Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

Impact of Liraglutide on Amylase, Lipase, and Acute Pancreatitis in Participants With Overweight/Obesity and Normoglycemia, Prediabetes, or Type 2 Diabetes: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data From the SCALE Clinical Development Program

  1. William M. Steinberg1,2,
  2. Julio Rosenstock3,
  3. Thomas A. Wadden4,
  4. Morten Donsmark5,
  5. Christine B. Jensen5 and
  6. J. Hans DeVries6⇑
  1. 1Department of Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
  2. 2Rockville Internal Medicine Group, Rockville, MD
  3. 3Dallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, TX
  4. 4Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
  5. 5Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark
  6. 6Department of Endocrinology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  1. Corresponding author: J. Hans DeVries, j.h.devries{at}amc.uva.nl.
Diabetes Care 2017 Jul; 40(7): 839-848. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2684
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Erratum. Impact of Liraglutide on Amylase, Lipase, and Acute Pancreatitis in Participants With Overweight/Obesity and Normoglycemia, Prediabetes, or Type 2 Diabetes: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data From the SCALE Clinical Development Program. Diabetes Care 2017;40:839–848 - July 01, 2018

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To describe amylase/lipase activity levels and events of acute pancreatitis (AP) in the SCALE (Satiety and Clinical Adiposity—Liraglutide Evidence in individuals with and without diabetes) weight-management trials.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Secondary analyses were performed on pooled data from four trials (N = 5,358 with BMI ≥30, or 27 to <30 kg/m2 with ≥1 comorbidity). Of these, 1,723 had normoglycemia, 2,789 had prediabetes, and 846 had type 2 diabetes. Participants were randomized to liraglutide 3.0 mg (n = 3,302), liraglutide 1.8 mg (n = 211, only type 2 diabetes), or placebo (n = 1,845). Relationships between baseline characteristics and amylase/lipase activity at baseline and during treatment were investigated.

RESULTS Over 56 weeks, liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo was associated with increases in mean levels of 7% (amylase) and 31% (lipase), respectively. Similar changes in amylase/lipase levels were observed with liraglutide 1.8 mg. More participants receiving liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo experienced amylase (9.4% vs. 5.9%) and lipase (43.5% vs. 15.1%) elevations greater than or equal to the upper limit of normal (ULN); few had elevations ≥3 × ULN for amylase (<0.1% with liraglutide 3.0 mg or placebo) or lipase (2.9% vs. 1.5%, respectively). After liraglutide discontinuation, enzymes returned to baseline levels. Thirteen participants developed AP: 12 on (n = 9, 0.3%) or after (n = 3, 0.1%) liraglutide 3.0 mg treatment and one (0.1%) with placebo. A total of 6/13 participants with AP (5/12 liraglutide; 1 placebo) had gallstone disease evident at AP onset. Amylase/lipase elevations either 1 × ULN or ≥3 × ULN before AP onset had very low positive predictive value for AP (<1%).

CONCLUSIONS Liraglutide resulted in dose-independent, reversible increases in amylase/lipase activity, unrelated to baseline characteristics, not predicting AP onset. Gallstones possibly contributed to 50% of AP cases. Data provide no basis for amylase/lipase level monitoring in liraglutide treatment except in suspected AP.

Introduction

The relationship between incretin-based therapies and the risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) has been the topic of research, debate, and regulatory review (1–6). All currently marketed glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors carry label warnings concerning AP (5). Based on review of all available evidence and types of data (including nonclinical toxicology studies, clinical trial data, and epidemiologic data), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency concluded that the data at the time did not support a causal relationship between incretin-based drugs and AP (4). However, although the totality of reviewed data provides reassurance, pancreatitis continues to be considered a risk until more data become available (4,5).

Amylase and lipase, as biomarkers of pancreatic inflammation, are routinely measured in clinical trials of incretin-based therapies as a regulatory requirement (7). Elevations, mostly within the range of greater than or equal to the upper limit of normal (ULN) to 2 × ULN, predominantly with lipase, have been described following treatment with GLP-1RAs and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (8–10). Little is known, however, about amylase or lipase activity in individuals with overweight/obesity without type 2 diabetes or whether routinely monitoring these enzymes can predict subsequent AP onset.

Liraglutide is an acylated human GLP-1 analog that binds to and activates the GLP-1 receptor (11,12). It lowers body weight through decreased caloric intake while stimulating insulin secretion and reducing glucagon via a glucose-dependent mechanism (13,14). Liraglutide at doses up to 1.8 mg has been licensed for treatment of type 2 diabetes since 2009 (15,16). Liraglutide 3.0 mg was recently approved for chronic weight management in adults with overweight (BMI ≥27 kg/m2) and ≥1 weight-related comorbidity, or with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2), as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity (11,12). As with other GLP-1RAs, AP has been reported in clinical trials and postmarketing use of liraglutide (11,12).

