Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Risk of Cause-Specific Death in Individuals With Diabetes: A Competing Risks Analysis

  1. Jose Miguel Baena-Díez1,2,3,
  2. Judit Peñafiel1,
  3. Isaac Subirana1,3,
  4. Rafel Ramos4,5,
  5. Roberto Elosua1,
  6. Alejandro Marín-Ibañez6,
  7. María Jesús Guembe7,8,
  8. Fernando Rigo9,
  9. María José Tormo-Díaz4,10,11,12,
  10. Conchi Moreno-Iribas13,14,15,
  11. Joan Josep Cabré16,
  12. Antonio Segura17,
  13. Manel García-Lareo2,
  14. Agustín Gómez de la Cámara3,18,
  15. José Lapetra19,20,
  16. Miquel Quesada4,
  17. Jaume Marrugat1,
  18. Maria José Medrano21,
  19. Jesús Berjón7,15,
  20. Guiem Frontera9,
  21. Diana Gavrila3,22,
  22. Aurelio Barricarte3,13,15,
  23. Josep Basora23,
  24. Jose María García17,
  25. Natalia C. Pavone2,
  26. David Lora-Pablos3,18,
  27. Eduardo Mayoral19,24,
  28. Josep Franch25,26,
  29. Manel Mata27,
  30. Conxa Castell28,
  31. Albert Frances29 and
  32. María Grau1,30⇑
  33. on behalf of the FRESCO Investigators*
  1. 1REGICOR Study Group–Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Genetics, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
  2. 2Primary Care Center La Marina and Primary Health Care Research Institute Jordi Gol, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain
  3. 3Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health, Madrid, Spain
  4. 4Family Medicine Research Unit and Primary Health Care Research Unit Institute Jordi Gol, Catalan Institute of Health, Girona, Spain
  5. 5Univeristy of Girona, Girona, Spain
  6. 6San Jose Norte Health Centre, Zaragoza, Spain
  7. 7Vascular Risk in Navarra Research Group, Health Department, Navarra Government, Pamplona, Spain
  8. 8Knowledge Planning, Evaluation and Management, Health Department, Navarra Government, Pamplona, Spain
  9. 9Cardiovascular Group of Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  10. 10Murcian Health Departament, Murcia, Spain
  11. 11University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain
  12. 12Murcian Institute of Biomedical Research, Murcia, Spain
  13. 13Navarre Public Health Institute, Pamplona, Spain
  14. 14Research Network for Health Services in Chronic Disease, Pamplona, Spain
  15. 15Navarra Health Research Institute, Pamplona, Spain
  16. 16Primary Care Center Sant Pere Centre and Primary Health Care Research Unit Institute Jordi Gol, Catalan Institute of Health, Reus-Tarragona, Spain
  17. 17Health Science Institute, Department of Health and Social Affairs, Castille–La Mancha Government, Talavera de la Reina, Spain
  18. 18Clinical Research Department, Hospital 12 Octubre Research Institute, Madrid, Spain
  19. 19Consortium for Biomedical Research in Obesity and Nutrition, Madrid, Spain
  20. 20Primary Care Division, Department of Family Medicine, Primary Care Center San Pablo, Sevilla, Spain
  21. 21Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain
  22. 22Health and Consumers Department, Murcia Government, Murcia, Spain
  23. 23Primary Health Care Research Unit Institute Jordi Gol, Catalan Institute of Health, Reus-Tarragona, Spain
  24. 24Diabetes Strategy, Andalusia Health Service, Seville, Spain
  25. 25Primary Care Center Raval Sud and Primary Health Care Research Unit Institute Jordi Gol, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain
  26. 26Consortium for Biomedical Research in Diabetes and Associated Metabolic Diseases, Madrid, Spain
  27. 27Primary Care Center La Mina and Primary Health Care Research Unit Institute Jordi Gol, Catalan Institute of Health, Barcelona, Spain
  28. 28Public Health Agency, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
  29. 29Department of Urology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
  30. 30University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  1. Corresponding author: María Grau, mgrau{at}imim.es.
Diabetes Care 2016 Nov; 39(11): 1987-1995. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0614
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Diabetes is a common cause of shortened life expectancy. We aimed to assess the association between diabetes and cause-specific death.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We used the pooled analysis of individual data from 12 Spanish population cohorts with 10-year follow-up. Participants had no previous history of cardiovascular diseases and were 35–79 years old. Diabetes status was self-reported or defined as glycemia >125 mg/dL at baseline. Vital status and causes of death were ascertained by medical records review and linkage with the official death registry. The hazard ratios and cumulative mortality function were assessed with two approaches, with and without competing risks: proportional subdistribution hazard (PSH) and cause-specific hazard (CSH), respectively. Multivariate analyses were fitted for cardiovascular, cancer, and noncardiovascular noncancer deaths.

