Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Risk of Lactic Acidosis or Elevated Lactate Concentrations in Metformin Users With Renal Impairment: A Population-Based Cohort Study

  1. Willemijn L. Eppenga1,2,
  2. Arief Lalmohamed3,4,
  3. Arjen F. Geerts3,
  4. Hieronymus J. Derijks2,3,
  5. Michel Wensing1,
  6. Antoine Egberts3,4,
  7. Peter A.G.M. De Smet1,5 and
  8. Frank de Vries3,6,7⇑
  1. 1Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
  2. 2Hospital Pharmacy ‘ZANOB’, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
  3. 3Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  4. 4Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  5. 5Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
  6. 6Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
  7. 7Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht, the Netherlands
  1. Corresponding author: Frank de Vries, f.devries{at}uu.nl.
Diabetes Care 2014 Aug; 37(8): 2218-2224. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-3023
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine whether treatment with metformin in patients with renal impairment is associated with a higher risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations compared with users of a noninsulin antidiabetic drug (NIAD) who had never used metformin.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A cohort of 223,968 metformin users and 34,571 diabetic patients who had never used metformin were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).The primary outcome was defined as either a CPRD READ code lactic acidosis or a record of a plasma lactate concentration >5 mmol/L. The associations between renal impairment, dose of metformin, and the risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations were determined with time-dependent Cox models and expressed as hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS The crude incidence of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in current metformin users was 7.4 per 100,000 person-years (vs. 2.2 per 100,000 person-years in nonusers). Compared with nonusers, risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in current metformin users was significantly associated with a renal function <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (adjusted HR 6.37 [95% CI 1.48–27.5]). The increased risk among patients with impaired renal function was further increased in users of ≥730 g of metformin in the preceding year (adjusted HR 11.8 [95% CI 2.27–61.5]) and in users of a recent high daily dose (>2 g) of metformin (adjusted HR 13.0 [95% CI 2.36–72.0]).

CONCLUSIONS Our study is consistent with current recommendations that the renal function of metformin users should be adequately monitored and that the dose of metformin should be adjusted, if necessary, if renal function falls below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Introduction

There is good evidence that metformin reduces the long-term incidence of macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes mellitus, especially among overweight patients (1–3). In contrast to alternative oral noninsulin antidiabetic drugs (NIADs) and insulin, metformin is not associated with a risk of hypoglycemia (3–5). The most serious adverse event that has been observed during metformin use is lactic acidosis, which is characterized by an elevated blood lactate concentration (>5 mmol/L), decreased blood pH (<7.35) and electrolyte disturbances with an increased anion gap (1,6–9). Estimated rates of lactic acidosis incidence during metformin use range from 1 to 47 cases per 100,000 patient-years (10,11). Reported predisposing factors include acute kidney injury; history of lactic acidosis; hypovolemia; decreased tissue perfusion or hemodynamic instability due to infection or other causes; seizure; concurrent liver disease; alcohol abuse; acute heart failure; myocardial infarction; and shock (12–14). Although lactic acidosis during metformin use has a better prognosis than other types of severe lactic acidosis (15), reported mortality rates may be as high as 25–50% (1,4,8). Yet metformin itself has not been linked to mortality in users developing lactic acidosis during metformin use, which perhaps reflects a primary effect of other underlying causes of the acidosis (16).

According to current guidelines, the dose of metformin should be reviewed if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) falls to <45 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the drug should be stopped in patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (3,17,18). A decreased glomerular filtration rate may theoretically increase the risk of lactic acidosis during metformin use because metformin is eliminated unchanged by the kidneys and may therefore accumulate when kidney function becomes impaired (3,19). However, the role of chronic renal insufficiency as a risk factor for lactic acidosis during metformin use remains controversial.

On the one hand, some authors argue that an association between high concentrations of metformin and lactic acidosis should be assumed because, for example, supratherapeutic plasma concentrations of metformin have frequently been found in patients with lactic acidosis during metformin use and because high metformin concentrations have been shown to increase plasma lactate in rats (4,9,20). On the other hand, a contributory role of chronic renal insufficiency to lactic acidosis during metformin use was not confirmed in large epidemiological studies (12,21), and a recent study of 56 cases of severe lactic acidosis during metformin use did not find a prognostic value for blood lactate (22).

