Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Low Adiponectin Levels and Increased Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction

  1. Søren Lindberg1⇑,
  2. Jan S. Jensen1,2,
  3. Sune H. Pedersen1,
  4. Søren Galatius1,
  5. Jan Frystyk3,
  6. Allan Flyvbjerg3,
  7. Mette Bjerre3 and
  8. Rasmus Mogelvang1
  1. 1Department of Cardiology, Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. 2Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. 3The Medical Research Laboratory, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  1. Corresponding author: Søren Lindberg, soerenli{at}hotmail.com.
Diabetes Care 2014 Nov; 37(11): 3003-3008. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0932
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) have increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Adiponectin is an insulin-sensitizing hormone produced in adipose tissue, directly suppressing hepatic gluconeogenesis, stimulating fatty acid oxidation and glucose uptake in skeletal muscle and insulin secretion. In healthy humans, low plasma adiponectin levels associate with increased risk of T2DM; however, the relationship between adiponectin and T2DM in patients with MI has never been investigated.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We prospectively included 666 patients with ST-segment elevation MI, without diabetes, treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, from September 2006 to December 2008 at a tertiary cardiac center. Blood samples were drawn before intervention, and total plasma adiponectin was measured in all samples. During follow-up (median 5.7 years [interquartile range 5.3–6.1]) 6% (n = 38) developed T2DM. Risk of T2DM was analyzed using a competing risk analysis.

RESULTS Low adiponectin levels were associated with increased risk of T2DM (P < 0.001). Even after adjustment for confounding risk factors (age, sex, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, current smoking, previous MI, BMI, blood glucose, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglyceride, estimated glomerular filtration rate, C-reactive protein, peak troponin I, and proatrial natriuretic peptide), low adiponectin levels remained an independent predictor of T2DM (hazard ratio [HR] 5.8 [2.3–15.0]; P < 0.001). Importantly, plasma adiponectin added to the predictive value of blood glucose, with the combination of high blood glucose and low plasma adiponectin, vastly increasing the risk of developing T2DM (HR 9.6 [3.7–25.3]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS Low plasma adiponectin levels are independently associated with increased risk of T2DM in patients with MI and added significantly to the predictive value of blood glucose.

Introduction

Adiponectin, a hormone almost exclusively secreted by adipocytes, participates in several anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing processes (1). Plasma levels are decreased in several metabolic disorders, including obesity, inflammatory states, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (2). Observational studies have consistently documented an inverse relationship between plasma adiponectin and incident T2DM in the general population (3–6).

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and no history of T2DM, impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and undiagnosed T2DM are common and strong predictors of poor prognosis (7). Even in nondiabetic patients, admission blood glucose levels remain an independent risk factor, in part related to impaired β-cell function (8,9).

Adiponectin asserts its effects through activation of the AMP-dependent kinase (AMPK), thereby directly suppressing hepatic gluconeogenesis and stimulating fatty acid oxidation in liver and muscle, glucose uptake in skeletal muscle, and insulin secretion (1,10). Adiponectin also improves pancreatic β-cell function by contributing to favorable glycometabolic properties through antiapoptotic effects (11).

Accordingly, one could hypothesize that high plasma adiponectin levels protect against the development of T2DM, thereby leading to a more favorable cardiovascular outcome. However, to the best of our knowledge, plasma adiponectin and risk of developing T2DM in patients with AMI has never been investigated.

Research Design and Methods

Study Population

From September 2006 through December 2008, we prospectively enrolled 666 nondiabetic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) at Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark (a high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention center with present on-site cardiac surgery performing >1,500 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures per year) (12). Inclusion criteria were patients admitted because of a suspected STEMI with presence of chest pain for >30 min and <12 h and persistent ST-segment elevation ≥2 mm in at least two contiguous precordial electrocardiogram leads or ≥1 mm in at least two contiguous limb electrocardiogram leads or a newly developed left bundle branch block. Exclusion criteria were a nonsignificant troponin I (TnI) increase (≤0.5 μg/L) or cancellation of pPCI (no occlusion on coronary artery angiography or coronary artery bypass surgery elected instead).

A total of 735 patients were included; however, in the current study, we excluded 69 patients because of prevalent diabetes, ending up with 666 STEMI patients.

