilization leading to increased gluconeogenesis (38). Short-term BNP infusion in healthy volunteers during an intravenous glucose tolerance test reduces the rise in blood glucose levels as compared with saline. This occurs without changes in insulin secretion and sensitivity and probably results from enhanced glucose volume distribution (49). These physiological studies do not, however, address the far more relevant issue of the long-term effects of chronic NP treatment on glucose metabolism. This has not yet been investigated in humans; however, a recent study in db/db mice has shown that chronic BNP infusion induces a significant reduction in blood glucose levels (50).

Obviously there is much additional work to be done in both basic and clinical research to fully understand the function of the NP system in metabolic processes. However, emerging evidence indicating that NPs are the mediators of a novel “heart-adipose axis” has opened the way to an entirely novel and exciting area of research with potentially high clinical impact.

NPs and Obesity, Diabetes, and Diabetes Complications

Obesity

Obesity is associated with decreased circulating levels of ANP and BNP, and a negative linear relationship between BMI and NP plasma values has been consistently reported in epidemiological studies (5,35,51). Conversely, weight loss increases NT-proBNP levels (52). There also is evidence that a reduction in NP levels is associated to a less favorable adipose tissue distribution profile. Recent data from the Dallas Heart Study show that both BNP and NT-proBNP are inversely associated with visceral and liver fat and positively associated with lower glutofemoral body fat, independent of confounders including insulin resistance (53).

Central obesity is a key feature of the metabolic syndrome (MetS); it is, however, still matter of debate if BNP and NT-proBNP levels are reduced in MetS, with studies reporting either lower or unchanged values. This is likely due to differences among examined populations in the relative frequencies of MetS components with opposite effects on BNP. Consistently, a recent longitudinal study performed on 3,019 African Americans has shown that both lower and higher BNP levels were predictors of incident MetS in a nonlinear U-shape relationship, likely a reflection of lower BNP relation to obesity and higher BNP relation to blood pressure (54).

The cause of the relative ANP and BNP deficiency seen in obesity (natriuretic handicap) is poorly understood, but it is of clinical relevance as it may expose obese patients to enhanced cardiovascular risk and represent a potential mechanism behind the frequent clustering of obesity and hypertension. Almost two decades ago, researchers interested in the relationship between obesity and hypertension noted that levels of the clearance NPR-C were markedly elevated in obese subjects. The underlying mechanism remains elusive; however, food intake and insulin resistance are likely involved as adipose tissue NPR-C expression is increased by a high-fat diet, correlates with fasting insulin, and is reduced by pharmacological strategies improving insulin sensitivity (5,40). Regardless of the mechanism, the observation that NPR-C is overexpressed in obese subjects fueled speculation that increased NP clearance could explain the “natriuretic handicap.” However, both NT-proBNP and NT-proANP, which are not cleared by NPR-C, show a similar inverse relationship with BMI, making this hypothesis less likely. In addition, recent data indicate that NPs are mainly cleared by NEP.

Alternatively, ANP and BNP levels may be reduced in obesity because of a lower synthesis and/or release from the heart. In keeping with this hypothesis, cardiac mRNA expression of both ANP and BNP is reduced in obese Zucker fatty rats and db/db mice (50,55). Data in humans are limited; however, a study in subjects who underwent cardiac catheterization has shown that cardiac BNP release is inversely and independently related to BMI (56). Obese individuals may be prone to a relative NP deficiency, stemming from suppressive effects of circulating androgens on ANP and BNP synthesis (57) and possibly from the deleterious systemic and local effects of cardiac ectopic fat on NP synthesis and release (58,59). Consistently, downregulation of cardiac ANP and BNP expression is paralleled by a rise in cardiac triglycerides content in animal models of obesity, and oleic acid reduces ANP mRNA levels in cultured cardiomyocytes (60).

On the other hand, the recently discovered effects of NPs on metabolism and energy expenditure raise the possibility that NP deficiency may directly contribute to the development and worsening of obesity and dysmetabolism. Indeed, in obese and insulin-resistant subjects, reduced ANP and BNP levels and upregulation of the clearance NPR-C in the adipose tissue may hamper the ability of the local NP system to enhance lipolysis and energy expenditure (5). In keeping with this hypothesis, targeted deletion of the NPR-C gene in rodents results in a lean phenotype, transgenic BNP mice fed with a high-fat diet are protected from obesity and insulin resistance, and chronic BNP infusion improves the metabolic profile of db/db mice, including a reduction in fat content (32,40,50).

