Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Racial Differences in and Prognostic Value of Biomarkers of Hyperglycemia

  1. Christina M. Parrinello1,
  2. A. Richey Sharrett1,
  3. Nisa M. Maruthur1,2,
  4. Richard M. Bergenstal3,
  5. Morgan E. Grams1,4,
  6. Josef Coresh1,2 and
  7. Elizabeth Selvin1,2⇑
  1. 1Department of Epidemiology and the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
  2. 2Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  3. 3International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, MN
  4. 4Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
  1. Corresponding author: Elizabeth Selvin, eselvin{at}jhu.edu.
Diabetes Care 2016 Apr; 39(4): 589-595. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-1360
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Adjusted associations of hyperglycemia with incident CVD, incident ESRD, and prevalent retinopathy by race. Hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD and ESRD were obtained using separate Cox proportional hazards regression models for white and black participants. Odds ratios for prevalent retinopathy were obtained using separate logistic regression models for white and black participants. In models that included both white and black participants, P values for interactions were calculated by conducting a likelihood ratio test to compare models with and without terms for the interaction between race and hyperglycemia. Models included adjustment for age; sex (male, female); BMI; BMI2; LDL-c; HDL-c; triglycerides; cholesterol-lowering medication use (yes, no); systolic blood pressure; antihypertensive medication use (yes, no); eGFR; family history of diabetes (yes, no); education level (less than high school, high school or some college, college or more); alcohol consumption (current, former, never); cigarette smoking status (current, former, never); and physical activity level. Categories of diabetes—no diabetes; no diabetes, intermediate levels; no diabetes, elevated levels; diabetes; and diabetes, elevated levels—were defined using the following levels of each biomarker, respectively: fasting glucose: <100, 100–125, ≥126, <149, ≥149 mg/dL; HbA1c: <5.7, 5.7–6.4, ≥6.5, <7.0, ≥7.0%; fructosamine: <239.8, 239.8–268.6, ≥268.7, <275.7, ≥275.7 mg/dL; glycated albumin: <13.52, 13.52–15.55, ≥15.56, <16.46, ≥16.46%; 1,5-AG: ≥15.0, 7.9–14.9, <7.9, >9.2, ≤9.2 μg/mL. Gray symbols indicate results for white participants. Black symbols indicate results for black participants. DM, diabetes.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Characteristics of the study population by diabetes status and race, ARIC visit 2 (1990–1992)

    No diagnosed diabetesDiagnosed diabetes
    White (n = 8,096)Black (n = 2,277)P value*White (n = 425)Black (n = 302)P value*
    Age, years57.3 (5.6)56.2 (5.7)<0.00158.7 (5.7)57.6 (5.7)0.013
    Male sex43.9%35.8%<0.00148.0%29.5%<0.001
    Less than HS education13.9%35.0%<0.00124.2%44.0%<0.001
    Obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)21.7%41.5%<0.00147.5%55.0%0.048
    Current smoking20.5%24.5%<0.00117.9%21.2%0.265
    Current drinking66.2%36.8%<0.00148.5%21.5%<0.001
    Family history of diabetes21.9%25.0%0.00241.9%41.1%0.824
    Hypertension†29.4%51.4%<0.00151.3%64.9%<0.001
    Antihypertensive medication use21.7%40.3%<0.00142.6%57.0%<0.001
    Systolic BP, mmHg118.8 (17.4)125.5 (19.9)<0.001125.2 (17.2)127.9 (20.1)0.052
    Systolic BP ≥140 mmHg11.7%21.0%<0.00119.8%22.2%0.428
    Diastolic BP, mmHg71.2 (9.7)75.7 (10.8)<0.00170.8 (9.7)73.0 (9.7)0.003
    Diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg3.8%10.1%<0.0013.3%4.3%0.478
    HDL-c, mg/dL50.1 (16.6)54.5 (17.0)<0.00142.1 (12.8)49.1 (13.6)<0.001
    Total cholesterol, mg/dL209.0 (37.4)208.9 (40.0)0.921208.7 (39.2)217.5 (45.6)0.005
    LDL-c, mg/dL132.8 (35.6)133.7 (38.3)0.281132.6 (35.2)141.4 (42.7)0.003
    Triglycerides, mg/dL130.7 (64.5)103.5 (50.0)<0.001169.5 (75.3)134.8 (68.3)<0.001
    Cholesterol-lowering medication use5.5%2.8%<0.00112.9%5.0%<0.001
    Glucose-lowering medications‡———61.5%76.5%<0.001
    eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m21.2%1.1%0.6702.4%4.6%0.090
    Prevalent retinopathy§1.6%3.3%<0.00119.6%30.7%0.005
    Baecke sport index‖2.5 (0.8)2.2 (0.7)<0.0012.4 (0.8)2.1 (0.6)<0.001
    • Data are mean (SD) or percentages.

    • BP, blood pressure; HS, high school; IQR, interquartile range.

    • ↵*Two-sided P values calculated using the Student t test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables.

    • ↵†Hypertension defined as diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg or systolic BP ≥140 mmHg or antihypertensive medication use.

    • ↵‡Among persons with diabetes, 13 black and 22 white participants are missing a response to self-reported use of glucose-lowering medication.

    • ↵§Retinopathy was assessed at visit 3 (1993–1995) and therefore was available for only a subset of the main study population (176 blacks and 317 whites among participants with diagnosed diabetes; 1,516 blacks and 6,561 whites among participants without diagnosed diabetes).

    • ↵‖The Baecke sport index is a score of sport index during leisure time, with values ranging from 1 to 5, based on intensity (light, moderate, heavy); time (hours per week); and proportion (months per year) of activity. Higher values indicate higher levels of physical activity.

