Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk

Body Composition and Diabetes Risk in South Asians: Findings From the MASALA and MESA Studies

  1. Elena Flowers1,2⇑,
  2. Feng Lin3,
  3. Namratha R. Kandula4,
  4. Matthew Allison5,
  5. Jeffrey J. Carr6,
  6. Jingzhong Ding7,
  7. Ravi Shah8,
  8. Kiang Liu9,
  9. David Herrington10 and
  10. Alka M. Kanaya3,11
  1. 1Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  2. 2Institute for Human Genetics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  3. 3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  4. 4Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
  5. 5Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
  6. 6Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN
  7. 7Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
  8. 8Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
  9. 9Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
  10. 10Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Cardiovascular Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
  11. 11Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
  1. Corresponding author: Elena Flowers, elena.flowers{at}ucsf.edu
Diabetes Care 2019 May; 42(5): 946-953. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1510

Abstract

OBJECTIVE South Asians have a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes compared with other race/ethnic groups. Body composition is associated with the risk for type 2 diabetes. Differences in body composition between South Asians and other race/ethnic groups are one hypothesized mechanism to explain the disproportionate prevalence of type 2 diabetes in this population.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This study used data from the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohorts to determine whether body composition mediated the elevated prevalence of impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes in South Asians. Participants (n = 2,615) with complete body composition data were included. Ordinal logistic regression models were calculated to determine the odds for glycemic impairment in South Asians compared with the MESA cohort.

RESULTS In multivariate models, South Asians had a significantly higher prevalence of glycemic impairment and type 2 diabetes compared with all four race/ethnic groups included in the MESA (P < 0.001 for all). In unadjusted and multivariate adjusted models, South Asians had higher odds for impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes compared with all other race/ethnic groups (P < 0.001 for all). The addition of body composition measures did not significantly mitigate this relationship.

CONCLUSIONS We did not identify strong evidence that accounting for body composition explains differences in the risk for type 2 diabetes. Future prospective studies of the MESA and MASALA cohorts are needed to understand how adipose tissue impacts the risk for type 2 diabetes and how to best assess this risk.

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes occurs in the setting of multiple genetic and lifestyle factors and is a priority area for public health efforts in the U.S. and globally (1–4). A previous analysis (5) of the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) showed that, after adjustment for demographic, behavioral, and metabolic risk factors, South Asians have a significantly higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes (26%) compared with whites (6%), Chinese Americans (13%), African Americans (18%), and Hispanics (17%).

Differences in body composition are associated with the risk for type 2 diabetes (6–9). Body composition characteristics can be assessed by measuring ectopic fat regions, including abdominal visceral fat area, intermuscular fat area, pericardial fat volume, and the presence of significant liver fat (6–9). One hypothesized mechanism for the increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes in South Asians compared with other race/ethnic groups is a higher distribution of adipose tissue in these ectopic regions (10–12). These adipose tissue regions are not well captured by traditional measures of body composition (e.g., BMI) (10). Measures of ectopic fat regions from computed tomography (CT) scans have demonstrated stronger associations with metabolic risk when compared with body weight or BMI in Asians (10,11,13).

Prior studies showed that ectopic fat is associated with insulin resistance and risk for type 2 diabetes (6–9). Studies also showed that South Asians have a more harmful body composition profile as measured by ectopic fat regions. However, no prior studies adequately measured and adjusted for multiple body compartments in multiple race/ethnic groups in order to determine whether elevated risk for type 2 diabetes is mediated by differences in body composition. The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences in body composition explain the differences in the prevalence of impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes among five race/ethnic groups in the United States.

Research Design and Methods

Study Sample

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of harmonized data from two community-based cohorts: MASALA and MESA. Prior analyses have been conducted using these harmonized variables (11). Subgroups of participants from MASALA (n = 747 South Asians) and MESA (n = 745 whites, n = 244 Chinese Americans, n = 394 African Americans, n = 485 Hispanics) with complete data for ectopic fat distribution, assessment of impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes, and relevant covariates, were included in this study. The institutional review boards at the sites conducting both the MASALA and MESA studies approved both study protocols. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

MASALA Study

The MASALA study, which was modeled on the MESA cohort (14), is a community-based cohort of South Asian adults without known cardiovascular disease (15). Study participants were sampled from two geographic locations: the nine counties of the San Francisco Bay Area and the greater Chicago area. Clinical sites for the study were at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), and Northwestern University (NWU). A total of 906 subjects were recruited between October 2010 and March 2013. Detailed methods for the MASALA study were previously published (15).

