Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes

DPP-4 Inhibitors and Heart Failure: Some Reassurance, Some Uncertainty

  1. Kristian B. Filion and
  2. Samy Suissa⇑
  1. Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  1. Corresponding author: Samy Suissa, samy.suissa{at}mcgill.ca.
Diabetes Care 2016 May; 39(5): 735-737. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci15-0036
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The American Diabetes Association’s Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2016 recommends the use of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in combination with metformin as a second- or third-line treatment for type 2 diabetes (1). Owing to their relatively high costs, many jurisdictions restrict their use to patients whose glycemia remains poorly controlled on metformin–sulfonylurea combination therapy. By inhibiting DPP-4 activity, these agents increase postprandial incretin concentrations, thereby increasing insulin secretion and decreasing glucagon secretion (1). With intermediate efficacy, a low risk of hypoglycemia, neutral effects on body weight, and relatively rare adverse effects (1), their use has increased considerably since their 2006 entry into the U.S. market (2). Nevertheless, concerns remain regarding their potential association with serious adverse effects including acute pancreatitis (3), pancreatic cancer (3), and heart failure (HF) (4).

The potential increased risk of HF with DPP-4 inhibitors was reported in the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53 (SAVOR-TIMI 53) trial, which randomized 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes and either a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or multiple CVD risk factors to saxagliptin (Onglyza) or placebo (5) (Table 1). Patients randomly assigned to saxagliptin unexpectedly had a significantly higher risk of hospitalization for HF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27 [95% CI 1.07–1.51]), a prespecified component of the secondary composite end point. This increased risk was clustered in the first year of follow-up (HR 1.46 [95% CI 1.15–1.88]) with no increase thereafter (6).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Data from randomized placebo-controlled trials of DPP-4 inhibitors and the risk of HF

The increased HF risk in SAVOR-TIMI 53 was not observed in subsequent trials (Table 1). In the Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes with Alogliptin versus Standard of Care (EXAMINE) trial, 5,380 patients with type 2 diabetes and a recent hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome were randomly assigned to alogliptin (Nesina in the U.S. and Vipidia in Europe) or placebo (7). Overall, alogliptin was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for HF (HR 1.19 [95% CI 0.90–1.58]), but the risk differed among patients with (HR 1.00 [95% CI 0.71–1.42]) and without (HR 1.76 [95% CI 1.07–2.90]) a history of HF (P for interaction = 0.068) (8). Most recently, the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) randomized 14,671 patients to sitagliptin (Januvia) or placebo and observed no difference in the risk of hospitalization for HF (adjusted HR 1.00 [95% CI 0.83–1.20]) (9). Pooling data across all three cardiovascular outcome trials results in an HR of 1.15 (95% CI 0.98–1.34) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Meta-analysis of the cardiovascular outcome trials reporting the risk of HF with DPP-4 inhibitors. The box size is proportional to the weight in the meta-analysis. *Estimated using the total person-years of follow-up reported for each group (16,884 for saxagliptin and 16,761 for placebo). †Estimated using the median duration of follow-up for the trial. ‡Adjusted for baseline history of HF.

The safety signal raised by the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial has led to several observational studies that produced somewhat conflicting results (10–17). In this issue of Diabetes Care, Fu et al. (18) report the results of a retrospective cohort study that compared the risk of hospitalization for HF with DPP-4 inhibitors to that of sulfonylureas and, in secondary analyses, directly compared the HF risks of saxagliptin and sitagliptin. Exposure was defined using an as-treated approach, in which patients were censored upon discontinuation of their cohort entry therapy or switching to the other drug. Using propensity score matching, the authors found no evidence of an increased risk of hospitalization for HF with DPP-4 inhibitors among patients with CVD history at baseline (HR 0.95 [95% CI 0.78–1.15]) and with no CVD history (HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.38–0.89]). Similarly, no difference was observed when comparing saxagliptin to sitagliptin (HR 0.95 [95% CI 0.70–1.28] and HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.56–1.75], respectively).

The study by Fu et al. (18) has several strengths. These include a large sample size of 218,556 patients and the use of propensity scores to minimize confounding. Furthermore, the head-to-head comparison of saxagliptin and sitagliptin represents an important addition to the literature particularly in light of the conflicting trial evidence on this issue. In addition, given the inherent differences between patients who participate in clinical trials and those seen in everyday clinical practice (19,20), these data should provide some reassurance to practicing clinicians and patients with type 2 diabetes.