Diabetes

Growing evidence of a role of NPs in obesity and insulin resistance raises the question of whether NP deficiency is implicated in the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Recently, two large and well-designed prospective studies have substantiated this hypothesis. In the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (6), MR-ANP and NT-proBNP levels were measured in 1,828 nondiabetic individuals who subsequently underwent a 16-year follow-up exam, including an oral glucose tolerance test. Results showed that low MR-ANP plasma levels predict development of future diabetes. After full adjustment, the odds ratio for incident diabetes in the bottom compared with the top quartile of MR-ANP was 1.65 (95% CI 1.08–2.51), independent of confounders. An inverse, but not statistically significant, association was found between NT-proBNP and diabetes risk. In the same cohort, the variant rs5068 within the ANP gene, which results in enhanced plasma ANP levels, was associated with a 12% reduced adjusted-risk of incident diabetes (61). Furthermore, other studies have reported that the rs5068 variant is associated with lower BMI, waist circumference, and prevalence of obesity and MetS (62,63).

In the longitudinal Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC) (7), which examined 7,822 nondiabetic individuals, with respect to NT-proBNP values in the highest quartile (>114 pg/mL), values in the lowest quartile (<31 pg/mL) were associated with higher risk of incident diabetes over a 12-year follow-up period, independent of confounders and risk factors (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% CI 0.64–0.87]). A significant linear trend across quartiles also was evident, even after stratification by BMI (7). Furthermore, a common genetic BNP variant (rs198389), which results in a 20% increase in plasma BNP levels, was found to be associated with a 15% reduced risk of T2D (64). See Table 1 for a summary of human studies (6,7,61,64,65).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

NPs and the risk of T2D in human epidemiological studies

Insight on the mechanisms whereby NP deficiency may enhance diabetes risk is still insufficient. In the Malmö and ARIC studies, the prospective relationship between MR-ANP and NT-proBNP and diabetes remained significant after adjustment for insulin resistance, indicating that alternative mechanisms, such as NPR-A–induced energy expenditure, adiponectin secretion, and improved β-cell function, may be involved (Fig. 3). Regardless of the mechanism, the evidence that low NP levels are implicated in the development of diabetes together with the well-established role of low NPs in hypertension and CVD suggests that NP deficiency may be a link between the relevant clinical problem of shared propensity to diabetes, hypertension, and CVD. Moreover, it suggests that NT-proBNP and MR-ANP may be used as biomarker for diabetes prediction. Further studies are, however, required to establish clinical relevance.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Potential link between NPs, obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes. Obesity and insulin resistance are associated with both impaired ANP and BNP cardiac release and overexpression of the clearance NPR-C, leading to reduced NP-mediated beneficial effects on target organs of metabolism (adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, pancreatic β-cells, central nervous system). This results in further weight gain and worsening of insulin resistance and also may favor diabetes development.

Diabetes Complications

Both BNP and NT-proBNP are well-established diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of HF in both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects (16). Although BNP and NT-proBNP levels appear elevated in patients with HF, the fraction of active BNP is relatively small. Current assays cross-react with poorly active BNP-related peptides (proBNP, BNP3–32, junk-BNP) (Fig. 2), whose levels are increased in HF, and they thus overestimate plasma and serum BNP and NT-proBNP values (25). Altered cardiac processing of proBNP to BNP is a likely explanation for the rise in circulating proBNP levels in HF. Notably, a recent study in humans has shown that cardiac proBNP release was greater in patients with HF and that the only variable positively associated with enhanced proBNP secretion was diabetes (14). This suggests that HF, particularly in diabetes, affects either the expression and activity of proBNP cleaving enzymes or proBNP glycosylation, a modification that changes proBNP susceptibility to cleavage by furin, particularly when it occurs at Thr71 (25). On the other hand, studies in db/db mice suggest that both enhanced BNP3–32 formation and resistance to mechanisms of proBNP clearance from the circulation also may contribute to increase circulating BNP immunoreactivity in diabetes (50).

BNP and NT-proBNP are not always reliable biomarkers for HF diagnosis as 30% of symptomatic HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) have normal BNP and NT-proBNP levels (66). This is of relevance to diabetes as HFPEF prevalence is very high in T2D and the relative risk of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization conferred by diabetes is significantly greater in HFPEF than in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF) (67,68). Recently, studies performed on myocardial tissue from patients with HFPEF and left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction have given new insight on the potential relationship between diabetes, HFPEF, and BNP. According to a novel proposed paradigm for the pathogenesis of HFPEF, a systemic inflammatory state induced by obesity, diabetes, and other comorbidities causes oxidative stress in the coronary microvascular endothelium, reducing myocardial NO bioavailability and leading to reduced PKG activity in cardiomyocytes, which therefore become stiff and hypertrophied (69). As BNP gene expression is regulated by diastolic LV wall stress, which is lower in HFPEF because of prevailing concentric LV remodeling, this is not compensated by an enhanced BNP production. Consistently, myocardial BNP expression is lower in patients with HFPEF than in those with HFREF (70). This raises the possibility that drugs increasing BNP levels may represent a novel therapeutic strategy in patients with HFPEF and the PARAGON-HF trial is under development to test this hypothesis.