Eligibility criteria for the MASALA study included self-identification of South Asian ethnicity, age 40–84 years, and the ability to speak and read English, Hindi, or Urdu (15). The MASALA study used exclusion criteria that were identical to those of the MESA, which included prior diagnosis of a heart attack, stroke, or transient ischemic attack; heart failure; angina; nitroglycerin medication use; any prior cardiovascular procedures; current atrial fibrillation; cancer treatment; shortened life expectancy; impaired cognition; plans to move out of the geographic vicinity of the study site in the next 5 years; living in a nursing home; or weight >300 lb. Participants were assisted by trained bilingual study staff to complete detailed questionnaires for demographic information and behaviors, including tobacco and alcohol use. Physical activity was assessed using the Typical Week’s Physical Activity Questionnaire (16). Blood pressure was measured after a 5-min seated rest using an automated blood pressure machine (V100 Vital Sign Monitor; GE Healthcare, Fairfield, CT). Three blood pressure readings were obtained, and the average of the last two readings was recorded. Systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg or use of any antihypertensive medication was defined as hypertension.

Laboratory Tests

Fasting plasma glucose was measured by the hexokinase method (Quest Laboratories, San Jose, CA). Type 2 diabetes was defined as fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL or the use of a glucose-lowering medication. Impaired fasting glucose was defined as fasting plasma glucose ≥100 and <126 mg/dL, and normal fasting glucose was defined as <100 mg/dL. Total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol were measured by enzymatic methods (Quest, Chicago, IL), and LDL cholesterol was calculated. Adiponectin and resistin were measured using the Millipore Luminex adipokine A panel (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). The interassay coefficient of variation was 2.3–4.1% for adiponectin and 3.3–5.5% for resistin.

Body Composition

Weight was measured on a standard balance-beam scale or digital weighing scale. Height was measured using a stadiometer. BMI was calculated as kilograms per square meter. Trained study coordinators measured waist circumference using a flexible tape measure at the site of maximum waist circumference midway between the lower ribs and the anterior superior iliac spine. The average of two measurements was recorded as the final measurement.

CT scans of the abdomen (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA; Toshiba Medical Systems, Tustin, CA; Siemens Medical Solution, Malvern, PA) were used to calculate abdominal visceral fat area and abdominal intermuscular fat area. A CT technician obtained a lateral scout image of the abdomen to establish position between the L4 and L5 vertebrae, and a single abdominal CT slice was obtained at this level. Medical Image Processing, Analysis, and Visualization (MIPAV) software was used to measure abdominal visceral fat at the University of California, San Diego, body composition reading center (17). Visceral fat was demarcated by pixels with the appropriate Hounsfield unit (HU) range inside the visceral cavity. As described previously, the four abdominal/back muscle groups from which abdominal intermuscular fat was measured included the psoas, paraspinous, oblique, and rectus muscles (18). These muscles were highlighted by the readers and then deleted from the calculation of the subcutaneous fat area.

Noncontrast cardiac CT images were used to quantify pericardial fat and liver fat attenuation using a cardiac-gated CT scanner (UCSF: Philips 16D scanner or Toshiba MSD Aquilion 64; NWU: Siemens Sensation Cardiac 64 Scanner). The same reading center staff, under the supervision of J.J.C., performed all measurements of pericardial fat volume and liver fat attenuation. The CT scan range encompassed the entire heart and provided information on 45 mm of adipose tissue encasing the proximal coronary arteries. First, the 45-mm z-axis volume containing the proximal coronary arteries was defined. Next, the technician assessed regions of interest relevant to pericardial fat within the 45-mm volume along with regions within the calibration phantom to determine the range of HU for each ectopic fat depot. The heart was segmented from the thorax by removing areas outside the lung using a deformable model-based edge detection method (i.e., active contours or live wires) to detect the boundary between the lung and pericardial fat (19–21).

CT images for liver fat attenuation were interrogated using the MIPAV software at the vertebral level of T12–L1. Within homogeneous portions of the liver and avoiding any vascular structures or other liver pathology, nine regions of interest across two levels were read. Measurement methods were similar to those used in the MESA (22). Fatty liver was defined as having <40 HUs.