The aims of this exploratory analysis of pooled data from the SCALE (Satiety and Clinical Adiposity—Liraglutide Evidence in individuals with and without diabetes) program were to 1) describe baseline and longitudinal on-treatment amylase and lipase data from phase 3a clinical trials of liraglutide in weight management, including dose-response and potential relationships with baseline characteristics, and 2) investigate any association between treatment-related increases in amylase and lipase activity and subsequent AP occurrence.

Research Design and Methods

Participants

This analysis includes four randomized, placebo-controlled trials comprising the SCALE phase 3a clinical trial program of liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management (Supplementary Fig. 1). The design and primary results from the trials have been published previously (17–20):

  • SCALE Obesity and Prediabetes (Trial 1). This 56-week, randomized, parallel-group trial (n = 3,731, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00422058) investigated the efficacy and safety of liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo (each as an adjunct to diet and exercise) in people with BMI ≥30 kg/m2, or ≥27 kg/m2 and ≥1 weight-related comorbidity. Participants with type 2 diabetes were excluded. After 56 weeks, participants on liraglutide without prediabetes at randomization were rerandomized to either continue liraglutide 3.0 mg or switch to placebo for an additional 12 weeks; placebo participants continued on placebo (17). Participants with prediabetes at randomization were studied for up to 3 years for new onset of diabetes.

  • SCALE Diabetes (Trial 2). This 56-week, randomized, parallel-group trial (n = 846, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01272232) investigated the efficacy and safety of liraglutide 3.0 mg versus liraglutide 1.8 mg or placebo (each as an adjunct to diet and exercise) in people with type 2 diabetes and BMI ≥27 kg/m2 (19). After 56 weeks, participants were studied for an additional 12 weeks off treatment.

  • SCALE Maintenance (Trial 3). This 56-week randomized, parallel-group trial (n = 422, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00781937) examined prevention of weight regain following a low-calorie diet run in with liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo (each as an adjunct to diet and exercise) in people with BMI ≥30 kg/m2, or ≥27 kg/m2 and ≥1 weight-related comorbidity (18). Participants with type 2 diabetes were excluded. After 56 weeks, participants were studied for an additional 12 weeks off treatment.

  • SCALE Sleep Apnea (Trial 4). This 32-week, randomized, parallel-group trial (n = 359, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01557166) investigated the efficacy and safety of liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo (each as an adjunct to diet and exercise) in people with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (20). Participants with type 2 diabetes were excluded.

Participants in all trials were prescribed a 500 kcal/day deficit diet (maximum ∼30% energy from fat, 20% energy from protein, 50% energy from carbohydrates) and increased physical activity (≥150 min/week brisk walking). People with a history of idiopathic AP or chronic pancreatitis were excluded from the SCALE program. There were no exclusion criteria based on elevated amylase/lipase levels (17–20).

Assessments

Serum amylase and lipase were measured at screening and randomization and monitored approximately once every 3 months during treatment, at end of treatment, and at follow-up (2 weeks and 3 months after last dose [Trials 1–3]) (7). Amylase and lipase activity were measured using enzymatic colorimetric assay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) performed by a central laboratory. ULN for amylase were 100 units/L (Trial 3) and 112 units/L (Trials 1, 2, 4) and for lipase 60 units/L (Trials 1–4). Elevated amylase/lipase levels ≥3 × ULN were to be reported as “medical events of special interest,” irrespective of gastrointestinal tract symptoms, but would lead to treatment discontinuation only if AP was suspected. For other trial assessments, see respective publications (17–20).

Evaluation of Pancreatitis

Across the SCALE trials, suspicion of pancreatitis was predefined as a “medical event of special interest” to ensure timely and systematic collection of relevant information for in-depth evaluation (7). The diagnosis of AP was based on meeting two or more of the following three criteria: 1) characteristic abdominal pain, 2) amylase and/or lipase >3 × ULN, and/or 3) characteristic findings on pancreas imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, MRI). All potential cases of pancreatitis were adjudicated by an independent, blinded adjudication committee (7). Severity was classified by an expert pancreatologist according to revised Atlanta criteria, using available information in source documents (7,17,21). Trial 3 (the first initiated of the four trials) was ongoing at adjudication implementation, and therefore events were adjudicated post hoc in this trial, following the same blinded process and charter as the other three prospectively adjudicated trials as far as possible (7). All suspected drugs (including protocol-permitted drugs) were to be discontinued if pancreatitis was suspected. Participants were withdrawn if a pancreatitis diagnosis was confirmed.

The sponsor took measures to identify potential events of pancreatitis not already identified by study investigators (7). During conduct of Trials 1, 2, and 4, the sponsor performed ongoing blinded searches, using a predefined Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) search, in the clinical database for potential events of pancreatitis not already identified by investigators. This search included AEs of increased amylase/lipase with concomitant reporting of AEs of abdominal pain or vomiting (occurring within a time window of ±30 days of elevated amylase/lipase). A similar retrospective search was carried out for Trial 3.

For completeness, all events with onset through the data cutoff for the regulatory 120-day safety update report to the FDA (corresponding to 1,621 additional person-years-of-observation [PYO] in Trial 1) were included in this analysis.

