Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Considerations in the Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

The Role of Energy, Nutrients, Foods, and Dietary Patterns in the Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies

  1. Danielle A.J.M. Schoenaker1⇑,
  2. Gita D. Mishra1,
  3. Leonie K. Callaway2,3 and
  4. Sabita S. Soedamah-Muthu4
  1. 1School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  2. 2School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  3. 3Departments of Obstetric and Internal Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
  4. 4Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands
  1. Corresponding author: Danielle A.J.M. Schoenaker, d.schoenaker{at}uq.edu.au.
Diabetes Care 2016 Jan; 39(1): 16-23. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-0540
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Diet may influence the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), but inconsistent findings have been reported. The purpose of this study was to synthesize evidence from observational studies on the associations between dietary factors and GDM.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Medline and Embase were searched for articles published until January 2015. We included observational studies of reproductive-aged women that reported on associations of maternal dietary intake before or during pregnancy, including energy, nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns, with GDM. All relevant results were extracted from each article. The number of comparable studies that adjusted for confounders was insufficient to perform a meta-analysis.

RESULTS The systematic review included 34 articles comprising 21 individual studies (10 prospective cohort, 6 cross-sectional, and 5 case-control). A limited number of prospective cohort studies adjusting for confounders indicated associations with a higher risk of GDM for replacing 1–5% of energy from carbohydrates with fat and for high consumption of cholesterol (≥300 mg/day), heme iron (≥1.1 mg/day), red and processed meat (increment of 1 serving/day), and eggs (≥7 per week). A dietary pattern rich in fruit, vegetables, whole grains, and fish and low in red and processed meat, refined grains, and high-fat dairy was found to be beneficial. The current evidence is based on a limited number of studies that are heterogeneous in design, exposure, and outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS The findings support current dietary guidelines to limit consumption of foods containing saturated fat and cholesterol, such as processed meat and eggs, as part of an overall balanced diet. Further large prospective studies are warranted.

Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), defined as glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy (1), is a common pregnancy complication affecting ∼7% of pregnancies (1,2). During the past 20 years, its prevalence has increased substantially across a range of multiethnic populations and is expected to continue to rise along with the increase in prevalence of obesity (3,4). GDM has a considerable impact on health outcomes of the mother and offspring during pregnancy, delivery, and beyond. Type 2 diabetes develops in >50% of women with GDM within 5–10 years after pregnancy (5). Children born to mothers with GDM are at an increased risk of childhood obesity and early onset of type 2 diabetes (6). Moreover, female offspring of mothers with GDM may be at an increased risk of GDM themselves, leading to an intergenerational cycle of the diabetes epidemic (4,7). The identification of modifiable risk factors could inform strategies and programs to prevent GDM.

The importance of diet therapy in GDM is well established (8). Evidence on the associations between diet before and during early pregnancy and GDM prevention, however, remains inconclusive. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of intervention studies examining dietary factors during pregnancy have shown mixed findings. A lower risk of GDM was found for dietary interventions, including a balanced diet (9), but not for fortified food products or dietary counseling (10). Findings may be mixed because the meta-analyses combined heterogeneous studies examining various types of interventions using different approaches to maintain compliance, different diagnostic criteria for GDM, and diverse populations in terms of ethnicity and BMI. Observational studies are essential in nutrition research because they capture long-term habitual dietary intake, inform intervention studies, and contribute to the development of practical dietary guidelines. On the basis of a nonsystematic review published in 2011, Zhang and Ning (11) concluded that epidemiologic data provide evidence that diet may play a role in the development of GDM, but the evidence remains limited and inconsistent. Additional studies have been published since, but to our knowledge, current findings on the associations between dietary factors and GDM from observational studies have not been reviewed systematically. Thus, we aimed to systematically review current evidence from observational studies among reproductive-aged women on the association of energy, nutrients, foods, and overall dietary patterns with the development of GDM.

Research Design and Methods

Data Sources and Searches

This systematic review was performed in accordance with Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines (12). The research question of interest was whether among women of reproductive age, the level of intake of energy, individual nutrients or foods, or overall dietary patterns are associated with GDM. A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline and Embase for eligible articles published from 1948 (Medline) or 1966 (Embase) until January 2015 using Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords “gestational diabetes mellitus,” “diet,” “nutrition,” “food,” and “vitamin.” The search was restricted to articles published in English and studies in human populations. Reference lists from relevant articles and reviews were manually searched for potentially relevant citations not detected by the electronic search.

Study Selection

Studies that met the following criteria were considered for inclusion in the systematic review: 1) original study (no review of previous studies); 2) observational study design, including cross-sectional, case-control, and retrospective and prospective cohort, in women of reproductive age; and 3) results on the associations of dietary intake before or during pregnancy (exposure) with development of GDM (outcome). To capture evidence on all components of an overall diet, studies were included if they reported on any of a wide range of dietary factors, including energy, nutrients, foods, or overall dietary patterns, alone or in combination with dietary supplements.

