Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Diabetes Care

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcast
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Clinical Diabetes
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Diabetes Care
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Browse
    • By Topic
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • Special Article Collections
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Guidance for Reviewers
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcast
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Peer Review
Reconsidering Pregnancy With Diabetes

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Diet: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Examining the Impact of Modified Dietary Interventions on Maternal Glucose Control and Neonatal Birth Weight

  1. Jennifer M. Yamamoto1,
  2. Joanne E. Kellett2,
  3. Montserrat Balsells3,
  4. Apolonia García-Patterson4,
  5. Eran Hadar5,
  6. Ivan Solà4,6,7,
  7. Ignasi Gich7,8,9,
  8. Eline M. van der Beek10,11,
  9. Eurídice Castañeda-Gutiérrez12,
  10. Seppo Heinonen13,14,
  11. Moshe Hod5,
  12. Kirsi Laitinen15,16,
  13. Sjurdur F. Olsen17,
  14. Lucilla Poston18,
  15. Ricardo Rueda19,
  16. Petra Rust20,
  17. Lilou van Lieshout21,
  18. Bettina Schelkle21,
  19. Helen R. Murphy2,22,23⇑ and
  20. Rosa Corcoy24,25,26
  1. 1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
  2. 2Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, Norfolk, U.K.
  3. 3Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain
  4. 4Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
  5. 5Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  6. 6Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
  7. 7CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  8. 8Department of Epidemiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
  9. 9Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
  10. 10Nutricia Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  11. 11Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
  12. 12Nestlé Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
  13. 13Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  14. 14Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
  15. 15Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  16. 16Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
  17. 17Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark
  18. 18King’s College London, London, U.K.
  19. 19Research and Development Department, Abbott Nutrition, Granada, Spain
  20. 20Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  21. 21International Life Sciences Institute Europe, Brussels, Belgium
  22. 22Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, U.K.
  23. 23Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, U.K.
  24. 24Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
  25. 25CIBER Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanotechnology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
  26. 26Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
  1. Corresponding author: Helen R. Murphy, helen.murphy{at}uea.ac.uk.
  1. H.R.M. and R.C. contributed equally to this work.

Diabetes Care 2018 Jul; 41(7): 1346-1361. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-0102
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

    Forest plot of birth weight for modified dietary interventions compared with control diets in women with GDM. Reference citations for studies can be found in Table 1. CHO, carbohydrate; IV, inverse variance.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Table 1