MESA

The study design, eligibility, and methods for the MESA were previously published (14). The MESA includes individuals from four racial/ethnic groups (whites, Chinese Americans, African Americans, and Hispanics) living in Forsyth County, NC; Chicago, IL; Baltimore, MD; Los Angeles County, CA; St. Paul, MN; and New York, NY. Identical questionnaires for assessing sociodemographic characteristics and behaviors, and identical protocols for seated blood pressure, anthropometry, and abdominal and cardiac CT scanning were used as described above for the MASALA study. Data from the baseline MESA examination (2000–2002) were used for hepatic fat attenuation and pericardial fat volume measurements; data from ancillary studies that included random subsets of participants from examinations 2 (2002–2004) and 3 (2004–2005) were used for the abdominal visceral fat, abdominal intermuscular fat, and adipokine measurements. Both studies used the same reading centers and protocols for measuring abdominal visceral fat area, pericardial fat volume, and hepatic fat attenuation for ease of data harmonization.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics and t tests were calculated in order to compare demographic and clinical characteristics, including ectopic fat distributions, between race/ethnic groups. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the correlations among measures of body composition. Univariate logistic regression models were calculated to determine the associations between each ectopic fat region (i.e., abdominal visceral fat area, hepatic fat attenuation, abdominal intermuscular fat area, and pericardial fat volume) and type 2 diabetes overall and then within each race/ethnic group. Prevalence of impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes with 95% CI was calculated. The first estimate of prevalence did not include any covariates, the second estimate included demographic and clinical covariates (i.e., age, sex, study site, education level, income level, prior and current smoking status, alcohol use, exercise, BMI, HDL, triglycerides, and hypertension), and the final estimate also included measures of ectopic fat. Ordinal logistic regression was used to assess for differences in the associations between body composition and glycemic status (i.e., impaired fasting blood glucose, type 2 diabetes) between race/ethnic groups with South Asians as the reference group. Models were adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates (i.e., age, sex, study site, education level, income level, smoking status, alcohol use, exercise level, BMI, HDL, triglycerides, hypertension) followed by ectopic fat regions and finally, two adipokines (i.e., adiponectin, resistin), in order to determine whether these variables mediated the associations between body composition and glycemic status. For ease of interpretation, odds ratios (ORs) and CIs are reported as the inverse (i.e., 1/OR). All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC).

Results

A total of 2,615 participants were included in the analysis (n = 747 South Asians, n = 745 whites, n = 244 Chinese Americans, n = 394 African Americans, n = 485 Hispanics). In South Asians, the mean abdominal visceral fat area was 159 ± 75 cm2, hepatic fat attenuation was 61 ± 12 HUs, abdominal intermuscular fat area was 28 ± 12 cm2, and pericardial fat volume was 85 ± 46 cm3 (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics

All body composition measures were associated with glycemic impairment in the five race/ethnic groups overall (P < 0.001 for all) except abdominal intermuscular fat area and type 2 diabetes (P = 0.32) (Table 2). For South Asians, in multivariate adjusted models, abdominal visceral fat area (OR 1.43 [95% CI 1.10, 1.86]) was positively associated with impaired fasting glucose. Abdominal visceral fat area (OR 1.66 [95% CI 1.26, 2.18]) and pericardial fat area (1.73 [95% CI 1.26, 2.38]) were positively associated with type 2 diabetes. Hepatic fat attenuation was negatively associated with type 2 diabetes (1.50 [95% CI 0.38, 0.66]), and abdominal intermuscular fat area was not significantly associated with glycemic impairment (Table 2).

