Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Metformin Does Not Affect Cancer Risk: A Cohort Study in the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink Analyzed Like an Intention-to-Treat Trial

  1. Konstantinos K. Tsilidis1,2⇑,
  2. Despoina Capothanassi1,
  3. Naomi E. Allen3,
  4. Evangelos C. Rizos4,
  5. David S. Lopez5,
  6. Karin van Veldhoven6,8,
  7. Carlotta Sacerdote7,
  8. Deborah Ashby9,
  9. Paolo Vineis6,7,
  10. Ioanna Tzoulaki1,6 and
  11. John P.A. Ioannidis10
  1. 1Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece
  2. 2Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.
  3. 3Clinical Trial Service Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.
  4. 4Lipid Disorders Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
  5. 5Division of Epidemiology, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX
  6. 6Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Campus, London, U.K.
  7. 7Human Genetics Foundation (HuGeF), Turin, Italy
  8. 8University College London Institute of Child Health, Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, London, U.K.
  9. 9Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, St Mary's Hospital, London, U.K.
  10. 10Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine; Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine; and Department of Statistics, Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences, Stanford, CA
  1. Corresponding author: Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, ktsilidi{at}cc.uoi.gr, ktsilidis{at}gmail.com.
Diabetes Care 2014 Sep; 37(9): 2522-2532. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0584
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Selection criteria for the study population in the CPRD.

  • Figure 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2

    Multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for the association between initiators of metformin monotherapy and initiators of sulfonylurea monotherapy and cancer risk using the ITT principle in the CPRD. NHL, non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

  • Figure 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3

    Proportion of participants who adhered to their initial antidiabetes treatment in the CPRD.

  • Figure 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4

    Multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for the association between initiators of metformin monotherapy and initiators of sulfonylurea monotherapy and total cancer risk using the ITT principle in the CPRD by type of sensitivity analyses. (Sensitivity analysis 1: after excluding participants with any treatment breaks of more than 90 days during the initial qualifying 12-month exposure period. Sensitivity analysis 2: after redefining the exposure to an antidiabetes drug class based on the first 6 months of each participant's prescription record compared with the 12-month treatment period used in the primary analysis. Sensitivity analysis 3: after excluding participants with any treatment breaks of more than 90 days during the latter qualifying 6-month exposure period. Sensitivity analysis 4: after excluding the initial 36 months of follow-up after the first antidiabetes prescription).

  • Figure 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5

    Multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for the association between initiators of metformin monotherapy and initiators of sulfonylurea monotherapy and total cancer risk using the ITT principle in the CPRD by subgroups.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Baseline characteristics by antidiabetes treatment in the CPRD