RESULTS We included 55,292 individuals (15.6% with diabetes and overall mortality of 9.1%). The adjusted hazard ratios showed that diabetes increased mortality risk: 1) cardiovascular death, CSH = 2.03 (95% CI 1.63–2.52) and PSH = 1.99 (1.60–2.49) in men; and CSH = 2.28 (1.75–2.97) and PSH = 2.23 (1.70–2.91) in women; 2) cancer death, CSH = 1.37 (1.13–1.67) and PSH = 1.35 (1.10–1.65) in men; and CSH = 1.68 (1.29–2.20) and PSH = 1.66 (1.25–2.19) in women; and 3) noncardiovascular noncancer death, CSH = 1.53 (1.23–1.91) and PSH = 1.50 (1.20–1.89) in men; and CSH = 1.89 (1.43–2.48) and PSH = 1.84 (1.39–2.45) in women. In all instances, the cumulative mortality function was significantly higher in individuals with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS Diabetes is associated with premature death from cardiovascular disease, cancer, and noncardiovascular noncancer causes. The use of CSH and PSH provides a comprehensive view of mortality dynamics in a population with diabetes.

Introduction

Diabetes constitutes a worldwide public health problem (1) that affected 382 million people (8.3% of the world’s population) in 2013 (2). Recent projections suggest that this prevalence is likely to increase in the next 20 years, affecting 592 million people (10.1%) in 2035. In Spain, diabetes affects 13.8% of individuals older than 18 years and is more prevalent in men than in women (3,4).

The average life expectancy of a 50-year-old individual with diabetes is 6 years shorter than it would be without the disease (5). Diabetes not only doubles or quadruples cardiovascular risk, compared with the general population (6,7), but also leads to an increased risk of cancer, as shown by some cohort studies (5,8).

The study of predictors of cause-specific death in individuals with diabetes in a cohort study is an example of competing risk analysis. Thus, a death due to the primary cause of interest (e.g., cancer) could be precluded by a death due to another cause (e.g., cardiovascular disease); the occurrence of the latter prevents us from observing the other. Two regression approaches have been widely used to study mortality risk with and without competing risks: proportional subdistribution hazard (PSH) and cause-specific hazard (CSH), respectively. The CSH quantifies the event rate among individuals at risk for developing the event, whereas the PSH estimates the probability of a particular event for an individual who has survived up to a given time without any event or had the competing event prior to that given time. Thus, the PSH analysis can be used if different types of events are studied, and the focus is on the time and type of the event of primary interest (9–12). Consequently, CSH and PSH yield different interpretations needed to understand the epidemiological event dynamics (13).

The aims of this study were to assess the association between exposure to diabetes at baseline, either self-reported or glycemia >125 mg/dL, and the risk of cause-specific death in a population-based cohort with a median follow-up of 10 years, with and without competing risks (PSH and CSH methods, respectively).

Research Design and Methods

Design and Participants

We conducted a pooled analysis of individual data from 12 population cohorts in 7 Spanish regions examined with similar methods between 1991 and 2005. Participants in all cohorts were randomly selected from the general population, did not present previous symptoms or diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, and were aged 35 to 79 years. All participants were examined at baseline and followed up for a median of 10 years. Supplementary Table 1 includes the characteristics of each cohort contributing to the FRESCO (Función de Riesgo ESpañola de acontecimientos Coronarios y Otros) Study. The methodology of the FRESCO Study has been explained in depth elsewhere (14). All of the participants were duly informed and signed a consent form to participate in the component studies. The FRESCO Study was approved by the local Parc de Salut Mar Ethics Committee (authorization number 2009/3391/I).