Subsequent medical treatment included daily aspirin 75 mg, clopidogrel 75 mg (for 12 months), lipid-lowering drugs (statins), and β-receptor antagonists.

Hypertension was defined as use of blood pressure–lowering drugs and hypercholesterolemia as treatment with cholesterol-lowering drugs at time of admission. Multivessel disease was defined as two- or three-vessel disease.

All patients were followed for a median of 5.7 years (interquartile range 5.3–6.1), and follow-up was 100% complete (n = 666). Follow-up data on mortality were obtained through the civil registration system, which holds information on vital status (alive, death, or emigration). Diagnosis of T2DM was obtained from the highly validated National Patient Registry using ICD-10 code E11. All events found using this registry were carefully validated using medical records (e.g., laboratory tests, medical charts, and hospital summaries), excluding possibly misclassified events.

The study was approved by the local scientific ethics committee and the Danish Data Protection Agency and complied with the 2nd Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Laboratory Methods

Blood samples were drawn from the femoral sheath before the pPCI procedure. Blood was allocated to 4 mL EDTA containers and within 30 min centrifuged at 10.000 RPM for 10 min. Plasma was stored in Nunc cryo tubes at −80°C until analysis in a blinded fashion in a dedicated core laboratory. Plasma adiponectin was determined by a validated in-house time-resolved immunofluorometric assay as previously described (13). This assay recognizes all three major molecular forms of plasma adiponectin (14). All samples were analyzed in duplicate, with a detection limit of 1.5 μg/L and intra- and interassay coefficients of variation <5% and <7%, respectively. C-reactive protein (CRP), TnI, creatinine, and blood glucose were assayed by routine laboratory methods. TnI was measured at baseline and again after 6 and 12 h. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated on the basis of serum creatinine, age, and sex using the MDRD formula (15).

Statistical Analysis

In Table 1, comparisons between groups were performed by χ2 test for dichotomous variables and Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables. Plasma adiponectin, CRP, TnI, and blood glucose concentrations were positively skewed and therefore logarithmically transformed using the base log of 2 before further analysis. The competing risk of death is important to take into account when examining the incidence of a cause-specific hazard like T2DM. A standard Cox proportional hazards regression analysis assumes that the risk of T2DM is similar in patients remaining alive and those censored at the time of death. By using a competing risk model, appropriate incidences of T2DM in patients remaining alive are calculated (16). To examine the association between adiponectin and risk of T2DM, we treated adiponectin as both a categorical (quartiles) and a continuous (per SD increase in log transformed) variable, using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses with competing risks by Fine and Gray (16). The dose-response relationship between adiponectin and risk of T2DM was examined by fitting restricted cubic splines to a Cox model (using three automated selected knots), testing for nonlinearity with a likelihood ratio test, comparing a model with only the linear term to a model with the linear and the cubic spline terms (17). Evaluation of first-order interactions was made in the final model, adjusting for multiple testing by the Bonferroni method. Deviation from linearity was assessed by simultaneous assessment of linear and quadratic effects. Misspecification of the functional form of the covariates and the assumption of proportional hazards were evaluated by plots of the cumulative martingale residuals. P values <5% on two-sided tests were considered significant. The competing risk calculations were performed using Stata/IC 11.1 for Windows, whereas all other statistical calculations were performed using the SAS statistical software (SAS for Windows, version 9.2, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Baseline characteristics according to age- and sex-adjusted quartiles of plasma adiponectin

Results

The plasma level of adiponectin (geometric mean [5th to 95th percentile]) was 7.4 mg/L (2.4–22.4 mg/L). During the 5-year follow-up, 38 participants developed T2DM (6%). Table 1 describes baseline characteristics according to quartiles of plasma adiponectin.

As seen, adiponectin was associated positively with age, female sex, HDL, and proatrial natriuretic peptide (proANP) and inversely with BMI, triglyceride, and eGFR. Of interest, adiponectin was not associated with blood glucose (Table 1).