Duong et al. (9) argue that there may be three different forms of lactic acidosis during metformin use and that one of these is characterized by the accumulation of metformin together with acute impairment of renal function and organ decompensation, such as acute or chronic heart failure, induced by sepsis and/or dehydration. They hypothesize that this type of lactic acidosis during metformin use involves a positive feedback system comprising one or more of the following factors: vomiting and diarrhea, acute kidney injury, high doses or excessive accumulation of metformin, and acute disease states leading to tissue hypoxia. They suggest that lactic acidosis may commence with relatively small changes in hydration, kidney function, plasma concentrations of metformin, or tissue oxygenation, which then lead to positive feedback and severe lactic acidosis. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate retrospectively, in a large cohort of patients using a NIAD, whether treatment with metformin is associated with a higher risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in patients with renal impairment compared with patients who had never used metformin. In addition, the risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in patients with different metformin doses was evaluated.

Research Design and Methods

Data Sources

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), previously known as the General Practice Research Database. The CPRD collates the computerized medical records of general practitioners (GPs). GPs play a key role in the U.K. health care system; they are responsible for primary health care and specialist referrals. Patients are semipermanently affiliated with a practice that centralizes the medical information from the GPs, specialist referrals, and hospitalizations. The data recorded in the CPRD include demographic information, prescription details, clinical events, preventive care provided, specialist referrals, hospital admissions, and major outcomes since 1987 (www.CPRD.com).

Study Population

All patients with at least one prescription for a NIAD and age >18 years during the period of valid CPRD data collection were enrolled. For this study, data collection started in April 2004, with the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework, and ended in August 2012. The first NIAD prescription after the start of data collection defined the index date. Patients with a record for renal transplant or dialysis during the study period were excluded (n = 152 among metformin users; n = 234 among nonusers).

Exposure

Exposure to metformin and/or other NIADs was assessed in a time-dependent manner. For this purpose, total follow-up of each individual was divided into small time intervals. The length of a time interval was based on NIAD prescriptions: a time interval starts with a NIAD prescription and ends 1 day before the next NIAD prescription. If the length of a time interval exceeded 90 days, the interval was further divided into separate 90-day intervals. This approach minimizes exposure misclassification. For each time interval, the exposure to metformin was assessed as 1) current metformin use (at least one metformin prescription in the 3 months before the start of a time interval); 2) recent metformin use (a most recent metformin prescription between 3 and 6 months before the start of a time interval); 3) past metformin use (a most recent metformin prescription >6 months before the start of a time interval); and 4) never metformin use (no metformin prescription at any time before the start of a time interval).

As a consequence, a patient could move between never, current, recent, and past metformin use. A past user could become a current metformin user again in the event of a new metformin prescription. Current metformin users were stratified according to their cumulative metformin exposure in the previous year (<730 g [<365 × 2 g] and ≥730 g) and their most recent prescribed daily metformin dose (≤2 g and >2 g).

Renal Function

For current metformin users, we evaluated the most recently recorded renal function 1 week to 1 year before to the start of an interval. Renal function was evaluated by reviewing laboratory test data (eGFR [MDRD] where possible), and CPRD READ codes (stages of chronic kidney disease). In the event of multiple eGFR values on the same day, the mean value was used. CPRD READ codes were prioritized if there was a laboratory test on the same day as recording.

Outcomes

Patients were followed up from the index date to either the end of data collection, the date the patient transferred out of the practice area, the patient’s death, or an event of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations.

Lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations were evaluated either by a CPRD READ code for lactic acidosis or by a record of plasma lactate concentration of >5 mmol/L, whichever came first. In the event of multiple laboratory tests for lactate concentrations on the same day, the lowest value was used. In a sensitivity analysis, the highest value was used instead of the lowest value. CPRD READ codes for lactic acidosis were prioritized if there was a laboratory test on the same day as recording.

Potential Confounders

The presence of risk factors for lactic acidosis during metformin use was assessed by reviewing the computerized medical records before the start of an interval. Risk factors that were considered in this study included age, sex, smoking status, BMI, alcohol use, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and a history of asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, heart failure, and/or sepsis (12,23–25). We further considered a prescription in the previous 6 months for drugs that may have influenced renal function (including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, loop diuretics, thiazide diuretics, β-blockers, statins, and systemic calcineurin inhibitors).