Statistical Analyses

All analyses are based on pooled liraglutide 3.0 mg and pooled placebo data from all four trials, adjusting for trial. Data from the liraglutide 1.8 mg group (Trial 2) are also reported. Geometric mean amylase/lipase activity levels were calculated based on scheduled visits; outlier (categorical) analyses also included data from unscheduled visits. The following definitions were used in the categorical analyses of amylase or lipase: ≥1 × ULN, ≥2 × ULN, and ≥3 × ULN. Exploratory subgroup analyses were used to investigate the relationship between baseline characteristics and amylase/lipase activity at baseline and during treatment. These analyses used an ANCOVA model of log-transformed baseline amylase/lipase, or amylase/lipase relative change from baseline, with trial and baseline characteristics as factors, or trial, treatment, baseline characteristics, and treatment × baseline characteristics interaction as factors and baseline amylase/lipase as covariates, respectively. Incidence was calculated in terms of PYO, covering the period from the start of treatment until the final contact with the patient (including off-drug follow-up). The positive predictive value (PPV) for AP was defined as the number of participants with at least one amylase/lipase value ≥1 × ULN, or ≥3 × ULN, at scheduled visits who subsequently developed AP (numerator) divided by the total number of participants (participants with and without subsequent AP) who had an amylase/lipase value ≥1 × ULN or ≥3 × ULN at any time during the study (denominator). Finally, a simple estimate of the number needed to harm (NNH) for AP was derived with the function 1/(Plira – Pplacebo), where Plira and Pplacebo are the yearly AP incidence rates based on observation time from treatment start until last participant contact. Amylase/lipase measurements from Trial 1 through the regulatory 120-day safety update were included when calculating the PPV for AP; all other changes from baseline data are based on randomization to end of treatment (Trials 1–3: 0–56 weeks; Trial 4: 0–32 weeks).

The following definitions were used for subgroup analyses: age-group, years (<45, 45–54, 55–64); sex (male, female); race (Asian, black/African American, other, white); BMI, kg/m2 (<30, ≥30 to <35, ≥35 to <40, ≥40); dyslipidemia, LDL ≥160 mg/dL and/or triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL and/or HDL <40 mg/dL for males, <50 mg/dL for females (yes/no); hypertension, systolic blood pressure ≥140 and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg (yes/no); renal impairment, mild (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 60–89 mL/min/1.73 m2), moderate (30–59 mL/min/1.73 m2), or severe (15–29 mL/min/1.73 m2); and glycemic status (normoglycemia, prediabetes, diabetes) (eGFR calculated via the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Eq. [22]). Normoglycemia (relevant for Trials 1, 3, 4) was defined as not having prediabetes or diabetes; in Trial 1 this equated to meeting all three of the following criteria: HbA1c <5.7%; fasting glucose <100 mg/dL; 2-h plasma glucose measurement <140 mg/dL during a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Prediabetes (relevant for Trials 1, 3, 4) was defined as having impaired fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (100–125 mg/dL) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (2-h plasma glucose 140–199 mg/dL [OGTT], Trial 1 only) and/or HbA1c 5.7–6.4% (39–46 mmol/mol) (17,23). Diabetes was defined as having a diagnosis at least 3 months prior to screening (Trial 2); diabetes was an exclusion criterion in Trial 1 (based on meeting ≥1 of the following: FPG ≥126 mg/dL; 2-h plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dL [OGTT]; HbA1c ≥6.5%) and in Trials 3 and 4 (diagnosis of type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes by the investigator; FPG ≥126 mg/dL).

Results

Baseline Characteristics

In total, 5,358 participants were randomized to liraglutide 3.0 mg (n = 3,302), liraglutide 1.8 mg (n = 211), or placebo (n = 1,845) in the SCALE trials (Supplementary Fig. 1). In total, 1,723 participants had normoglycemia, 2,789 had prediabetes, and 846 had type 2 diabetes (Table 1). Mean age was 47 years; 70.8% were female; 83.9% were white; mean body weight was 106.5 kg; and mean BMI was 38.0 kg/m2. It should be noted that the participants in the diabetes trial (Trial 2) were older (mean age 54.9 years) and that Trial 2, together with Trial 4, had more males compared with the other trials (Table 1). Overall, 52.4% of participants had normal renal function, while 43.0, 4.5, and 0.1% had mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively. Trials 1, 2, and 4 showed similar proportions of participants across renal function status, but in Trial 3, the majority of participants (86.2%) had normal renal function (Table 1). Baseline characteristics are summarized in further detail in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Baseline characteristics and categorical distribution of amylase and lipase activity for randomized participants of the phase 3 clinical trials

Amylase/Lipase Activity at Baseline

Table 1 shows the mean values and categorical distributions of amylase/lipase in Trials 1, 2, 3, and 4. At baseline, the mean amylase value across the four trials was 56.6 units/L, and 149 participants (2.8%) had amylase ≥1 × ULN, 4 participants (0.1%) had ≥2 × ULN, and no participants had values ≥3 × ULN (Table 1). For lipase, the mean value at baseline across the four trials was 36.2 units/L, and 323 (6%) had lipase ≥1 × ULN, 42 (0.8%) had ≥2 × ULN, and 19 (0.4%) had values ≥3 × ULN (Table 1).