The risk of developing T2DM was evaluated using plasma adiponectin both as a continuous and as a categorical variable by Cox regression competing risk analyses; the results are shown in Table 2. After adjustment for age and sex, patients in the lowest quartile of adiponectin had approximately six times increased risk of T2DM as compared with patients in the highest quartile. Additional adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, BMI, and blood test did not influence the association significantly; low adiponectin remained associated with risk of T2DM in all models. We also investigated the risk of T2DM per SD decrease in continuous adiponectin (log2 transformed), which yielded similar results with approximately two times the risk of T2DM per SD decrease in adiponectin. Again, multivariate adjusting only influenced the association weakly. Importantly, adiponectin was the only variable with increasing values associating with reduced risk of T2DM.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Risk of T2DM according to plasma adiponectin

We also examined the dose-response relationship between plasma adiponectin and risk of developing T2DM (using multivariate model 2) by adding several cubic splines, thus allowing the relationship between adiponectin and T2DM to be nonlinear (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Dose-response relationship between total plasma adiponectin and risk of T2DM. The adjusted HR of T2DM risk as a function of log2-transformed plasma adiponectin (back transformed for ease of interpretation). A histogram of the distribution of plasma adiponectin is shown underneath the graph. The 95% CI is indicated by the dashed lines. Model adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, current smoking, previous MI, BMI, and blood glucose (multivariate model 2).

The adjusted dose-response curve confirmed the linear inverse association with T2DM over the full spectrum of adiponectin levels (on the log-scale; Plinear = 0.003) (Fig. 1). By contrast, a nonlinear association was clearly nonsignificant (Pnonlinear = 0.89).

Using ROC curves, we identified an optimal cutoff value at a plasma adiponectin of 5.5 mg/L. Patients with adiponectin below the cutoff (low adiponectin) had a severely increased risk of developing T2DM (hazard ratio [HR] 5.1 [2.2–11.6]; P < 0.001 when adjusted for age and sex). When further adjusted for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, current smoking, previous myocardial infarction (MI), BMI, blood glucose, total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglyceride, eGFR, CRP, peak TnI, and proANP (model 4), patients with low adiponectin had more than five times increased risk of T2DM (HR 5.8 [2.3–15.0]; P < 0.001).

Finally, we investigated risk of T2DM using a combination of blood glucose and adiponectin using cutoffs at 5.5 mg/L for adiponectin and 10 mmol/L for blood glucose (Fig. 2). As shown, plasma adiponectin was additive to blood glucose in predicting risk of T2DM. Patients with high adiponectin/low blood glucose had a very low risk of T2DM. By contrast, patients with low adiponectin/high blood glucose had a very high risk (HR 9.6 [3.7–25.3]; P < 0.001), compared with patients with high adiponectin/low blood glucose.

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Risk of T2DM based on groups by adiponectin and blood glucose. Cumulative incidence of T2DM based on cutoffs of 5.5 mg/L for adiponectin and 10 mmol/L for blood glucose adjusted for age and sex. The curves are calculated using a competing risk analysis.

Conclusions

In the current study, we showed that in patients with AMI, low plasma adiponectin was associated independently with increased risk of developing T2DM in a linear dose-response relationship. Even in patients with low glucose, adiponectin still added significantly to the prognostic value, as the risk of developing T2DM was higher in patients with low adiponectin/low glucose compared with patients with high adiponectin/low glucose. However, the risk increased by ∼10-fold in patients who were characterized by the combination of low adiponectin and high blood glucose.

Low plasma adiponectin has been suggested to be causally involved in pathways leading to T2DM. The binding of adiponectin to its receptors (adiR1/R2) directly suppresses hepatic gluconeogenesis and stimulates fatty acid oxidation in liver and muscle, glucose uptake in skeletal muscle, and insulin secretion (1,10).

In a study of 335 cases of incident T2DM from the Whitehall II study, adiponectin was measured three times per participant from 1991 to 2004. Lower plasma adiponectin was already observed 20 years prior to the diagnosis of T2DM (18). Similarly, Tabák et al. (5) showed that increasing adiponectin was associated with decreased HbA1c during 10 years of follow-up. In several large observational studies in the general population, low plasma adiponectin was associated with increased risk of T2DM (3,4,6), and this was recently confirmed in 5,349 healthy participants from the Copenhagen City Heart Study (19).

In summary, both experimental and observational studies suggest adiponectin to be an important insulin-sensitizing hormone protecting against development of T2DM in the healthy population.