Data Analysis

Cox regression analysis compared hazard rates of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in current metformin users versus NIAD users who had never used metformin (SAS software version 9.2). Confounders were entered into the final model if they independently changed the β-coefficient for current metformin use by at least 5%. The main association for possible interactions with any of the risk factors was tested. Current metformin users were further stratified according to renal function and metformin dose.

Results

Table 1 displays the baseline characteristics of NIAD users who were either current metformin users (n = 223,968) or nonusers (n = 34,571). The mean duration of follow-up was 4.3 years for metformin users and 4.9 years for nonusers. Metformin users were younger (60.1 years) than nonusers (67.8 years). No substantial difference in sex distribution was observed. The proportion of metformin users with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) was lower than that of NIAD users (0.3% and 2.8%, respectively). Heart failure was less prevalent among the metformin users compared with the nonusers (3.9% and 8.3%, respectively). Age was strongly correlated with worsening of glomerular filtration rate (GFR): patients younger than 50 years old had a GFR of 96 mL/min/1.73 m2, those aged 50–64 years had a GFR of 84 mL/min/1.73 m2, patients aged 65–79 years had a GFR of 70 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the lowest GFR (59 mL/min/1.73 m2) was seen in patients aged 80 years and older (data not shown). Patients suffering from lactate acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations had a median age of 72 years (75% were older than 60 years of age).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of current metformin users and nonusers among patients using NIADs

Table 2 shows that the incidence rate of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations was 7.4 events per 100,000 person-years among current metformin users versus 2.2 events per 100,000 person-years among nonusers. Of a total of 68 events of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations, 50 (74%) originated from a READ code for lactic acidosis, whereas 18 (26%) were derived from an elevated plasma lactate concentration. Three events had both a READ record for lactic acidosis and a positive laboratory test. Current metformin users had a fourfold risk compared with NIAD users who had never used metformin, but this increase was not statistically significant (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 4.03 [95% CI 0.97–16.8]). The risk among recent or past users of metformin also was nonsignificantly increased. None of the results were influenced by our sensitivity analysis, which used the highest value (instead of the lowest value) in the event of multiple lactate concentrations on the same day.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations in current, recent, and past metformin users compared with never users of metformin

The different strata of current metformin users (compared with NIAD users who had never used metformin) showed the following increases in the risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations. 1) The risk in those with a most recent renal function <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was significantly higher than the risk in never users (AHR 6.37 [95% CI 1.48–27.5]), whereas the risk in current users with renal function ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (AHR 2.87 [95% CI 0.67–12.3]) was not. 2) In an additional analysis, we looked at an eGFR cut point of 45 mL/min/1.73m2. Current metformin users with an eGFR of ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2 had an AHR for lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations of 3.16 (95% CI 0.75–13.3), whereas those with poorer renal function (eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2) had an AHR of 6.74 (95% CI 1.34–33.8). Among metformin users with a recorded eGFR value, 14% of all lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations occurred among those with an eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. 3) The risk in those with a cumulative exposure to metformin of ≥730 g in the previous year (AHR 6.14 [95% CI 1.35–28.0]) was significantly increased; this was not the case in those with an exposure <730 g (AHR 3.69 [95% CI 0.88–15.5]). 4) The risk in those with a recent prescribed daily dose of >2 g of metformin (AHR 6.40 [95% CI 1.35–30.3]) was significantly increased; this was not the case in those with a dose of ≤2 g of metformin (AHR 3.78 [95% CI 0.90–15.8]).

When the strata in analyses 3 and 4 were substratified by renal function, the risk in metformin users with renal function <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 consistently showed a significant increase; this was not seen in those with renal function ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (Table 3). Compared with never users, there was an almost 12-fold risk in the substratum with reduced renal function and a cumulative exposure to ≥730 g of metformin in the preceding year (AHR 11.8 [95% CI 2.27–61.5]) and a 13-fold increase in the substratum with reduced renal function and recent exposure to >2 g of metformin/day (AHR 13.0 [95% CI 2.36–72.0]).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentration in current metformin users stratified by cumulative exposure or recent daily exposure to metformin and further stratified by renal function

Conclusions

The risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations was increased sixfold in current metformin users with reduced renal function (Table 2); it increased further to 12- or 13-fold in substrata with high cumulative exposure to metformin in the preceding year or with recent high daily exposure to metformin (Table 3).