Relationship Between Baseline Characteristics and Baseline Amylase/Lipase Activity

The following variables were associated with statistically higher amylase/lipase levels at baseline: increasing age (P < 0.0001); being male (P < 0.05); being Asian, black, African American, or other race versus being white (P < 0.0001); decreasing BMI category (P < 0.0001); having dyslipidemia (P < 0.05); having hypertension (P < 0.05); and increasing degree of renal impairment (P < 0.0001) (Supplementary Table 1).

In addition, there was a significant effect of worsening glycemic status (having prediabetes or diabetes vs. normoglycemia, defined according to the American Diabetes Association 2010 criteria [23]) on baseline lipase (20% higher lipase levels in individuals with type 2 diabetes vs. those with normoglycemia; P < 0.0001); no glycemic status effect was observed with amylase (Supplementary Table 1).

Changes in Amylase/Lipase Activity Over Time

The time course and magnitude of mean change from baseline in amylase/lipase activity were similar across trials (P value for trial by treatment interaction > 0.05): as an illustration, data are shown for Trials 1 (without type 2 diabetes, Fig. 1A and B) and 2 (with type 2 diabetes, Fig. 1C and D). Based on pooled data from the SCALE phase 3 program, liraglutide 3.0 mg was associated with an amylase increase of 7% and a lipase increase of 31%, relative to placebo (P < 0.001). These mean changes in amylase/lipase activity were not driven by a few outlying data points but rather a general right-shifted distribution, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Mean change from baseline in amylase and lipase activity over time in Trial 1 (A and B) and Trial 2 (C and D). A and B: Safety analysis set. Graphs are geometric means. Circles are geometric means with last observation carried forward (LOCF). Amylase ULN defined as 112 units/L. Lipase ULN defined as 60 units/L. At week 56, participants without prediabetes on liraglutide were rerandomized 1:1 to liraglutide or placebo. C and D: Safety analysis set. Graphs are geometric means. Circles are geometric means with LOCF. Amylase ULN defined as 112 units/L. Lipase ULN defined as 60 units/L. The liraglutide 1.8-mg and 3.0-mg graphs are virtually superimposed.

For both enzymes, the mean increase in activity with liraglutide was evident at the first scheduled measurement (4 weeks), and activity was consistently above baseline and placebo for as long as participants remained on treatment (Fig. 1B–D). Mean amylase/lipase activity returned toward baseline values once liraglutide treatment was discontinued (i.e., during 12-week off-treatment follow-up periods) (Fig. 1A–D). Treatment effects appeared similar in participants with normoglycemia, prediabetes, and diabetes (Trials 1 and 2) (Fig. 1A–D), and there was no evidence of a dose-response between liraglutide 1.8 mg and 3.0 mg (Trial 2) (Fig. 1C and D).

Figure 2 shows that while on treatment, 9.4% of participants on liraglutide 3.0 mg had amylase ≥1 × ULN vs. 5.9% for placebo; 0.5% vs. 0.2% had amylase ≥2 × ULN; and <0.1% had amylase ≥3 × ULN. For lipase, 43.5% of participants on liraglutide 3.0 mg vs. 15.1% on placebo had an elevation of lipase ≥1 × ULN at any time during treatment, while 7.7% vs. 3.5% and 2.9% vs. 1.5% had a ≥2 × ULN and ≥3 × ULN lipase elevation, respectively. It should be noted that, irrespective of treatment and possibly due to their higher baseline values, a relatively higher proportion of participants in Trial 2 (participants with type 2 diabetes) versus those in the pooled data set had elevations of lipase (≥1 × ULN, ≥2 × ULN, ≥3 × ULN) (Trial 2: 56.4%, 15.6%, 7.6% on liraglutide 3.0 mg; 56.2%, 16.2%, 9.5% on liraglutide 1.8 mg; and 29.7%, 10.8%, and 6.1% on placebo, respectively).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Amylase and lipase elevations at any time during treatment (pooled data from Trials 1–4).

The majority of elevations were not sustained. No participants treated with liraglutide 3.0 mg experienced recurrent elevated amylase ≥3 × ULN over ≥2 visits (Supplementary Fig. 3). Eleven (0.3%) and 3 (0.2%) of the participants in the liraglutide 3.0 mg and placebo groups, respectively, experienced lipase ≥3 × ULN over ≥2 visits (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Relationship Between Baseline Characteristics and Changes in Amylase/Lipase Activity Changes Over Time

The following characteristics were associated with greater increases in amylase following treatment with liraglutide: increasing age, male sex, and worsening glycemic status (Supplementary Table 2). Only increasing age was associated with greater increases in lipase with liraglutide (Supplementary Table 2).