    Characteristics of studies included

    Author, year (ref.)CountrynEstimated sample sizeDefinition of GDMDuration of dietary interventionGestational age in weeks at enrollment (mean ± SD)Baseline BMI, kg/m2 (mean ± SD)Mean maternal age, years (mean ± SD)Dietary interventionDiet composition (mean ± SD)*
    Low-GI diet
    Grant, 2011 (26)Canada4750 to detect a 0.6 mmol/L difference in capillary glucose; n not achievedCanadian Diabetes Association (40)28 weeks until deliveryControl: 29 ± 2.35 Intervention†: 29 ± 3.21Control: 26 ± 4.69 Intervention: 27 ± 4.58 (prepregnancy)Control: 34 ± 0.46 Intervention: 34 ± 5.16Low GI: Women were provided with a list of starch choices specific to either intervention (low GI) or controlControl: GI 58.0 ± 0.5 Intervention: GI 49.0 ± 0.8
    Louie, 2011 (29)Australia99120 to detect a 260-g difference in birth weight (stopped early because of smaller than expected SD)Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society criteria (41)Randomization until deliveryControl: 29.7 ± 3.5 Intervention: 29 ± 4.0Control: 24.1 ± 5.7 Intervention: 23.9 ± 4.4 (prepregnancy)Control: 32.4 ± 4.5 Intervention: 34 ± 4.1Low GI: Target GI ≤50 but otherwise similar composition to the control dietControl: energy 1,934 ± 465; carbohydrate 40.3 ± 8.3; protein 22.2 ± 7.5; fat 35.1 ± 16.9; GI 53.0 ± 6.5 Intervention: energy 1,836 ± 403; carbohydrate 38.7 ± 8.3; protein 23.4 ± 5.8; fat 34.9 ± 11.0; GI 47.0 ± 6.5
    Ma, 2015 (30)China95Not reportedChinese Medical Association and American Diabetes Association (42)24–26 weeks until deliveryControl: 27.9 ± 1.1 Intervention: 27.5 ± 1.1Control: 21.15 ± 2.75 Intervention: 21.90 ± 3.14 (prepregnancy)Control: 30.0 ± 3.5 Intervention: 30.1 ± 3.8Low GI: Women provided with an exchange list for starch choices specific to either intervention (low GI) or controlControl: energy 2,030 ± 215; carbohydrate 49.8 ± 6.8; protein 18.8 ± 2.5; fat 31.8 ± 3.8; GI 53.8 ± 2.5 Intervention: energy 2,006 ± 215; carbohydrate 48.56 ± 7.0; protein 18.9 ± 2.9; fat 32.1 ± 4.1; GI 50.1 ± 2.2
    Moses, 2009 (13)Australia63Not reportedAustralasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (41)28–32 weeks until deliveryControl: 29.9 ± 1.11 Intervention: 30.3 ± 1.11Control: 32.8 ± 7.92 Intervention: 32.0 ± 6.68 (at enrollment)Control: 31.3 ± 4.52 Intervention: 30.8 ± 3.90Low GI: Women asked to avoid specific high-GI foods and were provided with a booklet outlining carbohydrate choicesControl: energy 1,656 ± 433; carbohydrate 36.2 ± 8.2; protein 24.0 ± 4.4; fat 34.3 ± 9.9; GI 52.2 ± 6.0 Intervention: energy 1,713 ± 368; carbohydrate 36.7 ± 6.1; protein 23.9 ± 3.9; fat 33.4 ± 6.12; GI 48.0 ± 5.0
    DASH diet
    Asemi, 2013 (22)Iran3432 for “key variable serum HDL”50-g glucose challenge >140 mg/dL → 100 g OGTT; GDM if two or more of fasting >95 mg/dL, 1-h 180 mg/dL, 2-h 155 mg/dL, or 3-h 140 mg/dL4 weeksNot reportedControl: 31.4 ± 5.7 Intervention: 29.0 ± 3.2 (at enrollment)Control: 29.4 ± 6.2 Intervention: 30.7 ± 6.7DASH diet: diet rich in fruit, vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat dairy; low in saturated fats, cholesterol, refined grains, and sweetsControl: energy 2,392 ± 161; carbohydrate 54.0 ± 6.9; protein 17.6 ± 2.8; fat 29.3 ± 5.6 Intervention: energy 2,400 ± 25; carbohydrate 66.8 ± 2.2; protein 16.8 ± 1.2; fat 17.6 ± 0.9