Our crude incidence rate of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations—7.4 events per 100,000 person-years—among current metformin users corresponds well with the range of one to nine cases of lactic acidosis per 100,000 patient-years among metformin users that emerged from previous studies (7,10,12,26). Higher incidences of 47 to 57 cases per 100,000 patient-years also have been reported, but this is probably due to differences in study design (11,27). Ekström et al. (21) assessed whether different degrees of renal function affect the safety of metformin use in a cohort study comprising more than 51,000 patients with type 2 diabetes. To evaluate the occurrence of lactic acidosis, they used a composite end point that included a diagnosis of acidosis, shock, acute renal failure, and serious infections. When metformin use was compared with any other treatment, the risk of acidosis/serious infection was not significantly increased in patients with an eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

In contrast with these negative findings, we found that reduced renal function or high cumulative or daily exposure to metformin (all of which can lead to higher concentrations of metformin) were associated with an increased risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations. That the risk was further increased when both reduced renal function and a high intake of metformin were present is of particular interest. This lends support to the supposition that high concentrations of metformin may increase the risk of lactic acidosis during metformin use.

A major strength of our study is that it was conducted over a long observation period in a large database representative of the U.K. population in general practice, which offers the possibility to correct for smoking and BMI. The database’s information on drug exposure and diagnoses has been validated and proven to be of high quality (12). Another strength is that we not only separately evaluated the influence of renal function and the level of metformin intake, but also did so in combination.

Like most observational studies, our study is not without limitations. First, there is the potential issue of the selection and inaccurate estimation of our outcome measure. The inclusion of patients with a lactate concentration >5 mmol/L (26% of our cases) may have resulted in an overestimate compared with lactic acidosis during metformin use alone, since elevated lactate concentrations do not necessarily signify a diagnosis of lactic acidosis (28). Furthermore, in a previous study of the same CPRD database (General Practice Research Database) that we used, 7 of 14 patients with a READ code of lactic acidosis were excluded after a manual review of their medical record (12). This may have resulted in a nondifferential misclassification of the outcome, which might overestimate the incidence rates of lactic acidosis, although it is unlikely to affect the relative risk of lactic acidosis with metformin use among patients with decreased renal function. However, our period of observation (2004–2012) was different from the study period used by Bodmer et al. (1994–2005) and started with the year in which the so-called Quality and Outcomes Framework was introduced in the U.K. (29). The potential risk of differential underrecording among nonusers should also be considered. Because of the longstanding assumption that metformin may be linked to lactic acidosis, the lactate concentrations of metformin users may have been measured and recorded more selectively, particularly in those with reduced renal function. Nondifferential underrecording of lactic acidosis in the CPRD database may also have occurred; the presenting features of lactic acidosis are often vague (28), and GPs may not always have transferred lactic acidosis in a hospital discharge letter to their own records by means of the appropriate READ code. A counterargument against such underrecording is, of course, that lactic acidosis is a serious event that is likely to draw sufficient clinical attention. Mild elevations of lactate concentrations can be caused by a large number of pathologic conditions, ethanol, and drugs. Since we were not able to identify the exact cause of lactic acidosis, we were not able to exclude these events.

A second limitation is that we could not retrieve adequate information about all potentially relevant risk factors for lactic acidosis during metformin use. We based our classification of renal function on a READ code or a single eGFR value; we pragmatically accepted this latter value so long as it was not more than 1 year old (based on the argument that clinical guidelines often recommend annual monitoring of renal function). This may have increased the risk of including outdated information. In spite of our liberal choice, we could not retrieve renal function data for 27.4% and 34.6% of the current metformin users and nonusers, respectively (Table 1). Finally, we were not able to analyze the effect of acute decreases in GFR on the risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations.

In conclusion, our study suggests that the risk of lactic acidosis or elevated lactate concentrations is significantly increased in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency and that this risk is further increased in long-term heavy metformin users. Although these findings are not conclusive, they are consistent with current recommendations in the literature to adequately monitor the renal function of metformin users and to adjust the dose of metformin, if necessary, if the eGFR falls below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (3,17,18). This should be confirmed in future research, preferably in a study in which lactate concentrations, renal function, and metformin exposure are frequently assessed and in which all potential risk factors are accurately determined and recorded.