Relationship Between Low-Calorie Diet–Induced Weight Loss and Change in Amylase/Lipase Activity

We also speculated whether the treatment-related increases in pancreatic enzyme levels could be related to treatment-related improvement in glycemia and/or body weight. While the first hypothesis could not be tested with the current trials, based on results from Trial 3, a diet-induced weight loss of ≥5% was not associated with changes in amylase or lipase activity (data not shown).

Confirmed Pancreatitis Events

An overview of all AEs sent for adjudication on suspicion of pancreatitis and their outcome is in Supplementary Fig. 4. In total, 31 cases were reviewed by the external event adjudication committee, 14 of which were initially identified by the investigator and 17 by standardized MedDRA search in the AE database; 13 cases were confirmed as AP, 12 in participants who were either on treatment with liraglutide 3.0 mg at onset of the event (n = 9, 0.3%) or had previously been treated with liraglutide 3.0 mg (n = 3, 0.1%), and 1 treated with placebo (0.1%) (Table 2). All confirmed cases were from Trial 1. If all 12 cases associated with liraglutide are included, the event rates for liraglutide 3.0 mg, 1.8 mg, and placebo are 2.65, 0, and 0.44/1,000 PYO, respectively. Based on AP events with onset in the main-treatment and follow-up periods, the NNH for AP with liraglutide 3.0 mg is 322. There were no confirmed cases of chronic pancreatitis (not unexpected given the short exposure time).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Case details for confirmed AP events

In the 12 liraglutide-treated participants who developed AP, two latency periods (interval between drug initiation and developing pancreatitis) were observed. In 4/12 participants, pancreatitis developed <60 days after starting liraglutide, while 7/12 had a latency period of at least 5–6 months (Table 2). Six participants (five liraglutide-treated) had gallstone-associated pancreatitis, as indicated by presence of gallstones on imaging, alanine aminotransferase levels that were ≥3 × ULN, or both (24). All but one case were mild in severity according to Atlanta classification; the remaining case was classified as moderately severe (21). All events occurred in people without type 2 diabetes; 10/12 had prediabetes, and two had normoglycemia.

Supplementary Fig. 5 shows amylase and lipase levels measured during the regular protocol–scheduled visits as well as local measurements at admission (if available) for participants who experienced AP.

PPV of Amylase or Lipase Elevations for AP

Most amylase or lipase elevations ≥3 × ULN occurred once or twice during treatment and were unaccompanied by signs and symptoms of pancreatitis. The PPV for amylase ≥3 × ULN and subsequent AP was 0%. For lipase ≥3 × ULN, the PPV was 0.7%. The PPVs for amylase and lipase values ≥1 × ULN were 0.3% and 0.3%, respectively (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4).

Conclusions

This analysis was undertaken to better understand the nature of treatment-related increases in amylase/lipase activity with liraglutide 3.0 mg in people with overweight or obesity conditions, as well as any potential relationships between elevated amylase/lipase levels and subsequent occurrence of AP. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time such data have been reported in people without diabetes (but with and without prediabetes).

On average, amylase/lipase activity increased by 7% and 31%, respectively, with liraglutide 3.0 mg relative to placebo, corresponding to treatment-related increases in the range of 0–10 units/L for both amylase and lipase. Similar increases were observed with liraglutide 1.8 mg, indicating no dose-response of the effect. While incidental increases in amylase/lipase ≥1 × ULN were quite common (∼9% and ∼44% of participants treated with liraglutide, respectively), sustained elevations were uncommon, as were elevations ≥3 × ULN (<0.1% and 2.9%, respectively). Elevations were reversible upon treatment discontinuation; most values had returned to normal within 12 weeks.

Increasing age, male sex, non-white origin, lower BMI, having dyslipidemia and/or hypertension, and renal impairment were associated with modestly higher amylase/lipase levels at baseline. In addition, data from the present analysis suggest that worsening glycemia was associated with modestly higher baseline lipase levels. These findings are consistent with findings from the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) trial, which also demonstrated that asymptomatic enzyme elevations, including ≥3 × ULN, are not uncommon in people with type 2 diabetes and significant cardiovascular risk (25). Baseline characteristics had no material influence on amylase or lipase excursions on treatment.

Importantly, the current analysis provided no indication that routinely measured amylase or lipase values 3 × ULN predict occurrence of AP in people treated with liraglutide 3.0 mg (PPV 0.7% for lipase).

The mechanism by which liraglutide causes increased amylase/lipase in the blood is unknown. One possibility is that this GLP-1RA causes subclinical pancreatic inflammation leading to enzyme elevation. We consider this unlikely as the enzymes rise almost immediately after administration, stay elevated for as long as the agent is given, and return to normal levels as soon as the agent is stopped. These elevations were unaccompanied by the development of AP in the vast majority of cases. This is further corroborated by the recently published long-term LEADER trial that showed that despite liraglutide-induced elevations of amylase/lipase for a mean of 3.5 years (the length of the study), there was no increased rate of AP compared with placebo (25). Nevertheless, at this point in time, we cannot rule out persistent low grade inflammation.