Increased insulin sensitivity is particularly important in patients with AMI who are at high risk of developing T2DM. Wallander et al. (9) showed that in nondiabetic patients with AMI, glucose abnormalities were related to impaired pancreatic β-cell secretion of insulin. Interestingly, adiponectin increases function of β-cells by contributing to favorable glycometabolic properties through antiapoptotic effects (11). The current study showed for the first time that in patients with STEMI, low adiponectin was associated with increased risk of T2DM. Accordingly, raising adiponectin levels could seem advantageous in the management of IGT, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome, although this needs to be further investigated.

Surprisingly, we did not find any association between adiponectin and admission blood glucose. However, the early increase in blood glucose seen in AMI, known as stress-related hyperglycemia, is caused by the increased adrenal response (i.e., cortisol and adrenalin) (20). Still, admission blood glucose is a strong and independent risk factor of outcome (8,9). Importantly, adiponectin added significantly to the predictive value of admission blood glucose; low plasma adiponectin levels increased the risk of T2DM similar to high blood glucose, and the combination of low adiponectin/high blood glucose vastly increased the risk.

IGT is common in patients with AMI, increasing the risk of developing T2DM as well as mortality from cardiovascular disease (7). Interestingly, the increase in cardiovascular risk is also observed at lower blood glucose concentrations (21). Our finding that low adiponectin increased the risk of T2DM in patients with low admission blood glucose further suggests that low adiponectin may precede IGT.

Natriuretic peptides (NPs) and adiponectin are highly correlated, and recently NP was demonstrated to increase plasma adiponectin, possibly confounding the relationship between adiponectin and cardiovascular outcome through the strong association with prognosis (22,23). Indeed, we and others have recently demonstrated this. In 2,879 patients from the general population, Wannamethee et al. (24) demonstrated that adiponectin independently predicted cardiovascular mortality and coronary heart disease. However, when N-terminal pro-brain NP was included in the analysis, adiponectin was no longer significant. We have recently published similar results for risk of heart failure in the general population (25). Importantly, the findings of the current study showed that in contrast to cardiovascular outcome, the inverse association between adiponectin and risk of T2DM was not confounded by NP, even though NPs are elevated in patients with STEMI, thus emphasizing the beneficial insulin-sensitizing effects of adiponectin (26).

A direct link between NP, glucose metabolism, and T2DM has been suggested. Treatment of insulin-resistant human adipocytes with NP restored mitochondrial gene expression, suggesting that raising NPs may have a role in the management of obesity/insulin resistance (27).

In the Framingham Study, NP was associated inversely with several risk factors for metabolic syndrome, including insulin resistance (28). Mice treated with infusion of NP exhibited improved glucose tolerance, and in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, Magnusson et al. (29) showed that higher NPs were associated with increased glucose tolerance and lower risk of T2DM. However, the cause of the relationship between reduced NPs and long-term glucose deterioration and progression toward T2DM remains unknown. Based on our findings, we dare to suggest that the relationship between NP and reduced risk of T2DM is mediated through adiponectin.

Limitations and Strengths

The high molecule weight (HMW) isomer of adiponectin has been suggested as responsible for the majority of the insulin-sensitizing effects of adiponectin (30). However, in a large prospective cohort study, the association with incident T2DM was similar for both total and HMW adiponectin (31), indicating that measurement of total adiponectin is sufficient. In this context, we would like to stress that the assay used in the present investigation is, in fact, able to measure HMW adiponectin and, as the fraction corresponding to HMW adiponectin, constitutes the most abundant isoform; this may explain why measurements of total adiponectin and HMW adiponectin yield similar results (14). Furthermore, we did not have measurements of plasma insulin, previously shown to be inversely correlated with adiponectin, possibly confounding the results.

Finally, it is a limitation that cases of incident T2DM were identified using national registries, although we did validate all events.

Study strengths include the use of a homogeneous AMI population by only including patients with STEMI and the long follow-up time.

In conclusion, low plasma adiponectin levels were associated independently with increased risk of T2DM in patients with AMI in a dose-response relationship.

Article Information

Funding. This study was supported by the Danish Heart Foundation.