Studies were excluded if they reported on dietary supplements not in combination with dietary intake or examined only a biomarker of dietary intake. Because women with GDM generally receive dietary and lifestyle advice after diagnosis, prospective and cross-sectional studies were excluded if dietary intake was assessed to reflect the period after GDM diagnosis. Studies in <50 women, study populations comprising women with GDM with no control or comparison group with normal glucose control, and studies reporting on abnormal glucose tolerance but not GDM were not included. Only full-text articles were included; conference abstracts were excluded but used to search for related full-text articles. Intervention studies were not included because results from these studies have been systematically reviewed (9,10,13).

Articles identified from the literature search were screened for duplicates. Titles and abstracts were screened, and identified full-text articles were independently reviewed by two investigators (D.A.J.M.S. and S.S.S.-M.) for eligibility based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inconsistencies were referred to a third reviewer (G.D.M.) and resolved by discussion.

Data Extraction

The following information was extracted from each included article: study characteristics (author, year of publication, and study design, name, and country), population characteristics (number of women, number of GDM cases, recruitment location and period, baseline age, and exclusion criteria), exposure assessment (dietary factors and assessment method, validation, and period), outcome assessment (screening method and diagnostic criteria), and results (dietary intake [mean with SD, SE, or 95% CI] with number of women in each group, effect estimates, and 95% CIs for associations between dietary factors and GDM and confounding factors used in the analyses).

Quality Assessment

Quality assessment of included studies was independently performed by two investigators (D.A.J.M.S. and S.S.S.-M.) using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (14). Discrepancies were resolved by discussion with a third reviewer (G.D.M.). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was adapted slightly to specifically evaluate the quality of assessment of exposure and outcome variables of interest (Supplementary Data).

Data Synthesis and Analysis

Due to heterogeneity across studies in dietary factors, GDM diagnostic criteria, confounding factors used in analysis, effect estimates, and study design, an insufficient number of studies were available to combine study findings in a meta-analysis. Instead, results indicating significance and direction of the observed associations were qualitatively summarized in tables for each dietary factor by study design. Information on study characteristics was extracted to describe studies and populations.

Results

The numbers of identified and included articles are shown in Fig. 1. The database search and screening of bibliographies yielded 3,054 unique articles. After screening of titles and abstracts, 89 full-text articles were reviewed. Of these, 34 met the inclusion criteria. One article presented results from two studies (15), and multiple articles were published based on data from the Nurses’ Health Study II (n = 10), the Omega Cohort Study (n = 3), the Alpha Study (n = 2), a study conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto (n = 2), and a study conducted at the University of Torino (n = 2). The review, therefore, includes 21 individual studies. Dietary factors examined were mostly energy, macro- or micronutrients (26 articles/18 studies); fewer articles reported on foods (14 articles/10 studies), and only a few reported on dietary patterns (5 articles/3 studies).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Flow diagram for the selection of articles included in the systematic review on the associations between dietary factors and GDM. *No desirable exposure (e.g., not reporting on maternal dietary intake but on dietary supplements not in combination with maternal dietary intake, on a biomarker of dietary intake, or on dietary intake reflecting the period after GDM diagnosis). †No desirable outcome (e.g., not reporting GDM but abnormal glucose tolerance or studies with no comparison group comprising women with normal glucose tolerance). ‡Duplicate (i.e., similar study findings reported in multiple articles). §Number of articles and studies reporting on nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns do not add up to the total number of articles and studies included in the systematic review because some reported on a combination of nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns.

Study Characteristics

Study characteristics, including assessment of dietary intake and GDM, significant results, and main confounders used, are described in detail in Supplementary Table 1 for the 21 included studies across 34 articles. Studies were mostly prospective cohort studies (10 studies in 83,189 women, 2,446 with GDM), six were cross-sectional (2,452 women, 478 with GDM), and five were case-control studies (1,657 women, 438 with GDM). The mean baseline age was between 24 and 35 years. All articles were published after the year 2000. Dietary intake was measured using a validated tool (dietary recall, diet history, food frequency questionnaire) in 14 of the 21 studies. Diet was assessed before pregnancy in three studies. GDM was assessed using an oral glucose tolerance test in hospital-based studies (17 studies); in two studies, GDM was ascertained using validated self-reported diagnosis (≥92% agreement with medical records), and two studies used linkage with administrative data sets. Screening methods used for GDM diagnosis were generally consistent; however, cutoff values for the oral glucose tolerance test for GDM diagnosis differed across studies. Prevalence of GDM ranged from 1.6 to 28.8% (Supplementary Table 1).

Quality Assessment

Quality assessment ratings and scores of included studies are shown in Supplementary Table 2 (case-control studies) and Supplementary Table 3 (cohort studies). Total scores ranged from 0 (highest degree of bias) to 9 (lowest degree of bias) points. Scores ranged from 4 to 6 for case-control studies, 4 to 7 for cross-sectional studies, and 4 to 9 for prospective cohort studies. Main concerns were 1) representativeness of the study sample (no random sample of women in the community), 2) diet assessment in case-control studies (either studies used nonvalidated methods or assessment was not blinded to case or control status), and 3) comparability of exposed and unexposed participants based on design or analysis (a limited number of studies adjusted for potential key confounding factors, including lifestyle, socioeconomic status, previous macrosomia, and polycystic ovary syndrome).