View this table:
Table 2

ORs for glycemic impairment for each body composition measure for study sample overall and by race/ethnic group

South Asians have a significantly higher prevalence of impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes compared with all four race/ethnic groups included in the MESA. The crude prevalence of impaired fasting glucose was 22%, and 21% of participants had type 2 diabetes (Fig. 1). After adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, the prevalence increased to 24% (95% CI 21%, 26%) with impaired fasting glucose and 30% (95% CI 24%, 35%) with type 2 diabetes (Fig. 1) (P < 0.001 for all). In fully adjusted models that included demographic and clinical characteristics and all body composition measures, the prevalence of impaired fasting glucose in South Asians was 23% (95% CI 21%, 25%), and 27% of participants had type 2 diabetes (95% CI 22%, 32%) (Fig. 1) (P < 0.001 for all).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Prevalence of impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes by race/ethnic group. Panel A shows the unadjusted and multivariate adjusted prevalence of impaired fasting glucose. Panel B shows the unadjusted and multivariate adjusted prevalence of type 2 diabetes. Error bars show 95% CI. Model 1 did not adjust for any covariates. Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, study site, education level, income level, prior and current smoking status, alcohol use, exercise, BMI, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and hypertension. Model 3 includes all variables in model 2 and hepatic fat attenuation, abdominal visceral fat area, abdominal intermuscular fat area, and pericardial fat volume.

In multivariate ordinal logistic regression models for glycemic impairment, South Asians had significantly higher odds for impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes compared with all four MESA race/ethnic groups (ORs: 7.04 compared with whites, 3.60 compared with Chinese Americans, 3.44 compared with African Americans, 6.94 compared with Hispanics; P < 0.001 for all) (Table 3). The addition of body composition measures showed that South Asians are still at significantly greater risk for glycemic impairment compared with the other four race/ethnic groups (ORs: 6.41 compared with whites, 3.28 compared with Chinese Americans, 2.26 compared with African Americans, 4.00 compared with Hispanics; P < 0.001 for all) (Table 3). When we further adjusted for adiponectin and resistin, the ORs did not notably change for South Asians compared with Chinese Americans (OR 3.29), African Americans (OR 2.31), and Hispanics (OR 4.31) (P < 0.001 for all) (Table 3). However, for South Asians compared with whites, the association (OR 7.04) was similar to what was observed in the multivariate adjusted model without measures of ectopic fat (Table 3). We checked for collinearity among all of the body composition measures and found weak to moderate evidence for correlations overall; the strongest correlation was between abdominal visceral fat area and pericardial fat volume (r = 0.67) (Table 4).

View this table:
Table 3

ORs for abnormal glucose tolerance, comparing South Asians to each MESA race/ethnic group

View this table:
Table 4

Pearson correlation coefficients for each body composition measure for the overall study sample (n = 2,615)

Conclusions

Prior studies reported a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes in South Asians compared with other race/ethnic groups (5,23,24). Although there are known genetic risk factors for type 2 diabetes that are common in South Asians (25–30), the reasons for the elevated risk in this population are not fully understood. Our prior study (5) showed that traditionally measured risk factors for type 2 diabetes (e.g., age, sex, BMI, lipids) did not explain the disproportionately high prevalence of impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes in South Asians compared with other race/ethnic groups. Differences in body composition, assessed by measuring ectopic fat distributions, are the one hypothesized mechanism to explain this disparity (10–13,31–33). In the current study, we used harmonized data on body composition from the MASALA study and the MESA to determine whether the presence of ectopic fat explains the higher prevalence of glycemic impairment in South Asians compared with the four race/ethnic groups included in the MESA. The associations between race/ethnicity and glycemic impairment were moderately decreased with the addition of body composition variables to the models. The reduction in risk for South Asians was greatest in comparison with whites and Hispanics followed by African Americans. There was very little change in the risk for South Asians compared with Chinese Americans. These findings suggest that differences in body composition may be important for understanding the observed increased risk for type 2 diabetes in South Asians compared with whites more than the other race/ethnic groups.

Consistent with prior observations (7–9), all four measures of ectopic fat were associated with glycemic impairment in the study sample overall. However, these associations were not consistent among South Asians. Only abdominal visceral fat area was associated with the presence of impaired fasting glucose. Abdominal visceral fat area, liver fat attenuation, and pericardial fat volume were associated with the presence of type 2 diabetes. Our goal was to determine whether overall body composition mediated the higher prevalence of glycemic impairment in South Asians. Individual measures of body composition were moderately correlated. However, the lack of association between abdominal intermuscular fat and glycemic impairment was unlikely to be the result of collinearity, given a variance inflation factor of 1.8. An alternative explanation is that abdominal intermuscular fat is the smallest of the fat depots and therefore is unlikely to have a large effect. These inconsistencies in how ectopic fat relates to glycemic impairment among South Asians may be one reason for the observation from this study that body composition moderately decreases the differences in risk for type 2 diabetes in South Asians compared with other race/ethnic groups.