    Metformin mono-txMetformin combo-txSulfonylurea mono-txTZDs mono-txOther OHA mono-txOther OHA combo-txInsulin mono-txInsulin combo-tx
    n = 51,484n = 20,967n = 18,264n = 292n = 263n = 426n = 1,723n = 2,401
    Sex
     Male28,893 (56.1)11,437 (54.6)10,578 (57.9)170 (58.2)156 (59.3)246 (57.7)979 (56.8)1,330 (55.4)
     Female22,591 (43.9)9,530 (45.4)7,686 (42.1)122 (41.8)107 (40.7)180 (42.3)744 (43.2)1,071 (44.6)
    Age, years
     35–499,024 (17.5)4,329 (20.7)1,901 (10.4)38 (13.0)45 (17.1)71 (16.7)547 (31.8)767 (31.9)
     50–6422,086 (42.9)9,120 (43.5)6,327 (34.6)120 (41.1)111 (42.2)162 (38.0)641 (37.2)941 (39.2)
     65–7917,616 (34.2)6,503 (31.0)7,946 (43.5)112 (38.4)91 (34.6)160 (37.6)469 (27.2)609 (25.4)
     ≥802,758 (5.4)1,015 (4.8)2,090 (11.5)22 (7.5)16 (6.1)33 (7.7)66 (3.8)84 (3.5)
    BMI, kg/m2
     <18.546 (0.1)36 (0.2)124 (0.7)2 (0.7)3 (1.1)3 (0.7)11 (0.6)37 (1.5)
     18.5–24.94,037 (7.8)2,112 (10.1)4,435 (24.3)49 (16.8)42 (16.0)125 (29.3)306 (17.8)563 (23.5)
     25–29.916,321 (31.7)6,485 (30.9)6,797 (37.2)105 (36.0)103 (39.2)142 (33.3)460 (26.7)638 (26.6)
     ≥3029,098 (56.5)11,024 (52.6)3,833 (21.0)128 (43.8)94 (35.7)109 (25.6)468 (27.2)932 (38.8)
     Unknown1,982 (3.9)1,310 (6.2)3,075 (16.8)8 (2.7)21 (8.0)47 (11.1)478 (27.7)231 (9.6)
    Smoking
     Never21,214 (41.2)8,052 (38.4)6,514 (35.7)135 (46.2)93 (35.4)168 (39.4)547 (31.8)811 (33.8)
     Former18,225 (35.4)7,075 (33.7)4,194 (23.0)108 (37.0)57 (21.7)118 (27.7)379 (22.0)734 (30.6)
     Current8,389 (16.3)3,545 (16.9)2,53 (13.8)42 (14.4)41 (15.6)56 (13.2)283 (16.4)516 (21.5)
     Unknown3,656 (7.1)2,295 (11.0)5,026 (27.5)7 (2.4)72 (27.3)84 (19.7)514 (29.8)340 (14.1)
    Alcohol
     Never8,547 (16.6)3,638 (17.4)2,868 (15.7)45 (15.4)45 (17.1)71 (16.7)215 (12.5)390 (16.2)
     Former1,426 (2.8)575 (2.7)283 (1.6)6 (2.0)4 (1.5)10 (2.3)50 (2.9)95 (3.9)
     Current29,427 (57.1)10,641 (50.7)8,056 (44.1)169 (57.9)129 (49.1)190 (44.6)595 (34.5)1,108 (46.2)
     Unknown12,084 (23.5)6,113 (29.2)7,057 (38.6)72 (24.7)85 (32.3)155 (36.4)863 (50.1)808 (33.7)
    Aspirin/NSAID use*
     No20,414 (39.7)9,027 (43.0)9,333 (51.1)114 (39.0)136 (51.7)211 (49.5)889 (51.6)1,057 (44.0)
     Sparse13,391 (26.0)5,829 (27.8)4,354 (23.8)65 (22.3)69 (26.2)110 (25.8)419 (24.3)717 (29.9)
     Medium11,382 (22.1)4,064 (19.4)3,124 (17.1)74 (25.3)31 (11.8)75 (17.6)319 (18.5)423 (17.6)
     Frequent6,297 (12.2)2,047 (9.8)1,453 (8.0)39 (13.4)27 (10.3)30 (7.1)96 (5.6)204 (8.5)
    Statin use*
     No19,352 (37.6)9,709 (46.3)13,422 (73.5)81 (27.7)178 (67.7)249 (58.5)1,125 (65.3)1,238 (51.6)
     Sparse10,783 (20.9)4,651 (22.2)1,758 (9.6)74 (25.3)28 (10.6)66 (15.5)283 (16.4)585 (24.4)
     Medium13,54 (26.3)4,334 (20.7)1,991 (10.9)79 (27.1)27 (10.3)79 (18.5)233 (13.5)397 (16.5)
     Frequent7,809 (15.2)2,273 (10.8)1,093 (6.0)58 (19.9)30 (11.4)32 (7.5)82 (4.8)181 (7.5)
    Hormone use*†
     No19,193 (85.0)7,830 (82.2)6,841 (89.0)106 (86.9)91 (85.0)149 (82.8)624 (83.9)821 (76.7)
     Sparse1,289 (5.7)633 (6.6)316 (4.1)5 (4.1)5 (4.7)10 (5.6)54 (7.3)89 (8.3)
     Medium1,389 (6.1)697 (7.3)341 (4.4)6 (4.9)8 (7.5)16 (8.9)52 (6.9)115 (10.7)
     Frequent720 (3.2)370 (3.9)188 (2.5)5 (4.1)3 (2.8)5 (2.7)14 (1.9)46 (4.3)
    Diabetes duration, days‡
     Median (IQR)99 (1–618)35 (0–360)54 (0–414)259 (5–868)206 (6–765)30 (0–347)18 (0–105)30 (0–347)
     Missing, %5.68.117.09.214.815.639.08.7
    First year of therapy
     Median (IQR)2005 (2003–2007)2004 (2001–2007)2000 (1996–2002)2005 (2004–2006)2000 (1998–2003)2002 (1999–2004)2001 (1997–2004)2004 (2001–2007)
    • Figures are n (%) unless otherwise specified. Combo-tx, combination therapy; IQR, interquartile range; mono-tx, monotherapy; TZDs, thiazolidinediones.

    • ↵*Based on the percentile distribution of the number of prescriptions as no use, sparse use (1–10% of all prescriptions), medium use (10–50% of all prescriptions), and frequent use (>50% of all prescriptions). The exact distributional cut points were use of aspirin or NSAIDs: no, sparse [1–5 prescriptions], medium [6–16 prescriptions], frequent use [>16 prescriptions]; use of statins: no, sparse [1–6 prescriptions], medium [7–15 prescriptions], frequent use [>15 prescriptions]; use of exogenous hormones in women: no, sparse [1–2 prescriptions], medium [3–7 prescriptions], frequent use [>7 prescriptions].

    • ↵†Exogenous hormone use (oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy) in women.

    • ↵‡From time of diabetes diagnosis to time of first antidiabetes treatment prescription.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 37 (9)

In this Issue

September 2014, 37(9)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Metformin Does Not Affect Cancer Risk: A Cohort Study in the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink Analyzed Like an Intention-to-Treat Trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Metformin Does Not Affect Cancer Risk: A Cohort Study in the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink Analyzed Like an Intention-to-Treat Trial
Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Despoina Capothanassi, Naomi E. Allen, Evangelos C. Rizos, David S. Lopez, Karin van Veldhoven, Carlotta Sacerdote, Deborah Ashby, Paolo Vineis, Ioanna Tzoulaki, John P.A. Ioannidis
Diabetes Care Sep 2014, 37 (9) 2522-2532; DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0584

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Metformin Does Not Affect Cancer Risk: A Cohort Study in the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink Analyzed Like an Intention-to-Treat Trial
Konstantinos K. Tsilidis, Despoina Capothanassi, Naomi E. Allen, Evangelos C. Rizos, David S. Lopez, Karin van Veldhoven, Carlotta Sacerdote, Deborah Ashby, Paolo Vineis, Ioanna Tzoulaki, John P.A. Ioannidis
Diabetes Care Sep 2014, 37 (9) 2522-2532; DOI: 10.2337/dc14-0584
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparisons of Polyexposure, Polygenic, and Clinical Risk Scores in Risk Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes
  • Quantifying Variation in Treatment Utilization for Type 2 Diabetes Across Five Major University of California Health Systems
  • Trends in Total and Out-of-pocket Payments for Noninsulin Glucose-Lowering Drugs Among U.S. Adults With Large-Employer Private Health Insurance From 2005 to 2018
Show more Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.