Association Between Nutrients and GDM

Significant associations between nutrient intake and GDM adjusted for confounding factors are shown in Supplementary Table 1. With the exception of total fat, heme iron, and cholesterol, findings were not statistically significant or were reported by only one study.

Total Fat

Three prospective cohort studies examined dietary fat intake of which two showed a significant association between total fat intake and GDM risk (Supplementary Table 1) (16,17). In the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition Study, total fat intake was significantly higher among women with than among those without GDM. Moreover, replacing carbohydrates with fat was associated with a higher GDM risk (each 1% of total energy: relative risk [RR] 1.10 [95% CI 1.02, 1.10]) (16). Similarly, replacement of 5% of energy from carbohydrates with total fat slightly increased the risk of GDM (RR 1.04 [95% CI 1.00, 1.08]) in the Nurses’ Health Study II (17). In both studies, carbohydrate intake was within daily requirements (45–65% of total energy intake); however, total fat intake was increased beyond that recommended (20–35% of total energy intake) (18,19). Fat subtypes were examined in two of the three prospective cohort studies, but results did not show significant associations between saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fat and GDM risk (17,20).

Cholesterol

Study findings consistently indicated an increased GDM risk with a higher intake of cholesterol (Supplementary Table 1) (15,17,21,22). Prospective cohort studies indicated a significantly increased risk for women with a cholesterol intake of ∼300 mg/day or more (15,17). RRs reported were 2.35 (95% CI 1.35, 4.09) for >294 mg/day versus <151 mg/day in the Omega Cohort Study (15) and 1.45 (95% CI 1.11, 1.89) for the highest quintile (median intake 310 mg/day) versus the lowest quintile (167 mg/day) in the Nurses’ Health Study II (17).

Heme Iron

Two prospective cohort studies examining intake of heme iron before (23) and during pregnancy (24) showed an increased risk of GDM with higher intake (Supplementary Table 1). An intake of ≥1.1 mg/day was associated with a higher GDM risk in the Nurses’ Health Study II (RR [95% CI] for quintiles 3 [median intake 1.1 mg/day], 4 [1.3 mg/day], and 5 [1.6 mg/day] vs. quintile 1 [0.66 mg/day]: 1.31 [1.03, 1.68], 1.51 [1.17, 1.93], and 1.28 [1.21, 2.08], respectively; P trend = 0.0001) (23) and in the Omega Cohort Study (RR [95% CI] for quartile 4 [≥1.12 mg/day] vs. quartile 1 (<0.48 mg/day): 2.15 [1.09, 4.27], P trend = 0.04) (24).

Associations Between Foods and Food Groups and GDM

Findings for most foods or food groups were not statistically significant or were reported by only one study. For higher consumption of red and processed meat and for eggs, two to four individual studies adjusting for main confounding factors consistently found an association with elevated GDM risk (15,25,26) (Supplementary Table 1).

Red and Processed Meat

Higher consumption before pregnancy of total red meat and processed red meat (beef, lamb, pork, hamburger, bacon, beef hot dogs and sausages, salami and bologna) were significantly associated with increased risk of GDM in the Nurses’ Health Study II (25,26). For each increase of 1 serving/day of total red meat or processed red meat, GDM risk increased by 66% (95% CI 1.36%, 2.02%) and 47% (95% CI 0.98%, 2.20%), respectively (25). The Alpha Study reported a higher consumption of red and processed meat (types of meat not further specified) during pregnancy among participants with GDM than control participants (1.07 vs. 0.81 servings/day, P < 0.001) (15).

Eggs

GDM was more likely to develop in women with a high egg consumption of seven or more per week during early pregnancy versus those who consumed fewer than seven per week (13.5 and 16.1%, respectively) (Alpha Study: odds ratio 2.65 [95% CI 1.48, 4.72]; Omega Cohort Study: RR 1.77 [95% CI 1.19, 2.63]) (15). An egg consumption of fewer than seven per week was not significantly associated with GDM risk, but findings from both studies indicated a dose-response association for increasing egg consumption and higher GDM risk (15). More detailed results on all nutrients and foods examined in each study and factors controlled for are shown in Supplementary Tables 4–9.

Associations Between Dietary Patterns and GDM

Two studies examined associations between dietary patterns and GDM (26–29). Findings from the Nurses’ Health Study II provided evidence on prepregnancy dietary patterns and development of GDM (26–28). Zhang et al. (26) examined a prudent and a Western dietary pattern identified using factor analysis relative to GDM risk. In multivariable models, low consumption of the prudent dietary pattern (characterized by a low intake of fruit, green leafy vegetables, poultry, and fish) (lowest vs. highest quintile RR 1.37 [95% CI 1.09, 1.72], P trend = 0.02) and high consumption of the Western dietary pattern (characterized by a high intake of red meat, processed meat, refined grain products, sweets, french fries, and pizza) (highest vs. lowest quintile RR 1.63 [95% CI 1.20, 2.21], P trend = 0.001) were associated with an elevated risk of GDM. In the same study, adherence to a low-carbohydrate dietary pattern (characterized by a high consumption of red meat, poultry, and high-fat dairy and a low consumption of fruit, vegetables, whole grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages) was associated with an increased risk of GDM after adjustment for confounding factors (highest vs. lowest quartile RR 1.27 [95% CI 1.06, 1.51], P trend = 0.03) (27).