    Asemi, 2014 (23)Iran5242 to detect a 75-g difference in birth weightAs above4 weeksControl: 25.9 ± 1.4 Intervention: 25.8 ± 1.4Control: 31 ± 4.9 Intervention: 29.2 ± 3.5 (at enrollment)Control: 30.7 ± 6.3 Intervention: 31.9 ± 6.1DASH diet: as aboveControl: energy 2,352 ± 163; carbohydrate 54.2 ± 7.1; protein 18.2 ± 3.4; fat 28.5 ± 5.6 Intervention: energy 2,407 ± 30; carbohydrate 66.4 ± 2.04; protein 17.0 ± 1.3; fat 17.4 ± 1.0
    Yao, 2015 (36)China3342 to detect a 75-g difference in birth weight; not achieved50-g glucose challenge → 100 g OGTT results with two or more of fasting >95 mg/dL, 1-h ≥180 mg/dL, 2-h ≥155 mg/dL, or 3-h ≥140 mg/dL4 weeksControl: 25.7 ± 1.3 Intervention: 26.9 ± 1.4Control: 30.9 ± 3.6 Intervention: 30.2 ± 4.1 (at enrollment)Control: 28.3 ± 5.1 Intervention: 30.7 ± 5.6DASH diet: same as aboveControl: energy 2,386 ± 174; carbohydrate 52.3 ± 7.2; protein 18.0 ± 3.3; fat 28.3 ± 5.1 Intervention: energy 2,408 ± 54; carbohydrate 66.7 ± 2.3; protein 16.9 ± 1.2; fat 17.17 ± 1.16
    Low-carbohydrate diets
    Cypryk, 2007 (25)Poland30Not reportedWorld Health Organization criteria2 weeks29.2 ± 5.4Not reported28.7 ± 3.7Low (intervention) vs. high (control) carbohydrate (45% vs. 60% of total energy, respectively)Control‡: carbohydrate 60; protein 25; fat 15 Intervention‡: carbohydrate 45; protein 25; fat 30
    Hernandez, 2016 (12)U.S.12Pilot study to estimate SDCarpenter and Coustan criteria (43)30–31 weeks until deliveryControl§: 31.7 ± 2.45 Intervention: 31.2 ± 0.98Control: 34.3 ± 3.92 Intervention: 33.4 ± 3.43 (at enrollment)Control: 30 ± 2.45 Intervention: 28 ± 4.90Low carbohydrate (intervention) vs. higher-complex carbohydrate/ lower fat (control)Control‡: carbohydrate 60; protein 15; fat 25 Intervention‡: carbohydrate 40; protein 15; fat 45
    Moreno-Castilla, 2013 (31)Spain152152 to detect a 22% difference in need for insulin2006 National Diabetes and Pregnancy Clinical Guidelines (44,45)≤35 weeks until deliveryControl: 30.1 ± 3.5 Intervention: 30.4 ± 3.0Control: 26.6 ± 5.5 Intervention: 25.4 ± 5.7 (prepregnancy)Control: 32.1 ± 4.4 Intervention: 30.4 ± 3.0Low carbohydrate (intervention) vs. control (40% vs. 55% of total diet energy as carbohydrate)Control‡: energy 1,800 minimum; carbohydrate 55; protein 20; fat 25 Intervention‡: energy 1,800 minimum; carbohydrate 40; protein 20; fat 40
    Soy protein–enrichment diets
    Jamilian, 2015 (27)Iran6856 (minimum clinical difference not reported)One-step 75 g OGTT, American Diabetes Association (46)6 weeksNot reportedControl: 28.4 ± 3.4 Intervention: 28.9 ± 5.0Control: 29.3 ± 4.2 Intervention: 28.2 ± 4.6Soy protein diet had the same amount of protein as control diet but the protein portion was made up of 35% animal protein, 35% soy protein, 30% other plant proteinsControl: energy 2,426 ± 191; carbohydrate 54.6 ± 7.1; protein 14.4 ± 1.7; fat 32.1 ± 5.4 Intervention: energy 2,308 ± 194; carbohydrate 54.6 ± 7.3; protein 15.0 ± 2.6; fat 30.3 ± 4.7
    Sarathi, 2016 (14)India62Not reportedInternational Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria (47)From diagnosis until deliveryControl: 25.56 ± 1.69 Intervention: 25.19 ± 1.92Not reportedControl: 29.17 ± 3.38 Intervention: 29.43 ± 2.98Soy protein diet: 25% of cereal part of high-fiber complex carbohydrates replaced with soyControl‡: energy 1,600–2,000; minimum carbohydrate 175 g Intervention‡: energy 1,600–2,000; minimum carbohydrate 175 g
    Fat-modification diets