Article Information

Funding and Duality of Interest. The Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences employing A.L., A.F.G., H.J.D., A.E., and F.d.V. has received unrestricted research funding from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW), the Dutch Health Care Insurance Board (CVZ), the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association, the private-public funded Top Institute Pharma (www.tipharma.nl, includes co-funding from universities, government, and industry), the EU Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), EU 7th Framework Program (FP7), the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, the Dutch Ministry of Health, and industry (including GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, and others). No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. W.L.E., A.L., A.F.G., H.J.D., M.W., A.E., P.A.G.M.D.S., and F.d.V. conceptualized and designed the study, analyzed and interpreted data, and critically revised the manuscript. A.L. and F.d.V. acquired the data. W.L.E., A.L., P.A.G.M.D.S., and F.d.V. wrote the manuscript. W.L.E. and A.L. performed statistical analysis. F.d.V. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Received December 26, 2013.
  • Accepted March 31, 2014.
  • © 2014 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wen YK
    . Impact of acute kidney injury on metformin-associated lactic acidosis. Int Urol Nephrol 2009;41:967–972pmid:19280360
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Arroyo D,
    2. Melero R,
    3. Panizo N,
    4. et al
    . Metformin-associated acute kidney injury and lactic acidosis. Int J Nephrol 2011;2011:749653.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Nye HJ,
    2. Herrington WG
    . Metformin: the safest hypoglycaemic agent in chronic kidney disease? Nephron Clin Pract 2011;118:c380–c383pmid:21325870
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Graham GG,
    2. Punt J,
    3. Arora M,
    4. et al
    . Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clin Pharmacokinet 2011;50:81–98pmid:21241070
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Klachko D,
    2. Whaley-Connell A
    . Use of metformin in patients with kidney and cardiovascular diseases. Cardiorenal Med 2011;1:87–95pmid:22294985
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Lalau JD,
    2. Race JM
    . Metformin and lactic acidosis in diabetic humans. Diabetes Obes Metab 2000;2:131–137pmid:11220548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Salpeter SR,
    2. Greyber E,
    3. Pasternak GA,
    4. Salpeter EE
    . Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(4):CD002967
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Renda F,
    2. Mura P,
    3. Finco G,
    4. Ferrazin F,
    5. Pani L,
    6. Landoni G
    . Metformin-associated lactic acidosis requiring hospitalization. A national 10 year survey and a systematic literature review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17(Suppl. 1):45–49pmid:23436666
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Duong JK,
    2. Furlong TJ,
    3. Roberts DM,
    4. et al
    . The role of metformin in metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA): case series and formulation of a model of pathogenesis. Drug Saf 2013 April 3 [Epub ahead of print]pmid:23549904
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Brown JB,
    2. Pedula K,
    3. Barzilay J,
    4. Herson MK,
    5. Latare P
    . Lactic acidosis rates in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1659–1663pmid:9773726
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. van Berlo-van de Laar IR,
    2. Vermeij CG,
    3. Doorenbos CJ
    . Metformin associated lactic acidosis: incidence and clinical correlation with metformin serum concentration measurements. J Clin Pharm Ther 2011;36:376–382pmid:21545617
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bodmer M,
    2. Meier C,
    3. Krähenbühl S,
    4. Jick SS,
    5. Meier CR
    . Metformin, sulfonylureas, or other antidiabetes drugs and the risk of lactic acidosis or hypoglycemia: a nested case-control analysis. Diabetes Care 2008;31:2086–2091pmid:18782901
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. McCulloch DK. Metformin in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus [Internet], 2013. Philadelphia, PA, UptoDate, WoltersKluwer Health. Available from http://www.uptodate.com/contents/metformin-in-the-treatment-of-adults-with-type-2-diabetes-mellitus
  13. ↵
    1. Rocha A,
    2. Almeida M,
    3. Santos J,
    4. Carvalho A
    . Metformin in patients with chronic kidney disease: strengths and weaknesses. J Nephrol 2013;26:55–60pmid:22641582
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Friesecke S,
    2. Abel P,
    3. Roser M,
    4. Felix SB,
    5. Runge S
    . Outcome of severe lactic acidosis associated with metformin accumulation. Crit Care 2010;14:R226pmid:21171991
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Lipska KJ,
    2. Bailey CJ,
    3. Inzucchi SE
    . Use of metformin in the setting of mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1431–1437pmid:21617112
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. KNMP Royal Dutch Association for the Advancement of Pharmacy
    . Dutch guidelines for drug-dosing in chronic kidney disease. The Hague, Thieme GrafiMedia, 2012. [in Dutch]
  17. ↵
    1. Scheen AJ,
    2. Paquot N
    . Metformin revisited: a critical review of the benefit-risk balance in at-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab 2013;39:179–190pmid:23528671
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Sambol NC,
    2. Chiang J,
    3. Lin ET,
    4. et al
    . Kidney function and age are both predictors of pharmacokinetics of metformin. J Clin Pharmacol 1995;35:1094–1102pmid:8626883
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Lalau JD,
    2. Race JM
    . Lactic acidosis in metformin-treated patients. Prognostic value of arterial lactate levels and plasma metformin concentrations. Drug Saf 1999;20:377–384pmid:10230584
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Ekström N, Schioler L, Svensson AM, et al. Effectiveness and safety of metformin in 51 675 patients with type 2 diabetes and different levels of renal function: a cohort study from the Swedish National Diabetes Register. BMJ Open 2012;2. pii: e001076
  21. ↵
    1. Kajbaf F,
    2. Lalau JD
    . The prognostic value of blood pH and lactate and metformin concentrations in severe metformin-associated lactic acidosis. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2013;14:22
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Davis TM,
    2. Jackson D,
    3. Davis WA,
    4. Bruce DG,
    5. Chubb P
    . The relationship between metformin therapy and the fasting plasma lactate in type 2 diabetes: The Fremantle Diabetes Study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2001;52:137–144pmid:11488769
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Lim VC,
    2. Sum CF,
    3. Chan ES,
    4. Yeoh LY,
    5. Lee YM,
    6. Lim SC
    . Lactate levels in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin and its association with dose of metformin and renal function. Int J Clin Pract 2007;61:1829–1833pmid:17887995
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Scale T,
    2. Harvey JN
    . Diabetes, metformin and lactic acidosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2011;74:191–196pmid:21039727
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Stang M,
    2. Wysowski DK,
    3. Butler-Jones D
    . Incidence of lactic acidosis in metformin users. Diabetes Care 1999;22:925–927pmid:10372243
    OpenUrlAbstract
  25. ↵
    1. Kamber N,
    2. Davis WA,
    3. Bruce DG,
    4. Davis TM
    . Metformin and lactic acidosis in an Australian community setting: the Fremantle Diabetes Study. Med J Aust 2008;188:446–449pmid:18429709
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Howlett HC,
    2. Bailey CJ
    . A risk-benefit assessment of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drug Saf 1999;20:489–503pmid:10392666
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Lester H,
    2. Campbell S
    . Developing Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) indicators and the concept of ‘QOFability’. Qual Prim Care 2010;18:103–109pmid:20529471
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 37 (8)