Associations between a priori dietary pattern scores and GDM risk were examined in the Nurses’ Health Study II (28). Prepregnancy adherence to the alternate Mediterranean diet (highest vs. lowest quartile RR 0.76 [95% CI 0.60, 0.95], P trend = 0.004), the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (RR 0.66 [95% CI 0.53, 0.82], P trend = 0.0005), and the alternate Healthy Eating Index (RR 0.54 [95% CI 0.43, 0.68], P trend < 0.0001) all significantly decreased the risk of GDM in adjusted models. Common components between the prudent dietary pattern and dietary pattern scores were high consumption of fruit, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, nuts, and fish and low consumption of red and processed meat, high-fat dairy, refined grain products, sugar-sweetened beverages, sweets, and pizza.

In line with these findings from the Nurses’ Health Study II on prepregnancy dietary patterns, a study conducted in 10 Mediterranean countries showed that adherence to the Mediterranean diet was higher among women without GDM (mean diet index score 6.3 of 12) than among those with GDM (mean diet index score 5.8) independent of other risk factors (P = 0.03) (29). High adherence to the Mediterranean Diet Index was characterized by high consumption of fruit, vegetables, legumes, bread, and cereal and low consumption of meat, eggs, cheese, and dairy.

Conclusions

This systematic review of observational studies on the associations of energy, nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns with GDM shows that the current evidence is sparse and predominantly focused on intake of single nutrients and foods rather than on overall dietary patterns. Moreover, current evidence is dominated by findings from the Nurses’ Health Study II and should be interpreted with caution because incomplete adjustment or clustering of health behaviors may have confounded the reported associations. In terms of nutrients, higher intake of total fat, cholesterol, and heme iron were associated with higher GDM risk (15–17,23,24). In terms of foods, higher consumption of red meat, processed meat, and eggs was associated with a higher risk of GDM (15,25,26). In terms of dietary patterns, an overall diet rich in fruit, vegetables, legumes, nuts, whole grains, and fish and low in red and processed meat, refined grain products, eggs, and high-fat dairy may be beneficial in reducing GDM risk (26–29).

To our knowledge, this systematic review is the first to synthesize evidence from observational studies on the association between dietary factors and GDM. In a nonsystematic review published in 2011, Zhang and Ning (11) concluded that intake of several nutrients, including a higher intake of fat and lower intake of carbohydrates, may be associated with an increased risk of GDM. In the current systematic review, we also found evidence for associations of higher consumption of total fat, cholesterol, heme iron, red and processed meat, and eggs before or during pregnancy. These associations were adjusted for main confounding factors, including maternal age, ethnicity, parity, history of GDM, family history of diabetes, lifestyle, BMI, and energy intake. Since Zhang and Ning’s review, more studies on overall dietary patterns have been published, indicating that prepregnancy dietary patterns may be related to GDM risk. These findings remain predominantly based on U.S. data from the Nurses’ Health Study II and need confirmation in other study populations.

Several trials have been aimed at reducing the risk of GDM through dietary interventions during early pregnancy. Study findings summarized in systematic reviews and meta-analyses are diverse but suggest a beneficial effect (9,10,13,30). Additional research is needed because of the differences in interventions examined (e.g., diet quality, energy restriction, provision of fortified food products, dietary counseling) as well as the heterogeneous study populations and GDM diagnostic criteria. Findings from the current review of observational studies examining habitual dietary intake may contribute to informing the development of future dietary interventions.

Current epidemiologic evidence on dietary factors and GDM suggests an increased risk with a higher intake of total fat [replacing 1–5% of energy from carbohydrates with fat beyond the daily fat recommendation of 35% of total energy intake (18,19)], cholesterol [beyond the daily recommended intake of 300 mg/day (18,19)], heme iron (≥1.1 mg/day), and foods containing these nutrients, including red and processed meat (increment of 1 serving/day) and eggs (seven or more per week). These results are in line with findings on risk of type 2 diabetes (31–34), which shares a common etiology with GDM. Associations of total fat, cholesterol, heme iron, red and processed meat, and eggs with GDM are biologically plausible, with worsening inflammatory markers and oxidative stress as potential biological pathways involved in the development of GDM (35–38). Exact pathways remain unclear, and further studies are needed to elucidate potential mechanisms for the relationship of dietary factors with risk of GDM.