    Lauszus, 2001 (28)Denmark2720 to detect a difference in cholesterol of 0.65 mmol/L3-h 75 g OGTT with blood samples taken every 30 minutes, GDM if 2 or more glucoses >3 SD above the mean34 weeks until deliveryNot reportedControl: 32.2 ± 5.61 Intervention: 35.3 ± 8.65 (at enrollment)Control: 29 ± 3.74 Intervention: 31 ± 3.61High monounsaturated fatty acids: source was hybrid sunflower oil with high-content oleic acid and snacks of almonds and hazelnutsControl: energy 1,727; carbohydrate 50.0 ± 3.6; protein 19.0 ± 3.6; fat 30.0 ± 7.2 Intervention: energy 1,982; carbohydrate 46 ± 3.5; protein 16 ± 3.5; fat 37 ± 3.5
    Wang, 2015 (35)China84Not reportedInternational Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria (47)∼27 weeks until deliveryControl: 27.3 ± 1.96 Intervention: 27.4 ± 1.52Control: 22.2 ± 3.6 Intervention: 21.4 ± 3.0 (prepregnancy)Control: 29.7 ± 4.64 Intervention: 30.3 ± 4.17Polyunsaturated fatty acid meals (50–54% carbohydrate, 31–35% fat with 45–40 g sunflower oil)Control: energy 1,978 ± 107; carbohydrate 55.4 ± 2.0; protein 17.9 ± 1.0; fat 26.7 ± 1.3 Intervention: energy 1,960 ± 90; carbohydrate 47.7 ± 0.7; protein 18.0 ± 0.7; fat 34.3 ± 0.2
    Other diets
    Bo, 2014 (24)Italy99 in diet study (total n = 200)200 to detect a 10% difference in fasting glucose (based on exercise portion of trial)75 g OGTT24–26 weeks until deliveryNot reportedControl: 26.8 ± 4.1 Intervention: 26.9 ± 4.6Control: 33.9 ± 5.3 Intervention: 35.1 ± 4.4Behavioral dietary recommendations: individual recommendations for helping dietary choicesControl: energy 2,116 ± 383; carbohydrate 46.9 ± 5.9; protein 15.6 ± 2.6; fat 37.4 ± 4.2 Intervention: energy 2,156 ± 286; carbohydrate 47.8 ± 4.9; protein 15.5 ± 2.4; fat 36.7 ± 3.9
    Rae, 2000 (32)Australia124120 to detect a decrease in insulin use from 40% to 15% and a decrease in macrosomia from 25% to 5%OGTT fasting glucose >5.4 mmol/L and/or 2-h glucose >7.9 mmol/L (48)<36 weeks until deliveryControl: 28.3 ± 4.6 Intervention: 28.1 ± 5.8Control: 38.0 ± 0.7 Intervention: 37.9 ± 0.7 (at diagnosis)Control: 30.6 Intervention: 30.2 (SD not reported)Moderate energy restriction (1,590–1,776 kcal/day) vs. control (2,010–2,220 kcal/day)Control: energy 1,630 ± 339; carbohydrate 41.0 ± 4.6; protein 24.0 ± 2.3; fat 34.0 ± 5.3 Intervention: energy 1,566 ± 289; carbohydrate 42.0 ± 5.7; protein 25.0 ± 2.4; fat 31.0 ± 5.7
    Reece, 1995 (33)U.S.50Post hoc calculationNot reported24–29 weeks until deliveryNot reportedNot reportedNot reportedFiber-enriched diet: fiber taken as fiber-rich foods (40 g/day) and a high-fiber drink (40 g/day)Control‡: carbohydrate 50; fat 30; fiber 20 g/day Intervention‡: carbohydrate 60; fat 20 with 80 g fiber/day
    Valentini, 2012 (34)Italy20Not reported (pilot study)Fourth International Workshop Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (49)From diagnosis (screening at 24–28 weeks) until deliveryControl 27.1 ± 5.9 Intervention: 21.3 ± 6.8Control: 24.1 ± 4.7 Intervention: 25.7 ± 3.6 (prepregnancy)Control: 30.2 ± 4.7 Intervention: 28.9 ± 3.3Ethnic meal plan: foods commonly consumed per participant’s ethnicity with the same kcal and nutrient composition as the control dietControl‡: carbohydrate 53; protein 18; fat 28; fiber 26 g/day Intervention‡: carbohydrate 55; protein 17; fat 28; fiber 21 g/day
    • Unless otherwise stated, the units are kcal/day for energy, % for carbohydrate, protein, and fat. OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test.