This study also has important limitations, many of which are acknowledged by the authors. With a mean follow-up of only 6 months (median 3 months), the duration of follow-up may have been inadequate to fully assess the HF risk of DPP-4 inhibitors. Concerns regarding this limitation are partially mitigated by the early risk identified in SAVOR-TIMI 53 (6), but it remains important in interpreting these data. Informative censoring upon discontinuation of study medication must also be considered; the inclusion of an analysis analogous to an intention-to-treat approach where exposure is defined at cohort entry and patients are followed for a fixed duration of follow-up (e.g., 6 or 12 months) could shed light on this potential issue. In addition, despite matching on propensity score, the potential for confounding remains, particularly from formulary restrictions with DPP-4 inhibitors in place in many jurisdictions, which can result in important bias in pharmacoepidemiologic research (21). Finally, although the study restricted the cohort to new users of the study drugs, the recommended approach to avoid bias from the inclusion of prevalent users (22), the exclusion of patients who previously used sulfonylureas can be highly restrictive, even more so than many randomized trials. This is a potential major limitation of this approach; its scope can be far removed from the real-world data expected from such studies. Moreover, given the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes and its multistep treatment, the study of antidiabetes drugs is a challenging area in pharmacoepidemiology that is particularly ripe for selection and time-related biases (23). Despite these limitations, this study (18) joins several observational studies that have found no evidence of an increased HF risk with DPP-4 inhibitors (13–17).

There are several potential explanations for the discordance in data from trials and observational studies regarding DPP-4 inhibitors and the risk of HF. First, it is possible that the safety signal observed in SAVOR-TIMI 53 (5,6) and in the post hoc subgroup analyses of EXAMINE (8) are chance findings due to multiple testing. Second, it is possible that the increased risk of HF is specific to saxagliptin, the DPP-4 inhibitor examined in SAVOR-TIMI 53. Although Fu et al. compared the HF risks of saxagliptin and sitagliptin, with a mean follow-up of 6 months, their analysis in patients with a history of CVD (the population studied in SAVOR-TIMI 53) was underpowered, as they only ruled out HRs above 1.75 (18). Finally, the heterogeneity in comparators and their corresponding HF risks must be considered. All three trials were placebo-controlled but encouraged the use of nonstudy medications to maintain glycemic control; differences in the distribution of use of these drugs (and their HF risks) may explain some heterogeneity in risk estimates. On the other hand, many of the observational studies used sulfonylureas as the comparator, a drug class that has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk (24).

The observational study by Fu et al. (18) provides some welcome reassurance regarding the HF risk of DPP-4 inhibitors. However, to impart actual real-world data, such observational studies should ideally strive to evaluate the full spectrum of users of these drugs, not only the treatment-naïve ones. As the signals of this association from the large randomized trials remain largely unexplained, there is certainly room for broader observational studies that use different innovative approaches accounting for the complexity of pharmacoepidemiologic studies in type 2 diabetes.

Article Information

Funding. K.B.F. holds a Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Investigator award. S.S. is a recipient of the James McGill Professor award.

Duality of Interest. S.S. has received research grants and participated in advisory board meetings and/or as a speaker at conferences for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Footnotes

  • See accompanying articles, pp. 664, 668, 677, 686, 694, 701, 709, 717, 726, and 738.