Findings from the current review must be interpreted with caution because the evidence is based on a limited number of studies examining dietary factors in relation to GDM, and these studies have several caveats. First, even though diet was assessed using a validated tool in the majority of studies, self-reported dietary intake is known to be subject to measurement error. Misclassification of dietary intake may weaken or limit the detection of an association with GDM. In case-control studies, assessment of diet after GDM diagnosis may have resulted in recall bias. Second, most studies were restricted by the small sample size and, therefore, the power to detect an association. Moreover, selection bias should be considered because most study populations were not from a random sample from the community but from specific regions, cities, occupations, or ethnic groups, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Third, studies used different diagnostic criteria for GDM, with no clear pattern emerging regarding whether a significant association could be detected using less or more strict criteria. Some studies showed a gradient in dietary intake (e.g., increasing dietary fat intake) from normal glucose tolerance to abnormal glucose tolerance and GDM (39–41), whereas other studies found an association or no association consistent with both outcomes (16,20,42). Finally, the observed associations may be explained by residual confounding from unmeasured factors in the individual studies. Most studies adjusted for maternal age, ethnicity, parity, history of GDM, family history of diabetes, BMI, and total energy intake; however, less than one-half of the studies adjusted for other lifestyle factors, such as physical activity and smoking, and very few adjusted for gestational weight gain, previous macrosomia, polycystic ovary syndrome, or socioeconomic status, which may be important risk factors of GDM (43–45). Furthermore, because diets comprise a combination of food items, singling out the effect of an individual food item is difficult. For example, high egg consumption was against dietary advice at the time of the studies and may be an indicator of a diet that does not comply with guidelines and is high in deleterious food, such as processed meat. Specific types of foods not taken into account in the analyses (e.g., bacon) may contribute to explaining the observed association. Additionally, because of the interaction among nutrients, drawing conclusions on independent associations of specific individual nutrients is difficult; for example, heme iron has a strong positive correlation with animal protein, which was not taken into account in the analyses on heme iron and GDM risk.

Studies examining overall dietary patterns take into account the cumulative and interactive effects of nutrients and foods. Evidence on the association between overall diet and risk of GDM is in general agreement with findings on type 2 diabetes risk. A diet comparable to a Western dietary pattern (high intake of red and processed meat, sweets, savory snacks, and refined grains) has been found to increase risk (46,47) and a Mediterranean-style dietary pattern (high intake of fruit, vegetables, legumes, fish, and whole grains) to reduce risk (48). Moreover, these findings are in line with current international dietary guidelines for reproductive-aged women to 1) limit intake of foods that are high in sodium, added sugar, saturated fat, transfat, and cholesterol and 2) consume a diet rich in fruit, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, low-fat dairy, seafood, lean meat and poultry, and nuts (18,19,49). For pregnant women, guidelines recommend to only eat fresh seafood that has been cooked to kill Listeria and to avoid fish that may contain high levels of mercury. It should be noted that the Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (50), which informs the American federal government on current scientific evidence to develop a national nutrition policy, no longer includes the recommendation to limit cholesterol intake and defines eggs as a nutrient-dense food that should be part of an overall dietary pattern. Health-conscious women might change their dietary habits based on changes in dietary guidelines, and this needs to be assessed in future studies.

A strength of the current review is that it covers a wide range of dietary factors, including energy, nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns. Overall diet is a combination of foods that in turn contain a combination of nutrients. We found that a higher intake of total fat, cholesterol, and heme iron as well as a higher intake of foods containing these nutrients, including red and processed meat and eggs, were associated with higher GDM risk. Also as part of an overall Western dietary pattern, a diet rich in red and processed meats was associated with a higher risk of GDM. Causality cannot be inferred because of the observational design of the studies, and well-designed prospective intervention studies are needed to confirm these findings. Even though well-conducted trials are considered the highest level of evidence to infer causal relationships, observational studies are important in nutrition research. Diet is a complex combination and interaction among components that cumulatively affect health. Considering all components of an overall diet as well as good compliance in long-term intervention studies often is difficult to achieve, whereas well-designed observational studies capture habitual diet patterns. Evidence from prospective observational studies together with intervention trials could inform policy and contribute to the development of practical dietary guidelines for reproductive-aged women.

This systematic review is limited by the scarce number of published studies. A large diversity in nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns; criteria used for GDM diagnosis; and the way associations were analyzed and reported across various study designs was examined, limiting the consistency and comparability of findings and our ability to pool results in meta-analyses. Results from prospective cohort studies were dominated by analyses using data from the large Nurses’ Health Study II (10 of 21 studies); however, these findings were confirmed by at least one other study. The current review only includes studies published in English. Moreover, no studies examined dietary intake both before and during pregnancy to draw conclusions on whether timing of dietary habits affects the association with GDM.

In conclusion, current evidence from observational studies indicates a role of diet in the development of GDM. The findings support current dietary guidelines for reproductive-aged women to limit their consumption of foods containing saturated fat and cholesterol, including red and processed meat and eggs, as part of an overall balanced diet that is rich in fruit, vegetables, legumes, whole grains, low-fat dairy, nuts, and fish. Examining dietary patterns is crucial in taking into account interactions and cumulative effects of multiple nutrients and foods consumed in an overall diet. Further well-powered prospective observational and intervention studies are needed to examine dietary patterns both before and during pregnancy in relation to risk of GDM in a range of populations. Results from these studies will build an evidence base to inform intervention studies and for translation to more comprehensive and practical public health messages.

Article Information

Funding. D.A.J.M.S. is supported by an International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and G.D.M. by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT120100812).

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. D.A.J.M.S. contributed to the study design, performed the systematic review, and drafted the manuscript. G.D.M. contributed to the study design, interpretation of the results, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. L.K.C. contributed to the interpretation of the results and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. S.S.S-M. contributed to the study design, quality assessment, interpretation of the results, and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Footnotes

  • This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/dc15-0540/-/DC1.