GLP-1 receptors are weakly expressed on the acinar cells in the human pancreas (26), and in mice, short-term GLP-1 receptor activation leads to increased acinar cell amylase secretion (27). Also in mice, short-term administration of GLP-1RAs increases pancreas protein synthesis with no signs of an inflammatory state (28). Similarly, in nonhuman primates, chronic administration of liraglutide or semaglutide showed no histopathological changes in the pancreas (29). However, even if enzyme production in the acinar tissue is increased with continued GLP-1 receptor stimulation, it does not explain an increase in enzymes in the blood. Acini discharge their contents into the pancreatic ductules, and from there to the small bowel where the enzymes are not absorbed into the blood. It is possible that liraglutide (and other incretin-based therapies) might facilitate the transfer of acinar enzymes across the basolateral membrane of the pancreas and into the blood. This is a theory that has not yet been explored. Other explanations include the possibility that these drugs may affect the metabolism and excretion of lipase and or amylase from the kidney or peripheral tissues.

The absolute risk of AP in the SCALE program was low, but numerically higher in liraglutide versus placebo (0.4% for liraglutide 3.0 mg, <0.1% for placebo; 2.65 cases/1,000 PYO for liraglutide 3.0 mg vs. 0.44 cases/1,000 PYO for placebo). The estimated incidence rate includes the three participants in the liraglutide group who were off the medication for 35–392 days before the event of AP. In comparison, the estimated frequency of AP in the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) program was 1.6 cases/1,000 patient-years exposure for liraglutide 1.8 mg versus 0.7 cases/1,000 patient-years exposure for total active comparators (5). However, in the LEAD trial program, AP cases were not adjudicated. Using similar methodology for ascertainment and adjudication as in the SCALE program, the LEADER trial, by far the largest and longest GLP-1RA trial to date (∼9,300 people with type 2 diabetes, 1:1 randomized, median follow-up 3.5 years) showed no imbalance in AP for liraglutide 1.8 mg versus placebo (0.4% for liraglutide 1.8 mg, 0.5% for placebo) (17,30). Likewise, in the SUSTAIN-6 trial in which 3,297 participants with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk were randomly assigned to semaglutide, a once-weekly GLP-1RA, or placebo for 104 weeks, adjudicated AP rates were also similar between groups (0.5% for semaglutide, 0.7% for placebo) (31). Generally, it may be difficult to extrapolate incidence rates from a clinical trial setting to clinical practice in the real world, and the low number of cases in the SCALE program precludes any firm conclusions as to the risk of AP with liraglutide 3.0 mg.

It has recently been suggested that use of GLP-1 analogs is associated with an increased risk of biliary tract disease (32). Liraglutide has been associated with a doubling of gallstone-related AE frequency in recent clinical trials (17,30). This has been attributed to the greater magnitude of weight loss seen with liraglutide, as well as potentially weight-loss–independent mechanisms (17). Five of the 12 participants in the liraglutide-treated group (and the one on placebo) who developed AP in this study (total of 6/13) had gallstones at the time of presentation either by imaging or based on typical liver-enzyme findings, suggesting an important contribution of gallstones to the pancreatitis episode. Moreover, the great majority of patients developing AP while on liraglutide do so after being on drug more than 6 months. It is conceivable that in a small number of patients, GLP-1RAs may predispose to gallstone formation or may worsen existing gallstone disease, induced or worsened either by weight loss or alterations in biliary motility or by an unknown mechanism that may increase slightly the risk of AP (33). Analysis of large-scale studies may help to elucidate these questions.

In conclusion, asymptomatic elevations of amylase/lipase did not predict subsequent AP in participants with overweight/obesity in the SCALE phase 3a clinical trial program. The PPV of an elevated amylase or lipase in predicting AP is negligible, and therefore there is little rationale in monitoring these enzymes while on treatment. Amylase and especially lipase increases are common with liraglutide treatment, are not dose-dependent, and return to baseline levels upon treatment discontinuation. The mechanism and clinical relevance of these observations remain unclear. The absolute risk of AP with liraglutide 3.0 mg is low but higher than placebo, and gallstones appear the most commonly identifiable etiological factor potentially contributing to nearly half the identified cases. Mechanistic data are required to further advance our understanding of these findings.

Article Information

Acknowledgments. The authors thank the trial personnel and participants for their commitment and involvement in the trial. The authors also thank Arne Haahr Andreasen (Novo Nordisk) for statistical support and Gilbert Bezzina (Watermeadow Medical, an Ashfield Company) for editorial assistance (supported by Novo Nordisk).