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. S.L. researched data and wrote the manuscript. J.S.J. produced the study design/conception, researched data, and reviewed/edited the manuscript. S.H.P. and R.M. researched data and reviewed/edited the manuscript. S.G., J.F., A.F., and M.B. reviewed/edited the manuscript. S.L. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Received April 14, 2014.
  • Accepted July 13, 2014.
  • © 2014 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kadowaki T,
    2. Yamauchi T,
    3. Kubota N,
    4. Hara K,
    5. Ueki K,
    6. Tobe K
    . Adiponectin and adiponectin receptors in insulin resistance, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest 2006;116:1784–1792pmid:16823476
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Saltevo J,
    2. Laakso M,
    3. Jokelainen J,
    4. Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S,
    5. Kumpusalo E,
    6. Vanhala M
    . Levels of adiponectin, C-reactive protein and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist are associated with insulin sensitivity: a population-based study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2008;24:378–383pmid:18386294
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Koenig W,
    2. Khuseyinova N,
    3. Baumert J,
    4. Meisinger C,
    5. Löwel H
    . Serum concentrations of adiponectin and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease in apparently healthy middle-aged men: results from the 18-year follow-up of a large cohort from southern Germany. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1369–1377pmid:17010797
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Wannamethee SG,
    2. Lowe GD,
    3. Rumley A,
    4. Cherry L,
    5. Whincup PH,
    6. Sattar N
    . Adipokines and risk of type 2 diabetes in older men. Diabetes Care 2007;30:1200–1205pmid:17322479
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Tabák AG, Brunner EJ, Miller MA, et al. Low serum adiponectin predicts 10-year risk of type 2 diabetes and HbA1c independently of obesity, lipids, and inflammation: Whitehall II study. Horm Metab Res 2009;41:626–629
  6. ↵
    1. Heidemann C,
    2. Sun Q,
    3. van Dam RM,
    4. et al
    . Total and high-molecular-weight adiponectin and resistin in relation to the risk for type 2 diabetes in women. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:307–316pmid:18765700
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Norhammar A,
    2. Tenerz A,
    3. Nilsson G,
    4. et al
    . Glucose metabolism in patients with acute myocardial infarction and no previous diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: a prospective study. Lancet 2002;359:2140–2144pmid:12090978
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Norhammar AM,
    2. Rydén L,
    3. Malmberg K
    . Admission plasma glucose. Independent risk factor for long-term prognosis after myocardial infarction even in nondiabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1827–1831pmid:10546015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Wallander M,
    2. Bartnik M,
    3. Efendic S,
    4. et al
    . Beta cell dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction but without previously known type 2 diabetes: a report from the GAMI study. Diabetologia 2005;48:2229–2235pmid:16143862
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Rabe K,
    2. Lehrke M,
    3. Parhofer KG,
    4. Broedl UC
    . Adipokines and insulin resistance. Mol Med 2008;14:741–751pmid:19009016
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Lee YH,
    2. Magkos F,
    3. Mantzoros CS,
    4. Kang ES
    . Effects of leptin and adiponectin on pancreatic β-cell function. Metabolism 2011;60:1664–1672pmid:21632069
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Lindberg S,
    2. Pedersen SH,
    3. Møgelvang R,
    4. et al
    . Usefulness of adiponectin as a predictor of all cause mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2012;109:492–496pmid:22105783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Frystyk J,
    2. Tarnow L,
    3. Hansen TK,
    4. Parving HH,
    5. Flyvbjerg A
    . Increased serum adiponectin levels in type 1 diabetic patients with microvascular complications. Diabetologia 2005;48:1911–1918pmid:16078018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Andersen KK,
    2. Frystyk J,
    3. Wolthers OD,
    4. Heuck C,
    5. Flyvbjerg A
    . Gender differences of oligomers and total adiponectin during puberty: a cross-sectional study of 859 Danish school children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:1857–1862pmid:17284625
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Vervoort G,
    2. Klein Gunnewiek JM,
    3. Willems HL,
    4. Wetzels JF
    . Effect of creatinine assay standardization on the performance of Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formula in predicting GFR. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:2998–2999pmid:16735385
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Fine JP,
    2. Gray RJ
    . A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999;94:496–509
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Durrleman S,
    2. Simon R
    . Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 1989;8:551–561pmid:2657958
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Tabák AG,
    2. Carstensen M,
    3. Witte DR,
    4. et al