    • ↵*Reported actual dietary intake. When not reported, prescribed dietary intake is reported.

    • ↵†Intervention is defined as dietary intervention different from the usual dietary intervention used in the control group.

    • ↵‡Indicates prescribed diet.

    • ↵§The control and intervention groups were reversed for the purpose of meta-analysis so it could be included in the low-carbohydrate group.

  • Table 2

    Pooled analyses of primary maternal glycemic and infant birth weight outcomes

    OutcomeDiet subgroupN of studiesN of womenEffect estimateI2 (%)
    Maternal glycemic outcomes
    Mean [95% CI]
    Change in fasting glucose (mg/dL)All diets13662−4.07 [−7.58, −0.57]86
    Low GI (26,29,30)3195−5.28 [−6.83, −3.73]0
    DASH (22,36)267−11.55 [−14.00, −9.09]0
    Low carbohydrate (12,25)2423.81 [−4.29, 11.92]69
    Fat modification (28,35)21094.87 [−0.44, 10.18]0
    Soy protein (14,27)2130−7.47 [−20.28, 5.34]91
    Behavior (24)199−1.50 [−5.66, 2.66]—
    Ethnic (34)120−25.34 [−37.57, −13.11]—
    Change in postprandial glucose (mg/dL)All diets9475−7.78 [−12.27, −3.29]63
    Low GI (26,30)2121−7.08 [−12.07, −2.08]4
    DASH (22)134−45.22 [−68.97, −21.47]—
    Low carbohydrate (25)130−3.00 [−10.06, 4.06]—
    Fat modification (28,35)2109−6.43 [−13.08, 0.22]0
    Soy protein (14)162−1.05 [−11.03, 8.93]—
    Behavior (24)199−6.90 [−11.68, −2.12]—
    Ethnic (34)120−16.28 [−22.83, −9.73]—
    Change in post-breakfast glucose (mg/dL)All3175−4.76 [−9.13, −0.38]34
    Low GI (30)183−8.6 [−14.11, −3.09]—
    Low carbohydrate (25)130−3.00 [−8.15, 2.15]—
    Soy protein (14)162−1.05 [−9.73, 7.63]—
    Change in post-lunch glucose (mg/dL)All2924.50 [−1.90, 10.90]0
    Low carbohydrate (25)1304.00 [−4.56, 12.56]—
    Soy protein (14)1625.14 [−4.51, 14.79]—
    Change in post-dinner glucose (mg/dL)All2921.81 [−5.28, 8.90]13
    Low carbohydrate (25)1301.00 [−8.14, 10.14]—
    Soy protein (14)1623.03 [−8.20, 14.26]—
    Change in HOMA-IR (µIU/mL × mmol/L)All4212−1.10 [−2.26, 0.07]90
    DASH (36)133−1.90 [−2.36, −1.44]—
    Low carbohydrate (12)1120.60 [−1.90, 3.10]—
    Soy protein (27)168−2.00 [−3.17, −0.83]—
    Behavior (24)199−0.30 [−0.71, 0.11]—
    Change in HbA1c (%)All7407−0.05 [−0.13, 0.02]84
    Low GI (29,30)21670.01 [−0.02, 0.03]0
    DASH (22)134−0.25 [−0.42, −0.08]—
    Fat modification (28)1250.10 [−0.14, 0.34]—
    Soy protein (14)162−0.01 [−0.07, 0.05]—
    Behavior (24)199−0.19 [−0.26, −0.12]—
    Ethnic diet (34)120−0.05 [−0.27, 0.17]—
    RR [95% CI]
    Medication treatmentAll1510230.65 [0.47, 0.88]55
    Low GI (13,26,29,30)42930.80 [0.55, 1.14]34
    DASH (22,23,36)31190.29 [0.17, 0.50]0
    Low carbohydrate (31)11501.00 [0.75, 1.34]—
    Energy restriction (32)11171.05 [0.47, 2.34]—
    Fat modification (35)184Not estimable—
    Soy protein (14,27)21300.44 [0.21, 0.91]0
    Behavior (24)1990.61 [0.15, 2.42]—
    Ethnic (34)1202.00 [0.21, 18.69]—
    Fiber (33)111Not estimable—
    Infant birth weight outcomes
    Mean [95% CI]
    Birth weight (g)All16841−170.62 [−333.64, −7.60]88
    Low GI (13,26,29,30)4276−54.25 [−178.98, 70.47]0
    DASH (22,23,36)3119−598.19 [−663.09, −533.30]0
    Low carbohydrate (12,25)24257.73 [−164.93, 280.39]0
    Energy restriction (32)1122194.00 [−42.58, 430.58]—
    Fat modification (28,35)2109−139.61 [−294.80, 15.58]0
    Soy protein (14,27)2131−184.67 [−319.35, −49.98]0
    Ethnic diet (34)120−370.00 [−928.87, 188.87]—
    Fiber (33)122−94.00 [−446.68, 258.68]—
    RR [95% CI]
    Large for gestational ageAll 86470.96 [0.63, 1.46]0
    Low GI (13,26,29)31931.33 [0.54, 3.31]0
    Low carbohydrate (31)11490.51 [0.13, 1.95]—
    Energy restriction (32)11231.17 [0.65, 2.12]—
    Soy protein (14)1630.45 [0.04, 4.76]—
    Behavior (24)1990.73 [0.25, 2.14]—
    Ethnic diet (34)1200.14 [0.01, 2.45]—
    MacrosomiaAll128340.49 [0.27, 0.88]11
    Low GI (13,26,29,30)42760.46 [0.15, 1.46]0
    DASH (23,36)2850.12 [0.03, 0.51]0
    Low carbohydrate (25,31)21790.20 [0.02, 1.69]—
    Energy restriction (32)11221.56 [0.61, 3.94]—
    Fat modification (35)1840.35 [0.04, 3.23]—
    Soy protein (27)1680.60 [0.16, 2.31]—
    Ethnic diet (34)1200.20 [0.01, 3.70]—
  • Table 3