Measurements

The following risk factors were measured at baseline using standardized methods based on World Health Organization recommendations (15). BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by squared height in meters (kg/m2). Using a standardized smoking questionnaire, participants were classified as smokers (current or quit <1 year) or nonsmokers (quit ≥1 year or never smoked). Blood pressure was determined from the average of two separate readings taken at least 5 min apart. Blood was withdrawn after 10–14 h fasting. Total and HDL cholesterol concentrations were measured in serum sample aliquots stored at −80°C. Friedewald formula was used to estimate LDL cholesterol whenever triglycerides were <300 mg/dL. A previous study, in which 9 of the 11 FRESCO cohorts participated, obtained good agreement in the measurement of frozen samples from a random subset of participants, establishing that the study’s laboratory measurements can be reliably pooled (4).

Assessment of Diabetes Status and Plasma Glucose Level

Diabetes and type of treatment were self-reported by the participants in all studies. We also considered those participants in whom glycemia >125 mg/dL was observed at the time of baseline examination as having diabetes, regardless of their awareness of this glycemic disorder.

Mortality Ascertainment

Vital status and cause of death during 10-year follow-up were ascertained by examining the corresponding electronic medical record for in-hospital deaths and by reviewing death certificates from regional and national mortality offices and autopsy for out-of-hospital deaths. All deaths were coded according to the ICD-10 (14). Mortality was classified as being due to cardiovascular diseases (ICD F01, G45, I00–I99, Q20, Q28, and R96), all malignant neoplasms (ICD C00–C99 and D1–D48), and other diseases (rest of the ICD codes). The cardiovascular group was subdivided by coronary heart disease (ICD I20–I25), cerebrovascular disease (ICD F01, I60–I69, and G45), and heart failure (ICD I50–I52). Malignant neoplasms were subdivided into 10 individual sites: stomach (ICD C16), pancreas (ICD C25), liver and intrahepatic bile ducts (ICD C22), colon and rectum (ICD C18–C21), bronchus and lung (ICD C33–C34), prostate (ICD C61), female genital organs (ICD C51–C58), bladder (ICD C67), breast (ICD C50), and deaths due to malignancies at all other sites. Noncardiovascular and noncancer causes were grouped as “rest of causes” and were subdivided into infections (ICD A00–A99, B00–B99, and J12–J18), dementia and Alzheimer disease (ICD F00–F03, G30–G32), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ICD J41–J47), diseases of the liver (ICD K70–K77), and diseases of the genitourinary system (ICD N00–N39). All causes of death and the corresponding ICD codes have been included in Supplementary Table 2.

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were stratified by sex. Age was summarized as mean and SD and categorical variables as proportions. The χ2 tests for categorical variables and Student t test for continuous variables were computed to test differences in sociodemographic variables and risk factors prevalence according to diabetes at baseline. Additionally, differences in vital status at the end of the follow-up were estimated with the log-rank test. The sex-specific all-cause, cardiovascular, cancer and noncardiovascular noncancer mortality rates were calculated for the population with and without diabetes by 10-year age intervals and age-standardized by the direct method using a European standard population aged 35 to 79 years (16). The sex difference in absolute age-standardized mortality rates was assessed by the ratio of men and women in a population.

All multivariate analyses were fitted for death occurrence, divided into three groups: cardiovascular, cancer, and noncardiovascular noncancer death. The hazard ratios and cumulative mortality function were assessed by Cox (CSH) and Fine-Gray (PSH) regressions using the “cmprsk” R package (17,18). The first provides a direct measure of the association of diabetes with a single cause of death (i.e., treats any competing events as censored at the time they occurred). The second considers as a single cause of death both the association of diabetes with a single cause of death and the contribution of another competing event by actively maintaining individuals in the risk sets (i.e., divides the probability of death into the probability corresponding to each competing event). Proportional hazards assumption of CSH and PSH were validated in Cox and Fine-Gray regressions, respectively. A multivariable sex-stratified model was fitted, adjusting for potential confounders: age, smoking status, BMI, systolic blood pressure, and total and HDL cholesterol. Finally, we plotted the sex-stratified cumulative hazard functions for all three causes of death and the sex- and age-adjusted hazard ratios of the most frequent single causes of death according to the CSH and PSH methods. A sensitivity analysis was performed excluding those individuals who died of cancer during the first year of follow-up as a proxy of disease severity.