Besides HF, BNP and NT-proBNP can provide quantitative information about the state of cardiovascular health across the full spectrum of CVD, and there is increasing interest on their potential role as predictors and biomarkers of complications and cardiovascular mortality in diabetes. A prospective study performed on 315 T2D patients showed that NT-proBNP levels were greater in patients with albuminuria. Furthermore, NT-proBNP was a strong predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality independent of potential confounding risk factors and had a predictive value for all-cause mortality comparable to that of microalbuminuria (1). Consistently, we have recently reported that NT-proBNP was strongly and independently associated with cardiovascular mortality in a longitudinal study performed on a large cohort of 1,825 T2D patients from the population-based Casale Monferrato Study (71), and in the same cohort, NT-proBNP also was a negative confounder in the association between central obesity and cardiovascular death (72). Similarly, in type 1 diabetes NT-proBNP is associated with micro- and macrovascular complications and is a predictor of cardiovascular mortality (73,74). Recent studies also have demonstrated that NT-proBNP predicts cardiovascular events in T2D patients and has a greater predictive value than other well-established cardiac risk markers (2,75,76). Collectively, these data suggest the possible use of NT-proBNP as a tool for risk stratification, and preliminary data support this approach. In the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study, NT-proBNP greatly improved the accuracy with which the risk of cardiovascular events or death could be estimated in T2D patients and provided much more prognostic information than cholesterol or C-reactive protein (77). An additive effect of NT-proBNP and albuminuria in predicting cardiovascular mortality was, however, observed in the Casale Monferrato Study, suggesting that the parallel assessment of both may provide additional information for risk assessment (71).

NT-proBNP and BNP levels also mirror clinically silent processes in the cardiovascular system that gradually shift the homeostatic balance from health to disease far before cardiac events occur, and they are both markers and predictors of earlier cardiac abnormalities in diabetic patients. In the Hoorn Study (3), a slight increase in baseline BNP levels was a strong predictor of both LV hypertrophy and diastolic LV dysfunction, and this association was particularly evident in T2D patients. In asymptomatic T2D patients, NT-proBNP was associated with silent myocardial ischemia independent of microalbuminuria. Furthermore, a 10-year longitudinal study performed on asymptomatic high-risk diabetic patients found that NT-proBNP ≥38 pg/mL was the only independent predictor of silent coronary artery disease (4). Hypoxia and myocardial wall strain are likely inducers of BNP in these settings. In addition, inflammatory cytokines also may be involved as both TNF-α and IL-6 induce BNP secretion in cultured cardiomyocytes, their plasma levels rise prior to that of NT-proBNP in hypertensive subjects (78), and the association between NT-proBNP and vascular complications was dependent on TNF-α in the EURODIAB study (73). A strategy that selects asymptomatic T2D patients, based on BNP and NT-proBNP levels, for further investigation (e.g., echocardiography, stress testing) is very attractive. Supporting data are still scarce; however, Nadir et al. (79) have recently reported that in a community cohort BNP measurement was an optimal screening test to identify individuals with silent cardiac damage for further assessment. In addition, NT-proBNP may be proposed as a tool to guide intervention for primary prevention. In the Casale Monferrato study (71), NT-proBNP was prospectively associated with cardiovascular mortality even in normoalbuminuric patients without CVD at baseline, indicating that NT-proBNP may be useful for identification and treatment of patients with a hitherto unknown high risk of cardiovascular death. A prospective randomized controlled trial has recently substantiated this hypothesis by showing a remarkable 65% reduction in the risk of the primary end point of hospitalization or cardiac death in T2D patients with NT-proBNP levels greater than >125 pg/mL and no known cardiac disease randomized to a biomarker-guided “intensified” treatment (80).

Taken together, epidemiological evidence summarized here indicates that BNP and NT-proBNP are important biomarkers of CVD complications in patients with diabetes. The “clinical paradox” of BNP and NT-proBNP being negative predictors of diabetes and positive predictors of diabetes complications is unexplained; however, a possible interpretation is that changes in BNP and NT-proBNP levels reflect different pathophysiological processes in subjects at risk for diabetes and in those at risk for diabetes complications. In obese subjects, reduced BNP and NT-proBNP levels may mirror a deficiency in BNP synthesis, contributing to dysmetabolism and diabetes onset. On the contrary, in diabetic patients an increase in BNP and NT-proBNP levels may reflect proBNP accumulation that masks the linear relationship between residual active BNP and metabolic parameters, but being the result of altered cardiac processing is a valuable biomarker of early cardiac and hemodynamic abnormalities and of the inability of the heart to effectively counteract them by enhancing active BNP production. In keeping with this scenario, recent data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) (81) have shown that when subclinical CVD develops and NT-proBNP levels rise, the inverse relationship between NT-proBNP and both BMI and insulin resistance is completely lost.