    Sensitivity analysis of primary maternal glycemic and infant birth weight outcomes

    OutcomeDiet subgroupN of studiesN of womenEffect estimateI2 (%)
    Maternal glycemic outcomes
    Mean [95% CI]
    Change in fasting glucose (mg/dL)All diets10575−1.98 [−5.41, 1.45]74
    Low GI (26,29,30)3195−5.33 [−6.91, −3.76]0
    DASH00Not estimable—
    Low carbohydrate (12,25)2423.66 [−4.42, 11.73]57
    Fat modification (28,35)21094.88 [−1.45, 11.21]0
    Soy protein (14,27)2130−7.51 [−20.31, 5.30]90
    Behavior (24)199−1.50 [−6.47, 3.47]—
    Ethnic00Not estimable—
    Change in postprandial glucose (mg/dL)All diets7421−5.90 [−7.93, −3.88]0
    Low GI (26,30)2121−7.08 [−12.07, −2.08]4
    DASH00Not estimable—
    Low carbohydrate (25)130−3.00 [−8.15, 2.15]—
    Fat modification (28,35)2109−4.85 [−13.32, 3.62]40
    Soy protein (14)162−1.05 [−9.73, 7.63]—
    Behavior (24)199−6.90 [−9.85, −3.95]—
    Ethnic00Not estimable—
    Change in post-breakfast glucose (mg/dL)All diets3175−4.76 [−9.13, −0.38]34
    Low GI (30)183−8.6 [−14.11, −3.09]—
    Low carbohydrate (25)130−3.00 [−8.15, 2.15]—
    Soy protein (14)162−1.05 [−9.73, 7.63]—
    Change in post-lunch glucose (mg/dL)All diets2924.50 [−1.90, 10.90]0
    Low carbohydrate (25)1304.00 [−4.56, 12.56]—
    Soy protein (14)1625.14 [−4.51, 14.79]—
    Change in post-dinner glucose (mg/dL)All diets2921.81 [−5.28, 8.90]0
    Low carbohydrate (25)1301.00 [−8.14, 10.14]—
    Soy protein (14)1623.03 [−8.20, 14.26]—
    Change in HOMA-IR (µIU/mL × mmol/L)All diets3179−0.74 [−2.09, 0.61]75
    DASH00Not estimable—
    Low carbohydrate (12)1120.60 [−1.90, 3.10]—
    Soy protein (27)168−2.00 [−3.17, −0.83]—
    Behavior (24)199−0.30 [−0.71, 0.11]—
    Change in HbA1c (%)All diets5353−0.03 [−0.11, 0.05]87
    Low GI (29,30)21670.01 [−0.02, 0.03]0
    DASH00Not estimable—
    Fat modification (28)1250.10 [−0.14, 0.34]—
    Soy protein (14)162−0.01 [−0.07, 0.05]—
    Behavior (24)199−0.19 [−0.26, −0.12]—
    Ethnic diet00Not estimable—
    RR [95% CI]
    Medication treatmentAll diets118840.82 [0.65, 1.04]24
    Low GI (13,26,29,30)42930.80 [0.55, 1.14]34
    DASH00Not estimable—
    Low carbohydrate (31)11501.00 [0.75, 1.34]—
    Energy restriction (32)11171.05 [0.47, 2.34]—
    Fat modification (35)184Not estimable—
    Soy protein (14,27)21300.44 [0.21, 0.91]0
    Behavior (24)1990.61 [0.15, 2.42]—
    Ethnic00Not estimable—
    Fiber (33)111Not estimable—
    Infant birth weight outcomes
    Mean [95% CI]
    Birth weight (g)All diets12702−74.88 [−144.86, −4.90]1
    Low GI (13,26,29,30)4276−54.25 [−178.98, 70.47]0
    DASH00Not estimable—
    Low carbohydrate (12,25)24257.73 [−164.93, 280.39]0
    Energy restriction (32)1122194.00 [−42.58, 430.58]—
    Fat modification (28,35)2109−139.61 [−294.80, 15.58]0
    Soy protein (14,27)2131−184.67 [−319.35, −49.98]0
    Ethnic diet00Not estimable—
    Fiber (33)122−94.00 [−446.68, 258.68]—
    RR [95% CI]
    Large for gestational ageAll diets76271.00 [0.66, 1.53]0
    Low GI (13,26,29)31931.33 [0.54, 3.31]0
    Low carbohydrate (31)11490.51 [0.13, 1.95]—
    Energy restriction (32)11231.17 [0.65, 2.12]—
    Soy protein (14)1630.45 [0.04, 4.76]—
    Behavior (24)1990.73 [0.25, 2.14]—
    Ethnic diet00Not estimable—
    MacrosomiaAll97290.73 [0.40, 1.31]0
    Low GI (13,26,29,30)42760.46 [0.15, 1.46]0
    DASH00Not estimable0
    Low carbohydrate (25,31)21790.20 [0.02, 1.69]—
    Energy restriction (32)11221.56 [0.61, 3.94]—
    Fat modification (35)1840.35 [0.04, 3.23]—
    Soy protein (27)1680.60 [0.16, 2.31]—
    Ethnic diet00Not estimable—
PreviousNext
Back to top
Diabetes Care: 41 (7)