Although several studies showed that body composition characteristics are associated with risk for type 2 diabetes (7–9), there are some inconsistencies. A prior study (34) of white, Filipina, and African American women showed the highest prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Filipinas as well as high measures of abdominal visceral fat. However, the abdominal visceral fat levels failed to explain the differences in prevalence of type 2 diabetes between race/ethnic groups. Similarly, a prior study of the MASALA and MESA cohorts showed that South Asians had the highest burden of pericardial fat and the highest prevalence of coronary artery calcium, which is a marker of cardiovascular disease risk (35). However, the differences in body composition in this study failed to explain the elevated risk for cardiovascular disease in South Asians compared with the four other race/ethnic groups. Differences in how body composition is best assessed and how ectopic fat relates to risk for type 2 diabetes and related conditions may vary substantially by race/ethnicity, sex, age, and other characteristics. These differences could explain the observed inconsistencies between studies and support further investigation about the impact of body composition across heterogeneous populations.

Adiponectin and resistin, which are adipokines, are measured to assess adipocyte function rather than adipose tissue volume. Low levels of adiponectin and high levels of resistin are associated with insulin resistance, an important precursor to type 2 diabetes (36–38). The Molecular Study of Health and Risk in Ethnic Groups (mol-SHARE) showed that adipokines are useful for the identification of insulin resistance in South Asians, even those with a normal BMI (12). In the current study, we confirmed that South Asians have lower levels of adiponectin and higher resistin levels compared with the four race/ethnic groups in the MESA cohort (11). This profile has previously been linked to insulin resistance and increased risk for type 2 diabetes in South Asians (36,37,39,40). An alternative explanation for the observation that higher distributions of ectopic fat in South Asians did not mediate the higher prevalence of glycemic impairment is related to the metabolic impact of fat in these regions. Both adiponectin and resistin showed low correlation coefficients with measures of body composition in our study sample. In order to determine whether adipocyte function, in addition to adipose tissue volume, mediated the higher prevalence of glycemic impairment in South Asians, we added adiponectin and resistin to a final ordinal logistic regression model for glycemic impairment. For South Asians compared with whites, the estimate of the odds for glycemic impairment was stronger (OR 7.04 [95% CI 4.40, 11.24] with adipokines versus without adipokines (OR 6.41 [95% CI 4.41, 10.10]). The association was also stronger for South Asians compared with Hispanics with adipokines (OR 4.31 [95% CI 2.76, 6.71]) versus without adipokines (OR 4.00 [2.58, 6.21]). These findings suggest that adipokines represent some overlapping prediction of risk for type 2 diabetes between South Asians and whites and Hispanics, whereas the shared risk prediction may be lower for South Asians with Chinese Americans and African Americans.

This study has a number of strengths, including comprehensive analysis of body composition and adipokines among five ethnic groups in the U.S. using data from two large cohorts with harmonized data. In addition, we included several radiographic measures of body composition including rigorous measures of ectopic fat. The study protocols for both the MESA and the MASALA study were identical; however, there may be unmeasured confounders from both studies given the different dates of data collection and differences in socioeconomic status and acculturation between groups. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study, which prevents inferences about the mechanisms that underlie risk for type 2 diabetes across race/ethnic groups. However, we did include measures of adipokines to explore the possible functional impact of adipose tissue in addition to volume. The overall prevalence of obesity may have changed between 2000 and 2005 (MESA data collection) and between 2010 and 2013 (MASALA data collection), which is a potential source of bias between the two cohorts. The MASALA study is representative of the middle-aged to older South Asian population in the U.S.; however, our findings may not be generalizable to the younger U.S. South Asian population.

This study and others (11,31–33,41–43) have identified a higher level of ectopic fat and more harmful adipokine levels in South Asians; however, this did not account for the higher prevalence of glycemic impairment in this population. The differences in impaired fasting glucose and diabetes prevalence were greater for whites and Hispanics than for African Americans and Chinese Americans compared with South Asians. Future prospective studies of the MESA and MASALA study cohorts are needed in order to understand how adipose tissue impacts the risk for type 2 diabetes in South Asians and how to best assess this risk (e.g., adipokine biomarkers vs. measures of body composition).