All calculations were made with R statistical package (version 3.1.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

The FRESCO cohort included 55,292 individuals (15.6% with diabetes). The number of deaths in the 10-year median follow-up (interquartile range 8.8–10) was 1,710 (3.8%) among the 44,664 individuals without diabetes and 781 (9.1%) in those with diabetes. Finally, no cause of death information was available for 85 (10.9%) and 220 (12.9%) of the deaths with and without diabetes, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1). Individuals with diabetes were significantly older, less likely to smoke, had higher BMI, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and glycemia, and more often presented with hypertension, compared with individuals without diabetes. In addition, individuals with diabetes had significantly lower HDL cholesterol values, whereas total cholesterol values were significantly lower in men but significantly higher in women, compared with the population without diabetes. In addition, women with diabetes presented with significantly higher diastolic blood pressure and LDL cholesterol compared with women without diabetes. The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in individuals with diabetes, whereas only cardiovascular disease showed a higher unadjusted mortality rate in individuals with diabetes compared with those without (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Baseline characteristic of the participants in the FRESCO Study by sex and diabetes status

Men had higher mortality rates than women (i.e., sex ratio >1 in all instances). However, the lower sex ratio found in the population with diabetes reflects an attenuation of the mortality differences, probably driven by the status of diabetes (Supplementary Table 3).

The crude cumulative mortality functions showed that individuals with diabetes presented with significantly higher risk of cardiovascular, cancer, noncardiovascular noncancer, and overall death in the 10-year follow-up. The estimates performed with both methods (i.e., CSH and PSH) were similar in individuals without diabetes and slightly higher with the CSH approach in those with diabetes (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Cumulative mortality function for cardiovascular (A), cancer (B), and noncardiovascular noncancer (C) causes in men and in women assessed with CSH and PSH approaches.

To ascertain the association between diabetes status and mortality, we fitted a multivariate model for every cause of death adjusted for age, smoking status, BMI, systolic blood pressure, and total and HDL cholesterol. Diabetes significantly increased the risk of cardiovascular, cancer, noncardiovascular noncancer, and overall death in both sexes. The hazard ratios performed with PSH were lower than those performed with CSH in all instances; however, these differences were small (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 4). The sensitivity analysis including all individuals who had not died of cancer within the first year of follow-up yielded similar results (Supplementary Table 5). Single-cause analysis showed that, compared with the population without diabetes, individuals with diabetes had significantly higher risk of cardiovascular death (e.g., myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure), death due to liver, colon-rectum, and lung cancer, and death from infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and liver and kidney disease. Again, small differences were found between the PSH and the CSH results (Fig. 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Hazard ratios for death among participants with diabetes compared with those without diabetes at baseline, estimated by Cox regression (CSH) and Fine-Gray regression (PSH), after adjustment for potential risk factors according to cause of death

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Hazard ratios for death from cardiovascular, cancer, and noncardiovascular noncancer causes among participants with diabetes compared with those without diabetes at baseline. Models have been adjusted by age and sex. The size of the data markers is proportional to the number of each cause-specific death in individuals with diabetes.

Conclusions

Individuals with diabetes had significantly higher risk of death than the population without diabetes, even after adjusting for risk factors that have individually shown a significant association with mortality rates (i.e., age, smoking status, BMI, systolic blood pressure, and total and HDL cholesterol). Mortality rate was significantly higher for all causes, as classified in three groups: cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and all other causes. The highest magnitude of association was found for cardiovascular death, but the excess risk also observed for some cancer locations (e.g., stomach, liver, colon-rectum, or lung) or other pathologies (e.g., liver and kidney disease) points out the vulnerability that diabetes confers. The steep decrease in cardiovascular deaths, particularly observed in Western countries (19), likely results in the emergence of other causes of death in individuals with diabetes. Nonetheless, the disorder is still associated with shorter life expectancy.

Most Common Causes of Death in Diabetes

The risk of death from coronary heart disease was almost threefold higher in individuals with diabetes. This observation has traditionally lead to controversial interpretations pointing out that individuals with diabetes and no coronary heart disease should be managed with a cardiovascular secondary prevention strategy (20). However, more recent publications have shown that coronary risk in individuals with diabetes and no coronary heart disease was significantly lower than that observed in patients with a history of coronary heart disease (21,22). Although the magnitude of the association was lower, diabetes was also significantly related with higher mortality from stroke and heart failure (6).