  • See accompanying articles, pp. 13, 24, 31, 39, 43, 50, 53, 55, 61, and 65.

  • Received March 16, 2015.
  • Accepted July 26, 2015.
  • © 2016 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

References

  1. ↵
    1. American Diabetes Association
    . Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2013;36(Suppl. 1):S67–S74pmid:23264425
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Reece EA,
    2. Leguizamón G,
    3. Wiznitzer A
    . Gestational diabetes: the need for a common ground. Lancet 2009;373:1789–1797pmid:19465234
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Ferrara A
    . Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus: a public health perspective. Diabetes Care 2007;30(Suppl. 2):S141–S146pmid:17596462
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Dabelea D,
    2. Snell-Bergeon JK,
    3. Hartsfield CL,
    4. Bischoff KJ,
    5. Hamman RF,
    6. McDuffie RS; Kaiser Permanente of Colorado GDM Screening Program
    . Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) over time and by birth cohort: Kaiser Permanente of Colorado GDM Screening Program. Diabetes Care 2005;28:579–584pmid:15735191
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Kim C,
    2. Newton KM,
    3. Knopp RH
    . Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1862–1868pmid:12351492
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Kim C,
    2. Ferrara A
    1. Dabelea D
    . The diabetic intrauterine environment: short and long-term consequences. In Gestational Diabetes During and After Pregnancy. Kim C, Ferrara A, Eds. London, Springer-Verlag, 2010, p. 227–239
  7. ↵
    1. Egeland GM,
    2. Skjaerven R,
    3. Irgens LM
    . Birth characteristics of women who develop gestational diabetes: population based study. BMJ 2000;321:546–547pmid:10968815
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Metzger BE,
    2. Buchanan TA,
    3. Coustan DR, et al
    . Summary and recommendations of the fifth international workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2007;30(Suppl. 2):S251–S260pmid:17596481
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Thangaratinam S,
    2. Rogozińska E,
    3. Jolly K, et al
    . Effects of interventions in pregnancy on maternal weight and obstetric outcomes: meta-analysis of randomised evidence. BMJ 2012;344:e2088pmid:22596383
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Gresham E,
    2. Bisquera A,
    3. Byles JE,
    4. Hure AJ
    . Effects of dietary interventions on pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Matern Child Nutr. 22 July 2014 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12142pmid:25048387
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Ning Y
    . Effect of dietary and lifestyle factors on the risk of gestational diabetes: review of epidemiologic evidence. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94(Suppl.):1975S–1979Spmid:21613563
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Stroup DF,
    2. Berlin JA,
    3. Morton SC, et al
    . Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008–2012pmid:10789670
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Facchinetti F,
    2. Dante G,
    3. Petrella E,
    4. Neri I
    . Dietary interventions, lifestyle changes, and dietary supplements in preventing gestational diabetes mellitus: a literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2014;69:669–680pmid:25409159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [article online], 2014. Available from http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 9 May 2014
  15. ↵
    Qiu C, Frederick IO, Zhang C, Sorensen TK, Enquobahrie DA, Williams MA. Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in relation to maternal egg and cholesterol intake. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:649–658
  16. ↵
    1. Saldana TM,
    2. Siega-Riz AM,
    3. Adair LS
    . Effect of macronutrient intake on the development of glucose intolerance during pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 2004;79:479–486pmid:14985225
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Bowers K,
    2. Tobias DK,
    3. Yeung E,
    4. Hu FB,
    5. Zhang C
    . A prospective study of prepregnancy dietary fat intake and risk of gestational diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:446–453pmid:22218158
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. National Health and Medical Research Council
    . Australian Dietary Guidelines. Canberra, National Health and Medical Research Council, 2013
  19. ↵
    1. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
    . Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. Washington, DC, Government Printing Office, 2010
  20. ↵
    1. Radesky JS,
    2. Oken E,
    3. Rifas-Shiman SL,
    4. Kleinman KP,
    5. Rich-Edwards JW,
    6. Gillman MW
    . Diet during early pregnancy and development of gestational diabetes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008;22:47–59pmid:18173784
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. González-Clemente JM,
    2. Carro O,
    3. Gallach I, et al
    . Increased cholesterol intake in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab 2007;33:25–29pmid:17258930
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Ley SH,
    2. Hanley AJ,
    3. Retnakaran R,
    4. Sermer M,
    5. Zinman B,
    6. O’Connor DL
    . Effect of macronutrient intake during the second trimester on glucose metabolism later in pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:1232–1240pmid:21955650
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Bowers K,
    2. Yeung E,
    3. Williams MA, et al
    . A prospective study of prepregnancy dietary iron intake and risk for gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1557–1563pmid:21709294
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Qiu C, Zhang C, Gelaye B, Enquobahrie DA, Frederick IO, Williams MA. Gestational diabetes mellitus in relation to maternal dietary heme iron and nonheme iron intake. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1564–1569
  25. ↵
    1. Bao W,
    2. Bowers K,
    3. Tobias DK,
    4. Hu FB,
    5. Zhang C
    . Prepregnancy dietary protein intake, major dietary protein sources, and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2001–2008pmid:23378620
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Zhang C, Schulze MB, Solomon CG, Hu FB. A prospective study of dietary patterns, meat intake and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2006;49:2604–2613
  27. ↵