Article Information

Acknowledgments. The authors thank the other investigators, the staff, and the participants of the MASALA and MESA studies for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org.

Funding. The MASALA study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants 1R01-HL-093009 and K24-HL-112827. Data collection at UCSF was supported by NIH/National Center for Research Resources UCSF-Clinical & Translational Science Institute grant UL1-RR-024131. The MESA study was funded by NIH contracts N01-HC-95159, N01-HC-95160, N01-HC-95161, N01-HC-95162, N01-HC-95163, N01-HC-95164, N01-HC-95165, N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95167, N01-HC-95168, and N01-HC-95169 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and by grants UL1-TR-000040 and UL1-TR-001079 from the National Center for Research Resources. The pericardial fat and hepatic attenuation measurements for MESA were supported by NIH grant 5R01-HL-085323-04. The MESA Body Composition, Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease Ancillary Study was supported by NIH grant R01-HL-088451. E.F. was supported by grant KL2-TR-000143 from the National Center for the Advancement of Translational Science and grant P30-AG-15272 from the National Institute on Aging and the Hellman Family Foundation. R.S. received grants from the NIH.

The sponsors did not have a significant role in the analysis, interpretation, and presentation of results.

Duality of Interest. R.S. has received funding from Amgen (scientific advisory board), Myokardia (consulting), and Best Doctors (consulting). R.S. is co-inventor on a patent for ex-RNAs signatures of cardiac remodeling. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Author Contributions. E.F. designed the study, interpreted the results, and had primary responsibility for writing the manuscript. F.L. performed statistical analyses. N.R.K. is the co-principal investigator of the MASALA cohort that provided data for this study. M.A. conducted the ancillary studies in the MESA and MASALA study for abdominal visceral and intermuscular fat areas. J.J.C. performed radiographic data collection included in this study. J.D. conducted the ancillary studies in the MESA for pericardial fat area and liver fat attenuation. R.S. provided expertise on the interpretation of body composition measures. K.L. and D.H. are MESA and MASALA study coinvestigators. A.M.K. is the co-principal investigator of the MASALA cohort that provided data for this study, provided overall scientific guidance of the study design and analysis, and had secondary responsibility for writing the manuscript. E.F. is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

  • Received July 13, 2018.
  • Accepted January 16, 2019.
http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license

Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Dall TM,
    2. Yang W,
    3. Halder P, et al
    . The economic burden of elevated blood glucose levels in 2012: diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes, gestational diabetes mellitus, and prediabetes. Diabetes Care 2014;37:3172–3179pmid:25414388
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lyssenko V,
    2. Jonsson A,
    3. Almgren P, et al
    . Clinical risk factors, DNA variants, and the development of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2220–2232pmid:19020324
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hill JO,
    2. Galloway JM,
    3. Goley A, et al
    . Scientific statement: socioecological determinants of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2430–2439pmid:23788649
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Morris AP,
    2. Voight BF,
    3. Teslovich TM, et al.; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium; Meta-Analyses of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (MAGIC) Investigators; Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) Consortium; Asian Genetic Epidemiology Network–Type 2 Diabetes (AGEN-T2D) Consortium; South Asian Type 2 Diabetes (SAT2D) Consortium; DIAbetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium
    . Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet 2012;44:981–990pmid:22885922
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kanaya AM,
    2. Herrington D,
    3. Vittinghoff E, et al
    . Understanding the high prevalence of diabetes in U.S. south Asians compared with four racial/ethnic groups: the MASALA and MESA studies. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1621–1628pmid:24705613
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Addison O,
    2. Marcus RL,
    3. Lastayo PC,
    4. Ryan AS
    . Intermuscular fat: a review of the consequences and causes. Int J Endocrinol 2014;2014:309570
  7. ↵
    1. Iacobellis G,
    2. Leonetti F
    . Epicardial adipose tissue and insulin resistance in obese subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005;90:6300–6302pmid:16091479
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. McAuley PA,
    2. Hsu FC,
    3. Loman KK, et al
    . Liver attenuation, pericardial adipose tissue, obesity, and insulin resistance: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Obesity (Silver Spring) 2011;19:1855–1860pmid:21720430
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Lear SA,
    2. Kohli S,
    3. Bondy GP,
    4. Tchernof A,
    5. Sniderman AD
    . Ethnic variation in fat and lean body mass and the association with insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:4696–4702pmid:19820012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Hsu WC,
    2. Araneta MR,
    3. Kanaya AM,
    4. Chiang JL,
    5. Fujimoto W
    . BMI cut points to identify at-risk Asian Americans for type 2 diabetes screening. Diabetes Care 2015;38:150–158pmid:25538311
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Shah AD,
    2. Kandula NR,
    3. Lin F, et al
    . Less favorable body composition and adipokines in South Asians compared with other US ethnic groups: results from the MASALA and MESA studies. Int J Obes 2016;40:639–645pmid:26499444
  12. ↵
    1. Anand SS,
    2. Tarnopolsky MA,
    3. Rashid S, et al
    . Adipocyte hypertrophy, fatty liver and metabolic risk factors in South Asians: the Molecular Study of Health and Risk in Ethnic Groups (mol-SHARE). PLoS One 2011;6:e22112pmid:21829446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Lear SA,
    2. Chockalingam A,
    3. Kohli S,
    4. Richardson CG,
    5. Humphries KH
    . Elevation in cardiovascular disease risk in South Asians is mediated by differences in visceral adipose tissue. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2012;20:1293–1300pmid:22282045
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Bild DE,
    2. Bluemke DA,
    3. Burke GL, et al
    . Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:871–881pmid:12397006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Kanaya AM,
    2. Kandula N,
    3. Herrington D, et al
    . Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) study: objectives, methods, and cohort description. Clin Cardiol 2013;36:713–720pmid:24194499
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Ainsworth BE,
    2. Irwin ML,
    3. Addy CL,
    4. Whitt MC,
    5. Stolarczyk LM
    . Moderate physical activity patterns of minority women: the Cross-Cultural Activity Participation Study. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 1999;8:805–813pmid:10495261
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. McAuliffe M
    . Medical image processing, analysis, and visualization (MIPAV). Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, 2009
  18. ↵
    1. Senseney J,
    2. Hemler PF,
    3. McAuliffe MJ
    . Automated segmentation of computed tomography images. In Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2009. New York, NY, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, p. 311
  19. ↵
    1. Barrett WA,
    2. Mortensen EN
    . Interactive live-wire boundary extraction. Med Image Anal 1997;1:331–341pmid:9873914
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cohen LCI
    . Finite-element methods for active contour models and balloons for 2-D and 3-D images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1993;15:11
  21. ↵
    1. Kass MWA,
    2. Terzopoulos D
    . Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1988;1:321–331
  22. ↵
    1. Tota-Maharaj R,
    2. Blaha MJ,
    3. Zeb I, et al
    . Ethnic and sex differences in fatty liver on cardiac computed tomography: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2014;89:493–503pmid:24613289
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Misra A,
    2. Khurana L
    . Obesity-related non-communicable diseases: South Asians vs White Caucasians. Int J Obes 2011;35:167–187pmid:20644557
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Flowers E,
    2. Molina C,
    3. Mathur A, et al
    . Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in South Asians residing in the United States. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2010;8:417–423pmid:20939706