In this Issue

August 2014, 37(8)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Podcast
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk of Lactic Acidosis or Elevated Lactate Concentrations in Metformin Users With Renal Impairment: A Population-Based Cohort Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Risk of Lactic Acidosis or Elevated Lactate Concentrations in Metformin Users With Renal Impairment: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Willemijn L. Eppenga, Arief Lalmohamed, Arjen F. Geerts, Hieronymus J. Derijks, Michel Wensing, Antoine Egberts, Peter A.G.M. De Smet, Frank de Vries
Diabetes Care Aug 2014, 37 (8) 2218-2224; DOI: 10.2337/dc13-3023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Risk of Lactic Acidosis or Elevated Lactate Concentrations in Metformin Users With Renal Impairment: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Willemijn L. Eppenga, Arief Lalmohamed, Arjen F. Geerts, Hieronymus J. Derijks, Michel Wensing, Antoine Egberts, Peter A.G.M. De Smet, Frank de Vries
Diabetes Care Aug 2014, 37 (8) 2218-2224; DOI: 10.2337/dc13-3023
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparisons of Polyexposure, Polygenic, and Clinical Risk Scores in Risk Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes
  • Quantifying Variation in Treatment Utilization for Type 2 Diabetes Across Five Major University of California Health Systems
  • Trends in Total and Out-of-pocket Payments for Noninsulin Glucose-Lowering Drugs Among U.S. Adults With Large-Employer Private Health Insurance From 2005 to 2018
Show more Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.