Future Perspectives

In the past decade our understanding of the role of the NP system in diabetes has significantly improved; however, many questions still need to be answered. In particular, more research is required to clarify the mechanisms of the natriuretic handicap in obesity, the pathogenetic link between NP deficiency and diabetes onset, and the regulation of proBNP processing both in the heart and the bloodstream.

Regarding the use of NPs for treatment, preclinical and epidemiological data support the hypothesis of a role of ANP and BNP in the development of obesity and diabetes, but it is still unknown whether ANP and BNP may be effective in inducing weight loss and preventing diabetes, and there are concerns that NP-induced excessive lipid mobilization may promote muscular and hepatic ectopic fat storage and, thus, insulin resistance. To address these issues, development of appropriate therapeutic tools targeting the NP system and intervention trials in humans is needed and some effort has already been made. Studies looking at the effect of chronic NP infusion on metabolism are ongoing (82) and long half-life BNP formulations are under development (83). Agents that selectively either block NPR-C or activate NPR-A may be even more desirable as NPR-C overexpression may reduce the efficacy of BNP infusion. An alternative strategy is to enhance ANP and BNP levels by inhibiting the catalytic enzyme NEP. However, NEP degrades other vasoactive peptides, such as angiotensin I, bradykinin, and endothelin-1, leading to undesirable hemodynamic effects. Combined inhibition of NEP and ACE is not a suitable strategy because of a significant increased risk of angioedema; however, the use of angiotensin receptor blockade with NEP inhibition (ARNi) is a potential alternative option (23). In this regard, it is noteworthy that the PARADIGM-HF trial, testing efficacy and safety of the ARNi LCZ696 as compared with enalapril in patients with HFREF (34% with diabetes), has been stopped early based on evidence of compelling efficacy, and these promising incoming results may open the way to future trials in obese and diabetic patients.

Recent studies also suggest ancillary effects on the NP system of drugs currently used for diabetes treatment. In mice, liraglutide induces the cardiac release of ANP. If results are confirmed in humans, physicians may take advantage of this gut−heart link and use long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists to compensate for NP deficiency and gain indirect beneficial hemodynamic and metabolic effects mediated by ANP (45). DPP-4 inhibitors reduce BNP degradation to BNP3–32 (24) and thus may enhance full-length BNP bioavailability, potentially resulting in advantageous effects. However, the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53 (SAVOR-TIMI 53) trial has unexpectedly shown increased rates of hospitalization for HF in diabetic patients treated with saxagliptin. Although treatment neither increased nor decreased the composite cardiovascular primary end point, further studies are needed to clarify this issue and to rule out the unlikely possibility of a BNP-related effect (84).

Finally, the use of more reliable and specific assays for the measurement of both BNP and NT-proBNP is required. Although poor specificity of current assays may not hamper the clinical value of BNP and NT-proBNP as a predictor and biomarker of CVD, it significantly limits our possibility to understand underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and to envision novel therapeutic strategies. Recently, a new antibody that binds to the cleavage site of proBNP (Hinge76) has been developed, allowing accurate proBNP measurement (85). Furthermore, new NT-proBNP assays using antibodies directed against nonglycosylated epitopes are under development to overcome the problem of poor reactivity of current assays for O-glycosylated NT-proBNP (25). Whether these new assays will result in better clinical applicability awaits further evaluation.

Conclusions

Recent studies showing a role of NPs in metabolism and T2D onset have extended the interest of NP-related research beyond CVD and raised the possibility that new intervention strategies targeting the NP system may be effective in lowering not only blood pressure and sodium retention but also body weight and the risk of diabetes. The use of NT-proBNP as a tool for early diagnosis, risk assessment, and guided intervention in CVD holds great promise for improving the care of patients with diabetes.