  • Table 2

    Baseline levels of biomarkers of hyperglycemia by diabetes status and race

    Median (25th, 75th percentile)Median (25th, 75th percentile)P value*
    Among people without diagnosed diabetesWhite (n = 8,096)Black (n = 2,277)
     FG, mg/dL101 (95, 108)104 (97, 113)<0.001
      FG <100 mg/dL94 (90, 97)94 (90, 97)0.189
      FG 100–125 mg/dL106 (102, 111)108 (103, 114)<0.001
      FG ≥126 mg/dL136 (129, 151)138 (131, 154)0.150
     HbA1c, %5.4 (5.1, 5.6)5.7 (5.4, 6.0)<0.001
      FG <100 mg/dL5.3 (5.1, 5.4)5.5 (5.2, 5.7)<0.001
      FG 100–125 mg/dL5.4 (5.2, 5.7)5.7 (5.4, 6.0)<0.001
      FG ≥126 mg/dL6.2 (5.8, 6.8)6.6 (6.2, 7.2)<0.001
     Fructosamine, μmol/L225 (214, 237)234 (220, 250)<0.001
      FG <100 mg/dL224 (212, 234)230 (217, 242)<0.001
      FG 100–125 mg/dL226 (214, 237)234 (220, 249)<0.001
      FG ≥126 mg/dL247 (229, 268)260 (236, 285)<0.001
     Glycated albumin, %12.5 (11.7, 13.3)13.3 (12.4, 14.3)<0.001
      FG <100 mg/dL12.4 (11.7, 13.2)13.1 (12.3, 13.9)<0.001
      FG 100–125 mg/dL12.4 (11.7, 13.2)13.3 (12.4, 14.3)<0.001
      FG ≥126 mg/dL14.1 (12.8, 15.8)15.2 (13.6, 17.3)<0.001
     1,5-AG, μg/mL18.9 (15.3, 22.5)17.3 (13.9, 21.0)<0.001
      FG <100 mg/dL18.6 (15.2, 22.1)17.3 (14.2, 21.1)<0.001
      FG 100–125 mg/dL19.4 (15.8, 22.9)17.8 (14.3, 21.2)<0.001
      FG ≥126 mg/dL15.5 (10.0, 20.4)14.6 (8.2, 18.7)0.055
    Among people with diagnosed diabetesWhite (n = 425)Black (n = 302)
     FG, mg/dL158 (122, 216)194 (136, 271)<0.001
      FG <149 mg/dL117 (103, 133)120 (103, 135)0.517
      FG ≥149 mg/dL209 (176, 256)245 (191, 296)<0.001
     HbA1c, %7.1 (5.9, 8.6)8.4 (6.7, 10.6)<0.001
      FG <149 mg/dL5.8 (5.4, 6.5)6.4 (5.9, 7.1)<0.001
      FG ≥149 mg/dL8.4 (7.4, 9.8)9.7 (8.0, 11.4)<0.001
     Fructosamine, μmol/L280 (241, 358)331 (267, 423)<0.001
      FG <149 mg/dL240 (221, 260)254 (237, 281)<0.001
      FG ≥149 mg/dL341 (290, 404)378 (316, 465)<0.001
     Glycated albumin, %16.6 (13.3, 22.4)21.7 (16.0, 29.0)<0.001
      FG <149 mg/dL13.1 (12.1, 14.9)15.0 (13.4, 16.4)<0.001
      FG ≥149 mg/dL21.1 (17.4, 27.1)25.0 (21.1, 32.7)<0.001
     1,5-AG, μg/mL7.7 (2.4, 15.4)4.0 (1.5, 12.1)<0.001
      FG <149 mg/dL15.1 (10.2, 20.1)13.3 (9.5, 17.3)0.040
      FG ≥149 mg/dL2.8 (1.4, 7.1)2.1 (1.2, 5.3)0.065
    • Among people without diagnosed diabetes, there were 3,573 whites and 772 blacks with FG <100 mg/dL; 4,133 whites and 1,266 blacks with FG 100–125 mg/dL; and 390 whites and 239 blacks with FG ≥126 mg/dL. Among people with diagnosed diabetes, there were 193 whites and 95 blacks with FG <149 mg/dL and 232 whites and 207 blacks with FG ≥149 mg/dL. FG, fasting glucose.

    • ↵*P values were calculated using the Wilcoxon rank sum (Mann-Whitney U) test.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 39 (4)

In this Issue

April 2016, 39(4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Racial Differences in and Prognostic Value of Biomarkers of Hyperglycemia
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Racial Differences in and Prognostic Value of Biomarkers of Hyperglycemia
Christina M. Parrinello, A. Richey Sharrett, Nisa M. Maruthur, Richard M. Bergenstal, Morgan E. Grams, Josef Coresh, Elizabeth Selvin
Diabetes Care Apr 2016, 39 (4) 589-595; DOI: 10.2337/dc15-1360

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Racial Differences in and Prognostic Value of Biomarkers of Hyperglycemia
Christina M. Parrinello, A. Richey Sharrett, Nisa M. Maruthur, Richard M. Bergenstal, Morgan E. Grams, Josef Coresh, Elizabeth Selvin
Diabetes Care Apr 2016, 39 (4) 589-595; DOI: 10.2337/dc15-1360
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Regression to the Mean Contributes to the Apparent Improvement in Glycemia 3.8 Years After Screening: The ELSA-Brasil Study
  • Postintervention Effects of Varying Treatment Arms on Glycemic Failure and β-Cell Function in the TODAY Trial
  • Worldwide Epidemiology of Diabetes-Related End-Stage Renal Disease, 2000–2015
Show more Epidemiology/Health Services Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.