    Bao W, Bowers K, Tobias DK, et al. Prepregnancy low-carbohydrate dietary pattern and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;99:1378–1384
  28. ↵
    1. Tobias DK,
    2. Zhang C,
    3. Chavarro J, et al
    . Prepregnancy adherence to dietary patterns and lower risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;96:289–295pmid:22760563
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Karamanos B,
    2. Thanopoulou A,
    3. Anastasiou E, et al, .; MGSD-GDM Study Group
    . Relation of the Mediterranean diet with the incidence of gestational diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014;68:8–13pmid:24084515
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Oostdam N,
    2. van Poppel MN,
    3. Wouters MG,
    4. van Mechelen W
    . Interventions for preventing gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011;20:1551–1563pmid:21838525
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Soedamah-muthu S, Praagman J. (2015) The role of diet as a risk factor for T2DM [article online], 2015. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14496/dia.3104466188.11. Accessed 15 January 2015
    1. Rajpathak S,
    2. Ma J,
    3. Manson J,
    4. Willett WC,
    5. Hu FB
    . Iron intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes in women: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1370–1376pmid:16732023
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pan A,
    2. Sun Q,
    3. Bernstein AM, et al
    . Red meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: 3 cohorts of US adults and an updated meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2011;94:1088–1096pmid:21831992
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Shin JY,
    2. Xun P,
    3. Nakamura Y,
    4. He K
    . Egg consumption in relation to risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:146–159pmid:23676423
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Qiu C,
    2. Sorensen TK,
    3. Luthy DA,
    4. Williams MA
    . A prospective study of maternal serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2004;18:377–384pmid:15367325
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Boden G
    . Role of fatty acids in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and NIDDM. Diabetes 1997;46:3–10pmid:8971073
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Oude Griep LM,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Chan Q
    . Empirically-derived dietary patterns, diet quality scores, and markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Curr Nutr Rep 2013;2:97–104pmid:23750327
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Fung TT,
    2. McCullough ML,
    3. Newby PK, et al
    . Diet-quality scores and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;82:163–173pmid:16002815
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Bo S,
    2. Lezo A,
    3. Menato G, et al
    . Gestational hyperglycemia, zinc, selenium, and antioxidant vitamins. Nutrition 2005;21:186–191pmid:15723747
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Bo S,
    2. Menato G,
    3. Lezo A, et al
    . Dietary fat and gestational hyperglycaemia. Diabetologia 2001;44:972–978pmid:11484073
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Scholl TO,
    3. Leskiw M,
    4. Savaille J,
    5. Stein TP
    . Differences in maternal circulating fatty acid composition and dietary fat intake in women with gestational diabetes mellitus or mild gestational hyperglycemia. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2049–2054pmid:20805277
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Storlien LH,
    3. Jenkins AB, et al
    . Dietary variables and glucose tolerance in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2000;23:460–464pmid:10857935
    OpenUrlAbstract
  38. ↵
    1. McGuire V,
    2. Rauh MJ,
    3. Mueller BA,
    4. Hickock D
    . The risk of diabetes in a subsequent pregnancy associated with prior history of gestational diabetes or macrosomic infant. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1996;10:64–72pmid:8746432
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bouthoorn SH,
    2. Silva LM,
    3. Murray SE, et al
    . Low-educated women have an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: the Generation R Study. Acta Diabetol 2015;52:445–452pmid:25344768
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Lo JC,
    2. Feigenbaum SL,
    3. Escobar GJ,
    4. Yang J,
    5. Crites YM,
    6. Ferrara A
    . Increased prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus among women with diagnosed polycystic ovary syndrome: a population-based study. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1915–1917pmid:16873802
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Fung TT,
    2. Schulze M,
    3. Manson JE,
    4. Willett WC,
    5. Hu FB
    . Dietary patterns, meat intake, and the risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2235–2240pmid:15534160
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Montonen J,
    2. Knekt P,
    3. Härkänen T, et al
    . Dietary patterns and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:219–227pmid:15671254
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Salas-Salvadó J,
    2. Bulló M,
    3. Babio N, et al, .; PREDIMED Study Investigators
    . Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with the Mediterranean diet: results of the PREDIMED-Reus nutrition intervention randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2011;34:14–19pmid:20929998
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Public Health England; Welsh Government; Scottish Government; Food Standards Agency in Northern Ireland. The Eatwell Plate. London, Public Health England, 2013
  44. ↵
    United States Department of Agriculture. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee [article online], 2015. Available from: http://www.health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015-scientific-report. Accessed 9 June 2015
  45. Bao W, Tobias DK, Olsen SF, Zhang C. Pre-pregnancy fried food consumption and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Diabetologia 2014;57:2485–2491
    1. Behboudi-Gandevani S,
    2. Safary K,
    3. Moghaddam-Banaem L,
    4. Lamyian M,
    5. Goshtasebi A,
    6. Alian-Moghaddam N
    . The relationship between maternal serum iron and zinc levels and their nutritional intakes in early pregnancy with gestational diabetes. Biol Trace Elem Res 2013;154:7–13pmid:23743666
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Belzer LM,
    2. Smulian JC,
    3. Lu SE,
    4. Tepper BJ