Concurring with previous reports, our results showed a moderate association of diabetes with death from cancer, particularly in the liver and colon-rectum (5). A possible pathological mechanism that may explain this association with the digestive tract is the increased insulin resistance and the alteration of insulin-like growth factors (8,23,24). In addition, the risk of lung cancer was increased in individuals with diabetes in our study results. However, this association is not consistent in the literature, with studies showing both decreased and increased risks of this type of cancer in individuals with diabetes (5,8). Finally, we did not find a significant association between diabetes and pancreatic cancer, despite a suggested link between the two diseases (8).

Regarding other causes of death, we observed a strong positive association of diabetes with deaths from infections and from renal and liver diseases, similarly to the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration findings (5). These results may reflect associated diabetes complications such as suppression of cellular immunity, nephropathy, and fatty liver disease (19).

Finally, the hazard ratios for mortality in participants with diabetes compared with those without were always higher in women than in men for all groups of causes assessed. This observation suggests that insulin resistance may have a greater effect in women. In the case of cardiovascular mortality, the hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia environment is likely to worsen the effect of cardiovascular risk factors (25,26). In contrast, tumor cell proliferation and metastases may also increase, enhancing cancer risk (27,28). As a result, diabetes seems to attenuate the mortality risk gap between men and women observed in the general population (29).

Competing Risk Analysis

The differences observed between the CSH and PSH methods highlight the differing interpretations of both estimates and therefore their utility for understanding cause-specific death dynamic in diabetes, compared with the general population (12). The estimates performed with CSH implied that, among individuals who survived all events during the 10-year follow-up, the CSH rate in those with diabetes was the CSH ratio multiplied by the CSH rate of those who do not have diabetes. This method is appropriate to ascertain the disease etiology and therefore yields a valid measure of association. However, CSH did not allow event prediction because it measures the association of diabetes with a cause-specific death; a competing event contributes only by passively removing individuals from the risk set (i.e., the cause of death is irrelevant to the analysis). The PSH approach is more relevant for prediction because it yields a measure of association that reflects both the association of diabetes with a certain cause-specific death (e.g., lung cancer) and the contribution of another cause-specific death (e.g., coronary heart disease) by actively maintaining individuals with and without diabetes in the risk set (12).

To get a complete understanding of event dynamics in the population with diabetes, the present report followed the recommendations by Latouche et al. (13): 1) use a different terminology for each model of the hazard ratio (CSH for Cox model and PSH for Fine-Gray model), 2) report all of the CSH, 3) report the PSH for the event of interest and the PSH for the competing event, 4) present the results in a unified interpretation, 5) explicitly check the proportional hazards assumption for Cox and Fine-Gray models, and 6) provide plots of all cumulative mortalities using CSH and PSH.

The differences between methods observed in our study were not larger because of the low mortality rate, particularly in individuals with no diabetes. Indeed, we observed the biggest differences for the most common single causes of death: coronary heart disease and unspecified site or other cancers.

Public Health Implications

Several studies have shown alteration in the diabetes course by introducing changes in health promotion activities (e.g., screening and support in achieving lifestyle modifications), in the clinical management of such diseases (e.g., intensive control of cardiovascular risk factors), in health systems (e.g., functional multidisciplinary units for the management of diabetes), and in society as a whole (e.g., smoking ban policies) (30–35). This multidisciplinary approach may partially explain the annual 3% decrease in cardiovascular mortality observed in individuals with diabetes in the United States; however, the pattern in individuals without such disease has been much lower (36–38). In Spain, particularly, despite the improvements observed in the control of cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with diabetes, there is still room for preventive activity (4,39).

Characteristics and Limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, we used a single glycemia measure to diagnose diabetes; however, this is the standardized method defined by World Health Organization recommendations for epidemiologic studies (15). Second, the component studies did not register the specific type of diabetes (1 or 2). However, the prevalence of type 1 diabetes in our country ranged between 0.08 and 0.2%, whereas type 2 diabetes affects between 4.8 and 18.7% (40). Indeed, the Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration authors (5) did not distinguish between the types of diabetes in their analysis. Third, individuals with previous history of cancer were not excluded from the FRESCO Study. However, the impact of such individuals on the results seems minimal, based on the sensitivity analysis that excluded those who died of cancer in the first year of follow-up (i.e., proxy of disease severity). Finally, diabetes status was diagnosed only at baseline, and individuals who developed the disorder during follow-up were considered nonexposed. Although this could represent a misclassification bias, the impact on the final result is minimal. On the one hand, the risk of diabetes in our sample was low because 50% of those without diabetes were younger than 55 years. On the other hand, the inclusion of incident cases of diabetes as exposed would prevent us from observing the outcome due to the short time elapsed from diagnosis.