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Kooner JS,
    2. Saleheen D,
    3. Sim X, et al.; DIAGRAM; MuTHER
    . Genome-wide association study in individuals of South Asian ancestry identifies six new type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 2011;43:984–989pmid:21874001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cho YS,
    2. Chen CH,
    3. Hu C, et al.; DIAGRAM Consortium; MuTHER Consortium
    . Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies eight new loci for type 2 diabetes in east Asians. Nat Genet 2011;44:67–72pmid:22158537
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rees SD,
    2. Hydrie MZ,
    3. Shera AS, et al
    . Replication of 13 genome-wide association (GWA)-validated risk variants for type 2 diabetes in Pakistani populations. Diabetologia 2011;54:1368–1374pmid:21350842
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chauhan G,
    2. Spurgeon CJ,
    3. Tabassum R, et al
    . Impact of common variants of PPARG, KCNJ11, TCF7L2, SLC30A8, HHEX, CDKN2A, IGF2BP2, and CDKAL1 on the risk of type 2 diabetes in 5,164 Indians. Diabetes 2010;59:2068–2074pmid:20424228
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ramya K,
    2. Radha V,
    3. Ghosh S,
    4. Majumder PP,
    5. Mohan V
    . Genetic variations in the FTO gene are associated with type 2 diabetes and obesity in south Indians (CURES-79). Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:33–42pmid:21175269
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Sanghera DK,
    2. Ortega L,
    3. Han S, et al
    . Impact of nine common type 2 diabetes risk polymorphisms in Asian Indian Sikhs: PPARG2 (Pro12Ala), IGF2BP2, TCF7L2 and FTO variants confer a significant risk. BMC Med Genet 2008;9:59pmid:18598350
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Sandeep S,
    2. Gokulakrishnan K,
    3. Velmurugan K,
    4. Deepa M,
    5. Mohan V
    . Visceral & subcutaneous abdominal fat in relation to insulin resistance & metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic south Indians. Indian J Med Res 2010;131:629–635pmid:20516533
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Indulekha K,
    2. Anjana RM,
    3. Surendar J,
    4. Mohan V
    . Association of visceral and subcutaneous fat with glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, adipocytokines and inflammatory markers in Asian Indians (CURES-113). Clin Biochem 2011;44:281–287pmid:21219897
  33. ↵
    1. Rush EC,
    2. Freitas I,
    3. Plank LD
    . Body size, body composition and fat distribution: comparative analysis of European, Maori, Pacific Island and Asian Indian adults. Br J Nutr 2009;102:632–641pmid:19203416
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Araneta MR,
    2. Barrett-Connor E
    . Ethnic differences in visceral adipose tissue and type 2 diabetes: Filipino, African-American, and white women. Obes Res 2005;13:1458–1465pmid:16129729
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    1. Garg SK,
    2. Lin F,
    3. Kandula N, et al
    . Ectopic fat depots and coronary artery calcium in South Asians compared with other racial/ethnic groups. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e004257pmid:27856485
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Sulistyoningrum DC,
    2. Gasevic D,
    3. Lear SA,
    4. Ho J,
    5. Mente A,
    6. Devlin AM
    . Total and high molecular weight adiponectin and ethnic-specific differences in adiposity and insulin resistance: a cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2013;12:170pmid:24225161
  37. ↵
    1. Mente A,
    2. Razak F,
    3. Blankenberg S, et al.; Study of the Health Assessment And Risk Evaluation; Study of the Health Assessment And Risk Evaluation in Aboriginal Peoples Investigators
    . Ethnic variation in adiponectin and leptin levels and their association with adiposity and insulin resistance. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1629–1634pmid:20413520
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Steppan CM,
    2. Bailey ST,
    3. Bhat S, et al
    . The hormone resistin links obesity to diabetes. Nature 2001;409:307–312pmid:11201732
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Chandalia M,
    2. Lin P,
    3. Seenivasan T, et al
    . Insulin resistance and body fat distribution in South Asian men compared to Caucasian men. PLoS One 2007;2:e812pmid:17726542
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Valsamakis G,
    2. Chetty R,
    3. McTernan PG,
    4. Al-Daghri NM,
    5. Barnett AH,
    6. Kumar S
    . Fasting serum adiponectin concentration is reduced in Indo-Asian subjects and is related to HDL cholesterol. Diabetes Obes Metab 2003;5:131–135pmid:12630939
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Banerji MA,
    2. Faridi N,
    3. Atluri R,
    4. Chaiken RL,
    5. Lebovitz HE
    . Body composition, visceral fat, leptin, and insulin resistance in Asian Indian men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:137–144pmid:9920074
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Raji A,
    2. Seely EW,
    3. Arky RA,
    4. Simonson DC
    . Body fat distribution and insulin resistance in healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:5366–5371pmid:11701707
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Lear SA,
    2. Humphries KH,
    3. Kohli S,
    4. Chockalingam A,
    5. Frohlich JJ,
    6. Birmingham CL
    . Visceral adipose tissue accumulation differs according to ethnic background: results of the Multicultural Community Health Assessment Trial (M-CHAT). Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:353–359pmid:17684205
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Add to Selected Citations

Body Composition and Diabetes Risk in South Asians: Findings From the MASALA and MESA Studies
Elena Flowers, Feng Lin, Namratha R. Kandula, Matthew Allison, Jeffrey J. Carr, Jingzhong Ding, Ravi Shah, Kiang Liu, David Herrington, Alka M. Kanaya
Diabetes Care May 2019, 42 (5) 946-953; DOI: 10.2337/dc18-1510
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section