Article Information

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

  • Received March 14, 2014.
  • Accepted July 24, 2014.
  • © 2014 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Tarnow L,
    2. Gall MA,
    3. Hansen BV,
    4. Hovind P,
    5. Parving HH
    . Plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and mortality in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2006;49:2256–2262
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Gaede P,
    2. Hildebrandt P,
    3. Hess G,
    4. Parving HH,
    5. Pedersen O
    . Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as a major risk marker for cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Diabetologia 2005;48:156–163
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Kroon MH,
    2. van den Hurk K,
    3. Alssema M,
    4. et al
    . Prospective associations of B-type natriuretic peptide with markers of left ventricular function in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes: an 8-year follow-up of the Hoorn Study. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2510–2514
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Cosson E,
    2. Nguyen MT,
    3. Pham I,
    4. Pontet M,
    5. Nitenberg A,
    6. Valensi P
    . N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: an independent marker for coronary artery disease in asymptomatic diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2009;26:872–879
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Collins S
    . A heart-adipose tissue connection in the regulation of energy metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2014;10:157–163
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Magnusson M,
    2. Jujic A,
    3. Hedblad B,
    4. et al
    . Low plasma level of atrial natriuretic peptide predicts development of diabetes: the prospective Malmö Diet and Cancer study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:638–645
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Lazo M,
    2. Young JH,
    3. Brancati FL,
    4. et al
    . NH2-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and risk of diabetes. Diabetes 2013;62:3189–3193
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Ogawa Y,
    2. Itoh H,
    3. Nakao K
    . Molecular biology and biochemistry of natriuretic peptide family. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 1995;22:49–53
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Potter LR
    . Natriuretic peptide metabolism, clearance and degradation. FEBS J 2011;278:1808–1817
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Nishikimi T,
    2. Kuwahara K,
    3. Nakao K
    . Current biochemistry, molecular biology, and clinical relevance of natriuretic peptides. J Cardiol 2011;57:131–140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Sellitti DF,
    2. Koles N,
    3. Mendonça MC
    . Regulation of C-type natriuretic peptide expression. Peptides 2011;32:1964–1971
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Pemberton CJ,
    2. Johnson ML,
    3. Yandle TG,
    4. Espiner EA
    . Deconvolution analysis of cardiac natriuretic peptides during acute volume overload. Hypertension 2000;36:355–359
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Morgenthaler NG,
    2. Struck J,
    3. Thomas B,
    4. Bergmann A
    . Immunoluminometric assay for the midregion of pro-atrial natriuretic peptide in human plasma. Clin Chem 2004;50:234–236
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Costello-Boerrigter LC,
    2. Lapp H,
    3. Boerrigter G,
    4. et al
    . Secretion of prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide, proBNP1-108, is increased in heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 2013;1:207–212
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. McGrath MF,
    2. de Bold AJ
    . Determinants of natriuretic peptide gene expression. Peptides 2005;26:933–943
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Kim HN,
    2. Januzzi JL Jr
    . Natriuretic peptide testing in heart failure. Circulation 2011;123:2015–2019
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Chun YS,
    2. Hyun JY,
    3. Kwak YG,
    4. et al
    . Hypoxic activation of the atrial natriuretic peptide gene promoter through direct and indirect actions of hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Biochem J 2003;370:149–157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Ma KK,
    2. Ogawa T,
    3. de Bold AJ
    . Selective upregulation of cardiac brain natriuretic peptide at the transcriptional and translational levels by pro-inflammatory cytokines and by conditioned medium derived from mixed lymphocyte reactions via p38 MAP kinase. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2004;36:505–513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Clerico A,
    2. Del Ry S,
    3. Maffei S,
    4. Prontera C,
    5. Emdin M,
    6. Giannessi D
    . The circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic hormones in healthy adults: effects of age and sex. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002;40:371–377
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Clerico A,
    2. Passino C,
    3. Emdin M
    . When gonads talk to the heart sex hormones and cardiac endocrine function. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:627–628
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Prickett TC,
    2. Olney RC,
    3. Cameron VA,
    4. Ellis MJ,
    5. Richards AM,
    6. Espiner EA
    . Impact of age, phenotype and cardio-renal function on plasma C-type and B-type natriuretic peptide forms in an adult population. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2013;78:783–789
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Potter LR,
    2. Abbey-Hosch S,
    3. Dickey DM
    . Natriuretic peptides, their receptors, and cyclic guanosine monophosphate-dependent signaling functions. Endocr Rev 2006;27:47–72
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Mangiafico S,
    2. Costello-Boerrigter LC,
    3. Andersen IA,
    4. Cataliotti A,