Summary

Diabetes is associated with premature death from cardiovascular diseases (coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure), several cancers (liver, colorectal, and lung), and other diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and liver and kidney disease). In addition, the cause-specific cumulative mortality for cardiovascular, cancer, and noncardiovascular noncancer causes was significantly higher in individuals with diabetes, compared with the general population. The dual analysis with CSH and PSH methods provides a comprehensive view of mortality dynamics in the population with diabetes. This approach identifies the individuals with diabetes as a vulnerable population for several causes of death aside from the traditionally reported cardiovascular death. There is a need for more efficient preventive activities to reduce the incidence of this disease and its related complications.

Article Information

Acknowledgments. The authors thank Ruth Martí, Susana Tello, Marta Cabañero, Yolanda Ferrer, Sandra Farré, and Esmeralda Gómez, of the Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, for data management and administrative support and Elaine Lilly, of Writer's First Aid, for the English language revision of the manuscript. The authors also thank the Registre de Mortalitat de Catalunya del Servei d'Informació i Estudis, Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya (Anna Puigdefàbregas, Gloria Ribas, and Rosa Gispert) for collaboration.

Funding. This work was supported by MARATO TV3 (081630), Instituto de Salud Carlos III–Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional–European Regions Development Funds (Red de Investigación Cardiovascular RD12/0042 [Programa HERACLES], Red RedIAPP RD12/0005, RD06/0018, PI081327, and PI1101801), Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (2014 SGR 240), Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health, and Consortium for Biomedical Research in Obesity and Nutrition. M.G. was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III–Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional–European Regions Development Fund FEDER (FIS CP12/03287).

Duality of Interest. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. J.M.B.-D. researched data, contributed to the discussion, and reviewed, edited, and wrote the manuscript. J.P. and I.S. performed the statistical analysis, researched data, contributed to discussion, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. R.R., R.E., A.M.-I., M.J.G., F.R., M.J.T.-D., C.M.-I., J.J.C., A.S., M.G.-L., A.G.d.l.C., J.L., M.Q., J.M., M.J.M., J.Ber., G.F., D.G., A.B., J.Bas., J.M.G., N.C.P., D.L.-P., E.M., J.F., M.M., C.C., and A.F. researched data, contributed to discussion, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. M.G. wrote the manuscript, performed statistical analysis, researched data, contributed to the discussion, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. M.G. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Footnotes

  • This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/dc16-0614/-/DC1.

  • ↵* A complete list of the FRESCO Investigators can be found at www.regicor.org/fresco_inv.

  • See accompanying article, p. 1851.