    . Adiponectin trajectories before type 2 diabetes diagnosis: Whitehall II study. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2540–2547pmid:22933430
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Lindberg S,
    2. Jensen JS,
    3. Bjerre M,
    4. et al
    . Adiponectin, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 25 November 2013 [Epub ahead of print]pmid:24265290
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Oswald GA,
    2. Smith CC,
    3. Betteridge DJ,
    4. Yudkin JS
    . Determinants and importance of stress hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic patients with myocardial infarction. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986;293:917–922pmid:3094714
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Coutinho M,
    2. Gerstein HC,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. Yusuf S
    . The relationship between glucose and incident cardiovascular events. A metaregression analysis of published data from 20 studies of 95,783 individuals followed for 12.4 years. Diabetes Care 1999;22:233–240pmid:10333939
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Tsukamoto O,
    2. Fujita M,
    3. Kato M,
    4. et al
    . Natriuretic peptides enhance the production of adiponectin in human adipocytes and in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2070–2077pmid:19477358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Heeschen C,
    2. Hamm CW,
    3. Mitrovic V,
    4. Lantelme NH,
    5. White HD,
    6. Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management (PRISM) Investigators
    . N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels for dynamic risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 2004;110:3206–3212pmid:15533869
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Wannamethee SG,
    2. Welsh P,
    3. Whincup PH,
    4. et al
    . High adiponectin and increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in asymptomatic older men: does NT-proBNP help to explain this association? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2011;18:65–71
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Lindberg S,
    2. Jensen JS,
    3. Bjerre M,
    4. et al
    . Cardio-adipose tissue cross-talk: relationship between adiponectin, plasma pro brain natriuretic peptide and incident heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 2014;16:633–638pmid:24723498
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Riezebos RK,
    2. Ronner E,
    3. de Boer BA,
    4. Slaats EH,
    5. Tijssen JG,
    6. Laarman GJ
    . Dynamics in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J 2005;150:1255–1259pmid:16338268
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Souza SC,
    2. Chau MD,
    3. Yang Q,
    4. et al
    . Atrial natriuretic peptide regulates lipid mobilization and oxygen consumption in human adipocytes by activating AMPK. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011;410:398–403pmid:21672517
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Wang TJ,
    2. Larson MG,
    3. Keyes MJ,
    4. Levy D,
    5. Benjamin EJ,
    6. Vasan RS
    . Association of plasma natriuretic peptide levels with metabolic risk factors in ambulatory individuals. Circulation 2007;115:1345–1353pmid:17339551
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Magnusson M,
    2. Jujic A,
    3. Hedblad B,
    4. et al
    . Low plasma level of atrial natriuretic peptide predicts development of diabetes: the prospective Malmo Diet and Cancer study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:638–645pmid:22112816
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Rasouli N,
    2. Kern PA
    . Adipocytokines and the metabolic complications of obesity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93(Suppl. 1):S64–S73pmid:18987272
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Kizer JR,
    2. Arnold AM,
    3. Benkeser D,
    4. et al
    . Total and high-molecular-weight adiponectin and risk of incident diabetes in older people. Diabetes Care 2012;35:415–423pmid:22148099
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 37 (11)

In this Issue

November 2014, 37(11)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Low Adiponectin Levels and Increased Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Low Adiponectin Levels and Increased Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction
Søren Lindberg, Jan S. Jensen, Sune H. Pedersen, Søren Galatius, Jan Frystyk, Allan Flyvbjerg, Mette Bjerre, Rasmus Mogelvang
Diabetes Care Nov 2014, 37 (11) 3003-3008; DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0932

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Low Adiponectin Levels and Increased Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction
Søren Lindberg, Jan S. Jensen, Sune H. Pedersen, Søren Galatius, Jan Frystyk, Allan Flyvbjerg, Mette Bjerre, Rasmus Mogelvang
Diabetes Care Nov 2014, 37 (11) 3003-3008; DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0932
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Glucose Control, Sulfonylureas, and Insulin Treatment in Elderly People With Type 2 Diabetes and Risk of Severe Hypoglycemia and Death: An Observational Study
  • Comparisons of Polyexposure, Polygenic, and Clinical Risk Scores in Risk Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes
  • Quantifying Variation in Treatment Utilization for Type 2 Diabetes Across Five Major University of California Health Systems
Show more Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.