  • © 2016 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

References

  1. ↵
    1. American Diabetes Association
    . Approaches to glycemic treatment. Sec. 7. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2016. Diabetes Care 2016;39(Suppl. 1):S52–S59pmid:26696682
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Hampp C,
    2. Borders-Hemphill V,
    3. Moeny DG,
    4. Wysowski DK
    . Use of antidiabetic drugs in the U.S., 2003–2012. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1367–1374pmid:24623020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Egan AG,
    2. Blind E,
    3. Dunder K, et al
    . Pancreatic safety of incretin-based drugs—FDA and EMA assessment. N Engl J Med 2014;370:794–797pmid:24571751
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Udell JA,
    2. Cavender MA,
    3. Bhatt DL,
    4. Chatterjee S,
    5. Farkouh ME,
    6. Scirica BM
    . Glucose-lowering drugs or strategies and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with or at risk for type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:356–366pmid:25791290
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Scirica BM,
    2. Bhatt DL,
    3. Braunwald E, et al.; SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators
    . Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1317–1326pmid:23992601
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Scirica BM,
    2. Braunwald E,
    3. Raz I, et al.; SAVOR-TIMI 53 Steering Committee and Investigators
    . Heart failure, saxagliptin, and diabetes mellitus: observations from the SAVOR-TIMI 53 randomized trial. Circulation 2014;130:1579–1588pmid:25189213
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. White WB,
    2. Cannon CP,
    3. Heller SR, et al.; EXAMINE Investigators
    . Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1327–1335pmid:23992602
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Zannad F,
    2. Cannon CP,
    3. Cushman WC, et al.; EXAMINE Investigators
    . Heart failure and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes taking alogliptin versus placebo in EXAMINE: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2015;385:2067–2076pmid:25765696
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Green JB,
    2. Bethel MA,
    3. Armstrong PW, et al.; TECOS Study Group
    . Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:232–242pmid:26052984
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Weir DL,
    2. McAlister FA,
    3. Senthilselvan A,
    4. Minhas-Sandhu JK,
    5. Eurich DT
    . Sitagliptin use in patients with diabetes and heart failure: a population-based retrospective cohort study. JACC Heart Fail 2014;2:573–582pmid:24998080
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chen DY,
    2. Wang SH,
    3. Mao CT, et al
    . Sitagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease and acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study. Int J Cardiol 2015;181:200–206pmid:25528312
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wang KL,
    2. Liu CJ,
    3. Chao TF, et al
    . Sitagliptin and the risk of hospitalization for heart failure: a population-based study. Int J Cardiol 2014;177:86–90pmid:25499347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Yu OH,
    2. Filion KB,
    3. Azoulay L,
    4. Patenaude V,
    5. Majdan A,
    6. Suissa S
    . Incretin-based drugs and the risk of congestive heart failure. Diabetes Care 2015;38:277–284pmid:25205143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ou SM,
    2. Shih CJ,
    3. Chao PW, et al
    . Effects on clinical outcomes of adding dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors versus sulfonylureas to metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:663–672pmid:26457538
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wang SH,
    2. Chen DY,
    3. Lin YS, et al
    . Cardiovascular outcomes of sitagliptin in type 2 diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction, a population-based cohort study in Taiwan. PLoS One 2015;10:e0131122pmid:26115092
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Seong JM,
    2. Choi NK,
    3. Shin JY, et al
    . Differential cardiovascular outcomes after dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sulfonylurea, and pioglitazone therapy, all in combination with metformin, for type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0124287pmid:25992614
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Giorda CB,
    2. Picariello R,
    3. Tartaglino B, et al
    . Hospitalisation for heart failure and mortality associated with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor use in an unselected population of subjects with type 2 diabetes: a nested case-control study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e007959pmid:26048211
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Fu AZ,
    2. Johnston SS,
    3. Ghannam A, et al
    . Association between hospitalization for heart failure and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational study. Diabetes Care 2016;39:726–734pmid:26740636
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Dhruva SS,
    2. Redberg RF
    . Variations between clinical trial participants and Medicare beneficiaries in evidence used for Medicare national coverage decisions. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:136–140pmid:18227358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Udell JA,
    2. Wang TY,
    3. Li S, et al
    . Clinical trial participation after myocardial infarction in a national cardiovascular data registry. JAMA 2014;312:841–843pmid:25157729
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Filion KB,
    2. Eberg M,
    3. Ernst P
    . Confounding by drug formulary restriction in pharmacoepidemiologic research. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2016;25:278–286pmid:26648236
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Ray WA
    . Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158:915–920pmid:14585769
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Suissa S,
    2. Azoulay L
    . Metformin and the risk of cancer: time-related biases in observational studies. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2665–2673pmid:23173135
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Roumie CL,
    2. Hung AM,
    3. Greevy RA, et al
    . Comparative effectiveness of sulfonylurea and metformin monotherapy on cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:601–610pmid:23128859
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 39 (5)

In this Issue

May 2016, 39(5)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
DPP-4 Inhibitors and Heart Failure: Some Reassurance, Some Uncertainty
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
DPP-4 Inhibitors and Heart Failure: Some Reassurance, Some Uncertainty
Kristian B. Filion, Samy Suissa
Diabetes Care May 2016, 39 (5) 735-737; DOI: 10.2337/dci15-0036

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

DPP-4 Inhibitors and Heart Failure: Some Reassurance, Some Uncertainty
Kristian B. Filion, Samy Suissa
Diabetes Care May 2016, 39 (5) 735-737; DOI: 10.2337/dci15-0036
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Long-term Benefits of Intensive Glucose Control for Preventing End-Stage Kidney Disease: ADVANCE-ON
  • Nine-Year Effects of 3.7 Years of Intensive Glycemic Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes
Show more Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.