  • Received March 21, 2016.
  • Accepted June 27, 2016.
  • © 2016 by the American Diabetes Association.
http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Nolan CJ,
    2. Damm P,
    3. Prentki M
    . Type 2 diabetes across generations: from pathophysiology to prevention and management. Lancet 2011;378:169–181pmid:21705072
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th ed. Available from http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas. Accessed 21 January 2016
  3. ↵
    1. Soriguer F,
    2. Goday A,
    3. Bosch-Comas A, et al
    . Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in Spain: the Di@bet.es Study. Diabetologia 2012;55:88–93pmid:21987347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Grau M,
    2. Elosua R,
    3. Cabrera de León A, et al
    . [Cardiovascular risk factors in Spain in the first decade of the 21st Century, a pooled analysis with individual data from 11 population-based studies: the DARIOS study]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2011;64:295–304pmid:21397375
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Seshasai SR,
    2. Kaptoge S,
    3. Thompson A, et al.; Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration
    . Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med 2011;364:829–841pmid:21366474
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Sarwar N,
    2. Gao P,
    3. Seshasai SR, et al.; Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration
    . Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 2010;375:2215–2222pmid:20609967
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Tancredi M,
    2. Rosengren A,
    3. Svensson AM, et al
    . Excess Mortality among Persons with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1720–1732pmid:26510021
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Atchison EA,
    2. Gridley G,
    3. Carreon JD,
    4. Leitzmann MF,
    5. McGlynn KA
    . Risk of cancer in a large cohort of U.S. veterans with diabetes. Int J Cancer 2011;128:635–643pmid:20473855
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Wolbers M,
    2. Koller MT,
    3. Stel VS, et al
    . Competing risks analyses: objectives and approaches. Eur Heart J 2014;35:2936–2941pmid:24711436
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pintilie M
    . [An introduction to competing risks analysis]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2011;64:599–605pmid:21621892
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Andersen PK,
    2. Geskus RB,
    3. de Witte T,
    4. Putter H
    . Competing risks in epidemiology: possibilities and pitfalls. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:861–870pmid:22253319
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Lau B,
    2. Cole SR,
    3. Gange SJ
    . Competing risk regression models for epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:244–256pmid:19494242
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Latouche A,
    2. Allignol A,
    3. Beyersmann J,
    4. Labopin M,
    5. Fine JP
    . A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:648–653pmid:23415868
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Marrugat J,
    2. Subirana I,
    3. Ramos R, et al.; FRESCO Investigators
    . Derivation and validation of a set of 10-year cardiovascular risk predictive functions in Spain: the FRESCO Study. Prev Med 2014;61:66–74pmid:24412897
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Tunstall-Pedoe H,
    2. Kuulasmaa K,
    3. Amouyel P,
    4. Arveiler D,
    5. Rajakangas AM,
    6. Pajak A
    . Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates, and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents. Circulation 1994;90:583–612pmid:8026046
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Ahmad OE,
    2. Boschi-Pinto C,
    3. Lopez AD, et al
    . Age Standardization of Rates: A New WHO Sandard. GPE Discussion Paper Series: No. 31. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2000.
  15. ↵
    1. Fine JP,
    2. Gray RJ
    . A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999;94:496–509
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Scrucca L,
    2. Santucci A,
    3. Aversa F
    . Competing risk analysis using R: an easy guide for clinicians. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007;40:381–387pmid:17563735
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Gregg EW,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Wang J, et al
    . Changes in diabetes-related complications in the United States, 1990-2010. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1514–1523pmid:24738668
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Haffner SM,
    2. Lehto S,
    3. Rönnemaa T,
    4. Pyörälä K,
    5. Laakso M
    . Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1998;339:229–234pmid:9673301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. Cano JF,
    2. Baena-Diez JM,
    3. Franch J, et al.; REGICOR and GEDAPS Investigators
    . Long-term cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetic compared with nondiabetic first acute myocardial infarction patients: a population-based cohort study in southern Europe. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2004–2009pmid:20530746
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Bulugahapitiya U,
    2. Siyambalapitiya S,
    3. Sithole J,
    4. Idris I
    . Is diabetes a coronary risk equivalent? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2009;26:142–148pmid:19236616
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Gong G, et al
    . Increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cancer 2012;130:1639–1648pmid:21544812
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Jiang Y,
    2. Ben Q,
    3. Shen H,
    4. Lu W,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Zhu J
    . Diabetes mellitus and incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Epidemiol 2011;26:863–876pmid:21938478
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Colhoun H
    . Coronary heart disease in women: why the disproportionate risk? Curr Diab Rep 2006;6:22–28pmid:16522277
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Avogaro A,
    2. Giorda C,
    3. Maggini M, et al.; Diabetes and Informatics Study Group, Association of Clinical Diabetologists, Istituto Superiore di Sanità
    . Incidence of coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetic men and women: impact of microvascular complications, treatment, and geographic location. Diabetes Care 2007;30:1241–1247pmid:17290034
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Barone BB,
    2. Yeh HC,
    3. Snyder CF, et al
    . Long-term all-cause mortality in cancer patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2008;300:2754–2764pmid:19088353
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Verlato G,
    2. Zoppini G,
    3. Bonora E,
    4. Muggeo M
    . Mortality from site-specific malignancies in type 2 diabetic patients from Verona. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1047–1051pmid:12663571
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Hu G; DECODE Study Group
    . Gender difference in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality related to hyperglycaemia and newly-diagnosed diabetes. Diabetologia 2003;46:608–617pmid:12750769
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Kahn R,
    2. Alperin P,
    3. Eddy D, et al
    . Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 2010;375:1365–1374pmid:20356621
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. Sumamo E, Ha C, Korownyk C, et al. Lifestyle interventions for four conditions: type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, breast cancer, and prostate cancer [Internet], 2011. Rockville, MD, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK254022/. Accessed 21 January 2016
    1. Hemmingsen B,
    2. Lund SS,
    3. Gluud C, et al
    . Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;11:CD008143pmid:24214280
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Tricco AC,
    2. Ivers NM,
    3. Grimshaw JM, et al
    . Effectiveness of quality improvement strategies on the management of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012;379:2252–2261pmid:22683130
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Ali MK,
    2. Bullard KM,
    3. Saaddine JB,
    4. Cowie CC,
    5. Imperatore G,
    6. Gregg EW
    . Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999-2010. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1613–1624pmid:23614587
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Agüero F,
    2. Dégano IR,
    3. Subirana I, et al
    . Impact of a partial smoke-free legislation on myocardial infarction incidence, mortality and case-fatality in a population-based registry: the REGICOR Study. PLoS One 2013;8:e53722pmid:23372663
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Dale AC,
    2. Vatten LJ,
    3. Nilsen TI,
    4. Midthjell K,
    5. Wiseth R
    . Secular decline in mortality from coronary heart disease in adults with diabetes mellitus: cohort study. BMJ 2008;337:a236pmid:18595902
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gregg EW,
    2. Cheng YJ,
    3. Saydah S, et al
    . Trends in death rates among U.S. adults with and without diabetes between 1997 and 2006: findings from the National Health Interview Survey. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1252–1257pmid:22619288
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Lind M,
    2. Garcia-Rodriguez LA,
    3. Booth GL, et al
    . Mortality trends in patients with and without diabetes in Ontario, Canada and the UK from 1996 to 2009: a population-based study. Diabetologia 2013;56:2601–2608pmid:24114114
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Vinagre I,
    2. Mata-Cases M,
    3. Hermosilla E, et al
    . Control of glycemia and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in Catalonia (Spain). Diabetes Care 2012;35:774–779pmid:22344609
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Ruiz-Ramos M,
    2. Escolar-Pujolar A,
    3. Mayoral-Sánchez E,
    4. Corral-San Laureano F,
    5. Fernández-Fernández I
    . [Diabetes mellitus in Spain: death rates, prevalence, impact, costs and inequalities]. Gac Sanit 2006;20(Suppl. 1):15–24pmid:16539961
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 39 (11)