Funding and Duality of Interest. W.M.S. has served as a legal consultant for Eli Lilly and Company, Amylin, and Novo Nordisk. He has served on the steering committee of the Novo Nordisk LEADER study and has received consulting fees from and owns stock in Novo Nordisk. T.A.W. serves on a scientific advisory board for Novo Nordisk and has received grant support from Eisai Pharmaceutical and Novo Nordisk. M.D. and C.B.J. are full-time employees of, and share-holders in, Novo Nordisk A/S. J.R. has received grants/research support and has served on scientific advisory boards and received honorarium or consulting fees from manufacturers of GLP-1RAs including Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Hanmi, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and Intarcia. J.H.D. serves on scientific advisory boards for Merck & Co., Inc. and Novo Nordisk and received research support and is on the speakers’ bureau for Novo Nordisk. The SCALE trials were funded by Novo Nordisk, who also provided the trial products.

Author Contributions. W.M.S., J.R., and M.D. contributed to the interpretation of the data and the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. C.B.J. contributed to the acquisition of data from all SCALE trials, the conception and design of the analysis, the interpretation of the data, and the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. J.H.D. contributed to the conception and design of the analysis, the interpretation of the data, and the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. T.A.W. contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data for the SCALE maintenance trial and the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. All of the authors approved the final manuscript prior to submission. J.H.D. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Prior Presentation. Parts of this study were presented in abstract form at Digestive Disease Week, San Diego, CA, 19–22 May 2012, and at the 74th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association, San Francisco, CA, 14–17 June 2014.

Footnotes

  • This article contains Supplementary Data online at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.2337/dc16-2684/-/DC1.

  • See accompanying article, p. 966.

  • Received December 16, 2016.
  • Accepted March 2, 2017.
  • © 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.
http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Nauck MA
    . A critical analysis of the clinical use of incretin-based therapies: The benefits by far outweigh the potential risks. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2126–2132pmid:23645884
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Butler PC,
    2. Elashoff M,
    3. Elashoff R,
    4. Gale EA
    . A critical analysis of the clinical use of incretin-based therapies: Are the GLP-1 therapies safe? Diabetes Care 2013;36:2118–2125pmid:23645885
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Meier JJ,
    2. Nauck MA
    . Risk of pancreatitis in patients treated with incretin-based therapies. Diabetologia 2014;57:1320–1324pmid:24723174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Egan AG,
    2. Blind E,
    3. Dunder K, et al
    . Pancreatic safety of incretin-based drugs--FDA and EMA assessment. N Engl J Med 2014;370:794–797pmid:24571751
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Jensen TM,
    2. Saha K,
    3. Steinberg WM
    . Is there a link between liraglutide and pancreatitis? A post hoc review of pooled and patient-level data from completed liraglutide type 2 diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1058–1066pmid:25504028
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Azoulay L,
    2. Filion KB,
    3. Platt RW, et al.; and the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES) Investigators
    . Association between incretin-based drugs and the risk of acute pancreatitis. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:1464–1473pmid:27479930
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Novo Nordisk, Inc. Liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management. NDA 206-321 [Internet], 2014. Available from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/EndocrinologicandMetabolicDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM413318.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2016
  6. ↵
    Dunn SV. Tradjenta (linagliptin) new drug application medical review. In Center for Drug Evaluation and Research [Internet], 2011. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Available from http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2011/201280Orig1s000MedR.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2016
  7. European Medicines Agency. Januvia (sitagliptin) European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) scientific discussion [Internet]. Available from http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Scientific_Discussion/human/000722/WC500039057.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2016
  8. ↵
    Novartis Pharma Gmb HN. Galvus (vildagliptin) 50 mg tablets. Summary of product characteristics [Internet], 2012. Available from http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000771/WC500020327.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2016
  9. ↵
    Novo Nordisk A/S. Saxenda 6 mg/mL. Summary of product characterisitics [Internet], 2016. Available from http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/003780/WC500185786.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2016
  10. ↵
    Novo Nordisk, Inc. Saxenda (rDNA) injection. Prescribing information [Internet], 2015. Available from http://www.novo-pi.com/saxenda.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2016
  11. ↵
    1. Nauck MA,
    2. Kleine N,
    3. Orskov C,
    4. Holst JJ,
    5. Willms B,
    6. Creutzfeldt W
    . Normalization of fasting hyperglycaemia by exogenous glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36 amide) in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia 1993;36:741–744pmid:8405741
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. van Can J,
    2. Sloth B,
    3. Jensen CB,
    4. Flint A,
    5. Blaak EE,
    6. Saris WH
    . Effects of the once-daily GLP-1 analog liraglutide on gastric emptying, glycemic parameters, appetite and energy metabolism in obese, non-diabetic adults. Int J Obes 2014;38:784–793pmid:23999198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Victoza (liraglutide 6 mg/ml). Summary of product characteristics [Internet], 2014. Available from http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/001026/WC500050017.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2016
  14. ↵
    Victoza (liraglutide [rDNA origin] injection). Prescribing Information [Internet], 2015. Available from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/022341lbl.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2016
  15. ↵
    1. Pi-Sunyer X,
    2. Astrup A,
    3. Fujioka K, et al.; SCALE Obesity and Prediabetes NN8022-1839 Study Group
    . A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. N Engl J Med 2015;373:11–22pmid:26132939
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Wadden TA,
    2. Hollander P,
    3. Klein S, et al.; NN8022-1923 Investigators
    . Weight maintenance and additional weight loss with liraglutide after low-calorie-diet-induced weight loss: the SCALE Maintenance randomized study. Int J Obes 2013;37:1443–1451pmid:23812094
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Davies MJ,
    2. Bergenstal R,
    3. Bode B, et al.; NN8022-1922 Study Group
    . Efficacy of liraglutide for weight loss among patients with type 2 diabetes: the SCALE diabetes randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;314:687–699pmid:26284720
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Blackman A,
    2. Foster GD,
    3. Zammit G, et al
    . Effect of liraglutide 3.0 mg in individuals with obesity and moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea: the SCALE Sleep Apnea randomized clinical trial. Int J Obes 2016;40:1310–1319pmid:27005405
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Banks PA,
    2. Bollen TL,
    3. Dervenis C, et al.; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group
    . Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62:102–111pmid:23100216
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Levey AS,
    2. Stevens LA,
    3. Schmid CH, et al.; CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration)
    . A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med 2011;155:408]. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:604–612pmid:19414839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. American Diabetes Association
    . Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl. 1):S62–S69pmid:20042775
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Tenner S,
    2. Dubner H,
    3. Steinberg W
    . Predicting gallstone pancreatitis with laboratory parameters: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:1863–1866pmid:7942684
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Steinberg WM,
    2. Nauck MA,
    3. Zinman B, et al.; LEADER Trial investigators
    . LEADER 3--lipase and amylase activity in subjects with type 2 diabetes: baseline data from over 9000 subjects in the LEADER trial. Pancreas 2014;43:1223–1231pmid:25275271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Pyke C,
    2. Heller RS,
    3. Kirk RK, et al
    . GLP-1 receptor localization in monkey and human tissue: novel distribution revealed with extensively validated monoclonal antibody. Endocrinology 2014;155:1280–1290pmid:24467746
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Hou Y,
    2. Ernst SA,
    3. Heidenreich K,
    4. Williams JA
    . Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor is present in pancreatic acinar cells and regulates amylase secretion through cAMP. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2016;310:G26–G33pmid:26542397
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Koehler JA,
    2. Baggio LL,
    3. Cao X, et al
    . Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists increase pancreatic mass by induction of protein synthesis. Diabetes 2015;64:1046–1056pmid:25277394
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Gotfredsen CF,
    2. Mølck AM,
    3. Thorup I, et al
    . The human GLP-1 analogs liraglutide and semaglutide: absence of histopathological effects on the pancreas in nonhuman primates. Diabetes 2014;63:2486–2497pmid:24608440
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Marso SP,
    2. Daniels GH,
    3. Brown-Frandsen K, et al.; LEADER Steering Committee; LEADER Trial Investigators
    . Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016;375:311–322pmid:27295427
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Marso SP,
    2. Bain SC,
    3. Consoli A, et al.; SUSTAIN-6 Investigators
    . Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1834–1844pmid:27633186
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Faillie JL,
    2. Yu OH,
    3. Yin H,
    4. Hillaire-Buys D,
    5. Barkun A,
    6. Azoulay L
    . Association of bile duct and gallbladder diseases with the use of incretin-based drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:1474–1481pmid:27478902
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Meier JJ,
    2. Rosenstock J
    . Therapy: gastrointestinal safety of incretin therapies: are we there yet? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;13:630–632pmid:27649787
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 40 (7)