    5. Burnett JC Jr
    . Neutral endopeptidase inhibition and the natriuretic peptide system: an evolving strategy in cardiovascular therapeutics. Eur Heart J 2013;34:886–893c
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Vanderheyden M,
    2. Bartunek J,
    3. Goethals M,
    4. et al
    . Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV and B-type natriuretic peptide. From bench to bedside. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:248–252
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Nishikimi T,
    2. Kuwahara K,
    3. Nakagawa Y,
    4. Kangawa K,
    5. Minamino N,
    6. Nakao K
    . Complexity of molecular forms of B-type natriuretic peptide in heart failure. Heart 2013;99:677–679
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. de Lemos JA,
    2. McGuire DK,
    3. Drazner MH
    . B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular disease. Lancet 2003;362:316–322
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Troughton RW,
    2. Lewis LK,
    3. Yandle TG,
    4. Pemberton CJ,
    5. Nicholls MG
    . B-type natriuretic peptides: looking to the future. Ann Med 2011;43:188–197
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Nishikimi T,
    2. Maeda N,
    3. Matsuoka H
    . The role of natriuretic peptides in cardioprotection. Cardiovasc Res 2006;69:318–328
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Levin ER,
    2. Gardner DG,
    3. Samson WK
    . Natriuretic peptides. N Engl J Med 1998;339:321–328
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Sarzani R,
    2. Dessì-Fulgheri P,
    3. Paci VM,
    4. Espinosa E,
    5. Rappelli A
    . Expression of natriuretic peptide receptors in human adipose and other tissues. J Endocrinol Invest 1996;19:581–585
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Sengenès C,
    2. Berlan M,
    3. De Glisezinski I,
    4. Lafontan M,
    5. Galitzky J
    . Natriuretic peptides: a new lipolytic pathway in human adipocytes. FASEB J 2000;14:1345–1351
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Bordicchia M,
    2. Liu D,
    3. Amri EZ,
    4. et al
    . Cardiac natriuretic peptides act via p38 MAPK to induce the brown fat thermogenic program in mouse and human adipocytes. J Clin Invest 2012;122:1022–1036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Tsukamoto O,
    2. Fujita M,
    3. Kato M,
    4. et al
    . Natriuretic peptides enhance the production of adiponectin in human adipocytes and in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2070–2077
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Vila G,
    2. Grimm G,
    3. Resl M,
    4. et al
    . B-type natriuretic peptide modulates ghrelin, hunger, and satiety in healthy men. Diabetes 2012;61:2592–2596
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Moro C,
    2. Lafontan M
    . Natriuretic peptides and cGMP signaling control of energy homeostasis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2013;304:H358–H368
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Galitzky J,
    2. Sengenès C,
    3. Thalamas C,
    4. et al
    . The lipid-mobilizing effect of atrial natriuretic peptide is unrelated to sympathetic nervous system activation or obesity in young men. J Lipid Res 2001;42:536–544
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Birkenfeld AL,
    2. Budziarek P,
    3. Boschmann M,
    4. et al
    . Atrial natriuretic peptide induces postprandial lipid oxidation in humans. Diabetes 2008;57:3199–3204
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Birkenfeld AL,
    2. Boschmann M,
    3. Moro C,
    4. et al
    . β-Adrenergic and atrial natriuretic peptide interactions on human cardiovascular and metabolic regulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:5069–5075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    1. Engeli S,
    2. Birkenfeld AL,
    3. Badin PM,
    4. et al
    . Natriuretic peptides enhance the oxidative capacity of human skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest 2012;122:4675–4679
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Miyashita K,
    2. Itoh H,
    3. Tsujimoto H,
    4. et al
    . Natriuretic peptides/cGMP/cGMP-dependent protein kinase cascades promote muscle mitochondrial biogenesis and prevent obesity. Diabetes 2009;58:2880–2892
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Chen XJ
    . Adenine nucleotide translocase, mitochondrial stress, and degenerative cell death. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2013;2013:146860
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Birkenfeld AL,
    2. Boschmann M,
    3. Engeli S,
    4. et al
    . Atrial natriuretic peptide and adiponectin interactions in man. PLoS One 2012;7:e43238
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Kishimoto I,
    2. Tokudome T,
    3. Hosoda H,
    4. Miyazato M,
    5. Kangawa K
    . Ghrelin and cardiovascular diseases. J Cardiol 2012;59:8–13
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    1. Yamada-Goto N,
    2. Katsuura G,
    3. Ebihara K,
    4. et al
    . Intracerebroventricular administration of C-type natriuretic peptide suppresses food intake via activation of the melanocortin system in mice. Diabetes 2013;62:1500–1504
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Kim M,
    2. Platt MJ,
    3. Shibasaki T,
    4. et al
    . GLP-1 receptor activation and Epac2 link atrial natriuretic peptide secretion to control of blood pressure. Nat Med 2013;19:567–575
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Buglioni A,
    2. Burnett JC Jr
    . A gut-heart connection in cardiometabolic regulation. Nat Med 2013;19:534–536
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Ropero AB,
    2. Soriano S,
    3. Tudurí E,
    4. et al
    . The atrial natriuretic peptide and guanylyl cyclase-A system modulates pancreatic beta-cell function. Endocrinology 2010;151:3665–3674
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Uehlinger DE,
    2. Weidmann P,
    3. Gnädinger MP,
    4. et al