In this Issue

November 2016, 39(11)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Risk of Cause-Specific Death in Individuals With Diabetes: A Competing Risks Analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Risk of Cause-Specific Death in Individuals With Diabetes: A Competing Risks Analysis
Jose Miguel Baena-Díez, Judit Peñafiel, Isaac Subirana, Rafel Ramos, Roberto Elosua, Alejandro Marín-Ibañez, María Jesús Guembe, Fernando Rigo, María José Tormo-Díaz, Conchi Moreno-Iribas, Joan Josep Cabré, Antonio Segura, Manel García-Lareo, Agustín Gómez de la Cámara, José Lapetra, Miquel Quesada, Jaume Marrugat, Maria José Medrano, Jesús Berjón, Guiem Frontera, Diana Gavrila, Aurelio Barricarte, Josep Basora, Jose María García, Natalia C. Pavone, David Lora-Pablos, Eduardo Mayoral, Josep Franch, Manel Mata, Conxa Castell, Albert Frances, María Grau
Diabetes Care Nov 2016, 39 (11) 1987-1995; DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0614

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Risk of Cause-Specific Death in Individuals With Diabetes: A Competing Risks Analysis
Jose Miguel Baena-Díez, Judit Peñafiel, Isaac Subirana, Rafel Ramos, Roberto Elosua, Alejandro Marín-Ibañez, María Jesús Guembe, Fernando Rigo, María José Tormo-Díaz, Conchi Moreno-Iribas, Joan Josep Cabré, Antonio Segura, Manel García-Lareo, Agustín Gómez de la Cámara, José Lapetra, Miquel Quesada, Jaume Marrugat, Maria José Medrano, Jesús Berjón, Guiem Frontera, Diana Gavrila, Aurelio Barricarte, Josep Basora, Jose María García, Natalia C. Pavone, David Lora-Pablos, Eduardo Mayoral, Josep Franch, Manel Mata, Conxa Castell, Albert Frances, María Grau
Diabetes Care Nov 2016, 39 (11) 1987-1995; DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0614
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Risk of Blindness Among Patients With Diabetes and Newly Diagnosed Diabetic Retinopathy
  • Prediabetes, Diabetes, and the Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality in a Japanese Working Population: Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study
  • Thirty-Year Trends in Complications in U.S. Adults With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes
Show more Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.