In this Issue

July 2017, 40(7)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Liraglutide on Amylase, Lipase, and Acute Pancreatitis in Participants With Overweight/Obesity and Normoglycemia, Prediabetes, or Type 2 Diabetes: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data From the SCALE Clinical Development Program
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Impact of Liraglutide on Amylase, Lipase, and Acute Pancreatitis in Participants With Overweight/Obesity and Normoglycemia, Prediabetes, or Type 2 Diabetes: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data From the SCALE Clinical Development Program
William M. Steinberg, Julio Rosenstock, Thomas A. Wadden, Morten Donsmark, Christine B. Jensen, J. Hans DeVries
Diabetes Care Jul 2017, 40 (7) 839-848; DOI: 10.2337/dc16-2684

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Impact of Liraglutide on Amylase, Lipase, and Acute Pancreatitis in Participants With Overweight/Obesity and Normoglycemia, Prediabetes, or Type 2 Diabetes: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data From the SCALE Clinical Development Program
William M. Steinberg, Julio Rosenstock, Thomas A. Wadden, Morten Donsmark, Christine B. Jensen, J. Hans DeVries
Diabetes Care Jul 2017, 40 (7) 839-848; DOI: 10.2337/dc16-2684
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of Baseline Characteristics With Insulin Sensitivity and β-Cell Function in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) Study Cohort
  • Independent Observational Analysis of Ulcer Outcomes for SINBAD and University of Texas Ulcer Scoring Systems
  • Presence of Liver Steatosis Is Associated With Greater Diabetes Remission After Gastric Bypass Surgery
Show more Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.