    . Increase in circulating insulin induced by atrial natriuretic peptide in normal humans. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1986;8:1122–1129
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Heinisch BB,
    2. Vila G,
    3. Resl M,
    4. et al
    . B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) affects the initial response to intravenous glucose: a randomised placebo-controlled cross-over study in healthy men. Diabetologia 2012;55:1400–1405
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Plante E,
    2. Menaouar A,
    3. Danalache BA,
    4. Broderick TL,
    5. Jankowski M,
    6. Gutkowska J
    . Treatment with brain natriuretic peptide prevents the development of cardiac dysfunction in obese diabetic db/db mice. Diabetologia 2014;57:1257–1267
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Wang TJ,
    2. Larson MG,
    3. Levy D,
    4. et al
    . Impact of obesity on plasma natriuretic peptide levels. Circulation 2004;109:594–600
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Chen-Tournoux A,
    2. Khan AM,
    3. Baggish AL,
    4. et al
    . Effect of weight loss after weight loss surgery on plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Am J Cardiol 2010;106:1450–1455
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Neeland IJ,
    2. Winders BR,
    3. Ayers CR,
    4. et al
    . Higher natriuretic peptide levels associate with a favorable adipose tissue distribution profile. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:752–760
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Musani SK,
    2. Vasan RS,
    3. Bidulescu A,
    4. et al
    . Aldosterone, C-reactive protein, and plasma B-type natriuretic peptide are associated with the development of metabolic syndrome and longitudinal changes in metabolic syndrome components: findings from the Jackson Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2013;36:3084–3092
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Cabiati M,
    2. Raucci S,
    3. Liistro T,
    4. et al
    . Impact of obesity on the expression profile of natriuretic peptide system in a rat experimental model. PLoS One 2013;8:e72959
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Mizuno Y,
    2. Harada E,
    3. Katoh D,
    4. et al
    . Cardiac production of B-type natriuretic peptide is inversely related to the plasma level of free fatty acids in obese individuals—possible involvement of the insulin resistance. Endocr J 2013;60:87–95
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Chang AY,
    2. Abdullah SM,
    3. Jain T,
    4. et al
    . Associations among androgens, estrogens, and natriuretic peptides in young women: observations from the Dallas Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:109–116
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    1. Iozzo P
    . Myocardial, perivascular, and epicardial fat. Diabetes Care 2011;34(Suppl. 2):S371–S379
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Morabito D,
    2. Vallotton MB,
    3. Lang U
    . Obesity is associated with impaired ventricular protein kinase C-MAP kinase signaling and altered ANP mRNA expression in the heart of adult Zucker rats. J Investig Med 2001;49:310–318
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Bartels ED,
    2. Nielsen JM,
    3. Bisgaard LS,
    4. Goetze JP,
    5. Nielsen LB
    . Decreased expression of natriuretic peptides associated with lipid accumulation in cardiac ventricle of obese mice. Endocrinology 2010;151:5218–5225
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    1. Jujić A,
    2. Nilsson PM,
    3. Engström G,
    4. Hedblad B,
    5. Melander O,
    6. Magnusson M
    . Atrial natriuretic peptide and type 2 diabetes development—biomarker and genotype association study. PLoS One 2014;9:e89201
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Cannone V,
    2. Boerrigter G,
    3. Cataliotti A,
    4. et al
    . A genetic variant of the atrial natriuretic peptide gene is associated with cardiometabolic protection in the general community. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:629–636
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. ↵
    1. Cannone V,
    2. Cefalu AB,
    3. Noto D,
    4. et al
    . The atrial natriuretic peptide genetic variant rs5068 is associated with a favorable cardiometabolic phenotype in a Mediterranean population. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2850–2856
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Pfister R,
    2. Sharp S,
    3. Luben R,
    4. et al
    . Mendelian randomization study of B-type natriuretic peptide and type 2 diabetes: evidence of causal association from population studies. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1001112
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Salomaa V,
    2. Havulinna A,
    3. Saarela O,
    4. et al
    . Thirty-one novel biomarkers as predictors for clinically incident diabetes. PLoS One 2010;5:e10100
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Anjan VY,
    2. Loftus TM,
    3. Burke MA,
    4. et al
    . Prevalence, clinical phenotype, and outcomes associated with normal B-type natriuretic peptide levels in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:870–876
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Boonman-de Winter LJ,
    2. Rutten FH,
    3. Cramer MJ,
    4. et al
    . High prevalence of previously unknown heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 2012;55:2154–2162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. MacDonald MR,
    2. Petrie MC,
    3. Varyani F,
    4. et al.,
    5. CHARM Investigators
    . Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. Eur Heart J 2008;29:1377–1385
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Paulus WJ,
    2. Tschöpe C
    . A novel paradigm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: comorbidities drive myocardial dysfunction and remodeling through coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:263–271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  68. ↵
    1. van Heerebeek L,
    2. Hamdani N,