    . Food cravings and intake of sweet foods in healthy pregnancy and mild gestational diabetes mellitus. A prospective study. Appetite 2010;55:609–615pmid:20869416
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bennett WL,
    2. Liu SH,
    3. Yeh HC, et al
    . Changes in weight and health behaviors after pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: the CARDIA study. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013;21:1269–1275pmid:23666593
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Campbell SK,
    2. Lynch J,
    3. Esterman A,
    4. McDermott R
    . Pre-pregnancy predictors of diabetes in pregnancy among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women in North Queensland, Australia. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:1284–1292pmid:21959925
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chen L,
    2. Hu FB,
    3. Yeung E,
    4. Willett W,
    5. Zhang C
    . Prospective study of pre-gravid sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2009;32:2236–2241pmid:19940226
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chen L,
    2. Hu FB,
    3. Yeung E,
    4. Tobias DK,
    5. Willett WC,
    6. Zhang C
    . Prepregnancy consumption of fruits and fruit juices and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1079–1082pmid:22446174
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. Hinkle S, Laughon S, Catov J, Olsen J, Bech B. First trimester coffee and tea intake and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a study within a national birth cohort. BJOG 2015;122:420–428
  47. Zhang C, Williams MA, Sorensen TK, et al. Maternal plasma ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Epidemiology 2004;15:597–604
  48. Zhang C, Liu S, Solomon CG, Hu FB. Dietary fiber intake, dietary glycemic load, and the risk for gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2223–2230
    1. Canda MT,
    2. Sezer O,
    3. Demir N
    . An audit of seafood consumption awareness during pregnancy and its association with maternal and fetal outcomes in a Turkish population. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;31:293–297pmid:21534748
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Helin A,
    2. Kinnunen TI,
    3. Raitanen J,
    4. Ahonen S,
    5. Virtanen SM,
    6. Luoto R
    . Iron intake, haemoglobin and risk of gestational diabetes: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2012;2:e001730pmid:23015603
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Jali MV,
    2. Desai BR,
    3. Gowda S,
    4. Kambar S,
    5. Jali SM
    . A hospital based study of prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in an urban population of India. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2011;15:1306–1310pmid:22195364
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Ley SH,
    2. Hanley AJ,
    3. Sermer M,
    4. Zinman B,
    5. O’Connor DL
    . Lower dietary vitamin E intake during the second trimester is associated with insulin resistance and hyperglycemia later in pregnancy. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013;67:1154–1156pmid:24065066
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Park S,
    2. Kim MY,
    3. Baik SH, et al
    . Gestational diabetes is associated with high energy and saturated fat intakes and with low plasma visfatin and adiponectin levels independent of prepregnancy BMI. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013;67:196–201pmid:23385969
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rezvan N,
    2. Hosseinzadeh-Attar MJ,
    3. Masoudkabir F,
    4. Moini A,
    5. Janani L,
    6. Mazaherioun M
    . Serum visfatin concentrations in gestational diabetes mellitus and normal pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;285:1257–1262pmid:22167446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. Zhang C, Williams MA, Frederick IO, et al. Vitamin C and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a case-control study. J Reprod Med 2004;49:257–266
    1. Carpenter MW,
    2. Coustan DR
    . Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;144:768–773pmid:7148898
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    1. American Diabetes Association
    . Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl. 1):S62–S69pmid:20042775
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Genuth S,
    2. Alberti KG,
    3. Bennett P, et al, .; Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
    . Follow-up report on the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26:3160–3167pmid:14578255
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. National Diabetes Data Group
    . Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes 1979;28:1039–1057pmid:510803
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. World Health Organization
    . Definition, Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications. Report of a WHO Consultation. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1999
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 39 (1)

In this Issue

January 2016, 39(1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Role of Energy, Nutrients, Foods, and Dietary Patterns in the Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Role of Energy, Nutrients, Foods, and Dietary Patterns in the Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
Danielle A.J.M. Schoenaker, Gita D. Mishra, Leonie K. Callaway, Sabita S. Soedamah-Muthu
Diabetes Care Jan 2016, 39 (1) 16-23; DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0540

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

The Role of Energy, Nutrients, Foods, and Dietary Patterns in the Development of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
Danielle A.J.M. Schoenaker, Gita D. Mishra, Leonie K. Callaway, Sabita S. Soedamah-Muthu
Diabetes Care Jan 2016, 39 (1) 16-23; DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0540
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Comparative Effectiveness of Diabetes Prevention Strategies to Reduce Postpartum Weight Retention in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Gestational Diabetes’ Effects on Moms (GEM) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Can Be Prevented by Lifestyle Intervention: The Finnish Gestational Diabetes Prevention Study (RADIEL)
  • Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Effects of a Low–Glycemic Index Diet on Pregnancy Outcomes in Women at High Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The GI Baby 3 Study
Show more Considerations in the Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.