In this Issue

July 2018, 41(7)
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by Author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Diabetes Care.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Diet: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Examining the Impact of Modified Dietary Interventions on Maternal Glucose Control and Neonatal Birth Weight
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Diabetes Care
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Diabetes Care web site.
Citation Tools
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Diet: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Examining the Impact of Modified Dietary Interventions on Maternal Glucose Control and Neonatal Birth Weight
Jennifer M. Yamamoto, Joanne E. Kellett, Montserrat Balsells, Apolonia García-Patterson, Eran Hadar, Ivan Solà, Ignasi Gich, Eline M. van der Beek, Eurídice Castañeda-Gutiérrez, Seppo Heinonen, Moshe Hod, Kirsi Laitinen, Sjurdur F. Olsen, Lucilla Poston, Ricardo Rueda, Petra Rust, Lilou van Lieshout, Bettina Schelkle, Helen R. Murphy, Rosa Corcoy
Diabetes Care Jul 2018, 41 (7) 1346-1361; DOI: 10.2337/dc18-0102

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Diet: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Examining the Impact of Modified Dietary Interventions on Maternal Glucose Control and Neonatal Birth Weight
Jennifer M. Yamamoto, Joanne E. Kellett, Montserrat Balsells, Apolonia García-Patterson, Eran Hadar, Ivan Solà, Ignasi Gich, Eline M. van der Beek, Eurídice Castañeda-Gutiérrez, Seppo Heinonen, Moshe Hod, Kirsi Laitinen, Sjurdur F. Olsen, Lucilla Poston, Ricardo Rueda, Petra Rust, Lilou van Lieshout, Bettina Schelkle, Helen R. Murphy, Rosa Corcoy
Diabetes Care Jul 2018, 41 (7) 1346-1361; DOI: 10.2337/dc18-0102
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Research Design and Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Article Information
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Suppl Material
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Sensitivity and Specificity of the Glucose Challenge Test in a Universal Two-Step Screening Strategy for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using the 2013 World Health Organization Criteria
  • Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Renal Function: A Prospective Study With 9- to 16-Year Follow-up After Pregnancy
Show more Reconsidering Pregnancy With Diabetes

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Standards of Care Guidelines
  • Online Ahead of Print
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Clinical Diabetes
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care Print ISSN: 0149-5992, Online ISSN: 1935-5548.