    3. Falcão-Pires I,
    4. et al
    . Low myocardial protein kinase G activity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2012;126:830–839
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Bruno G,
    2. Landi A,
    3. Barutta F,
    4. et al
    . N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular mortality than C-reactive protein and albumin excretion rate in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: the Casale Monferrato population-based study. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2677–2682
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Bruno G,
    2. Barutta F,
    3. Landi A,
    4. Cavallo Perin P,
    5. Gruden G
    . The effect of age and NT-proBNP on the association of central obesity with 6-years cardiovascular mortality of middle-aged and elderly diabetic people: the population-based Casale Monferrato study. PLoS One 2014;9:e96076
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Gruden G,
    2. Barutta F,
    3. Chaturvedi N,
    4. et al
    . NH2-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide is associated with diabetes complications in the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study: the role of tumor necrosis factor-α. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1931–1936
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Tarnow L,
    2. Hildebrandt P,
    3. Hansen BV,
    4. Borch-Johnsen K,
    5. Parving HH
    . Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as an independent predictor of mortality in diabetic nephropathy. Diabetologia 2005;48:149–155
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  73. ↵
    1. Dawson A,
    2. Jeyaseelan S,
    3. Morris AD,
    4. Struthers AD
    . B-type natriuretic peptide as an alternative way of assessing total cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:933–934
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  74. ↵
    1. Clodi M,
    2. Resl M,
    3. Neuhold S,
    4. et al
    . A comparison of NT-proBNP and albuminuria for predicting cardiac events in patients with diabetes mellitus. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2012;19:944–951
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Hillis GS,
    2. Welsh P,
    3. Chalmers J,
    4. et al
    . The relative and combined ability of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to predict cardiovascular events and death in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014;37:295–303
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Roselló-Lletí E,
    2. Calabuig JR,
    3. Morillas P,
    4. et al
    . Variability of NT-proBNP and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study. PLoS One 2012;7:e31189
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Nadir MA,
    2. Rekhraj S,
    3. Wei L,
    4. et al
    . Improving the primary prevention of cardiovascular events by using biomarkers to identify individuals with silent heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:960–968
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. ↵
    1. Huelsmann M,
    2. Neuhold S,
    3. Resl M,
    4. et al
    . PONTIAC (NT-proBNP selected prevention of cardiac events in a population of diabetic patients without a history of cardiac disease): a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1365–1372
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  79. ↵
    1. Sanchez OA,
    2. Duprez DA,
    3. Bahrami H,
    4. et al
    . The associations between metabolic variables and NT-proBNP are blunted at pathological ranges: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Metabolism 2014;63:475–483
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Translational Research Institute for Metabolism and Diabetes Research Studies
    . BNP [Internet]. Available from http://www.tri-md.org/research-studies/bnp. Accessed 4 September 2014
  81. ↵
    1. Zakeri R,
    2. Burnett JC
    . Designer natriuretic peptides: a vision for the future of heart failure therapeutics. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2011;89:593–601
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Scirica BM,
    2. Bhatt DL,
    3. Braunwald E,
    4. et al.,
    5. SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators
    . Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1317–1326
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  83. ↵
    1. Giuliani I,
    2. Rieunier F,
    3. Larue C,
    4. et al
    . Assay for measurement of intact B-type natriuretic peptide prohormone in blood. Clin Chem 2006;52:1054–1061
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 37 (11)

In this Issue

November 2014, 37(11)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Natriuretic Peptides, Heart, and Adipose Tissue: New Findings and Future Developments for Diabetes Research
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Natriuretic Peptides, Heart, and Adipose Tissue: New Findings and Future Developments for Diabetes Research
Gabriella Gruden, Andrea Landi, Graziella Bruno
Diabetes Care Nov 2014, 37 (11) 2899-2908; DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0669

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Natriuretic Peptides, Heart, and Adipose Tissue: New Findings and Future Developments for Diabetes Research
Gabriella Gruden, Andrea Landi, Graziella Bruno
Diabetes Care Nov 2014, 37 (11) 2899-2908; DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0669
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • NPs and Their Receptors
    • Biological Actions of NPs and Metabolism
    • NPs and Obesity, Diabetes, and Diabetes Complications
    • Future Perspectives
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Ocular Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy: The Role of VEGF in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Retinopathy
  • Ocular Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Retinopathy: Overview of Clinical Efficacy and Evolving Applications
Show more Bench to Clinic Symposia

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.